TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-6 | Record | 5-2 |
| 1-6 | ATS | 3-4 |
| 2-5 | O/U | 2-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 120–105 · win probability BOS 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 225.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 219-233 in 2025-26. Model numbers
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
UTAH 1, BOS 7 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
UTAH has played the 1st-hardest schedule, BOS the 22nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTAH 16.2%, BOS 15.1%. Forced: UTAH 13.0%, BOS 17.5%
UTAH offense vs BOS defense
Offense 21st of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
BOS offense vs UTAH defense
Offense 16th of 30 against a defense 27th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UTAH hits 32.9% and allows 37.2%; BOS hits 34.5% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 40.7% and 46.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTAH 49.5 and allows 53.7; BOS 53.8 and allows 52.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTAH 26.1%, BOS 28.9%. Defensive: UTAH 77.6%, BOS 69.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTAH 30.2, BOS 31.1. Allowed: UTAH 33.7, BOS 29.7
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: UTAH plays 104.0 a game (12th fastest), BOS 101.5 (22nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, UTAH 0-2 away
Even
Recent form
Last 5: UTAH 1-4 ATS, margin -12.8; BOS 2-3 ATS, margin +9.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTAH 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: UTAH 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -15.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model225.1
Model edge—
Projected score
UTAH 104.7 · BOS 120.4
Win probability
BOS 87%
1st half
Spread
BOS -8.7
Total
112.8
Projected score
UTAH 52.1 · BOS 60.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 14% | 1-6 14% | 2-5 29% | |
| 5-2 71% | 3-4 43% | 2-5 29% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
UTAH 3–7 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · UTAH 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025-26 | BOS 129 @ UTAH 119 | UTAH +8.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | UTAH 105 @ BOS 103 | BOS -10.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 21, 2024-25 | BOS 121 @ UTAH 99 | UTAH +15.5 | BOS W |
| Mar 10, 2024-25 | UTAH 108 @ BOS 114 | BOS -15.5 | UTAH W |
| Mar 12, 2023-24 | BOS 123 @ UTAH 107 | UTAH +6.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jazz
7 games played
Straight up
1-6
14% wins
Against the spread
1-6
14% covers · avg −5.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-5
29% overs · avg −9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 | @ | L 103-123 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 240.5 | U 226 |
| Oct 23 | vs | W 120-119 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 238.5 | O 239 |
| Oct 25 | vs | L 123-132 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 237.5 | O 255 |
| Oct 26 | vs | L 105-110 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 237.5 | U 215 |
| Oct 28 | vs | L 111-117 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 232.5 | U 228 |
| Oct 31 | vs | L 90-112 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 232.5 | U 202 |
| Nov 2 | @ | L 97-119 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 226.5 | U 216 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−18.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
−0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
−2.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−3.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
+7.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−15.5
2
@
SA
L 97-119
−5.5
covered 1didn’t cover 6avg −5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
MEM
L 103-123
−14.5
23
vs
NO
W 120-119
+0.5
25
vs
LAL
L 123-132
+17.5
26
vs
MEM
L 105-110
−22.5
28
vs
SA
L 111-117
−4.5
31
vs
POR
L 90-112
−30.5
2
@
SA
L 97-119
−10.5
over 2under 5avg −9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
7 games played
Straight up
5-2
71% wins
Against the spread
3-4
43% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-5
29% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20 | @ | L 113-121 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 220.5 | O 234 |
| Oct 23 | vs | W 107-103 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 220.5 | U 210 |
| Oct 26 | vs | W 134-99 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 233.5 | U 233 |
| Oct 27 | vs | W 125-124 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 223.5 | O 249 |
| Oct 30 | vs | W 125-111 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 236.5 | U 236 |
| Nov 1 | @ | W 108-97 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 221.5 | U 205 |
| Nov 2 | @ | L 93-109 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 215.5 | U 202 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
2
@
HOU
L 93-109
−11.5
covered 3didn’t cover 4avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
2
@
HOU
L 93-109
−13.5
over 2under 5avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Jazz 1, Celtics 4, even 0
JazzBetterCeltics
G K. George19.6 pts · 4.3 reb · 5.4 ast
Score 7
→BOSBig
G D. White11.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 86
G D. Peterson13.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 15
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 74
G A. Bailey12.1 pts · 7.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→BOSBig
F J. Tatum27 pts · 6 reb · 7.9 ast
Score 86
F L. Markkanen16.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 93
←UTAHSmall
C N. Queta9.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 61
C J. Hayes8.2 pts · 6.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 33
→BOSSmall
C M. Robinson6.2 pts · 4.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 51
JazzBetterCeltics
UTAH offense21st of 30 · -2.0
→BOSBig
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
UTAH defense27th of 30 · -5.4
→BOSBig
BOS offense16th of 30 · +0.1
Backcourt-20.8 · 3 players
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+13.8 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+17.4 · 3 players
Bench+1.7 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+31.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTAH betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. George31 minD. Peterson30 minA. Bailey30 minI. Collier18 minJ. Okogie17 minS. Mykhailiuk16 min
Forwards
L. Markkanen29 minB. Hinson20 minB. Sensabaugh15 minK. Filipowski8 minH. Ingram4 min
Centers
J. Hayes25 minM. Bamba19 minT. Bradley11 min
Out
J. JacksonOut
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh16 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman20 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez13 min
Forwards
J. Tatum35 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac3 minD. Mitchell2 min
Centers
N. Queta22 minM. Robinson19 minL. Garza12 min
Out
P. GeorgeDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
107.0Points per game115.0
1.04Points per possession1.13
104.0Pace (possessions)101.5
Shooting
49.5Effective FG%53.8
32.93-point %34.5
40.73-point attempt rate46.6
30.2Free throw rate31.1
Possessions
16.2Turnover rate15.1
26.1Offensive rebound rate28.9
24.7Assists per game26.9
Defense
118.9Points allowed109.1
1.13Points allowed per possession1.08
53.7Opponent effective FG%52.8
37.2Opponent 3-point %34.6
13.0Turnovers forced17.5
77.6Defensive rebound rate69.0
6.6Steals per game8.7
6.6Blocks per game3.7
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 107.0 #26 | Points per game | 115.0 #13 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.13 #9 |
| 104.0 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 101.5 #22 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #27 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #14 |
| 32.9 #22 | 3-point % | 34.5 #17 |
| 40.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.6 #7 |
| 30.2 #12 | Free throw rate | 31.1 #9 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #22 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #12 |
| 26.1 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.9 #11 |
| 24.7 #24 | Assists per game | 26.9 #12 |
| Defense | ||
| 118.9 #24 | Points allowed | 109.1 #10 |
| 1.13 #23 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #12 |
| 53.7 #16 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.8 #12 |
| 37.2 #25 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #12 |
| 13.0 #29 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #5 |
| 77.6 #2 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #27 |
| 6.6 #28 | Steals per game | 8.7 #14 |
| 6.6 #3 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #28 |
Jazz
1-6 overall · 1-6 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Spurs97–119
- Lvs Trail Blazers90–112
- Lvs Spurs111–117
- Lvs Grizzlies105–110
- Lvs Lakers123–132
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-2 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Rockets93–109
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
A week or more of rest.