Iowa Hawkeyes at Purdue Boilermakers: Model Line and Edge

Tue, Dec 1, 7:00 PM ETMackey Arena · at Purdue · Conference game

#43IOWAIowa

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Iowa and Purdue
IOWA	This season	PUR
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects PUR 74–69 · win probability PUR 66%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 142.6

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: PUR has more of the edges

IOWA 1, PUR 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

PURBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: IOWA 30.2%, PUR 36.4%. Defensive: IOWA 70.8%, PUR 72.9%

IOWASmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: IOWA 15.1%, PUR 13.7%. Forced: IOWA 20.3%, PUR 15.3%

PURSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: IOWA 35.1, PUR 28.6. Allowed: IOWA 38.5, PUR 25.5

PURSmall

Home court

PUR at home. This season: PUR 0-0 at home, IOWA 0-0 away

PURSmall

IOWA offense vs PUR defense

Offense 69th of 366 against a defense 18th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: IOWA 61%, PUR 43%. Transfers in: IOWA 2, PUR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Context

Schedule so far

IOWA has played the 30th-hardest schedule, PUR the 6th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

PUR offense vs IOWA defense

Offense 38th of 366 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Tempo

About 64 possessions: IOWA plays 63.0 a game (365th fastest), PUR 65.4 (333rd). Faster games mean more points

Even

Three-pointers

IOWA hits 35.6% and allows 33.3%; PUR hits 38.3% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 43.0% and 40.2% of their shots

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: IOWA 56.4 and allows 52.6; PUR 57.6 and allows 52.4

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	PUR -4.6	—
Total	—	142.6	—
Projected score	—	IOWA 69 · PUR 73.6

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	PUR -2.6	—
1H total	66.7	—
1H projected score	IOWA 32.1 · PUR 34.7	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
IOWA LWWWL	21-16	57%	5-6	—
PUR WWWLL	17-22	44%	5-12	—

Venue/role: IOWA away; PUR home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
IOWA OUUOU	20-17	54%	24-13
PUR OOOOU	20-19	51%	30-9

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
IOWA	5-5 50%	5-5 50%	4-6 40%
PUR	8-2 80%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Iowa

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 7	vs IU	W74–57WU
Dec 10	vs ISU	L62–66WU
Dec 13	vs WIU	W77–58LU

Purdue

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 5	@ ISU	L58–81LU
Dec 8	@ WIS	L93–97LO
Dec 11	vs TENN	W72–66WU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22

IOWA 1–8 PURPUR leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · PUR has won the last 6 meetings · IOWA 3-6 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Feb 14, 2025-26	PUR 78 @ IOWA 57	IOWA +2.5	PUR W
Jan 14, 2025-26	IOWA 72 @ PUR 79	PUR -10.5	IOWA W
Feb 4, 2024-25	PUR 90 @ IOWA 81	IOWA +6.5	PUR W
Jan 20, 2023-24	PUR 84 @ IOWA 70	IOWA +7	PUR W
Dec 4, 2023-24	IOWA 68 @ PUR 87	PUR -14.5	PUR W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Iowa

37 games played

Straight up

24-13

65% wins

Against the spread

21-16

57% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-17

54% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1365%

W W W W W W W L W L W W W W L L L W W W W W W L L W L W L L L W L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1657%

W L W W W W W L W W W W L W L L W W L L W W L L L W L W L W L L L W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

