Alumni Hall (Navy) · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USF 79–73 · win probability USF 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JOES has more of the edges
JOES 2, USF 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JOES 16.8%, USF 15.1%. Forced: JOES 15.0%, USF 19.1%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: JOES plays 68.4 a game (208th fastest), USF 74.4 (9th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
JOES hits 30.8% and allows 31.7%; USF hits 32.5% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 45.1% and 43.8% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JOES 40%, USF 14%. Transfers in: JOES 2, USF 10. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JOES 31.4%, USF 38.1%. Defensive: JOES 69.4%, USF 68.1%
Even
USF offense vs JOES defense
Offense 59th of 366 against a defense 91st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: JOES 49.2 and allows 47.6; USF 50.6 and allows 48.8
Context
Schedule so far
JOES has played the 102nd-hardest schedule, USF the 89th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
JOES offense vs USF defense
Offense 134th of 366 against a defense 121st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: JOES 29.7, USF 40.4. Allowed: JOES 26.9, USF 39.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USF -6.1 | — |
| Total | — | 152.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | JOES 73 · USF 79.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USF -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | JOES 33.8 · USF 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
JOES 0–1 USFUSF leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · JOES 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2022-23 | USF 75 vs JOES 62 | JOES -2.5 | USF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Joseph's
34 games played
Straight up
22-12
65% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-23
32% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-76 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-65 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 59-94 | +12.5 | L −22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 74-83 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 85-99 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 60-58 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 87-65 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 63-71 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 67-51 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 62-68 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 79-102 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 56-62 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-90 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-65 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 68-64 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 72-79 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-74 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 85-64 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-58 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 64-68 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 71-65 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-61 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 81-63 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 61-55 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 70-67 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 88-76 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 69-64 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 76-75 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 24 | @ | L 69-84 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
−4.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−22.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
−3.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−3.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
−0.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
+3.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−1.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−13.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
−3.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−4.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+8.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
+9.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
+5.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
+7.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+13.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+19.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
+6.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
+4.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−7.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
+11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
+4.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+19.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
+8.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+4.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+0.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
+9.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−6.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
+10.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
+6.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−4.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
+22.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−5.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−6.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
+22.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−28.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
−8.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
+5.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
−12.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−19.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−14.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
+19.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−21.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+37.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
−18.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
−15.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
−0.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+15.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+5.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
−17.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
−6.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−27.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−3.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
−11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
−6.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+7.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
−25.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+21.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
−5.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−4.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
−11.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−2.5
over 11under 23avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Florida
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-67 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 95-99 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-50 | -34.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 108-89 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 95-103 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 97-91 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-83 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 81-75 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 93-104 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-69 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 106-109 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-70 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-78 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-71 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 97-83 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 109-88 | -23.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 80-74 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-56 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 90-62 | -15.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 96-89 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-60 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-64 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+9.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
−5.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
+15.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+11.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
−4.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−10.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
−1.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−17.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
+10.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−7.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+3.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
−11.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−0.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+16.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−7.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
−8.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
+10.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
+8.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+5.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
−10.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
−2.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
+1.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
+5.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−2.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
+11.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
+7.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
+12.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
−0.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
+5.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
+6.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
+8.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+15.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
+34.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
−17.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+19.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
+20.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−28.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−4.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
−27.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−4.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+18.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
+51.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−3.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+7.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−5.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
+12.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
−17.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
−2.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+21.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
+2.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
+32.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
−16.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
−36.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−1.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
−10.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
−26.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
−3.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
+21.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
−13.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
−3.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
−26.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
+1.5
over 15under 18avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Florida has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Joseph's 1, South Florida 2, even 2
Saint Joseph'sBetterSouth Florida
G J. Glover-Toscano15.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 80
=Even
G S. Wilson TR17.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
G A. Williford7.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 46
→USFSmall
G A. Dancler TR15.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 72
G L. Carey TR9.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 60
→USFSmall
G J. Omojafo11 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 80
G K. Myers4.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 59
=Even
G A. Shoshkikj TR10.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 73
F S. Logan TR3.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 58
←JOESSmall
F R. Goods TR7.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 41
Saint Joseph'sBetterSouth Florida
JOES offense134th of 366 · -3.9
=Even
USF defense121st of 366 · -2.1
JOES defense91st of 366 · -0.3
=Even
USF offense59th of 366 · +2.7
Backcourt+0.6 · 4 players
→USFBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestJOES betterUSF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Glover-Toscano32 minA. Williford26 minL. Carey26 min · TRK. Myers15 minM. Johnson4 minB. Rayer1 min
Forwards
S. Logan16 min · TRW. Lange1 minG. MarrsNewL. NonfonNewD. FlamerNewK. SaccoNew
Guards
S. Wilson37 min · TRA. Dancler34 min · TRJ. Omojafo28 minA. Shoshkikj26 min · TRC. Davis18 min · TRM. James11 min · TR
Forwards
R. Goods25 min · TRG. Johnson23 min · TRJ. Lewis23 min · TRZ. High9 min · TRR. StevensonNewJ. FeldhausNew
Centers
T. Diawara3 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #245 | Points per game | 86.8 #6 |
| 1.05 #244 | Points per possession | 1.17 #42 |
| 68.4 #208 | Pace (possessions) | 74.4 #9 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.2 #284 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #209 |
| 30.8 #325 | 3-point % | 32.5 #255 |
| 45.1 #65 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #93 |
| 29.7 #318 | Free throw rate | 40.4 #55 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #187 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #73 |
| 31.4 #147 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.1 #7 |
| 15.1 #84 | Assists per game | 16.8 #28 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.6 #68 | Points allowed | 76.5 #230 |
| 1.03 #59 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #54 |
| 47.6 #34 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.8 #58 |
| 31.7 #51 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #218 |
| 15.0 #286 | Turnovers forced | 19.1 #42 |
| 69.4 #185 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.1 #252 |
| 5.5 #290 | Steals per game | 9.0 #8 |
| 4.6 #30 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #72 |
Saint Joseph's
22-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico69–84
- W@ California76–75
- W@ Colorado St69–64
- Lvs VCU64–77
- Wvs Davidson70–58
A week or more of rest.
South Florida
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisville79–83
- Wvs Wichita St70–55
- Wvs Charlotte86–64
- Wvs Charlotte83–60
- W@ Memphis96–89
A week or more of rest.