UTSA Convocation Center · at UTSA · Conference game
Closing line
ECU -4.5✓ UTSA covered by 3.5
Closing total153.5Over by 9.5
| This season | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 8-18 | Record | 3-22 |
| 10-16 | ATS | 8-17 |
| 13-13 | O/U | 12-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ECU 77–73 UTSA · ✓ ECU (64%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECU | 34 | 48 | 82 |
| UTSA | 43 | 38 | 81 |
1st half: ECU 34, UTSA 43 (UTSA by 9). The model had ECU by 2.6 and a total of 70.4 (actual 77).
Team stats
| ECU | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-56 50% | Field goals | 31-54 57% |
| 7-20 35% | 3-pointers | 10-22 45% |
| 19-26 73% | Free throws | 9-10 90% |
| 29 14 off | Rebounds | 25 8 off |
| 12 | Assists | 19 |
| 11 | Steals | 10 |
| 1 | Blocks | 4 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 17 |
| 10 | Fouls | 16 |
| 34 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 12 |
Players
| ECU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Riley G | 39 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 7-16 | 3-5 |
| Corey Caulker G | 38 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 4-7 | 3-6 |
| Giovanni Emejuru C | 35 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| Eli DeLaurier C | 29 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-2 |
| Demitri Gardner G | 29 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4-12 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Isaiah Mbeng G | 16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Reid Cason F | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Patrick D'Arcy G | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Luke Davis F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Vito Perkovic F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Daithi Quinn, Jake Baker, Ladontae Felton, Trevion LaBeaux, Tybo Bailey, Jayshayne Woodard, Grant Smith
| UTSA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian Hayes G | 40 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 5-10 | 4-6 |
| Jamir Simpson G | 40 | 22 | 1 | 10 | 8-11 | 1-3 |
| Daniel Akitoby F | 39 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 8-11 | 1-2 |
| Brent Moss G | 33 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-6 |
| Matheo Coffi F | 27 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Baboucarr Njie F | 21 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jackson Fazande, Vasean Allette, Macaleab Rich, Kaidon Rayfield, LJ Brown, Mo Njie, Stanley Borden, Austin Nunez, Pierce Spencer
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketECU -4.5
ModelECU -4.2
Model edgeUTSA +0.3
W UTSA covered
Total
Market153.5
Model150.5
Model edgeUnder 3.0
L Over
Projected score
ECU 77.4 · UTSA 73.2
ECU 82 · UTSA 81
Win probability
ECU 64%
1st half
Spread
ECU -2.6
UTSA -9.0
Total
70.4
77 points
Projected score
ECU 36.5 · UTSA 33.9
ECU 34 · UTSA 43
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenECU -4.5
no move
CloseECU -4.5
No change since the open
Total
Open150.5
▲ 3
Close153.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
ECU -198 · UTSA +164
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened ECU -4.5 · unchangedmodel ECU -4
model ECU -4
Opened 150.5 · closed 153.5 · moved 3 upmodel 150.5
model 150.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ECU 5–0 UTSAECU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · ECU has won the last 5 meetings · ECU 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2025-26 | UTSA 72 @ ECU 88 | ECU -10.5 | ECU W |
| Mar 13, 2024-25 | UTSA 65 vs ECU 70 | ECU -4.5 | ECU W |
| Feb 23, 2024-25 | UTSA 89 @ ECU 96 | ECU -8.5 | UTSA W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | ECU 80 @ UTSA 79 | UTSA +1.5 | UTSA W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | ECU 84 @ UTSA 73 | UTSA +1.5 | ECU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Carolina
26 games played
Straight up
8-18
31% wins
Against the spread
10-16
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-13
50% overs · avg +3.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 92-89 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-87 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-85 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 65-77 | -13.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 56-89 | +19.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-67 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 68-56 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-82 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 54-67 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 74-53 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-99 | +25.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-79 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-75 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 71-82 | +18.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 70-73 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 60-77 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-83 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 76-75 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-72 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-75 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-92 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 56-68 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
−2.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
−9.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−18.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−25.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
−13.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
+1.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−0.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
−11.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−17.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
+1.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
+16.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
−22.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
−7.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−0.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+5.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
+7.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
−4.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−4.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
+14.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
−8.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
+11.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
−5.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+5.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+14.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+4.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−7.5
covered 10didn’t cover 16avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
+29.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
+15.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−0.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−15.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
+4.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
−19.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−3.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
+20.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−9.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−3.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
−4.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
+5.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
+3.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+21.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
−5.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
+3.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−7.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
−12.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
+19.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
−2.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
+13.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+9.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+13.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+31.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−21.5
over 13under 13avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTSA
25 games played
Straight up
3-22
12% wins
Against the spread
8-17
32% covers · avg −4.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-13
48% overs · avg −1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-77 | -6.5 | L −23.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-80 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 50-61 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 77-64 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-82 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 55-97 | +33.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-88 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-97 | +25.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 70-110 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-76 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-74 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 52-85 | +7.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-89 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 69-95 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 64-70 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 73-83 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 88-109 | +23.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 58-81 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 72-88 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 88-79 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 52-60 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 74-100 | +21.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−23.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
−8.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+9.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−8.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
+16.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−22.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−8.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−1.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
−1.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
+7.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
−23.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−8.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−9.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−25.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
−9.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
−5.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
−3.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
+4.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+2.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+2.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−12.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
−5.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+22.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
+3.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
−4.5
covered 8didn’t cover 17avg −4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIUE
L 60-77
−16.5
12
@
TXST
L 69-80
+1.5
15
@
DEN
W 84-79
+14.5
24
vs
ACU
L 50-61
−33.5
25
vs
GASO
W 77-64
−19.5
30
vs
USA
L 58-82
−1.5
7
@
ALA
L 55-97
−19.5
13
@
COLO
L 64-88
−2.5
17
@
USC
L 70-97
+9.5
22
vs
SEA
L 68-71
−9.5
31
@
FAU
L 70-110
+21.5
3
@
TEM
L 57-76
−16.5
7
vs
CLT
L 58-74
−13.5
10
vs
TULN
L 52-85
−10.5
14
vs
RICE
L 73-89
+17.5
18
@
MEM
L 69-95
+16.5
21
@
UNT
L 62-81
+4.5
24
vs
TEM
L 64-70
−11.5
28
vs
UAB
L 73-83
+0.5
4
@
USF
L 88-109
+32.5
7
vs
UNT
L 58-81
−2.5
11
@
ECU
L 72-88
+9.5
15
@
CLT
W 88-79
+18.5
18
vs
FAU
L 52-60
−45.5
22
@
TLSA
L 74-100
+14.5
over 12under 13avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Carolina
8-18 overall · 4-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Charlotte56–68
- Lvs Wichita St89–92
- W@ Rice85–75
- Wvs UTSA88–72
- Lvs Temple73–81
4 days since their last game.
UTSA
3-22 overall · 1-14 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Tulsa74–100
- Lvs FAU52–60
- W@ Charlotte88–79
- L@ East Carolina72–88
- Lvs North Texas58–81
3 days since their last game.