20-1754%

O U U O O O U U O U O U O U O O O U U O O O O O U U O U U U O O O U U O U

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsRMU	W 101-69	-22.5	W +9.5	136.5	O 170
Nov 7	vsWIU	W 77-58	-30.5	L −11.5	145.5	U 135
Nov 14	vsXAV	W 81-62	-15.5	W +3.5	143.5	U 143
Nov 18	vsSEMO	W 99-70	-23.5	W +5.5	147.5	O 169
Nov 20	vsCHST	W 93-54	-31.5	W +7.5	142.5	O 147
Nov 25	vsMISS	W 74-69	-4.5	W +0.5	140.5	O 143
Nov 26	vsGCU	W 59-46	-8.5	W +4.5	143.5	U 105
Dec 2	@MSU	L 52-71	+5.5	L −13.5	133.5	U 123
Dec 6	vsMD	W 83-64	-10.5	W +8.5	137.5	O 147
Dec 11	@ISU	L 62-66	+11.5	W +7.5	141.5	U 128
Dec 14	vsWMU	W 91-51	-25.5	W +14.5	137.5	O 142
Dec 20	vsBUCK	W 94-39	-25.5	W +29.5	133.5	U 133
Dec 29	vsUML	W 90-62	-33.5	L −5.5	145.5	O 152
Jan 3	vsUCLA	W 74-61	-6.5	W +6.5	140.5	U 135
Jan 6	@MINN	L 67-70	-4.5	L −7.5	130.5	O 137
Jan 11	vsILL	L 69-75	+1.5	L −4.5	142.5	O 144
Jan 14	@PUR	L 72-79	+10.5	W +3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@IU	W 74-57	+3.5	W +20.5	146.5	U 131
Jan 20	vsRUTG	W 68-62	-17.5	L −11.5	140.5	U 130
Jan 28	vsUSC	W 73-72	-9.5	L −8.5	141.5	O 145
Feb 1	@ORE	W 84-66	-9.5	W +8.5	133.5	O 150
Feb 4	@WASH	W 84-74	-2.5	W +7.5	141.5	O 158
Feb 8	vsNU	W 76-70	-10.5	L −4.5	139.5	O 146
Feb 11	@MD	L 70-77	-10.5	L −17.5	138.5	O 147
Feb 14	vsPUR	L 57-78	+2.5	L −18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsNEB	W 57-52	-1.5	W +3.5	139.5	U 109
Feb 22	@WIS	L 71-84	+2.5	L −10.5	147.5	O 155
Feb 25	vsOSU	W 74-57	-6.5	W +10.5	141.5	U 131
Feb 28	@PSU	L 69-71	-9.5	L −11.5	143.5	U 140
Mar 5	vsMICH	L 68-71	+9.5	W +6.5	146.5	U 139
Mar 8	@NEB	L 75-84	+4.5	L −4.5	136.5	O 159
Mar 11	vsMD	W 75-64	-11.5	L −0.5	133.5	O 139
Mar 12	vsOSU	L 69-72	-1.5	L −4.5	140.5	O 141
Mar 20	vsCLEM	W 67-61	-1.5	W +4.5	130.5	U 128
Mar 22	vsFLA	W 73-72	+10.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 145
Mar 26	vsNEB	W 77-71	+1.5	W +7.5	131.5	O 148
Mar 28	vsILL	L 59-71	+6.5	L −5.5	138.5	U 130

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

RMU

W 101-69

+9.5

WIU

W 77-58

−11.5

XAV

W 81-62

+3.5

SEMO

W 99-70

+5.5

CHST

W 93-54

+7.5

MISS

W 74-69

+0.5

GCU

W 59-46

+4.5

MSU

L 52-71

−13.5

W 83-64

+8.5

ISU

L 62-66

+7.5

WMU

W 91-51

+14.5

BUCK

W 94-39

+29.5

UML

W 90-62

−5.5

UCLA

W 74-61

+6.5

MINN

L 67-70

−7.5

ILL

L 69-75

−4.5

PUR

L 72-79

+3.5

W 74-57

+20.5

RUTG

W 68-62

−11.5

USC

W 73-72

−8.5

ORE

W 84-66

+8.5

WASH

W 84-74

+7.5

W 76-70

−4.5

L 70-77

−17.5

PUR

L 57-78

−18.5

NEB

W 57-52

+3.5

WIS

L 71-84

−10.5

OSU

W 74-57

+10.5

PSU

L 69-71

−11.5

MICH

L 68-71

+6.5

NEB

L 75-84

−4.5

W 75-64

−0.5

OSU

L 69-72

−4.5

CLEM

W 67-61

+4.5

FLA

W 73-72

+11.5

NEB

W 77-71

+7.5

ILL

L 59-71

−5.5

covered 21didn’t cover 16avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

RMU

W 101-69

+33.5

WIU

W 77-58

−10.5

XAV

W 81-62

−0.5

SEMO

W 99-70

+21.5

CHST

W 93-54

+4.5

MISS

W 74-69

+2.5

GCU

W 59-46

−38.5

MSU

L 52-71

−10.5

W 83-64

+9.5

ISU

L 62-66

−13.5

WMU

W 91-51

+4.5

BUCK

W 94-39

−0.5

UML

W 90-62

+6.5

UCLA

W 74-61

−5.5

MINN

L 67-70

+6.5

ILL

L 69-75

+1.5

PUR

L 72-79

+5.5

W 74-57

−15.5

RUTG

W 68-62

−10.5

USC

W 73-72

+3.5

ORE

W 84-66

+16.5

WASH

W 84-74

+16.5

W 76-70

+6.5

L 70-77

+8.5

PUR

L 57-78

−7.5

NEB

W 57-52

−30.5

WIS

L 71-84

+7.5

OSU

W 74-57

−10.5

PSU

L 69-71

−3.5

MICH

L 68-71

−7.5

NEB

L 75-84

+22.5

W 75-64

+5.5

OSU

L 69-72

+0.5

CLEM

W 67-61

−2.5

FLA

W 73-72

−0.5

NEB

W 77-71

+16.5

ILL

L 59-71

−8.5

over 20under 17avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Purdue

39 games played

Straight up

30-9

77% wins

Against the spread

17-22

44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

30-977%

W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W L L L W W W W L W L L W L W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2244%

