Purdue Boilermakers at Iowa State Cyclones: Model Line and Edge

Sat, Dec 5, 8:00 PM ETHilton Coliseum · at Iowa State

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Purdue and Iowa State
PUR	This season	ISU
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects ISU 78–68 · win probability ISU 79%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 146.1

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: ISU has more of the edges

PUR 0, ISU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

ISUSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: PUR 13.7%, ISU 14.9%. Forced: PUR 15.3%, ISU 22.6%

ISUSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: PUR 57.6 and allows 52.4; ISU 56.2 and allows 49.8

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: PUR plays 65.4 a game (333rd fastest), ISU 68.5 (204th). Faster games mean more points

ISUSmall

Three-pointers

PUR hits 38.3% and allows 34.1%; ISU hits 38.3% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 40.2% and 38.8% of their shots

ISUSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: PUR 28.6, ISU 34.5. Allowed: PUR 25.5, ISU 28.1

ISUSmall

Home court

ISU at home. This season: ISU 0-0 at home, PUR 0-0 away

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: PUR 36.4%, ISU 35.1%. Defensive: PUR 72.9%, ISU 71.4%

Context

Schedule so far

PUR has played the 6th-hardest schedule, ISU the 38th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

PUR offense vs ISU defense

Offense 38th of 366 against a defense 6th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: PUR 43%, ISU 57%. Transfers in: PUR 0, ISU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

ISU offense vs PUR defense

Offense 26th of 366 against a defense 18th, on the model’s ratings

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	ISU -9.3	—
Total	—	146.1	—
Projected score	—	PUR 68.4 · ISU 77.7

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	ISU -5.4	—
1H total	68.3	—
1H projected score	PUR 31.4 · ISU 36.9	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
PUR WWWLL	17-22	44%	6-5	—
ISU WWWWL	22-15	59%	9-8	—

Venue/role: PUR away; ISU home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
PUR OOOOU	20-19	51%	30-9
ISU UOOUU	15-22	41%	29-8

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
PUR	8-2 80%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%
ISU	6-4 60%	7-3 70%	4-6 40%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Purdue

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 8	@ WIS	L93–97LO
Dec 11	vs TENN	W72–66WU

Iowa State

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 10	@ IOWA	W66–62LU
Dec 13	vs NCCU	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

PUR 0–1 ISUISU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PUR 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Dec 6, 2025-26	ISU 81 @ PUR 58	PUR -4.5	ISU W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Purdue

39 games played

Straight up

30-9

77% wins

Against the spread

17-22

44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

30-977%

W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W L L L W W W W L W L L W L W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2244%

L L W L L W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L W L W W L W L L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1951%

U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O O U U O U O U O U O O O O U O O U U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsEVAN	W 82-51	-33.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 133
Nov 7	vsOAK	W 87-77	-31.5	L −21.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 13	@ALA	W 87-80	+3.5	W +10.5	172.5	U 167
Nov 16	vsAKR	W 97-79	-18.5	L −0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 20	vsMEM	W 80-71	-14.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 21	vsTTU	W 86-56	-3.5	W +26.5	153.5	U 142
Nov 28	vsEIU	W 109-62	-40.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 171
Dec 2	@RUTG	W 81-65	-13.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	vsISU	L 58-81	-4.5	L −27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 10	vsMINN	W 85-57	-19.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsMARQ	W 79-59	-16.5	W +3.5	154.5	U 138
Dec 20	vsAUB	W 88-60	-7.5	W +20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsKENT	W 101-60	-24.5	W +16.5	155.5	O 161
Jan 3	@WIS	W 89-73	-5.5	W +10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 7	vsWASH	W 81-73	-16.5	L −8.5	154.5	U 154
Jan 10	vsPSU	W 93-85	-22.5	L −14.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 14	vsIOWA	W 79-72	-10.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@USC	W 69-64	-9.5	L −4.5	155.5	U 133
Jan 20	@UCLA	L 67-69	-5.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 136
Jan 24	vsILL	L 82-88	-5.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 170
Jan 27	@IU	L 67-72	-4.5	L −9.5	150.5	U 139
Feb 1	@MD	W 93-63	-15.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 156
Feb 7	vsORE	W 68-64	-19.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 132
Feb 10	@NEB	W 80-77	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	@IOWA	W 78-57	-2.5	W +18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsMICH	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 20	vsIU	W 93-64	-11.5	W +17.5	150.5	O 157
Feb 26	vsMSU	L 74-76	-5.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 150
Mar 1	@OSU	L 74-82	-6.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 156
Mar 4	@NU	W 70-66	-12.5	L −8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	vsWIS	L 93-97	-9.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsNU	W 81-68	-13.5	L −0.5	139.5	O 149
Mar 13	vsNEB	W 74-58	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 14	vsUCLA	W 73-66	-7.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 15	vsMICH	W 80-72	+4.5	W +12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 20	vsQUC	W 104-71	-25.5	W +7.5	159.5	O 175
Mar 22	vsMIA	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 148
Mar 26	vsTEX	W 79-77	-8.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 156
Mar 28	vsARIZ	L 64-79	+5.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−2.5

