Wintrust Arena · at DePaul
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEP 78–73 · win probability DEP 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
USF 2, DEP 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: USF plays 74.4 a game (9th fastest), DEP 67.7 (240th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: USF 15.1%, DEP 17.7%. Forced: USF 19.1%, DEP 18.7%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: USF 38.1%, DEP 30.1%. Defensive: USF 68.1%, DEP 69.0%
Home court
DEP at home. This season: DEP 0-0 at home, USF 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: USF 14%, DEP 38%. Transfers in: USF 10, DEP 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: USF 40.4, DEP 35.3. Allowed: USF 39.0, DEP 37.8
Even
DEP offense vs USF defense
Offense 92nd of 366 against a defense 121st, on the model’s ratings
Even
USF offense vs DEP defense
Offense 59th of 366 against a defense 31st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
USF hits 32.5% and allows 34.5%; DEP hits 32.5% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 43.8% and 39.0% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: USF 50.6 and allows 48.8; DEP 49.8 and allows 49.3
Context
Schedule so far
USF has played the 89th-hardest schedule, DEP the 72nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEP -4.7 | — |
| Total | — | 150.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | USF 72.8 · DEP 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEP -2.7 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | USF 33.8 · DEP 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Florida
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-67 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 95-99 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-50 | -34.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 108-89 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 95-103 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 97-91 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-83 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 81-75 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 93-104 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-69 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 106-109 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-70 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-78 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-71 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 97-83 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 109-88 | -23.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 80-74 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-56 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 90-62 | -15.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 96-89 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-60 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-64 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+9.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
−5.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
+15.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+11.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
−4.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−10.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
−1.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−17.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
+10.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−7.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+3.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
−11.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−0.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+16.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−7.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
−8.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
+10.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
+8.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+5.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
−10.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
−2.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
+1.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
+5.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−2.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
+11.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
+7.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
+12.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
−0.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
+5.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
+6.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
+8.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+15.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
+34.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
−17.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+19.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
+20.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−28.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−4.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
−27.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−4.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+18.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
+51.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−3.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+7.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−5.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
+12.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
−17.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
−2.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+21.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
+2.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
+32.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
−16.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
−36.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−1.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
−10.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
−26.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
−3.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
+21.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
−13.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
−3.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
−26.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
+1.5
over 15under 18avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
DePaul
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-21
34% overs · avg −5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-62 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 72-64 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 53-66 | -18.5 | L −31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-62 | -21.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-75 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-61 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-96 | +5.5 | L −27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 76-72 | -23.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 92-49 | -21.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 61-58 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 66-79 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 54-72 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 56-50 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-75 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-68 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 56-68 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-90 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 72-71 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 69-57 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-71 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-71 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 62-51 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 57-76 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-81 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 56-63 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+5.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−14.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−31.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+3.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
+9.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+0.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
+12.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
−27.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−19.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
+21.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
+10.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
+6.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−5.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
+7.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+6.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
+3.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
+7.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+2.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+0.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
+9.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−5.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
+2.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−2.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
−13.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+2.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
+19.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−5.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+4.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
+15.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−17.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
−14.5
11
vs
GTWN
L 56-63
−5.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+10.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−11.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−34.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+14.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
−0.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+18.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
−11.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−8.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
−9.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
−26.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
−2.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−7.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
−2.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+13.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
−38.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
−5.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+9.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+19.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
−8.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−8.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
−16.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−21.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
+8.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+1.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
−3.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−13.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+0.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
−26.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−2.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
+9.5
11
vs
GTWN
L 56-63
−17.5
over 11under 21avg −5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: South Florida 1, DePaul 1, even 3
South FloridaBetterDePaul
G S. Wilson TR17.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
→DEPSmall
G K. Holmes TR19.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 96
G A. Dancler TR15.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 72
←USFSmall
G A. Popoola TR10.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
G J. Omojafo11 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 80
=Even
G L. Blocker11.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 77
G A. Shoshkikj TR10.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 73
=Even
G K. Cotton TR14.1 pts · 5.5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
F R. Goods TR7.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 41
=Even
C W. Jacques TR8.9 pts · 8.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 52
South FloridaBetterDePaul
USF offense59th of 366 · +2.7
=Even
DEP defense31st of 366 · +3.5
USF defense121st of 366 · -2.1
=Even
DEP offense92nd of 366 · -0.3
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
→DEPSmall
Backcourt+7.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
→DEPSmall
Frontcourt+0.5 · 1 player
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
→DEPSmall
Bench+0.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUSF betterDEP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Wilson37 min · TRA. Dancler34 min · TRJ. Omojafo28 minA. Shoshkikj26 min · TRC. Davis18 min · TRM. James11 min · TR
Forwards
R. Goods25 min · TRG. Johnson23 min · TRJ. Lewis23 min · TRZ. High9 min · TRR. StevensonNewJ. FeldhausNew
Centers
T. Diawara3 min · TR
Guards
K. Holmes32 min · TRA. Popoola29 min · TRL. Blocker29 minK. Cotton28 min · TRN. Meeusen27 min · TRK. McClure19 min
Forwards
M. Gwath19 min · TRT. Pierre-Justin16 minJ. JohnsonNewA. JensenNew
Centers
W. Jacques28 min · TRF. Flores11 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.8 #6 | Points per game | 70.3 #279 |
| 1.17 #42 | Points per possession | 1.04 #280 |
| 74.4 #9 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #240 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #209 | Effective FG% | 49.8 #243 |
| 32.5 #255 | 3-point % | 32.5 #253 |
| 43.8 #93 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.0 #191 |
| 40.4 #55 | Free throw rate | 35.3 #169 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.1 #73 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #253 |
| 38.1 #7 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.1 #197 |
| 16.8 #28 | Assists per game | 15.0 #87 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.5 #230 | Points allowed | 69.6 #57 |
| 1.03 #54 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #55 |
| 48.8 #58 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.3 #77 |
| 34.5 #218 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #274 |
| 19.1 #42 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #64 |
| 68.1 #252 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #205 |
| 9.0 #8 | Steals per game | 6.9 #134 |
| 4.0 #72 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #152 |
South Florida
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisville79–83
- Wvs Wichita St70–55
- Wvs Charlotte86–64
- Wvs Charlotte83–60
- W@ Memphis96–89
A week or more of rest.
DePaul
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Georgetown56–63
- Lvs Butler71–81
- Lvs Villanova57–76
- W@ Marquette62–51
- W@ Creighton72–71
A week or more of rest.