L L W L L W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L W L W W L W L L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1951%

U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O O U U O U O U O U O O O O U O O U U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsEVAN	W 82-51	-33.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 133
Nov 7	vsOAK	W 87-77	-31.5	L −21.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 13	@ALA	W 87-80	+3.5	W +10.5	172.5	U 167
Nov 16	vsAKR	W 97-79	-18.5	L −0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 20	vsMEM	W 80-71	-14.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 21	vsTTU	W 86-56	-3.5	W +26.5	153.5	U 142
Nov 28	vsEIU	W 109-62	-40.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 171
Dec 2	@RUTG	W 81-65	-13.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	vsISU	L 58-81	-4.5	L −27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 10	vsMINN	W 85-57	-19.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsMARQ	W 79-59	-16.5	W +3.5	154.5	U 138
Dec 20	vsAUB	W 88-60	-7.5	W +20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsKENT	W 101-60	-24.5	W +16.5	155.5	O 161
Jan 3	@WIS	W 89-73	-5.5	W +10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 7	vsWASH	W 81-73	-16.5	L −8.5	154.5	U 154
Jan 10	vsPSU	W 93-85	-22.5	L −14.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 14	vsIOWA	W 79-72	-10.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@USC	W 69-64	-9.5	L −4.5	155.5	U 133
Jan 20	@UCLA	L 67-69	-5.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 136
Jan 24	vsILL	L 82-88	-5.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 170
Jan 27	@IU	L 67-72	-4.5	L −9.5	150.5	U 139
Feb 1	@MD	W 93-63	-15.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 156
Feb 7	vsORE	W 68-64	-19.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 132
Feb 10	@NEB	W 80-77	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	@IOWA	W 78-57	-2.5	W +18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsMICH	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 20	vsIU	W 93-64	-11.5	W +17.5	150.5	O 157
Feb 26	vsMSU	L 74-76	-5.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 150
Mar 1	@OSU	L 74-82	-6.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 156
Mar 4	@NU	W 70-66	-12.5	L −8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	vsWIS	L 93-97	-9.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsNU	W 81-68	-13.5	L −0.5	139.5	O 149
Mar 13	vsNEB	W 74-58	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 14	vsUCLA	W 73-66	-7.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 15	vsMICH	W 80-72	+4.5	W +12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 20	vsQUC	W 104-71	-25.5	W +7.5	159.5	O 175
Mar 22	vsMIA	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 148
Mar 26	vsTEX	W 79-77	-8.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 156
Mar 28	vsARIZ	L 64-79	+5.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−2.5

OAK

W 87-77

−21.5

ALA

W 87-80

+10.5

AKR

W 97-79

−0.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

+26.5

EIU

W 109-62

+6.5

RUTG

W 81-65

+2.5

ISU

L 58-81

−27.5

MINN

W 85-57

+8.5

MARQ

W 79-59

+3.5

AUB

W 88-60

+20.5

KENT

W 101-60

+16.5

WIS

W 89-73

+10.5

WASH

W 81-73

−8.5

PSU

W 93-85

−14.5

IOWA

W 79-72

−3.5

USC

W 69-64

−4.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−7.5

ILL

L 82-88

−11.5

L 67-72

−9.5

W 93-63

+14.5

ORE

W 68-64

−15.5

NEB

W 80-77

+5.5

IOWA

W 78-57

+18.5

MICH

L 80-91

−8.5

W 93-64

+17.5

MSU

L 74-76

−7.5

OSU

L 74-82

−14.5

W 70-66

−8.5

WIS

L 93-97

−13.5

W 81-68

−0.5

NEB

W 74-58

+11.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−0.5

MICH

W 80-72

+12.5

QUC

W 104-71

+7.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

−6.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 22avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−17.5

OAK

W 87-77

+5.5

ALA

W 87-80

−5.5

AKR

W 97-79

+12.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

−11.5

EIU

W 109-62

+29.5

RUTG

W 81-65

−0.5

ISU

L 58-81

−15.5

MINN

W 85-57

−1.5

MARQ

W 79-59

−16.5

AUB

W 88-60

−4.5

KENT

W 101-60

+5.5

WIS

W 89-73

+8.5

WASH

W 81-73

−0.5

PSU

W 93-85

+25.5

IOWA

W 79-72

+5.5

USC

W 69-64

−22.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−11.5

ILL

L 82-88

+17.5

L 67-72

−11.5

W 93-63

+7.5

ORE

W 68-64

−12.5

NEB

W 80-77

+10.5

IOWA

W 78-57

−7.5

MICH

L 80-91

+14.5

W 93-64

+6.5

MSU

L 74-76

+6.5

OSU

L 74-82

+6.5

W 70-66

−9.5

WIS

L 93-97

+35.5

W 81-68

+9.5

NEB

W 74-58

−13.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−4.5

MICH

W 80-72

+2.5

QUC

W 104-71

+15.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

+9.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

over 20under 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Purdue has the better starters

