Capital One Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UVA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UVA 81–80 · win probability UVA 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UVA has more of the edges
ARK 2, UVA 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: ARK plays 73.8 a game (12th fastest), UVA 67.6 (247th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ARK 32.0%, UVA 37.9%. Defensive: ARK 69.1%, UVA 70.8%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ARK 56.4 and allows 51.8; UVA 54.6 and allows 45.8
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ARK 12.2%, UVA 16.0%. Forced: ARK 15.5%, UVA 15.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: ARK 35.9, UVA 32.3. Allowed: ARK 31.2, UVA 32.9
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ARK 19%, UVA 57%. Transfers in: ARK 2, UVA 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
ARK has played the 8th-hardest schedule, UVA the 68th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
UVA offense vs ARK defense
Offense 32nd of 366 against a defense 47th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
ARK hits 38.2% and allows 31.8%; UVA hits 36.3% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 33.0% and 46.7% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
ARK offense vs UVA defense
Offense 6th of 366 against a defense 13th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UVA -1.1 | — |
| Total | — | 160.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ARK 79.5 · UVA 80.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UVA -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 74.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | ARK 37.1 · UVA 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Arkansas
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
23-14
62% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-15
59% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
23-1462%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 109-77 | -26.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 66-69 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-56 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 79-75 | -24.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-83 | -23.5 | L −22.5 | 168.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 115-61 | -29.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 71-80 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-80 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 82-58 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-86 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 108-80 | -23.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 85-94 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-74 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-75 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 94-87 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-95 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 108-74 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-90 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 93-68 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 173.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-81 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-85 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-68 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-62 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 159.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 115-117 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-86 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 99-84 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | O 183 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-111 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 169.5 | O 188 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 105-85 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-84 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-79 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 166.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 93-90 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 97-78 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 94-88 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 171.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 26 | vs | L 88-109 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+5.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−0.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−20.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−22.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+24.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
+3.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+10.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
+4.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+9.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+4.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
−3.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+5.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+12.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+3.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−19.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+21.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−11.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
+23.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
−6.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
+0.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
−14.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
+14.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
+24.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
+5.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+1.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
−1.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+7.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
−24.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+13.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+6.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−3.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
−5.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
+13.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+4.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
−12.5
covered 23didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SOU
W 109-77
+35.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-69
−20.5
11
vs
CARK
W 93-56
−9.5
14
vs
SAM
W 79-75
−4.5
18
vs
WIN
W 84-83
−1.5
21
vs
JKST
W 115-61
+16.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 71-80
−8.5
3
vs
LOU
W 89-80
+2.5
6
vs
FRES
W 82-58
−21.5
13
vs
TTU
W 93-86
+23.5
16
vs
QUC
W 108-80
+18.5
20
vs
HOU
L 85-94
+32.5
29
vs
JMU
W 103-74
+17.5
3
vs
TENN
W 86-75
+2.5
7
@
MISS
W 94-87
+27.5
10
@
AUB
L 73-95
−1.5
14
vs
SC
W 108-74
+26.5
17
@
UGA
L 76-90
−15.5
20
vs
VAN
W 93-68
−12.5
24
vs
LSU
W 85-81
+2.5
27
@
OU
W 83-79
−5.5
31
vs
UK
L 77-85
+2.5
7
@
MSST
W 88-68
−7.5
10
@
LSU
W 91-62
−6.5
14
vs
AUB
W 88-75
−2.5
18
@
ALA
L 115-117
+50.5
21
vs
MIZ
W 94-86
+20.5
25
vs
TA&M
W 99-84
+12.5
28
@
FLA
L 77-111
+18.5
4
vs
TEX
W 105-85
+26.5
7
@
MIZ
W 88-84
+8.5
13
vs
OU
W 82-79
−5.5
14
vs
MISS
W 93-90
+23.5
15
vs
VAN
W 86-75
−4.5
19
vs
HAW
W 97-78
+16.5
21
vs
HPU
W 94-88
+10.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 88-109
+30.5
over 22under 15avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Virginia
36 games played
Straight up
30-6
83% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1850%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-53 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-62 | -34.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 91-53 | -24.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 104-78 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 73-80 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 88-69 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 84-60 | -36.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-72 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 95-51 | -27.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 85-95 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-61 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 84-60 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 79-70 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-68 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 80-85 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 100-97 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 197 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 73-66 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-59 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 61-58 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 94-68 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 86-83 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 90-61 | -6.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-77 | +9.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 75-70 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 76-72 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-74 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 84-62 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 70-74 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 82-73 | -17.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
+7.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−15.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
+13.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+5.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+0.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−13.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
−0.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+22.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+7.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
−12.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−8.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
+16.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
−15.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
+19.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
+9.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
+2.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
+13.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
+1.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
−11.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
−6.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−6.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
+7.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−0.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−5.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−1.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+12.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
−4.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
+22.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−16.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−9.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
−7.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+0.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
+18.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+2.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
−8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
−5.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
RID
W 87-53
−8.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 81-62
−8.5
11
vs
HAMP
W 91-53
−4.5
15
vs
MRSH
W 104-78
+26.5
21
vs
NU
W 83-78
+11.5
23
vs
BTLR
L 73-80
−2.5
28
vs
QUC
W 94-69
+2.5
3
@
TEX
W 88-69
+2.5
6
vs
DAY
W 86-73
+11.5
9
vs
UMES
W 84-60
+9.5
20
vs
MD
W 80-72
−1.5
22
vs
AMER
W 95-51
−7.5
31
@
VT
L 85-95
+26.5
3
@
NCSU
W 76-61
−14.5
7
vs
CAL
W 84-60
−4.5
10
vs
STAN
W 70-55
−18.5
13
@
LOU
W 79-70
−5.5
17
@
SMU
W 72-68
−13.5
24
vs
UNC
L 80-85
+12.5
27
@
ND
W 100-97
+51.5
31
@
BC
W 73-66
−2.5
3
vs
PITT
W 67-47
−28.5
7
vs
SYR
W 72-59
−16.5
10
@
FSU
W 61-58
−36.5
14
vs
OSU
W 70-66
−10.5
18
@
GT
W 94-68
+11.5
21
vs
MIA
W 86-83
+23.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 90-61
−0.5
28
@
DUKE
L 51-77
−15.5
3
vs
WAKE
W 75-70
−5.5
7
vs
VT
W 76-72
+2.5
12
vs
NCSU
W 81-74
+1.5
13
vs
MIA
W 84-62
−0.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 70-74
+3.5
20
vs
WRST
W 82-73
+8.5
22
vs
TENN
L 72-79
+13.5
over 16under 20avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas has the better starters
Position by position: Arkansas 1, Virginia 0, even 4
ArkansasBetterVirginia
G B. Richmond11.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 85
=Even
G J. Dixon TR15.7 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 82
G J. Wilkinson TR17.4 pts · 2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 98
←ARKSmall
G J. Vide TR12 pts · 3.1 reb · 4 ast
Score 66
G A. Brown0.1 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Harmon TR13.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 73
F C. Bowser TR13.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 91
=Even
G S. Lewis10.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 77
F I. Sealy2.9 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. De Ridder15.6 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 95
ArkansasBetterVirginia
ARK offense6th of 366 · +10.8
=Even
UVA defense13th of 366 · +6.6
ARK defense47th of 366 · +2.2
=Even
UVA offense32nd of 366 · +5.9
Backcourt+5.9 · 3 players
←ARKSmall
Backcourt+3.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt+3.7 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+4.2 · 1 player
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
→UVABig
Bench+3.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestARK betterUVA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Richmond28 minJ. Wilkinson26 min · TRA. Brown2 minA. Kelley2 minJ. SmithNewD. ThompsonNew
Forwards
C. Bowser30 min · TRI. Sealy7 minP. SemedoNewM. MakerNewJ. AndrewsNewM. MuurinenNew
Guards
J. Dixon31 min · TRJ. Vide29 min · TRC. Harmon28 min · TRS. Lewis26 minC. Mallory24 minE. Gertrude6 min
Forwards
T. De Ridder28 minC. Lang2 minK. AnyaNewS. BarksdaleNewN. AdekunleNew
Centers
J. Grunloh21 minF. IbeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 90.2 #2 | Points per game | 80.4 #57 |
| 1.23 #3 | Points per possession | 1.19 #21 |
| 73.8 #12 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #247 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.4 #16 | Effective FG% | 54.6 #49 |
| 38.2 #16 | 3-point % | 36.3 #48 |
| 33.0 #315 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.7 #36 |
| 35.9 #155 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #253 |
| Possessions | ||
| 12.2 #1 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #141 |
| 32.0 #121 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.9 #9 |
| 17.2 #20 | Assists per game | 16.3 #41 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.0 #333 | Points allowed | 68.8 #46 |
| 1.09 #213 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #39 |
| 51.8 #201 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.8 #8 |
| 31.8 #54 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #46 |
| 15.5 #246 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #256 |
| 69.1 #197 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #120 |
| 7.3 #96 | Steals per game | 6.3 #199 |
| 5.2 #12 | Blocks per game | 6.4 #1 |
Arkansas
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-5 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arizona88–109
- Wvs High Point94–88
- Wvs Hawai'i97–78
- Wvs Vanderbilt86–75
- Wvs Ole Miss93–90
A week or more of rest.
Virginia
30-6 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee72–79
- Wvs Wright St82–73
- Lvs Duke70–74
- Wvs Miami84–62
- Wvs NC State81–74
A week or more of rest.