KFC Yum! Center · at Louisville · Conference game
Closing line
LOU -21.5✓ BC covered by 8.5
Closing total150.5Under by 13.5
| This season | LOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 7-8 | Record | 11-4 |
| 4-11 | ATS | 9-6 |
| 6-9 | O/U | 7-8 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BC 65–87 LOU · ✓ LOU (97%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 34 | 28 | 62 |
| LOU | 30 | 45 | 75 |
1st half: BC 34, LOU 30 (BC by 4). The model had LOU by 13.1 and a total of 70.9 (actual 64).
Team stats
| BC | LOU | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-63 37% | Field goals | 25-51 49% |
| 9-28 32% | 3-pointers | 6-21 29% |
| 7-16 44% | Free throws | 19-25 76% |
| 31 7 off | Rebounds | 42 6 off |
| 13 | Assists | 13 |
| 6 | Steals | 3 |
| 1 | Blocks | 4 |
| 6 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 19 | Fouls | 15 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| BC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Payne G | 36 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 9-15 | 4-7 |
| Donald Hand Jr. G | 33 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 3-17 | 3-10 |
| Boden Kapke F | 32 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-3 |
| Luka Toews G | 21 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 |
| Jayden Hastings F | 14 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Aidan Shaw F | 30 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Chase Forte G | 15 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Caleb Steger G | 13 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Marko Radunovic F | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Jack Bailey, Jack DiDonna, Akbar Waheed III, Nick Petronio, Will Eggemeier, Jason Asemota, Kany Musungay
| LOU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrian Wooley G | 36 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 5-12 | 0-4 |
| Isaac McKneely G | 33 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-8 |
| J'Vonne Hadley G | 30 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-1 |
| Kobe Rodgers G | 29 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Sananda Fru F | 28 | 19 | 13 | 1 | 8-9 | 1-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Khani Rooths F | 25 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Aly Khalifa C | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Kasean Pryor F | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Vangelis Zougris F | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ryan Conwell, Cole Sherman, Spencer Legg, London Johnson, Mouhamed Camara, Mikel Brown Jr., Will Hanke
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLOU -21.5
ModelLOU -22.2
Model edgeLOU +0.7
L BC covered
Total
Market150.5
Model151.4
Model edgeOver 0.9
L Under
Projected score
BC 64.6 · LOU 86.8
BC 62 · LOU 75
Win probability
LOU 97%
1st half
Spread
LOU -13.1
BC -4.0
Total
70.9
64 points
Projected score
BC 28.9 · LOU 42
BC 34 · LOU 30
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLOU -20.5
1 → LOU
CloseLOU -21.5
1 pt toward LOU
Total
Open145.5
▲ 5
Close150.5
Up 5 since the open
Moneyline
BC +1600 · LOU -4000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LOU -20.5 · closed LOU -21.5 · moved 1 toward LOUmodel LOU -22
model LOU -22
Opened 145.5 · closed 150.5 · moved 5 upmodel 151.5
model 151.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
BC 4–2 LOUBC leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · BC 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024-25 | LOU 84 @ BC 58 | BC +13.5 | LOU W |
| Mar 9, 2023-24 | BC 67 @ LOU 61 | LOU +4 | BC W |
| Feb 13, 2023-24 | LOU 77 @ BC 89 | BC -9.5 | BC W |
| Mar 7, 2022-23 | LOU 62 vs BC 80 | BC -5.5 | BC W |
| Jan 25, 2022-23 | LOU 65 @ BC 75 | BC -9.5 | BC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Boston College
15 games played
Straight up
7-8
47% wins
Against the spread
4-11
27% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-9