Position by position: Iowa 1, Purdue 2, even 2

IowaBetterPurdue

G K. Combs6.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast Score 54

PURSmall

G C. Cox8.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

G T. Coleman TR10 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.7 ast Score 82

Even

G G. Harris4.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

F C. Koch7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 57

PURSmall

G J. Benter4.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

F C. Manyawu6.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.1 ast Score 90

IOWASmall

G O. Mayer5.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 64

C A. McKeever TR8.3 pts · 9.1 reb · 1.8 ast Score 77

Even

C D. Jacobsen5.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 88

IowaBetterPurdue

IOWA offense69th of 366 · +1.8

Even

PUR defense18th of 366 · +6.0

IOWA defense20th of 366 · +5.4

Even

PUR offense38th of 366 · +5.0

Backcourt+0.9 · 2 players

PURSmall

Backcourt+2.4 · 4 players

Frontcourt+4.1 · 3 players

IOWASmall

Frontcourt+1.8 · 1 player

Bench+2.0 · 5 players

IOWASmall

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestIOWA betterPUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Iowa

Guards

K. Combs26 minT. Coleman23 min · TRI. Howard18 minT. Sage16 minJ. Koch2 minP. McCollumNew

Forwards

C. Koch28 minC. Manyawu19 minJ. Matteoni4 minT. ThompsonNew

Centers

A. McKeever23 min · TRT. Jirak8 min

Purdue

Guards

C. Cox24 minG. Harris16 minJ. Benter15 minO. Mayer14 minJ. Rayl2 minJ. Lusk2 min

Forwards

S. KingNewC. PierceNewE. ShahrvinNewR. BurgessNewR. KnightNew

Centers

D. Jacobsen13 minS. HuanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

IOWA74.5 #177

PUR81.6 #35

Points per possession

IOWA1.18 #28

PUR1.25 #2

Pace (possessions)

IOWA63.0 #365

PUR65.4 #333

Shooting

Effective FG%

IOWA56.4 #17

PUR57.6 #10

3-point %

IOWA35.6 #85

PUR38.3 #11

3-point attempt rate

IOWA43.0 #117

PUR40.2 #164

Free throw rate

IOWA35.1 #176

PUR28.6 #336

Possessions

Turnover rate

IOWA15.1 #75

PUR13.7 #16

Offensive rebound rate

IOWA30.2 #192

PUR36.4 #19

Assists per game

IOWA15.0 #88

PUR19.6 #2

Defense

Points allowed

IOWA66.3 #16

PUR70.5 #65

Points allowed per possession

IOWA1.05 #91

PUR1.08 #162

Opponent effective FG%

IOWA52.6 #245

PUR52.4 #232

Opponent 3-point %

IOWA33.3 #143

PUR34.1 #192

Turnovers forced

IOWA20.3 #17

PUR15.3 #263

Defensive rebound rate

IOWA70.8 #119

PUR72.9 #39

Steals per game

IOWA6.8 #140

PUR5.5 #297

Blocks per game

IOWA1.9 #349

PUR2.8 #257

IOWA		PUR
Scoring
74.5 #177	Points per game	81.6 #35
1.18 #28	Points per possession	1.25 #2
63.0 #365	Pace (possessions)	65.4 #333
Shooting
56.4 #17	Effective FG%	57.6 #10
35.6 #85	3-point %	38.3 #11
43.0 #117	3-point attempt rate	40.2 #164
35.1 #176	Free throw rate	28.6 #336
Possessions
15.1 #75	Turnover rate	13.7 #16
30.2 #192	Offensive rebound rate	36.4 #19
15.0 #88	Assists per game	19.6 #2
Defense
66.3 #16	Points allowed	70.5 #65
1.05 #91	Points allowed per possession	1.08 #162
52.6 #245	Opponent effective FG%	52.4 #232
33.3 #143	Opponent 3-point %	34.1 #192
20.3 #17	Turnovers forced	15.3 #263
70.8 #119	Defensive rebound rate	72.9 #39
6.8 #140	Steals per game	5.5 #297
1.9 #349	Blocks per game	2.8 #257

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Iowa

24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Illinois59–71
Wvs Nebraska77–71
Wvs Florida73–72
Wvs Clemson67–61
Lvs Ohio State69–72

A week or more of rest.

Purdue

30-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arizona64–79
Wvs Texas79–77
Wvs Miami79–69
Wvs Queens University Royals104–71
Wvs Michigan80–72

A week or more of rest.

Iowa Hawkeyes at Purdue Boilermakers

What could decide it: PUR has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Iowa

Purdue

Purdue has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Iowa

Purdue