Allen Arena · at Lipscomb
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LIP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LIP 77–70 · win probability LIP 73%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LIP has more of the edges
UNCA 0, LIP 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCA 17.4%, LIP 16.0%. Forced: UNCA 15.5%, LIP 17.7%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNCA plays 68.0 a game (230th fastest), LIP 70.8 (83rd). Faster games mean more points
UNCA offense vs LIP defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 226th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNCA has played the 215th-hardest schedule, LIP the 270th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
LIP at home. This season: LIP 0-0 at home, UNCA 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%; LIP hits 35.7% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 33.6% and 47.9% of their shots
Even
LIP offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 191st of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCA 29.8%, LIP 25.8%. Defensive: UNCA 68.7%, LIP 69.8%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCA 40.0, LIP 26.0. Allowed: UNCA 38.7, LIP 29.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCA 30%, LIP 44%. Transfers in: UNCA 4, LIP 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3; LIP 54.1 and allows 53.2
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLIP -7.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model146.0
Model edge—
Projected score
UNCA 69.5 · LIP 76.5
Win probability
LIP 73%
1st half
Spread
LIP -4.0
Total
68.3
Projected score
UNCA 32.1 · LIP 36.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNCA 1–1 LIPSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · UNCA 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | LIP 64 @ UNCA 69 | UNCA -6.5 | LIP W |
| Nov 24, 2023-24 | LIP 86 vs UNCA 75 | UNCA -3.5 | LIP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lipscomb
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-105 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 77-92 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 90-67 | +7.5 | W +30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 88-77 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 92-58 | -11.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 73-97 | +32.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-89 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-57 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 83-91 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-71 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 86-71 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 100-94 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 76-87 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 78-86 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-61 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 81-87 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-51 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 78-84 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-77 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-77 | -3.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
−17.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
−11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
+1.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
+5.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
+15.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
+30.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+14.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
−7.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+22.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+8.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
−13.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
+6.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−10.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
−19.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+9.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−1.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+1.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−10.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+9.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
−4.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
−6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
−11.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
+7.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
−2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−0.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
+9.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
−11.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
+1.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−27.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
+11.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
+11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
−25.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
−15.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
−6.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
−0.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+11.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+3.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+18.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
+0.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
−14.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−16.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
+23.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+3.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−2.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+4.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−4.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+3.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−7.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
+28.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
+6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
+8.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
−24.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
+2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−7.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
−25.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
+8.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
−0.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−20.5
over 16under 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lipscomb has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Asheville 0, Lipscomb 2, even 3
UNC AshevilleBetterLipscomb
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
→LIPBig
G T. Simpkins TR12.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
→LIPBig
G M. Esmeraldo9.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 6.9 ast
Score 81
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Sargiunas9.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 28
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
=Even
F O. Ashkenazi2.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 3
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
=Even
F T. Byrne TR3.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 4
UNC AshevilleBetterLipscomb
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
→LIPSmall
LIP defense226th of 366 · -6.0
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
=Even
LIP offense191st of 366 · -5.9
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
→LIPBig
Backcourt+3.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-6.7 · 3 players
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
→LIPSmall
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUNCA betterLIP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Guards
T. Simpkins32 min · TRM. Esmeraldo31 minZ. WellsNewV. VisnjicNewH. TidareNewK. QuinnNew
Forwards
T. Sargiunas24 minO. Ashkenazi20 minT. Byrne16 min · TRK. Okpara13 minL. JackNewD. MartinNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #248 | Points per game | 77.6 #104 |
| 1.06 #236 | Points per possession | 1.10 #142 |
| 68.0 #230 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #83 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #194 | Effective FG% | 54.1 #67 |
| 35.1 #110 | 3-point % | 35.7 #75 |
| 33.6 #307 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #24 |
| 40.0 #60 | Free throw rate | 26.0 #357 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #230 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #142 |
| 29.8 #211 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.8 #327 |
| 10.1 #358 | Assists per game | 17.2 #19 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #161 | Points allowed | 77.0 #242 |
| 1.09 #203 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #187 |
| 51.3 #175 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.2 #273 |
| 32.6 #93 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #207 |
| 15.5 #251 | Turnovers forced | 17.7 #113 |
| 68.7 #218 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #171 |
| 5.1 #324 | Steals per game | 6.8 #141 |
| 3.5 #133 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #291 |
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.
Lipscomb
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU53–77
- W@ E Kentucky80–77
- L@ West Georgia78–84
- Wvs North Alabama73–51
- W@ Bellarmine75–72
A week or more of rest.