Carver-Hawkeye Arena · at Iowa
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IOWA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ISU 73–68 · win probability ISU 67%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ISU has more of the edges
ISU 5, IOWA 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: ISU 34.5, IOWA 35.1. Allowed: ISU 28.1, IOWA 38.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ISU 35.1%, IOWA 30.2%. Defensive: ISU 71.4%, IOWA 70.8%
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: ISU plays 68.5 a game (204th fastest), IOWA 63.0 (365th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
ISU hits 38.3% and allows 32.0%; IOWA hits 35.6% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 38.8% and 43.0% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: ISU 56.2 and allows 49.8; IOWA 56.4 and allows 52.6
IOWA offense vs ISU defense
Offense 69th of 366 against a defense 6th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
IOWA at home. This season: IOWA 0-0 at home, ISU 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ISU 14.9%, IOWA 15.1%. Forced: ISU 22.6%, IOWA 20.3%
Context
Schedule so far
ISU has played the 38th-hardest schedule, IOWA the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ISU 57%, IOWA 61%. Transfers in: ISU 5, IOWA 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
ISU offense vs IOWA defense
Offense 26th of 366 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ISU -5.0 | — |
| Total | — | 141.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | ISU 73.4 · IOWA 68.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ISU -3.1 | — |
| 1H total | 66.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | ISU 34.8 · IOWA 31.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ISU 4–1 IOWAISU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · ISU has won the last 3 meetings · ISU 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025-26 | IOWA 62 @ ISU 66 | ISU -11.5 | IOWA W |
| Dec 12, 2024-25 | ISU 89 @ IOWA 80 | IOWA +5.5 | ISU W |
| Dec 7, 2023-24 | IOWA 65 @ ISU 90 | ISU -7.5 | ISU W |
| Dec 8, 2022-23 | ISU 56 @ IOWA 75 | IOWA -2.5 | IOWA W |
| Dec 9, 2021-22 | IOWA 53 @ ISU 73 | ISU +5 | ISU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Iowa State
37 games played
Straight up
29-8
78% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-50 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 102-62 | -33.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 96-80 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 96-57 | -40.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-82 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-60 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 95-64 | -10.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 132-68 | -42.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 81-58 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 66-62 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 78-53 | -43.5 | L −18.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -37.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-61 | -35.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-59 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 70-60 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-71 | -19.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 63-84 | -3.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 70-79 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-57 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 84-71 | -10.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 97-67 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 95-61 | -12.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-69 | -14.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 55-62 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 74-56 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 70-67 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-79 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 75-59 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-82 | -10.5 | L −19.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 57-73 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-65 | -16.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-42 | -13.5 | W +35.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 75-53 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 80-82 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 108-74 | -24.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 82-63 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 62-76 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FDU
W 88-50
+0.5
6
vs
GRAM
W 102-62
+6.5
10
vs
MSST
W 96-80
+10.5
17
vs
STO
W 96-57
−1.5
24
vs
SJU
W 83-82
−1.5
25
vs
CREI
W 78-60
+8.5
26
vs
SYR
W 95-64
+20.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 132-68
+21.5
6
@
PUR
W 81-58
+27.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 66-62
−7.5
14
vs
EIU
W 78-53
−18.5
21
vs
LBSU
W 91-60
−6.5
29
vs
HCU
W 89-61
−7.5
2
vs
WVU
W 80-59
+4.5
7
@
BAY
W 70-60
+6.5
10
vs
OKST
W 83-71
−7.5
13
@
KU
L 63-84
−24.5
17
@
CIN
L 70-79
−14.5
20
vs
UCF
W 87-57
+15.5
24
@
OKST
W 84-71
+2.5
29
vs
COLO
W 97-67
+12.5
1
@
KSU
W 95-61
+21.5
7
vs
BAY
W 72-69
−11.5
10
@
TCU
L 55-62
−14.5
14
vs
KU
W 74-56
+10.5
16
vs
HOU
W 70-67
+0.5
21
@
BYU
L 69-79
−12.5
24
@
UTAH
W 75-59
+1.5
28
vs
TTU
L 73-82
−19.5
2
@
ARIZ
L 57-73
−8.5
7
vs
ASU
W 86-65
+4.5
11
vs
ASU
W 91-42
+35.5
12
vs
TTU
W 75-53
+14.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 80-82
+1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 108-74
+9.5
22
vs
UK
W 82-63
+13.5
27
vs
TENN
L 62-76
−16.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FDU
W 88-50
−9.5
6
vs
GRAM
W 102-62
+19.5
10
vs
MSST
W 96-80
+25.5
17
vs
STO
W 96-57
+6.5
24
vs
SJU
W 83-82
+6.5
25
vs
CREI
W 78-60
−14.5
26
vs
SYR
W 95-64
+13.5
3
vs
ALCN
W 132-68
+48.5
6
@
PUR
W 81-58
−15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 66-62
−13.5
14
vs
EIU
W 78-53
−13.5
21
vs
LBSU
W 91-60
+1.5
29
vs
HCU
W 89-61
+4.5
2
vs
WVU
W 80-59
−3.5
7
@
BAY
W 70-60
−25.5
10
vs
OKST
W 83-71
−11.5
13
@
KU
L 63-84
−5.5
17
@
CIN
L 70-79
+7.5
20
vs
UCF
W 87-57
−12.5
24
@
OKST
W 84-71
−7.5
29
vs
COLO
W 97-67
+11.5
1
@
KSU
W 95-61
−0.5
7
vs
BAY
W 72-69
−10.5
10
@
TCU
L 55-62
−30.5
14
vs
KU
W 74-56
−17.5
16
vs
HOU
W 70-67
+2.5
21
@
BYU
L 69-79
−6.5
24
@
UTAH
W 75-59
−10.5
28
vs
TTU
L 73-82
+9.5
2
@
ARIZ
L 57-73
−19.5
7
vs
ASU
W 86-65
+2.5
11
vs
ASU
W 91-42
−15.5
12
vs
TTU
W 75-53
−15.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 80-82
+17.5
20
vs
TNST
W 108-74
+34.5
22
vs
UK
W 82-63
−1.5
27
vs
TENN
L 62-76
−1.5
over 15under 22avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iowa
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
21-16
57% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 101-69 | -22.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 77-58 | -30.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 81-62 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-70 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 93-54 | -31.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 59-46 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-71 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 83-64 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 62-66 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 91-51 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-39 | -25.5 | W +29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-62 | -33.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-61 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 67-70 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 69-75 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-79 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-57 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-72 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 84-66 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 84-74 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 70-77 | -10.5 | L −17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-78 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 57-52 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-57 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-71 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 68-71 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 75-84 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-64 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 69-72 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 73-72 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 77-71 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 28 | vs | L 59-71 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+9.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−11.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
