Rose Hill Gym · at Fordham · Conference game
Closing line
FOR -8.5✓ LUC covered by 5.5
Closing total135.5Under by 14.5
| This season | FOR | |
|---|---|---|
| 6-20 | Record | 11-12 |
| 7-19 | ATS | 13-10 |
| 14-12 | O/U | 5-18 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LUC 64–73 FOR · ✓ FOR (79%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUC | 21 | 38 | 59 |
| FOR | 33 | 29 | 62 |
1st half: LUC 21, FOR 33 (FOR by 12). The model had FOR by 5.5 and a total of 64.4 (actual 54).
Team stats
| LUC | FOR | |
|---|---|---|
| 19-47 40% | Field goals | 20-51 39% |
| 7-26 27% | 3-pointers | 6-19 32% |
| 14-22 64% | Free throws | 16-27 59% |
| 32 5 off | Rebounds | 38 10 off |
| 13 | Assists | 11 |
| 6 | Steals | 6 |
| 2 | Blocks | 2 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 21 | Fouls | 19 |
| 24 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 10 | Fast-break points | 6 |
Players
| LUC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Moore G | 30 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Xavier Amos F | 27 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-7 |
| Kayde Dotson G | 25 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 3-6 |
| Miles Rubin C | 22 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 7-8 | 0-0 |
| Daniil Glazkov G | 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Deywilk Tavarez G | 29 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-7 |
| Alexander Richardson C | 28 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Nic Anderson G | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Caleb Reese G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Sam Yurasek, Chuck Love III, Brayden Young, Zachary Royster, Kymany Houinsou, Joshua Ola-Joseph, Dominick Harris
| FOR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dejour Reaves G | 35 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-3 |
| Akira Jacobs F | 32 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3-4 | 3-4 |
| Christian Henry G | 30 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-5 |
| Rikus Schulte F | 30 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-0 |
| Abass Bodija F | 29 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Roor Akhuar F | 23 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Marcus Greene G | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
| Louis Lesmond G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Kingston Price G | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ryan Pettis, Aidan Crotty, Max Miller, Zarique Nutter, Jack Whitbourn, Jace Howard, Jameson O'Toole
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketFOR -8.5
ModelFOR -9.4
Model edgeFOR +0.9
L LUC covered
Total
Market135.5
Model137.5
Model edgeOver 2.0
L Under
Projected score
LUC 64 · FOR 73.4
LUC 59 · FOR 62
Win probability
FOR 79%
1st half
Spread
FOR -5.5
FOR -12.0
Total
64.4
54 points
Projected score
LUC 29.5 · FOR 34.9
LUC 21 · FOR 33
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenFOR -9.5
1 → LUC
CloseFOR -8.5
1 pt toward LUC
Total
Open138.5
▼ 3
Close135.5
Down 3 since the open
Moneyline
LUC +340 · FOR -440
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened FOR -9.5 · closed FOR -8.5 · moved 1 toward LUCmodel FOR -9.5
model FOR -9.5
Opened 138.5 · closed 135.5 · moved 3 downmodel 137.5
model 137.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LUC 2–1 FORLUC leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · LUC has won the last 2 meetings · LUC 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024-25 | FOR 66 @ LUC 70 | LUC -10.5 | FOR W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | LUC 65 @ FOR 61 | FOR +1.5 | LUC W |
| Feb 22, 2022-23 | FOR 71 @ LUC 69 | LUC +1.5 | FOR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Loyola Chicago
26 games played
Straight up
6-20
23% wins
Against the spread
7-19
27% covers · avg −7.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-88 | -17.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 65-73 | -21.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 74-95 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 67-80 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 59-76 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 51-72 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 51-63 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 75-84 | -15.5 | L −24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 71-85 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 80-78 | +15.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 61-57 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 68-70 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-79 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 66-101 | +14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 74-82 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 51-78 | +16.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 70-84 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 59-71 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 64-85 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 75-89 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 71-61 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 64-84 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 59-86 | +17.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
−14.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−29.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−3.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
−15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−9.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−30.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−12.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−10.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+4.5
6
vs
PRIN
W 73-68
−1.5
14
vs
CHST
L 75-84
−24.5
17
@
SF
L 71-85
−2.5
20
vs
SCU
W 80-78
+17.5
31
@
URI
W 61-57
+13.5
3
vs
DAY
L 68-70
+5.5
7
vs
DAV
L 64-79
−13.5
10
@
GW
L 66-101
−20.5
13
vs
GMU
L 74-82
+3.5
16
@
DAY
L 51-78
−10.5
20
@
SBU
L 70-84
−3.5
24
vs
DUQ
L 59-71
−6.5
27
vs
JOES
L 64-85
−19.5
30
@
VCU
L 75-89
+4.5
3
vs
LAS
W 71-61
+7.5
6
@
DAV
L 64-84
−10.5
13
vs
SLU
L 59-86
−9.5
covered 7didn’t cover 19avg −7.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CLE
W 91-88
+27.5
6
vs
MERC
L 65-73
−6.5
9
vs
UNT
L 62-64
−12.5
13
@
WICH
L 74-95
+15.5
16
vs
CSU
L 67-80
−4.5
21
vs
NIU
L 59-76
−13.5
25
vs
UNI
L 51-72
−11.5
26
vs
SJSU
L 51-63
−22.5
2
vs
CMU
W 83-72
+14.5
6
vs
PRIN
W 73-68
+4.5
14
vs
CHST
L 75-84
+18.5
17
@
SF
L 71-85
+12.5
20
vs
SCU
W 80-78
+6.5
31
@
URI
W 61-57
−27.5
3
vs
DAY
L 68-70
−2.5
7
vs
DAV
L 64-79
+6.5
10
@
GW
L 66-101
+12.5
13
vs
GMU
L 74-82
+15.5
16
@
DAY
L 51-78
−12.5
20
@
SBU
L 70-84
+6.5
24
vs
DUQ
L 59-71
−22.5
27
vs
JOES
L 64-85
+5.5
30
@
VCU
L 75-89
+13.5
3
vs
LAS
W 71-61
−8.5
6
@
DAV
L 64-84
+7.5
13
vs
SLU
L 59-86
−10.5
over 14under 12avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fordham
23 games played
Straight up
11-12
48% wins
Against the spread
13-10
57% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-18
22% overs · avg −8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 61-72 | -14.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 63-61 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 71-76 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 69-53 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 62-72 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-70 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 75-54 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-53 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 65-47 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 56-63 | +16.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 75-83 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-67 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-77 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 56-78 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-74 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 63-68 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 64-58 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-65 | +11.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 59-63 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-70 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 68-64 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−25.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−10.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
+0.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
+11.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+9.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
−11.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
+9.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
+20.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
+4.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
+9.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
−5.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−3.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+12.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−4.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−9.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−0.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
+0.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
+25.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
+3.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−1.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
+7.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+8.5
covered 13didn’t cover 10avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−14.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−15.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
−23.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+12.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
+0.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
−12.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
−12.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
−15.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
−20.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
+15.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−9.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+15.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−20.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−8.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−4.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
−14.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
−6.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
−24.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−4.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
−3.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+1.5
over 5under 18avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Loyola Chicago
6-20 overall · 2-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Louis59–86
- L@ Davidson64–84
- Wvs La Salle71–61
- L@ VCU75–89
- Lvs Saint Joseph's64–85
5 days since their last game.
Fordham
11-12 overall · 5-8 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Rhode Island70–66
- W@ Saint Joseph's68–64
- Lvs St Bonaventure67–70
- Lvs VCU59–63
- W@ G Washington79–65
4 days since their last game.