OAK

W 87-77

−21.5

ALA

W 87-80

+10.5

AKR

W 97-79

−0.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

+26.5

EIU

W 109-62

+6.5

RUTG

W 81-65

+2.5

ISU

L 58-81

−27.5

MINN

W 85-57

+8.5

MARQ

W 79-59

+3.5

AUB

W 88-60

+20.5

KENT

W 101-60

+16.5

WIS

W 89-73

+10.5

WASH

W 81-73

−8.5

PSU

W 93-85

−14.5

IOWA

W 79-72

−3.5

USC

W 69-64

−4.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−7.5

ILL

L 82-88

−11.5

L 67-72

−9.5

W 93-63

+14.5

ORE

W 68-64

−15.5

NEB

W 80-77

+5.5

IOWA

W 78-57

+18.5

MICH

L 80-91

−8.5

W 93-64

+17.5

MSU

L 74-76

−7.5

OSU

L 74-82

−14.5

W 70-66

−8.5

WIS

L 93-97

−13.5

W 81-68

−0.5

NEB

W 74-58

+11.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−0.5

MICH

W 80-72

+12.5

QUC

W 104-71

+7.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

−6.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 22avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−17.5

OAK

W 87-77

+5.5

ALA

W 87-80

−5.5

AKR

W 97-79

+12.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

−11.5

EIU

W 109-62

+29.5

RUTG

W 81-65

−0.5

ISU

L 58-81

−15.5

MINN

W 85-57

−1.5

MARQ

W 79-59

−16.5

AUB

W 88-60

−4.5

KENT

W 101-60

+5.5

WIS

W 89-73

+8.5

WASH

W 81-73

−0.5

PSU

W 93-85

+25.5

IOWA

W 79-72

+5.5

USC

W 69-64

−22.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−11.5

ILL

L 82-88

+17.5

L 67-72

−11.5

W 93-63

+7.5

ORE

W 68-64

−12.5

NEB

W 80-77

+10.5

IOWA

W 78-57

−7.5

MICH

L 80-91

+14.5

W 93-64

+6.5

MSU

L 74-76

+6.5

OSU

L 74-82

+6.5

W 70-66

−9.5

WIS

L 93-97

+35.5

W 81-68

+9.5

NEB

W 74-58

−13.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−4.5

MICH

W 80-72

+2.5

QUC

W 104-71

+15.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

+9.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

over 20under 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Iowa State

37 games played

Straight up

29-8

78% wins

Against the spread

22-15

59% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-22

41% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

29-878%

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L L W W W W W L W W L W L L W W W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

22-1559%

W W W L L W W W W L L L L W W L L L W W W W L L W W L W L L W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