+3.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+5.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+7.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+0.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
+4.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−13.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+8.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
+7.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+14.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
+29.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
−5.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
+6.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
−7.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
−4.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+3.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
+20.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−11.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
−8.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+8.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+7.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
−4.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
−17.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−18.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
+3.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
−10.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
+10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−11.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
+6.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
−4.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
−0.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
−4.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
+4.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
+11.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+7.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−5.5
covered 21didn’t cover 16avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+33.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−10.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
−0.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+21.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+4.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+2.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
−38.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−10.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+9.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
−13.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
−0.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
+6.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
−5.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
+6.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
+1.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+5.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
−15.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−10.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
+3.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+16.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+16.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
+6.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
+8.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−7.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
−30.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
+7.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
−10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−3.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
−7.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
+22.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
+5.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
+0.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
−2.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
−0.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+16.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−8.5
over 20under 17avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Iowa State has the better starters
Position by position: Iowa State 2, Iowa 0, even 3
Iowa StateBetterIowa
G R. Prather TR16.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 84
←ISUSmall
G K. Combs6.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
G L. Bond TR12.1 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
=Even
G T. Coleman TR10 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 82
G T. Lipsey13.5 pts · 3.9 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 98
←ISUBig
F C. Koch7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 57
G J. Johnson TR16.8 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 98
=Even
F C. Manyawu6.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
G K. Toure8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 79
=Even
C A. McKeever TR8.3 pts · 9.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 77
Iowa StateBetterIowa
ISU offense26th of 366 · +7.0
=Even
IOWA defense20th of 366 · +5.4
ISU defense6th of 366 · +9.3
←ISUSmall
IOWA offense69th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+14.4 · 5 players
←ISUBig
Backcourt+0.9 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+4.1 · 3 players
Bench+4.1 · 5 players
←ISUSmall
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestISU betterIOWA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Prather35 min · TRL. Bond33 min · TRT. Lipsey32 minJ. Johnson31 min · TRK. Toure25 minJ. Batemon16 min
Forwards
T. Singleton25 min · TRB. Buchanan25 minT. Manning21 min · TRD. Pleta11 minX. Mitchell3 minD. Rinaldo-KomlanNew
Guards
K. Combs26 minT. Coleman23 min · TRI. Howard18 minT. Sage16 minJ. Koch2 minP. McCollumNew
Forwards
C. Koch28 minC. Manyawu19 minJ. Matteoni4 minT. ThompsonNew
Centers
A. McKeever23 min · TRT. Jirak8 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 82.0 #32 | Points per game | 74.5 #177 |
| 1.19 #20 | Points per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 68.5 #204 | Pace (possessions) | 63.0 #365 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.2 #20 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #17 |
| 38.3 #12 | 3-point % | 35.6 #85 |
| 38.8 #196 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #117 |
| 34.5 #194 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #176 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #58 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #75 |
| 35.1 #45 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #192 |
| 17.4 #16 | Assists per game | 15.0 #88 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.6 #9 | Points allowed | 66.3 #16 |
| 0.96 #4 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #91 |
| 49.8 #92 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #245 |
| 32.0 #63 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #143 |
| 22.6 #4 | Turnovers forced | 20.3 #17 |
| 71.4 #85 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #119 |
| 9.0 #9 | Steals per game | 6.8 #140 |
| 2.6 #289 | Blocks per game | 1.9 #349 |
Iowa State
29-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tennessee62–76
- Wvs Kentucky82–63
- Wvs Tennessee St108–74
- Lvs Arizona80–82
- Wvs Texas Tech75–53
A week or more of rest.
Iowa
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois59–71
- Wvs Nebraska77–71
- Wvs Florida73–72
- Wvs Clemson67–61
- Lvs Ohio State69–72
A week or more of rest.