Ocean Bank Convocation Center · at FIU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FIU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FAU 80–77 · win probability FAU 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
FAU 3, FIU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FAU offense vs FIU defense
Offense 85th of 366 against a defense 217th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: FAU 52.2 and allows 49.5; FIU 50.6 and allows 52.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FAU 17.6%, FIU 17.8%. Forced: FAU 15.5%, FIU 20.0%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FAU 31.6%, FIU 33.9%. Defensive: FAU 71.7%, FIU 65.2%
Free throws
Free throw rate: FAU 33.3, FIU 38.6. Allowed: FAU 36.2, FIU 35.9
Home court
FIU at home. This season: FIU 0-0 at home, FAU 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
FAU has played the 101st-hardest schedule, FIU the 151st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
FAU hits 33.3% and allows 33.8%; FIU hits 34.7% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 38.2% and 32.8% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FAU 17%, FIU 0%. Transfers in: FAU 5, FIU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
FIU offense vs FAU defense
Offense 144th of 366 against a defense 174th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: FAU plays 71.1 a game (71st fastest), FIU 72.4 (26th). Faster games mean more points
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelFAU -3.2
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model157.5
Model edge—
Projected score
FAU 80.4 · FIU 77.1
Win probability
FAU 61%
1st half
Spread
FAU -2.0
Total
73.6
Projected score
FAU 37.8 · FIU 35.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
FAU 6–0 FIUFAU leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · FAU has won the last 6 meetings · FAU 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2024-25 | FAU 88 @ FIU 77 | FIU +9.5 | FAU W |
| Dec 13, 2023-24 | FIU 60 @ FAU 94 | FAU -23.5 | FAU W |
| Jan 11, 2022-23 | FAU 77 @ FIU 73 | FIU +10.5 | FIU W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | FIU 53 @ FAU 79 | FAU -14.5 | FAU W |
| Mar 5, 2021-22 | FIU 76 @ FAU 84 | FAU -12 | FIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
FAU
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-78 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-77 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-88 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-74 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-76 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 105-79 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 75-88 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 80-85 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 110-70 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-69 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 89-78 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-67 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-92 | +3.5 | L −23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 75-76 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 73-81 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 81-83 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 60-52 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 72-73 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 77-76 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 70-88 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+3.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+11.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
−12.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
+15.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
+7.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−6.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+2.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+7.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+0.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+3.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+23.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−6.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
+8.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+9.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
+14.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−5.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−8.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
−23.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−11.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
+1.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
−11.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
+2.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−3.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+1.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
−0.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
−5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
−9.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
+5.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+12.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+14.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
+3.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
−13.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
−3.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−11.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+6.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+36.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+17.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+2.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+21.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−23.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
−15.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+14.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
−3.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−2.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−2.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
+4.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−2.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
−8.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
+2.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
−1.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−45.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+4.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
+4.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
+5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
+7.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
−22.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
+7.5
over 17under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
FIU
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-96 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 81-98 | +21.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 72-80 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-61 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-83 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-65 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 81-98 | +22.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 86-79 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 94-97 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 76-64 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 64-71 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-79 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-76 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 77-83 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 81-78 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 74-78 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 70-80 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 66-68 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 89-90 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-100 | +6.5 | L −26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-73 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 92-67 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
−8.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+4.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−10.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
+8.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+7.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+17.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+5.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+0.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+1.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+16.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
+5.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−5.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−5.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
+2.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−15.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
−7.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
+10.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
−7.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+9.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−5.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−10.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
+9.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+8.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−0.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
−26.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+10.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−7.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
+26.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEB
L 66-96
+5.5
13
@
LSU
L 81-98
+20.5
24
vs
JMU
L 72-80
−3.5
26
vs
OMA
W 74-61
−22.5
3
vs
FGCU
W 89-83
+17.5
6
vs
JAX
W 88-65
+7.5
16
@
MIA
L 81-98
+17.5
20
vs
LIU
W 86-79
+3.5
28
vs
LIB
L 94-97
+38.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 89-74
+5.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 76-64
−12.5
7
@
JXST
L 64-71
−15.5
10
@
MOST
L 71-79
−3.5
14
@
KENN
L 86-89
−0.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 63-76
−29.5
22
@
UTEP
L 77-83
+8.5
24
@
NMSU
W 81-78
−0.5
28
vs
JXST
L 74-78
+3.5
4
@
MTSU
W 88-84
+17.5
7
@
WKU
L 70-80
−9.5
12
vs
DEL
L 66-68
−13.5
14
vs
LT
W 77-64
−5.5
19
@
LIB
L 89-90
+26.5
21
vs
MOST
W 70-67
−17.5
26
@
SHSU
L 67-100
+5.5
28
@
LT
W 84-76
+14.5
5
vs
MTSU
L 67-73
−13.5
7
vs
WKU
W 92-67
−1.5
10
vs
MOST
L 72-75
−5.5
over 14under 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
FIU has the better starters
Position by position: FAU 1, FIU 2, even 2
FAUBetterFIU
G B. Speed TR15.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 82
=Even
G T. Saine TR18.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 91
G J. Hamilton TR17.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
←FAUBig
G C. Caulker TR7.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 22
G K. Carlyle14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 73
=No call
G H. Cuevas TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
G M. Charles TR10.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 32
→FIUSmall
F J. Colonel TR4.6 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 52
F M. Porter-Brown TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
→FIUSmall
F R. Seals TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 61
FAUBetterFIU
FAU offense85th of 366 · +0.4
←FAUBig
FIU defense217th of 366 · -5.7
FAU defense174th of 366 · -3.9
=Even
FIU offense144th of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt+4.0 · 4 players
←FAUBig
Backcourt-0.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.0 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.9 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestFAU betterFIU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Speed34 min · TRJ. Hamilton32 min · TRK. Carlyle31 minM. Charles30 min · TRL. Dayco-Green2 minL. Smith1 min
Forwards
M. Porter-Brown20 min · TRJ. HarrisNewM. PuodziukaitisNewD. MusisNew
Centers
K. Mullen6 min · TRT. IfaolaNew
Guards
T. Saine34 min · TRC. Caulker31 min · TRH. Cuevas13 min · TRN. MendyNewM. BlazerNewC. HallNew
Forwards
J. Colonel26 min · TRR. Seals18 min · TRJ. Payne7 min · TRG. GiceviciusNewC. RingNewS. N'DiayeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.2 #111 | Points per game | 77.7 #100 |
| 1.09 #170 | Points per possession | 1.08 #197 |
| 71.1 #71 | Pace (possessions) | 72.4 #26 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #135 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #210 |
| 33.3 #210 | 3-point % | 34.7 #137 |
| 38.2 #208 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #321 |
| 33.3 #231 | Free throw rate | 38.6 #87 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #246 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #258 |
| 31.6 #140 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #69 |
| 13.0 #210 | Assists per game | 13.6 #173 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.3 #198 | Points allowed | 79.1 #301 |
| 1.06 #108 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #194 |
| 49.5 #81 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #264 |
| 33.8 #169 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #313 |
| 15.5 #252 | Turnovers forced | 20.0 #22 |
| 71.7 #78 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.2 #335 |
| 5.7 #272 | Steals per game | 8.8 #12 |
| 5.3 #11 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #43 |
FAU
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Texas70–74
- Wvs Temple63–59
- L@ Wichita St70–88
- Wvs Charlotte77–76
- Wvs Temple77–73
A week or more of rest.
FIU
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Missouri St72–75
- Wvs Western KY92–67
- Lvs MTSU67–73
- W@ Louisiana Tech84–76
- L@ Sam Houston67–100
A week or more of rest.