Delta Center · at Jazz · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTAH | |
|---|---|---|
| 3-2 | Record | 1-5 |
| 2-3 | ATS | 1-5 |
| 3-2 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEN 121–115 · win probability DEN 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 236.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEN has more of the edges
DEN 5, UTAH 2 · 2026-27 so far
DEN offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 8th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DEN has played the 18th-hardest schedule, UTAH the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEN 31.3, UTAH 31.6. Allowed: DEN 21.5, UTAH 33.8
Three-pointers
DEN hits 37.4% and allows 35.0%; UTAH hits 32.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 40.9% and 41.7% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEN 16.4%, UTAH 17.0%. Forced: DEN 15.9%, UTAH 13.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEN 54.7 and allows 54.2; UTAH 51.0 and allows 53.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEN 27.5%, UTAH 25.7%. Defensive: DEN 70.5%, UTAH 77.1%
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: DEN plays 102.1 a game (21st fastest), UTAH 104.0 (12th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 1-4 at home, DEN 2-1 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: DEN 2-3 ATS, margin -1.2; UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -8.2
Even
UTAH offense vs DEN defense
Offense 20th of 30 against a defense 19th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEN 100%, UTAH 100%. Transfers in: DEN 0, UTAH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelDEN -6.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model236.1
Model edge—
Projected score
DEN 121.4 · UTAH 114.7
Win probability
DEN 68%
1st half
Spread
DEN -4.0
Total
118.0
Projected score
DEN 61 · UTAH 57
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-2 60% | 2-3 40% | 3-2 60% | |
| 1-5 17% | 1-5 17% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 20 since 2021-22
DEN 13–7 UTAHDEN leads · 20 games since 2021-22 · DEN has won the last 10 meetings · DEN 9-11 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025-26 | DEN 130 @ UTAH 117 | UTAH +17.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 27, 2025-26 | UTAH 129 @ DEN 135 | DEN -19.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 2, 2025-26 | DEN 128 @ UTAH 125 | UTAH +11.5 | UTAH W |
| Dec 22, 2025-26 | UTAH 112 @ DEN 135 | DEN -12.5 | DEN W |
| Mar 28, 2024-25 | UTAH 93 @ DEN 129 | DEN -19.5 | DEN W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nuggets
5 games played
Straight up
3-2
60% wins
Against the spread
2-3
40% covers · avg −5.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-2
60% overs · avg −7.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
22
@
OKC
L 84-96
−4.5
24
vs
NO
W 141-135
−5.5
26
vs
GS
L 114-134
−26.5
28
@
NO
W 104-91
+8.5
30
@
PHX
W 127-120
+2.5
covered 2didn’t cover 3avg −5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
22
@
OKC
L 84-96
−56.5
24
vs
NO
W 141-135
+36.5
26
vs
GS
L 114-134
+11.5
28
@
NO
W 104-91
−46.5
30
@
PHX
W 127-120
+15.5
over 3under 2avg −7.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Jazz
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
1-5
17% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
covered 1didn’t cover 5avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
over 2under 4avg −9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nuggets has the better starters
Position by position: Nuggets 4, Jazz 0, even 1
NuggetsBetterJazz
G J. Murray25.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 40
←DENSmall
G K. George21.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 8
G C. Braun15.4 pts · 4.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 66
←DENBig
G A. Bailey13.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 11
F A. Gordon12.8 pts · 6 reb · 3 ast
Score 74
←DENBig
G D. Peterson13.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 17
F C. Johnson8.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 2 ast
Score 98
=Even
F L. Markkanen15.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 94
C N. Jokic21.2 pts · 9.8 reb · 9.2 ast
Score 86
←DENBig
C J. Hayes8 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 36
NuggetsBetterJazz
DEN offense8th of 30 · +2.5
←DENBig
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -6.0
DEN defense19th of 30 · -0.9
=Even
UTAH offense20th of 30 · -1.2
Backcourt+7.7 · 2 players
←DENBig
Backcourt-20.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+35.7 · 3 players
←DENBig
Frontcourt+15.0 · 2 players
Bench-4.0 · 5 players
→UTAHBig
Bench+2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDEN betterUTAH betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Murray38 minC. Braun36 minD. DeRozan26 minR. Nembhard20 minT. Jones10 min
Forwards
A. Gordon30 minC. Johnson23 minT. Brazile23 minC. Whitmore17 minB. Hopkins17 minM. Bagley12 min
Centers
N. Jokic37 min
Out
A. DialloOut
Guards
K. George32 minA. Bailey31 minD. Peterson30 minI. Collier19 minS. Mykhailiuk17 minJ. Okogie16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh16 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes26 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 114.0 #15 | Points per game | 108.7 #24 |
| 1.13 #9 | Points per possession | 1.05 #25 |
| 102.1 #21 | Pace (possessions) | 104.0 #12 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.7 #11 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #24 |
| 37.4 #7 | 3-point % | 32.6 #23 |
| 40.9 #22 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.7 #21 |
| 31.3 #11 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #10 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.4 #21 | Turnover rate | 17.0 #25 |
| 27.5 #15 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.7 #22 |
| 26.8 #14 | Assists per game | 26.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 115.2 #18 | Points allowed | 118.8 #25 |
| 1.12 #20 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #25 |
| 54.2 #20 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #18 |
| 35.0 #15 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #25 |
| 15.9 #11 | Turnovers forced | 13.3 #28 |
| 70.5 #22 | Defensive rebound rate | 77.1 #4 |
| 10.2 #5 | Steals per game | 6.2 #29 |
| 4.4 #18 | Blocks per game | 6.5 #5 |
Nuggets
3-2 overall · 3-2 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Suns127–120
- W@ Pelicans104–91
- Lvs Warriors114–134
- Wvs Pelicans141–135
- L@ Thunder84–96
A week or more of rest.
Jazz
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
- Wvs Pelicans120–119
A week or more of rest.