FedExForum · at Grizzlies · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Record | 6-0 |
| 1-5 | ATS | 6-0 |
| 5-1 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 124–112 · win probability MEM 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 235.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 211-223 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
SAC 0, MEM 8 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
SAC hits 30.4% and allows 39.2%; MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%. Threes are 38.0% and 42.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: SAC 51.0 and allows 60.4; MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2
Context
Schedule so far
SAC has played the 8th-hardest schedule, MEM the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MEM offense vs SAC defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 29th, on the model’s ratings
SAC offense vs MEM defense
Offense 27th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SAC 22.9%, MEM 30.6%. Defensive: SAC 73.7%, MEM 75.0%
Recent form
Last 5: SAC 1-4 ATS, margin -17.8; MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SAC 15.9%, MEM 15.4%. Forced: SAC 14.6%, MEM 15.7%
Home court
MEM at home. This season: MEM 2-0 at home, SAC 0-4 away
Context
Tempo
About 105 possessions: SAC plays 106.0 a game (6th fastest), MEM 103.6 (13th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SAC 26.4, MEM 25.3. Allowed: SAC 31.2, MEM 31.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SAC 100%, MEM 100%. Transfers in: SAC 0, MEM 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -11.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model235.2
Model edge—
Projected score
SAC 111.6 · MEM 123.6
Win probability
MEM 80%
1st half
Spread
MEM -6.6
Total
117.6
Projected score
SAC 55.5 · MEM 62.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 0% | 1-5 17% | 5-1 83% | |
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 19 since 2021-22
SAC 8–11 MEMMEM leads · 19 games since 2021-22 · MEM has won the last 2 meetings · SAC 6-13 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026-27 | SAC 105 @ MEM 136 | MEM -7.5 | MEM W |
| Oct 25, 2026-27 | MEM 123 @ SAC 112 | SAC +3.5 | MEM W |
| Feb 23, 2025-26 | SAC 123 @ MEM 114 | MEM -2.5 | SAC W |
| Feb 4, 2025-26 | MEM 129 @ SAC 125 | SAC -2.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 30, 2025-26 | MEM 115 @ SAC 107 | SAC +3.5 | MEM W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kings
6 games played
Straight up
0-6
0% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −10.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-1
83% overs · avg +6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−19.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+1.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
−7.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
−7.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
−5.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
−23.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −10.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
LAC
L 96-121
−9.5
23
vs
POR
L 120-128
+16.5
25
vs
MEM
L 112-123
+0.5
27
@
SA
L 103-130
+0.5
29
@
NO
L 120-132
+17.5
31
@
MEM
L 105-136
+11.5
over 5under 1avg +6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Kings 0, Grizzlies 4, even 1
KingsBetterGrizzlies
G D. Acuff26.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 4
→MEMBig
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
F D. Sabonis16 pts · 15.8 reb · 7.3 ast
Score 26
→MEMBig
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
F D. Hunter14 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
=Even
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
F P. Achiuwa12.5 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
Score 7
→MEMBig
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
F L. Black7.1 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 13
→MEMBig
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
KingsBetterGrizzlies
SAC offense27th of 30 · -3.0
→MEMBig
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
SAC defense29th of 30 · -7.9
→MEMBig
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
Backcourt-13.7 · 1 player
→MEMBig
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
Frontcourt-18.6 · 4 players
→MEMBig
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
Bench-13.2 · 5 players
←SACBig
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSAC betterMEM betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Acuff37 minE. Sharp18 minD. Plowden14 minM. Monk12 minN. Clifford8 minA. FlaglerNew
Forwards
D. Sabonis37 minD. Hunter29 minP. Achiuwa29 minL. Black29 minJ. Mogbo17 minA. Karaban10 min
Out
Z. LaVineDay-To-DayK. MurrayOut
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 109.3 #22 | Points per game | 121.2 #1 |
| 1.03 #28 | Points per possession | 1.16 #4 |
| 106.0 #6 | Pace (possessions) | 103.6 #13 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #23 | Effective FG% | 55.9 #5 |
| 30.4 #27 | 3-point % | 41.7 #1 |
| 38.0 #27 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.1 #19 |
| 26.4 #20 | Free throw rate | 25.3 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #16 |
| 22.9 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #5 |
| 24.5 #23 | Assists per game | 27.0 #13 |
| Defense | ||
| 128.3 #29 | Points allowed | 106.0 #3 |
| 1.21 #29 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #2 |
| 60.4 #30 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #3 |
| 39.2 #27 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.0 #3 |
| 14.6 #22 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #15 |
| 73.7 #12 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #9 |
| 8.0 #21 | Steals per game | 6.3 #28 |
| 2.3 #30 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #11 |
Kings
0-6 overall · 0-6 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Grizzlies105–136
- L@ Pelicans120–132
- L@ Spurs103–130
- Lvs Grizzlies112–123
- Lvs Trail Blazers120–128
A week or more of rest.
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.