15-2241%

U O O O O U O O U U U O O U U U U O U U O U U U U O U U O U O U U O O U U

2 straight unders2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsFDU	W 88-50	-37.5	W +0.5	147.5	U 138
Nov 6	vsGRAM	W 102-62	-33.5	W +6.5	144.5	O 164
Nov 10	vsMSST	W 96-80	-5.5	W +10.5	150.5	O 176
Nov 17	vsSTO	W 96-57	-40.5	L −1.5	146.5	O 153
Nov 24	vsSJU	W 83-82	-2.5	L −1.5	158.5	O 165
Nov 25	vsCREI	W 78-60	-9.5	W +8.5	152.5	U 138
Nov 26	vsSYR	W 95-64	-10.5	W +20.5	145.5	O 159
Dec 3	vsALCN	W 132-68	-42.5	W +21.5	151.5	O 200
Dec 6	@PUR	W 81-58	+4.5	W +27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 11	vsIOWA	W 66-62	-11.5	L −7.5	141.5	U 128
Dec 14	vsEIU	W 78-53	-43.5	L −18.5	144.5	U 131
Dec 21	vsLBSU	W 91-60	-37.5	L −6.5	149.5	O 151
Dec 29	vsHCU	W 89-61	-35.5	L −7.5	145.5	O 150
Jan 2	vsWVU	W 80-59	-16.5	W +4.5	142.5	U 139
Jan 7	@BAY	W 70-60	-3.5	W +6.5	155.5	U 130
Jan 10	vsOKST	W 83-71	-19.5	L −7.5	165.5	U 154
Jan 13	@KU	L 63-84	-3.5	L −24.5	152.5	U 147
Jan 17	@CIN	L 70-79	-5.5	L −14.5	141.5	O 149
Jan 20	vsUCF	W 87-57	-14.5	W +15.5	156.5	U 144
Jan 24	@OKST	W 84-71	-10.5	W +2.5	162.5	U 155
Jan 29	vsCOLO	W 97-67	-17.5	W +12.5	152.5	O 164
Feb 1	@KSU	W 95-61	-12.5	W +21.5	156.5	U 156
Feb 7	vsBAY	W 72-69	-14.5	L −11.5	151.5	U 141
Feb 10	@TCU	L 55-62	-7.5	L −14.5	147.5	U 117
Feb 14	vsKU	W 74-56	-7.5	W +10.5	147.5	U 130
Feb 16	vsHOU	W 70-67	-2.5	W +0.5	134.5	O 137
Feb 21	@BYU	L 69-79	-2.5	L −12.5	154.5	U 148
Feb 24	@UTAH	W 75-59	-14.5	W +1.5	144.5	U 134
Feb 28	vsTTU	L 73-82	-10.5	L −19.5	145.5	O 155
Mar 2	@ARIZ	L 57-73	+7.5	L −8.5	149.5	U 130
Mar 7	vsASU	W 86-65	-16.5	W +4.5	148.5	O 151
Mar 11	vsASU	W 91-42	-13.5	W +35.5	148.5	U 133
Mar 12	vsTTU	W 75-53	-7.5	W +14.5	143.5	U 128
Mar 13	vsARIZ	L 80-82	+3.5	W +1.5	144.5	O 162
Mar 20	vsTNST	W 108-74	-24.5	W +9.5	147.5	O 182
Mar 22	vsUK	W 82-63	-5.5	W +13.5	146.5	U 145
Mar 27	vsTENN	L 62-76	-2.5	L −16.5	139.5	U 138

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

FDU

W 88-50

+0.5

GRAM

W 102-62

+6.5

MSST

W 96-80

+10.5

STO

W 96-57

−1.5

SJU

W 83-82

−1.5

CREI

W 78-60

+8.5

SYR

W 95-64

+20.5

ALCN

W 132-68

+21.5

PUR

W 81-58

+27.5

IOWA

W 66-62

−7.5

EIU

W 78-53

−18.5

LBSU

W 91-60

−6.5

HCU

W 89-61

−7.5

WVU

W 80-59

+4.5

BAY

W 70-60

+6.5

OKST

W 83-71

−7.5

L 63-84

−24.5

CIN

L 70-79

−14.5

UCF

W 87-57

+15.5

OKST

W 84-71

+2.5

COLO

W 97-67

+12.5

KSU

W 95-61

+21.5

BAY

W 72-69

−11.5

TCU

L 55-62

−14.5

W 74-56

+10.5

HOU

W 70-67

+0.5

BYU

L 69-79

−12.5

UTAH

W 75-59

+1.5

TTU

L 73-82

−19.5

ARIZ

L 57-73

−8.5

ASU

W 86-65

+4.5

ASU

W 91-42

+35.5

TTU

W 75-53

+14.5

ARIZ

L 80-82

+1.5

TNST

W 108-74

+9.5

W 82-63

+13.5

TENN

L 62-76

−16.5

covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

FDU

W 88-50

−9.5

GRAM

W 102-62

+19.5

MSST

W 96-80

+25.5

STO

W 96-57

+6.5

SJU

W 83-82

+6.5

CREI

W 78-60

−14.5

SYR

W 95-64

+13.5

ALCN

W 132-68

+48.5

PUR

W 81-58

−15.5

IOWA

W 66-62

−13.5

EIU

W 78-53

−13.5

LBSU

W 91-60

+1.5

HCU

W 89-61

+4.5

WVU

W 80-59

−3.5

BAY

W 70-60

−25.5

OKST

W 83-71

−11.5

L 63-84

−5.5

CIN

L 70-79

+7.5

UCF

W 87-57

−12.5

OKST

W 84-71

−7.5

COLO

W 97-67

+11.5

KSU

W 95-61

−0.5

BAY

W 72-69

−10.5

TCU

L 55-62

−30.5

W 74-56

−17.5

HOU

W 70-67

+2.5

BYU

L 69-79

−6.5

UTAH

W 75-59

−10.5

TTU

L 73-82

+9.5

ARIZ

L 57-73

−19.5

ASU

W 86-65

+2.5

ASU

W 91-42

−15.5

TTU

W 75-53

−15.5

ARIZ

L 80-82

+17.5

TNST

W 108-74

+34.5

W 82-63

−1.5

TENN

L 62-76

−1.5

over 15under 22avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Iowa State has the better starters

