TD Garden · at Celtics
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-1 | Record | 5-1 |
| 3-2 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 2-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 114–109 · win probability BOS 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 222.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
POR 3, BOS 3 · 2026-27 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: POR 27.6%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: POR 77.3%, BOS 68.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: POR 35.9, BOS 32.3. Allowed: POR 27.8, BOS 31.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: POR 14.6%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: POR 14.8%, BOS 17.8%
POR offense vs BOS defense
Offense 10th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, POR 3-0 away
BOS offense vs POR defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: POR 56.2 and allows 51.3; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Context
Schedule so far
POR has played the 27th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
POR hits 35.3% and allows 32.1%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 51.5% and 45.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: POR plays 103.5 a game (14th fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Recent form
Last 5: POR 3-2 ATS, margin +11.4; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: POR 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: POR 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -4.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model222.9
Model edge—
Projected score
POR 109.4 · BOS 113.5
Win probability
BOS 61%
1st half
Spread
BOS -2.2
Total
111.8
Projected score
POR 54.8 · BOS 57
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-1 80% | 3-2 60% | 2-3 40% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
POR 2–8 BOSBOS leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · POR 3-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2025-26 | POR 94 @ BOS 102 | BOS -8.5 | POR W |
| Dec 28, 2025-26 | BOS 108 @ POR 114 | POR +6.5 | POR W |
| Mar 23, 2024-25 | BOS 129 @ POR 116 | POR +6.5 | BOS W |
| Mar 5, 2024-25 | POR 118 @ BOS 128 | BOS -8.5 | BOS W |
| Apr 7, 2023-24 | POR 107 @ BOS 124 | BOS -16.5 | BOS W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Trail Blazers
5 games played
Straight up
4-1
80% wins
Against the spread
3-2
60% covers · avg +6.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-3
40% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
+37.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
−1.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+8.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−28.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
+15.5
covered 3didn’t cover 2avg +6.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
PHX
W 124-83
−25.5
23
@
SAC
W 128-120
+16.5
27
@
LAL
W 136-129
+30.5
29
vs
MEM
L 103-124
−6.5
31
@
UTAH
W 112-90
−30.5
over 2under 3avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Trail Blazers 0, Celtics 2, even 3
Trail BlazersBetterCeltics
G D. Lillard19.2 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 89
=Even
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G S. Henderson8.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F D. Avdija23 pts · 6.8 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 82
=Even
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F T. Camara15.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
→BOSSmall
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
C D. Clingan8.6 pts · 8.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 74
=Even
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
Trail BlazersBetterCeltics
POR offense10th of 30 · +1.4
→BOSSmall
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
POR defense11th of 30 · +1.8
=Even
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt+11.6 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+16.7 · 3 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench+15.6 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPOR betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lillard29 minS. Henderson21 minJ. Holiday25 minS. Cissoko22 minV. Krejci11 minC. Youngblood6 min
Forwards
D. Avdija31 minT. Camara26 minJ. Tonje8 min
Centers
D. Clingan22 minM. Potter19 minR. Williams17 minB. Carlson12 minY. Hansen10 min
Out
J. MorantOut
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 120.6 #4 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.16 #5 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 103.5 #14 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.2 #4 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 35.3 #12 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 51.5 #1 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 35.9 #3 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.6 #9 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 27.6 #14 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 26.2 #17 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 109.2 #10 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.06 #10 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 51.3 #8 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 32.1 #8 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 14.8 #20 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 77.3 #3 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 8.6 #18 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 4.2 #21 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Trail Blazers
4-1 overall · 4-1 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Jazz112–90
- Lvs Grizzlies103–124
- W@ Lakers136–129
- W@ Kings128–120
- Wvs Suns124–83
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.