FedExForum · at Grizzlies · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-5 | Record | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 6-0 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 115–113 · win probability MEM 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 227.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 224-242 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MEM has more of the edges
LAC 1, MEM 6 · 2026-27 so far
Context
Schedule so far
LAC has played the 10th-hardest schedule, MEM the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAC 52.9 and allows 56.9; MEM 55.9 and allows 49.2
LAC offense vs MEM defense
Offense 28th of 30 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
LAC hits 38.6% and allows 38.2%; MEM hits 41.7% and allows 30.0%. Threes are 42.3% and 42.1% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAC 26.5%, MEM 30.6%. Defensive: LAC 70.9%, MEM 75.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAC 28.0, MEM 25.3. Allowed: LAC 24.7, MEM 31.4
Recent form
Last 5: LAC 2-3 ATS, margin -13.8; MEM 5-0 ATS, margin +14.2
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: LAC plays 101.7 a game (23rd fastest), MEM 103.6 (13th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MEM at home. This season: MEM 2-0 at home, LAC 0-4 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAC 20.4%, MEM 15.4%. Forced: LAC 17.0%, MEM 15.7%
Even
MEM offense vs LAC defense
Offense 11th of 30 against a defense 12th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAC 100%, MEM 100%. Transfers in: LAC 0, MEM 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMEM -2.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model227.3
Model edge—
Projected score
LAC 112.7 · MEM 114.6
Win probability
MEM 56%
1st half
Spread
MEM -1.0
Total
113.8
Projected score
LAC 56.4 · MEM 57.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | |
| 6-0 100% | 6-0 100% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
LAC 9–9 MEMSeries tied · 18 games since 2021-22 · LAC 6-12 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025-26 | LAC 123 @ MEM 120 | MEM +7.5 | MEM W |
| Dec 15, 2025-26 | MEM 121 @ LAC 103 | LAC -5.5 | MEM W |
| Dec 5, 2025-26 | LAC 98 @ MEM 107 | MEM +2.5 | MEM W |
| Nov 28, 2025-26 | MEM 112 @ LAC 107 | LAC -6.5 | MEM W |
| Mar 21, 2024-25 | MEM 108 @ LAC 128 | LAC -6.5 | LAC W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clippers
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
+19.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+0.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
+9.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−17.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
−19.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
−10.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
SAC
W 121-96
−9.5
23
@
LAL
L 117-125
+16.5
25
@
OKC
L 101-108
−14.5
28
vs
LAL
L 87-103
−34.5
30
@
MIN
L 101-127
+5.5
1
@
GS
L 112-124
+15.5
over 3under 3avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Grizzlies
6 games played
Straight up
6-0
100% wins
Against the spread
6-0
100% covers · avg +14.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg −8.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
+18.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
+7.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+7.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
+3.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
+28.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+23.5
covered 6didn’t cover 0avg +14.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
UTAH
W 123-103
−14.5
23
@
GS
W 111-108
−17.5
25
@
SAC
W 123-112
+0.5
26
@
UTAH
W 110-105
−22.5
29
@
POR
W 124-103
−6.5
31
vs
SAC
W 136-105
+11.5
over 2under 4avg −8.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Grizzlies has the better starters
Position by position: Clippers 0, Grizzlies 3, even 2
ClippersBetterGrizzlies
G D. Garland20.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 27
→MEMBig
G T. Jerome25.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G K. Dunn8.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 25
→MEMBig
F C. Boozer17.7 pts · 10.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 87
G K. Sanders8.5 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
F C. Coward13 pts · 8.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 33
F R. Hachimura13.4 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 83
=Even
F J. Wells12.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
F I. Jackson8 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 8
→MEMBig
C Z. Edey7 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
Score 92
ClippersBetterGrizzlies
LAC offense28th of 30 · -3.5
→MEMBig
MEM defense13th of 30 · +1.1
LAC defense12th of 30 · +1.7
=Even
MEM offense11th of 30 · +1.3
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→MEMBig
Backcourt+16.5 · 1 player
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
→MEMBig
Frontcourt+29.5 · 4 players
Bench+3.5 · 5 players
←LACBig
Bench-18.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAC betterMEM betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Garland33 minK. Dunn30 minK. Sanders23 minK. Wagler25 minJ. Pickett16 minG. Dick14 min
Forwards
R. Hachimura30 minI. Jackson22 minB. Miller8 minN. Martinelli5 min
Centers
B. Lopez22 min
Out
D. JonesDay-To-Day
Guards
T. Jerome30 minJ. Mashack22 minJ. Small21 minC. Spencer19 minW. Clayton11 min
Forwards
C. Boozer31 minC. Coward28 minJ. Wells27 minJ. Grant24 minT. Hendricks19 minO. Prosper19 min
Centers
Z. Edey20 minI. Stewart18 minC. Cooper3 min
Out
S. PippenDay-To-DayQ. PostDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
106.5Points per game121.2
1.04Points per possession1.16
101.7Pace (possessions)103.6
Shooting
52.9Effective FG%55.9
38.63-point %41.7
42.33-point attempt rate42.1
28.0Free throw rate25.3
Possessions
20.4Turnover rate15.4
26.5Offensive rebound rate30.6
24.3Assists per game27.0
Defense
113.8Points allowed106.0
1.13Points allowed per possession1.03
56.9Opponent effective FG%49.2
38.2Opponent 3-point %30.0
17.0Turnovers forced15.7
70.9Defensive rebound rate75.0
11.3Steals per game6.3
4.2Blocks per game5.2
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 106.5 #28 | Points per game | 121.2 #1 |
| 1.04 #27 | Points per possession | 1.16 #4 |
| 101.7 #23 | Pace (possessions) | 103.6 #13 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #18 | Effective FG% | 55.9 #5 |
| 38.6 #5 | 3-point % | 41.7 #1 |
| 42.3 #17 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.1 #19 |
| 28.0 #17 | Free throw rate | 25.3 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.4 #30 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #16 |
| 26.5 #21 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.6 #5 |
| 24.3 #26 | Assists per game | 27.0 #13 |
| Defense | ||
| 113.8 #15 | Points allowed | 106.0 #3 |
| 1.13 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #2 |
| 56.9 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #3 |
| 38.2 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.0 #3 |
| 17.0 #8 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #15 |
| 70.9 #20 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #9 |
| 11.3 #3 | Steals per game | 6.3 #28 |
| 4.2 #22 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #11 |
Clippers
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Warriors112–124
- L@ Timberwolves101–127
- Lvs Lakers87–103
- L@ Thunder101–108
- L@ Lakers117–125
A week or more of rest.
Grizzlies
6-0 overall · 6-0 in conference · Western Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Kings136–105
- W@ Trail Blazers124–103
- W@ Jazz110–105
- W@ Kings123–112
- W@ Warriors111–108
A week or more of rest.