40% overs · avg −4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-83 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 76-47 | -15.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 59-60 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 63-52 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 49-59 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 90-93 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 73-60 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 69-78 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 67-63 | -17.5 | L −13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-61 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 72-64 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 53-65 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 71-79 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
FAU
L 78-83
−3.5
6
vs
CIT
W 76-47
+13.5
11
vs
CCSU
L 59-60
−18.5
15
@
TEM
W 76-71
+8.5
18
vs
HAMP
W 63-52
−1.5
21
vs
DAV
L 49-59
−11.5
23
vs
TULN
L 90-93
−5.5
26
vs
HARV
W 73-60
+5.5
3
vs
LSU
L 69-78
−1.5
6
vs
NHVN
W 67-63
−13.5
10
vs
MASS
L 74-76
−3.5
22
vs
FDU
W 72-61
−5.5
28
vs
LEM
W 72-64
−4.5
3
@
GT
L 53-65
−5.5
6
vs
NCSU
L 71-79
+3.5
covered 4didn’t cover 11avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
FAU
L 78-83
+12.5
6
vs
CIT
W 76-47
−21.5
11
vs
CCSU
L 59-60
−17.5
15
@
TEM
W 76-71
+4.5
18
vs
HAMP
W 63-52
−20.5
21
vs
DAV
L 49-59
−32.5
23
vs
TULN
L 90-93
+42.5
26
vs
HARV
W 73-60
−5.5
3
vs
LSU
L 69-78
−2.5
6
vs
NHVN
W 67-63
+3.5
10
vs
MASS
L 74-76
+6.5
22
vs
FDU
W 72-61
−8.5
28
vs
LEM
W 72-64
−10.5
3
@
GT
L 53-65
−27.5
6
vs
NCSU
L 71-79
+8.5
over 6under 9avg −4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Louisville
15 games played
Straight up
11-4
73% wins
Against the spread
9-6
60% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-8
47% overs · avg −4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 104-45 | -35.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 106-70 | -38.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 96-88 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 173.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 106-81 | -31.5 | L −6.5 | 174.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 74-64 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-46 | -33.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 104-47 | -44.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-89 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 87-78 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 99-73 | -16.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 62-83 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-54 | -30.5 | W +9.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 90-70 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 76-80 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 73-84 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SCST
W 104-45
+23.5
6
vs
JKST
W 106-70
−2.5
11
vs
UK
W 96-88
+2.5
15
vs
OHIO
W 106-81
−6.5
21
vs
CIN
W 74-64
+1.5
24
vs
EMU
W 87-46
+7.5
26
vs
NJIT
W 104-47
+12.5
3
@
ARK
L 80-89
−10.5
6
vs
IU
W 87-78
+5.5
13
vs
MEM
W 99-73
+9.5
16
@
TENN
L 62-83
−16.5
20
vs
MONT
W 94-54
+9.5
30
@
CAL
W 90-70
+12.5
2
@
STAN
L 76-80
−11.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 73-84
−9.5
covered 9didn’t cover 6avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SCST
W 104-45
−10.5
6
vs
JKST
W 106-70
+10.5
11
vs
UK
W 96-88
+10.5
15
vs
OHIO
W 106-81
+12.5
21
vs
CIN
W 74-64
−25.5
24
vs
EMU
W 87-46
−29.5
26
vs
NJIT
W 104-47
−7.5
3
@
ARK
L 80-89
+2.5
6
vs
IU
W 87-78
+2.5
13
vs
MEM
W 99-73
+9.5
16
@
TENN
L 62-83
−11.5
20
vs
MONT
W 94-54
−18.5
30
@
CAL
W 90-70
+0.5
2
@
STAN
L 76-80
−1.5
6
vs
DUKE
L 73-84
−4.5
over 7under 8avg −4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Boston College
7-8 overall · 0-2 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC State71–79
- L@ Georgia Tech53–65
- Wvs Le Moyne72–64
- Wvs FDU72–61
- Lvs UMass74–76
4 days since their last game.
Louisville
11-4 overall · 1-2 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke73–84
- L@ Stanford76–80
- W@ California90–70
- Wvs Montana94–54
- L@ Tennessee62–83
4 days since their last game.