Crisler Center · at Michigan
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MICH 96–62 · win probability MICH 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MICH has more of the edges
W&M 1, MICH 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MICH offense vs W&M defense
Offense 5th of 366 against a defense 289th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: W&M 26.0%, MICH 34.7%. Defensive: W&M 68.5%, MICH 71.8%
Context
Schedule so far
W&M has played the 171st-hardest schedule, MICH the 3rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
W&M hits 33.0% and allows 33.0%; MICH hits 36.8% and allows 30.4%. Threes are 42.8% and 41.5% of their shots
W&M offense vs MICH defense
Offense 160th of 366 against a defense 10th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: W&M 54.3 and allows 51.9; MICH 58.3 and allows 44.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: W&M 16.6%, MICH 16.3%. Forced: W&M 18.9%, MICH 15.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: W&M 1%, MICH 38%. Transfers in: W&M 7, MICH 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
MICH at home. This season: MICH 0-0 at home, W&M 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: W&M 44.0, MICH 38.0. Allowed: W&M 35.5, MICH 26.0
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: W&M plays 73.6 a game (14th fastest), MICH 71.7 (48th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MICH -34.3 | — |
| Total | — | 157.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | W&M 61.7 · MICH 96.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MICH -20.3 | — |
| 1H total | 73.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | W&M 26.7 · MICH 47 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 9-1 90% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
William & Mary
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 81-78 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-93 | +28.5 | L −4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 82-74 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 167.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-63 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 92-58 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 88-75 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-99 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 96-83 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-70 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 76-57 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 79-88 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-81 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 58-64 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 97-89 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 77-70 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-82 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-79 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 96-104 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 85-78 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-77 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 94-67 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 83-84 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-77 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 91-88 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 94-85 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 61-92 | +2.5 | L −28.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+5.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−4.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
+16.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
+8.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+35.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
+4.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
+9.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+0.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+4.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
+12.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
+7.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
−6.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−13.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−9.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
−5.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
+4.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+3.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
−16.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+11.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−8.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
+21.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−11.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−2.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−4.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
−5.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
−2.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
+4.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+11.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−26.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
−11.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
−22.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+2.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
−0.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
−8.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+10.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+8.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
−3.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
−26.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
+1.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−5.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−28.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
+23.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
−12.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+13.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−14.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
+31.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+3.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−1.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
−6.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−6.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−0.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−3.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
+15.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
+15.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
−29.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
+0.5
over 13under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Michigan
40 games played
Straight up
37-3
93% wins
Against the spread
19-21
48% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-23
43% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 121-78 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-84 | -15.5 | L −14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 86-61 | -27.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 94-54 | -6.5 | W +33.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 102-72 | -4.5 | W +25.5 | 163.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 101-61 | +3.5 | W +43.5 | 165.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 101-60 | -25.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 89-61 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 101-83 | -19.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 102-50 | -40.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 112-71 | -24.5 | W +16.5 | 161.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 96-66 | -22.5 | W +7.5 | 173.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 74-72 | -24.5 | L −22.5 | 169.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 88-91 | -19.5 | L −22.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-72 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-71 | -18.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 86-72 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 74-62 | -16.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 75-72 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 110-69 | -26.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 82-61 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 87-75 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 86-56 | -15.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 91-80 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-68 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 77-67 | -22.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 84-70 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 71-68 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 90-80 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 71-67 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 68-65 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 72-80 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 101-80 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 95-72 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 90-77 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 29 | vs | W 95-62 | -8.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 91-73 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
| Apr 6 | vs | W 69-63 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
OAK
W 121-78
+18.5
11
vs
WAKE
W 85-84
−14.5
14
@
TCU
W 67-63
−3.5
19
vs
MTSU
W 86-61
−2.5
24
vs
SDSU
W 94-54
+33.5
25
vs
AUB
W 102-72
+25.5
26
vs
GONZ
W 101-61
+43.5
6
vs
RUTG
W 101-60
+15.5
9
vs
VILL
W 89-61
+10.5
13
@
MD
W 101-83
−1.5
21
vs
LAS
W 102-50
+11.5
29
vs
MCN
W 112-71
+16.5
2
vs
USC
W 96-66
+7.5
6
@
PSU
W 74-72
−22.5
10
vs
WIS
L 88-91
−22.5
14
@
WASH
W 82-72
−2.5
17
@
ORE
W 81-71
−8.5
20
vs
IU
W 86-72
−1.5
23
vs
OSU
W 74-62
−4.5
27
vs
NEB
W 75-72
−8.5
30
@
MSU
W 83-71
+9.5
5
vs
PSU
W 110-69
+14.5
8
@
OSU
W 82-61
+12.5
11
@
NU
W 87-75
−3.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 86-56
+14.5
17
@
PUR
W 91-80
+8.5
21
vs
DUKE
L 63-68
−8.5
24
vs
MINN
W 77-67
−12.5
27
@
ILL
W 84-70
+12.5
5
@
IOWA
W 71-68
−6.5
8
vs
MSU
W 90-80
−0.5
13
vs
OSU
W 71-67
−8.5
14
vs
WIS
W 68-65
−9.5
15
vs
PUR
L 72-80
−12.5
19
vs
HOW
W 101-80
−9.5
21
vs
SLU
W 95-72
+10.5
27
vs
ALA
W 90-77
+3.5
29
vs
TENN
W 95-62
+24.5
4
vs
ARIZ
W 91-73
+19.5
6
vs
CONN
W 69-63
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 21avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
OAK
W 121-78
+42.5
11
vs
WAKE
W 85-84
+0.5
14
@
TCU
W 67-63
−34.5
19
vs
MTSU
W 86-61
−12.5
24
vs
SDSU
W 94-54
−0.5
25
vs
AUB
W 102-72
+10.5
26
vs
GONZ
W 101-61
−3.5
6
vs
RUTG
W 101-60
+7.5
9
vs
VILL
W 89-61
−6.5
13
@
MD
W 101-83
+20.5
21
vs
LAS
W 102-50
−3.5
29
vs
MCN
W 112-71
+21.5
2
vs
USC
W 96-66
−11.5
6
@
PSU
W 74-72
−23.5
10
vs
WIS
L 88-91
+9.5
14
@
WASH
W 82-72
−11.5
17
@
ORE
W 81-71
−5.5
20
vs
IU
W 86-72
−5.5
23
vs
OSU
W 74-62
−29.5
27
vs
NEB
W 75-72
−10.5
30
@
MSU
W 83-71
+4.5
5
vs
PSU
W 110-69
+17.5
8
@
OSU
W 82-61
−18.5
11
@
NU
W 87-75
+8.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 86-56
−14.5
17
@
PUR
W 91-80
+14.5
21
vs
DUKE
L 63-68
−20.5
24
vs
MINN
W 77-67
−1.5
27
@
ILL
W 84-70
−5.5
5
@
IOWA
W 71-68
−7.5
8
vs
MSU
W 90-80
+17.5
13
vs
OSU
W 71-67
−17.5
14
vs
WIS
W 68-65
−28.5
15
vs
PUR
L 72-80
+2.5
19
vs
HOW
W 101-80
+29.5
21
vs
SLU
W 95-72
+5.5
27
vs
ALA
W 90-77
−5.5
29
vs
TENN
W 95-62
+10.5
4
vs
ARIZ
W 91-73
+6.5
6
vs
CONN
W 69-63
−14.5
over 17under 23avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Michigan has the better starters
Position by position: William & Mary 0, Michigan 4, even 1
William & MaryBetterMichigan
G J. Baldwin TR7.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 63
→MICHSmall
G K. Noland TR17.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 87
G J. McIntosh TR6.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 48
→MICHBig
G E. Cadeau10.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.9 ast
Score 87
G T. Blassingame TR3.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 18
→MICHBig
G T. McKenney9.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 88
G N. Daniels TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Gayle7.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 76
F S. Sivka TR2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 15
→MICHBig
C M. Thiam TR12.8 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 92
William & MaryBetterMichigan
W&M offense160th of 366 · -4.8
→MICHBig
MICH defense10th of 366 · +7.4
W&M defense289th of 366 · -7.2
→MICHBig
MICH offense5th of 366 · +10.9
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
→MICHBig
Backcourt+7.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
→MICHBig
Frontcourt+4.4 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 3 players
→MICHBig
Bench+5.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestW&M betterMICH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Baldwin20 min · TRJ. McIntosh17 min · TRT. Blassingame17 min · TRN. Daniels10 min · TRZ. Clark9 min · TRJ. Forsythe4 min · TR
Forwards
S. Sivka11 min · TRB. CarterNewJ. RolandNew
Guards
K. Noland34 min · TRE. Cadeau27 minT. McKenney22 minR. Gayle21 minH. Eisley1 minR. LiburdNew
Forwards
J. Estrella18 min · TRJ. Reed18 min · TRO. Goodman5 minH. HochbergNewL. CosbyNewQ. CostelloNew
Centers
M. Thiam27 min · TRM. MollerNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 81.5 #38 | Points per game | 87.3 #4 |
| 1.11 #116 | Points per possession | 1.21 #8 |
| 73.6 #14 | Pace (possessions) | 71.7 #48 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.3 #58 | Effective FG% | 58.3 #8 |
| 33.0 #233 | 3-point % | 36.8 #33 |
| 42.8 #120 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.5 #141 |
| 44.0 #9 | Free throw rate | 38.0 #102 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #171 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #157 |
| 26.0 #324 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.7 #55 |
| 17.4 #17 | Assists per game | 18.6 #5 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #294 | Points allowed | 69.5 #55 |
| 1.07 #126 | Points allowed per possession | 0.97 #8 |
| 51.9 #205 | Opponent effective FG% | 44.6 #1 |
| 33.0 #126 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.4 #18 |
| 18.9 #52 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #270 |
| 68.5 #229 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #70 |
| 7.9 #47 | Steals per game | 5.6 #286 |
| 3.8 #95 | Blocks per game | 6.0 #2 |
William & Mary
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra61–92
- Wvs Elon72–62
- Wvs Hampton94–85
- W@ NC A&T91–88
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
A week or more of rest.
Michigan
37-3 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs UConn69–63
- Wvs Arizona91–73
- Wvs Tennessee95–62
- Wvs Alabama90–77
- Wvs Saint Louis95–72
A week or more of rest.