Events Center (Binghamton) · at Binghamton · Conference game
Closing line
UML -6.5✓ BING covered by 1.5
UML -6.5✓ BING covered by 1.5Closing total146.5Under by 5.5
| UML | This season | BING |
|---|---|---|
| 4-10 | Record | 1-13 |
| 8-6 | ATS | 5-9 |
| 8-6 | O/U | 8-6 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: UML 79–74 BING · ✓ UML (67%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UML | 45 | 28 | 73 |
| BING | 36 | 32 | 68 |
1st half: UML 45, BING 36 (UML by 9). The model had UML by 3.1 and a total of 71.5 (actual 81).
Team stats
| UML | BING | |
|---|---|---|
| 23-49 47% | Field goals | 25-54 46% |
| 7-16 44% | 3-pointers | 5-14 36% |
| 20-30 67% | Free throws | 13-19 68% |
| 31 6 off | Rebounds | 32 6 off |
| 9 | Assists | 11 |
| 8 | Steals | 6 |
| 5 | Blocks | 4 |
| 11 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 20 | Fouls | 25 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 40 |
| 12 | Fast-break points | 10 |
Players
| UML | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Spencer G | 40 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 6-10 | 4-6 |
| Angel Montas Jr. G | 36 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-4 |
| Austin Green F | 30 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Shawn Simmons II F | 26 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Darrel Yepdo G | 22 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Khalil Farmer G | 21 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Jared Frey G | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Victor Okojie F | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| JJ Massaquoi F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Keenan Bey, Jerrell Roberson II, Kris Johnson, Isaiah Walter
| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremiah Quigley G | 40 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 6-10 | 1-1 |
| Wes Peterson Jr. G | 38 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-4 |
| Ryan Richardson G | 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Jackson Benigni G | 23 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Stephan Snagg F | 20 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Bryson Wilson G | 28 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 6-9 | 0-2 |
| Zyier Beverly F | 19 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 5-10 | 0-0 |
| Jake Blackburn G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Nevin Ibroci G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Evan Ashe, Sayerr Senghore, Jayden Kelsey, Demetrius Lilley, Jayden Lemond
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketUML -6.5
ModelUML -4.9
Model edgeBING +1.6
W BING covered
Total
Market146.5
Model152.7
Model edgeOver 6.2
L Under
Projected score
UML 78.8 · BING 73.9
UML 73 · BING 68
Win probability
UML 67%
1st half
Spread
UML -3.1
UML -9.0
Total
71.5
81 points
Projected score
UML 37.3 · BING 34.2
UML 45 · BING 36
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUML -5.5
1 → UML
CloseUML -6.5
1 pt toward UML
Total
Open147.5
▼ 1
Close146.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
UML -250 · BING +205
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UML -5.5 · closed UML -6.5 · moved 1 toward UMLmodel UML -5
model UML -5
Opened 147.5 · closed 146.5 · moved 1 downmodel 152.5
model 152.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UML | 4-6 40% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
| BING | 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
UML 4–4 BINGSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · UML 3-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2024-25 | BING 53 @ UML 79 | UML -8.5 | UML W |
| Feb 6, 2024-25 | UML 54 @ BING 66 | BING +4.5 | BING W |
| Feb 22, 2023-24 | BING 80 @ UML 87 | UML -9.5 | BING W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | UML 80 @ BING 60 | BING +7.5 | UML W |
| Feb 18, 2022-23 | BING 70 @ UML 84 | UML -11.5 | UML W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UMass Lowell
14 games played
Straight up
4-10
29% wins
Against the spread
8-6
57% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-6
57% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ CONN | L 47-110 | +36.5 | L −26.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 10 | vs NHVN | L 67-73 | -10.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 13 | @ COLU | L 72-86 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | @ WAKE | L 75-109 | +30.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 19 | @ BRAD | L 77-87 | +21.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | @ SPU | L 66-68 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 26 | @ STO | W 75-64 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ MASS | L 60-80 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ QUIN | L 71-75 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs SHU | W 87-82 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ BU | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ IOWA | L 62-90 | +33.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs UALB | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 8 | @ BRY | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@CONN
CONNL 47-110
−26.5
10
vsNHVN
NHVNL 67-73
−16.5
13
@COLU
COLUL 72-86
−0.5
16
@WAKE
WAKEL 75-109
−3.5
19
@BRAD
BRADL 77-87
+11.5
22
@SPU
SPUL 66-68
+6.5
26
@STO
STOW 75-64
+13.5
6
@MASS
MASSL 60-80
−8.5
13
@QUIN
QUINL 71-75
+8.5
16
vsSHU
SHUW 87-82
+7.5
21
@BU
BUL 76-88
−6.5
29
@IOWA
IOWAL 62-90
+5.5
3
vsUALB
UALBW 83-71
+9.5
8
@BRY
BRYW 77-63
+16.5
covered 8didn’t cover 6avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@CONN
CONNL 47-110
+5.5
10
vsNHVN
NHVNL 67-73
−2.5
13
@COLU
COLUL 72-86
+1.5
16
@WAKE
WAKEL 75-109
+18.5
19
@BRAD
BRADL 77-87
+14.5
22
@SPU
SPUL 66-68
−13.5
26
@STO
STOW 75-64
−9.5
6
@MASS
MASSL 60-80
−15.5
13
@QUIN
QUINL 71-75
−7.5
16
vsSHU
SHUW 87-82
+17.5
21
@BU
BUL 76-88
+18.5
29
@IOWA
IOWAL 62-90
+6.5
3
vsUALB
UALBW 83-71
+3.5
8
@BRY
BRYW 77-63
−3.5
over 8under 6avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Binghamton
14 games played
Straight up
1-13
7% wins
Against the spread
5-9
36% covers · avg −4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-6
57% overs · avg +6.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ SYR | L 47-85 | +21.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs NIA | L 59-67 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ GTWN | L 70-83 | +27.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | @ LONG | L 82-90 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 22 | vs UMES | L 52-63 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 23 | @ CAN | L 66-75 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs LEH | W 80-71 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs LEM | L 63-78 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs CCSU | L 67-84 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 17 | @ PITT | L 63-103 | +24.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ MERC | L 61-82 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ ARMY | L 85-95 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs NJIT | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | @ UVM | L 59-60 | +20.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@SYR
SYRL 47-85
−16.5
8
vsNIA
NIAL 59-67
−10.5
12
@GTWN
GTWNL 70-83
+14.5
15
@LONG
LONGL 82-90
+7.5
22
vsUMES
UMESL 52-63
−16.5
23
@CAN
CANL 66-75
−6.5
2
vsLEH
LEHW 80-71
+12.5
6
vsLEM
LEML 63-78
−12.5
13
vsCCSU
CCSUL 67-84
−9.5
17
@PITT
PITTL 63-103
−15.5
20
@MERC
MERCL 61-82
−13.5
23
@ARMY
ARMYL 85-95
+2.5
3
vsNJIT
NJITL 65-73
−11.5
8
@UVM
UVML 59-60
+19.5
covered 5didn’t cover 9avg −4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@SYR
SYRL 47-85
−21.5
8
vsNIA
NIAL 59-67
−12.5
12
@GTWN
GTWNL 70-83
+11.5
15
@LONG
LONGL 82-90
+24.5
22
vsUMES
UMESL 52-63
−10.5
23
@CAN
CANL 66-75
+11.5
2
vsLEH
LEHW 80-71
+11.5
6
vsLEM
LEML 63-78
−3.5
13
vsCCSU
CCSUL 67-84
+17.5
17
@PITT
PITTL 63-103
+31.5
20
@MERC
MERCL 61-82
+10.5
23
@ARMY
ARMYL 85-95
+39.5
3
vsNJIT
NJITL 65-73
−2.5
8
@UVM
UVML 59-60
−21.5
over 8under 6avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UMass Lowell
4-10 overall · 2-0 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Bryant77–63
- Wvs UAlbany83–71
- L@ Iowa62–90
- L@ Boston U76–88
- Wvs Sacred Heart87–82
2 days since their last game.
Binghamton
1-13 overall · 0-2 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont59–60
- Lvs NJIT65–73
- L@ Army85–95
- L@ Mercyhurst61–82
- L@ Pitt63–103
2 days since their last game.