Delta Center · at Jazz · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-2 | Record | 1-5 |
| 4-2 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAL 120–114 · win probability DAL 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 233.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 224-242 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAL has more of the edges
DAL 5, UTAH 2 · 2026-27 so far
Three-pointers
DAL hits 35.1% and allows 29.7%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 42.1% and 41.7% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: DAL 56.9 and allows 51.3; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
DAL offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 16th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Recent form
Last 5: DAL 4-1 ATS, margin +6.6; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DAL 27.8%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: DAL 69.4%, UTAH 77.1%
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, DAL 2-1 away
UTAH offense vs DAL defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 16th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DAL 16.8%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: DAL 14.5%, UTAH 13.3%
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: DAL plays 102.8 a game (18th fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
DAL has played the 2nd-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DAL 21.4, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: DAL 27.2, UTAH 33.8
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DAL 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: DAL 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelDAL -5.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model233.8
Model edge—
Projected score
DAL 119.8 · UTAH 114.1
Win probability
DAL 66%
1st half
Spread
DAL -3.3
Total
116.9
Projected score
DAL 60.1 · UTAH 56.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-2 67% | 4-2 67% | 2-4 33% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 25 since 2021-22
DAL 16–9 UTAHDAL leads · 25 games since 2021-22 · DAL has won the last 2 meetings · DAL 16-9 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | UTAH 120 @ DAL 138 | DAL -3.5 | DAL W |
| Jan 15, 2025-26 | UTAH 122 @ DAL 144 | DAL -2.5 | DAL W |
| Jan 8, 2025-26 | DAL 114 @ UTAH 116 | UTAH +5.5 | UTAH W |
| Dec 15, 2025-26 | DAL 133 @ UTAH 140 | UTAH +1.5 | UTAH W |
| Nov 30, 2024-25 | DAL 106 @ UTAH 94 | UTAH +5.5 | DAL W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mavericks
6 games played
Straight up
4-2
67% wins
Against the spread
4-2
67% covers · avg +10.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
HOU
L 110-128
−8.5
23
@
IND
W 121-105
+23.5
24
vs
SA
L 106-122
−1.5
26
@
MIA
W 113-109
+11.5
28
vs
OKC
W 120-96
+28.5
30
vs
HOU
W 116-111
+10.5
covered 4didn’t cover 2avg +10.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
HOU
L 110-128
+7.5
23
@
IND
W 121-105
−15.5
24
vs
SA
L 106-122
−1.5
26
@
MIA
W 113-109
−18.5
28
vs
OKC
W 120-96
−11.5
30
vs
HOU
W 116-111
+3.5
over 2under 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mavericks has the better starters
Position by position: Mavericks 2, Jazz 1, even 2
MavericksBetterJazz
G M. Christie8.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 9
=Even
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
F P. Washington13.8 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 78
←DALBig
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F C. Flagg26.8 pts · 6 reb · 6.6 ast
Score 49
←DALSmall
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F Z. Risacher9.5 pts · 6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 65
→UTAHSmall
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
F D. Gafford8.5 pts · 7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 46
=Even
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
MavericksBetterJazz
DAL offense16th of 30 · +0.6
←DALBig
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
DAL defense16th of 30 · -0.1
=Even
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt-6.6 · 1 player
←DALBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+16.0 · 4 players
=Even
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench+2.7 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDAL betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Christie27 minM. Sasser19 minJ. Howard12 min
Forwards
P. Washington34 minC. Flagg32 minZ. Risacher30 minD. Gafford24 minN. Marshall28 minC. Martin20 min
Centers
M. Cisse14 min
Out
S. de LarreaOutK. IrvingDay-To-Day
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
114.3Points per game108.7
1.12Points per possession1.05
102.8Pace (possessions)104.0
Shooting
56.9Effective FG%51.0
35.13-point %32.6
42.13-point attempt rate41.7
21.4Free throw rate31.6
Possessions
16.8Turnover rate17.0
27.8Offensive rebound rate25.7
27.0Assists per game26.2
Defense
111.8Points allowed118.8
1.08Points allowed per possession1.14
51.3Opponent effective FG%53.9
29.7Opponent 3-point %37.6
14.5Turnovers forced13.3
69.4Defensive rebound rate77.1
8.8Steals per game6.2
6.8Blocks per game6.5
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 114.3 #14 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.12 #11 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 102.8 #18 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.9 #2 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 35.1 #14 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 42.1 #18 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 21.4 #29 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #23 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 27.8 #13 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 27.0 #12 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 111.8 #14 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.08 #13 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 51.3 #9 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 29.7 #2 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 14.5 #24 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 69.4 #25 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 8.8 #16 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 6.8 #2 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Mavericks
4-2 overall · 2-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Rockets116–111
- Wvs Thunder120–96
- W@ Heat113–109
- Lvs Spurs106–122
- W@ Pacers121–105
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.