Position by position: Purdue 0, Iowa State 2, even 3

PurdueBetterIowa State

G C. Cox8.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

Even

G R. Prather TR16.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.7 ast Score 84

G G. Harris4.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

Even

G L. Bond TR12.1 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.5 ast Score 74

G J. Benter4.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

ISUSmall

G T. Lipsey13.5 pts · 3.9 reb · 5.1 ast Score 98

G O. Mayer5.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 64

ISUSmall

G J. Johnson TR16.8 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast Score 98

C D. Jacobsen5.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 88

Even

G K. Toure8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.3 ast Score 79

PurdueBetterIowa State

PUR offense38th of 366 · +5.0

Even

ISU defense6th of 366 · +9.3

PUR defense18th of 366 · +6.0

Even

ISU offense26th of 366 · +7.0

Backcourt+2.4 · 4 players

ISUBig

Backcourt+14.4 · 5 players

Frontcourt+1.8 · 1 player

No call

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

ISUBig

Bench+4.1 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestPUR betterISU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Purdue

Guards

C. Cox24 minG. Harris16 minJ. Benter15 minO. Mayer14 minJ. Rayl2 minJ. Lusk2 min

Forwards

S. KingNewC. PierceNewE. ShahrvinNewR. BurgessNewR. KnightNew

Centers

D. Jacobsen13 minS. HuanNew

Iowa State

Guards

R. Prather35 min · TRL. Bond33 min · TRT. Lipsey32 minJ. Johnson31 min · TRK. Toure25 minJ. Batemon16 min

Forwards

T. Singleton25 min · TRB. Buchanan25 minT. Manning21 min · TRD. Pleta11 minX. Mitchell3 minD. Rinaldo-KomlanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

PUR81.6 #35

ISU82.0 #32

Points per possession

PUR1.25 #2

ISU1.19 #20

Pace (possessions)

PUR65.4 #333

ISU68.5 #204

Shooting

Effective FG%

PUR57.6 #10

ISU56.2 #20

3-point %

PUR38.3 #11

ISU38.3 #12

3-point attempt rate

PUR40.2 #164

ISU38.8 #196

Free throw rate

PUR28.6 #336

ISU34.5 #194

Possessions

Turnover rate

PUR13.7 #16

ISU14.9 #58

Offensive rebound rate

PUR36.4 #19

ISU35.1 #45

Assists per game

PUR19.6 #2

ISU17.4 #16

Defense

Points allowed

PUR70.5 #65

ISU65.6 #9

Points allowed per possession

PUR1.08 #162

ISU0.96 #4

Opponent effective FG%

PUR52.4 #232

ISU49.8 #92

Opponent 3-point %

PUR34.1 #192

ISU32.0 #63

Turnovers forced

PUR15.3 #263

ISU22.6 #4

Defensive rebound rate

PUR72.9 #39

ISU71.4 #85

Steals per game

PUR5.5 #297

ISU9.0 #9

Blocks per game

PUR2.8 #257

ISU2.6 #289

PUR		ISU
Scoring
81.6 #35	Points per game	82.0 #32
1.25 #2	Points per possession	1.19 #20
65.4 #333	Pace (possessions)	68.5 #204
Shooting
57.6 #10	Effective FG%	56.2 #20
38.3 #11	3-point %	38.3 #12
40.2 #164	3-point attempt rate	38.8 #196
28.6 #336	Free throw rate	34.5 #194
Possessions
13.7 #16	Turnover rate	14.9 #58
36.4 #19	Offensive rebound rate	35.1 #45
19.6 #2	Assists per game	17.4 #16
Defense
70.5 #65	Points allowed	65.6 #9
1.08 #162	Points allowed per possession	0.96 #4
52.4 #232	Opponent effective FG%	49.8 #92
34.1 #192	Opponent 3-point %	32.0 #63
15.3 #263	Turnovers forced	22.6 #4
72.9 #39	Defensive rebound rate	71.4 #85
5.5 #297	Steals per game	9.0 #9
2.8 #257	Blocks per game	2.6 #289

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Purdue

30-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arizona64–79
Wvs Texas79–77
Wvs Miami79–69
Wvs Queens University Royals104–71
Wvs Michigan80–72

A week or more of rest.

Iowa State

29-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Tennessee62–76
Wvs Kentucky82–63
Wvs Tennessee St108–74
Lvs Arizona80–82
Wvs Texas Tech75–53

A week or more of rest.

Purdue Boilermakers at Iowa State Cyclones

What could decide it: ISU has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Purdue

Iowa State

Iowa State has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Purdue

Iowa State