Tucker Center · at Florida St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FSU 81–66 · win probability FSU 91%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FSU has more of the edges
BALL 0, FSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
BALL has played the 236th-hardest schedule, FSU the 73rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: BALL plays 65.9 a game (317th fastest), FSU 71.8 (41st). Faster games mean more points
BALL offense vs FSU defense
Offense 221st of 366 against a defense 98th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BALL 47.0 and allows 52.7; FSU 52.3 and allows 52.2
FSU offense vs BALL defense
Offense 73rd of 366 against a defense 159th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FSU at home. This season: FSU 0-0 at home, BALL 0-0 away
Three-pointers
BALL hits 31.4% and allows 34.8%; FSU hits 33.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 39.4% and 50.6% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BALL 16.2%, FSU 15.2%. Forced: BALL 18.7%, FSU 19.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BALL 25%, FSU 9%. Transfers in: BALL 9, FSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BALL 31.6, FSU 34.7. Allowed: BALL 32.1, FSU 32.7
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BALL 27.1%, FSU 30.8%. Defensive: BALL 69.0%, FSU 65.9%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FSU -15.1 | — |
| Total | — | 147.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | BALL 66.2 · FSU 81.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FSU -8.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | BALL 30.1 · FSU 38.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Ball State
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-20
31% overs · avg −5.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 55-86 | +26.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-68 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 52-70 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 73-80 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 37-55 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 140.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 96-85 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-64 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-68 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 64-69 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 77-86 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 72-85 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 52-74 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-79 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 77-87 | +20.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 68-67 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 58-53 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-73 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 52-77 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 53-63 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 68-75 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 57-69 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 65-78 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 74-73 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-43 | +1.5 | W +37.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 74-71 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-69 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UL
W 75-64
+6.5
11
@
WIS
L 55-86
−4.5
15
vs
LR
L 62-68
−8.5
22
@
INST
L 52-70
−10.5
28
vs
MONM
L 73-80
−4.5
29
@
LAF
L 37-55
−19.5
30
vs
LEM
W 96-85
+12.5
3
@
EVAN
L 52-64
−5.5
9
vs
SDST
L 64-68
+1.5
14
@
CAM
L 64-69
+3.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
−1.5
3
@
BUF
L 72-85
−6.5
6
vs
EMU
L 52-74
−23.5
10
@
MASS
L 71-79
+2.5
13
@
AKR
L 77-87
+10.5
16
vs
OHIO
W 76-71
+10.5
20
@
CMU
W 68-67
−0.5
24
vs
NIU
W 58-53
−0.5
31
@
TOL
L 55-73
−9.5
3
@
BGSU
L 52-77
−13.5
7
@
ULM
W 73-68
+0.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-63
−11.5
14
vs
KENT
L 68-75
+0.5
17
@
OHIO
L 57-69
−2.5
20
vs
AKR
L 65-78
+0.5
24
vs
MASS
W 74-73
+4.5
28
@
NIU
W 79-43
+37.5
3
@
WMU
W 74-71
+4.5
6
vs
CMU
W 85-69
+13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UL
W 75-64
−2.5
11
@
WIS
L 55-86
−15.5
15
vs
LR
L 62-68
−16.5
22
@
INST
L 52-70
−32.5
28
vs
MONM
L 73-80
+16.5
29
@
LAF
L 37-55
−48.5
30
vs
LEM
W 96-85
+40.5
3
@
EVAN
L 52-64
−20.5
9
vs
SDST
L 64-68
−10.5
14
@
CAM
L 64-69
−12.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
+15.5
3
@
BUF
L 72-85
+11.5
6
vs
EMU
L 52-74
−11.5
10
@
MASS
L 71-79
+2.5
13
@
AKR
L 77-87
+11.5
16
vs
OHIO
W 76-71
−0.5
20
@
CMU
W 68-67
−7.5
24
vs
NIU
W 58-53
−30.5
31
@
TOL
L 55-73
−18.5
3
@
BGSU
L 52-77
−8.5
7
@
ULM
W 73-68
−2.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-63
−25.5
14
vs
KENT
L 68-75
−0.5
17
@
OHIO
L 57-69
−19.5
20
vs
AKR
L 65-78
−4.5
24
vs
MASS
W 74-73
+3.5
28
@
NIU
W 79-43
−11.5
3
@
WMU
W 74-71
+6.5
6
vs
CMU
W 85-69
+19.5
over 9under 20avg −5.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Florida St
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 108-76 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-64 | -24.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 76-78 | +17.5 | W +15.5 | 180.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-73 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-72 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-59 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 59-95 | -1.5 | L −37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-107 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-82 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 95-103 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 165.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-97 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 96-49 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 87-63 | -23.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 66-79 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-91 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-113 | +4.5 | L −39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 65-63 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-83 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 63-61 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 58-61 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 92-69 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 80-72 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-71 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 95-89 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +16.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+4.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
+12.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
+15.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
+7.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
+3.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−37.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
−35.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
−2.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
−20.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
−21.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
+6.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
+0.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−0.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+12.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
−39.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
−3.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+0.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
+12.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
+8.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−1.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+4.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+4.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
+5.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+27.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
−3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
+13.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
−7.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
+3.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
−0.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+11.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+4.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+15.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+27.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
−1.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
−26.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
−5.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
−11.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−20.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
+3.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
+0.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
+32.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
+3.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
−19.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
−9.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−21.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+14.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
+21.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
+19.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−31.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
−35.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
−0.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−33.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+15.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+6.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
−36.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+4.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
+3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
−10.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
+3.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
−7.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+10.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+29.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+8.5
over 17under 16avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Florida St has the better starters
Position by position: Ball State 1, Florida St 4, even 0
Ball StateBetterFlorida St
G Z. Collins TR11.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 73
→FSUSmall
G K. Taylor TR19.8 pts · 5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 90
G S. Blake TR10.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 53
→FSUSmall
G A. Robinson TR8.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 73
G J. Guy-King TR10 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 50
→FSUSmall
F S. Rancik TR12.3 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
G K. Parker TR10.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 78
←BALLBig
F C. Schwieger TR5.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
F M. Jones4.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
→FSUBig
F S. Abaev TR7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
Ball StateBetterFlorida St
BALL offense221st of 366 · -6.7
→FSUSmall
FSU defense98th of 366 · -0.7
BALL defense159th of 366 · -3.5
→FSUSmall
FSU offense73rd of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt+0.6 · 4 players
→FSUBig
Backcourt+3.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 1 player
→FSUBig
Frontcourt+1.4 · 3 players
Bench-1.4 · 5 players
→FSUSmall
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestBALL betterFSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Collins31 min · TRS. Blake29 min · TRJ. Guy-King23 min · TRK. Parker21 min · TRJ. Hart19 minT. Lewis18 min · TR
Forwards
M. Jones31 minB. Durodola19 min · TRK. WrightNewK. McGrewNew
Centers
J. Smith9 min · TR
Guards
K. Taylor36 min · TRA. Robinson27 min · TRJ. Crawford1 minJ. LopezNewA. RobinsonNewB. BassNew
Forwards
S. Rancik28 min · TRC. Schwieger20 min · TRS. Abaev16 min · TRA. Swinton16 minC. PaulNew
Centers
M. PonderNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.1 #345 | Points per game | 80.4 #58 |
| 1.00 #325 | Points per possession | 1.12 #101 |
| 65.9 #317 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #41 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.0 #336 | Effective FG% | 52.3 #132 |
| 31.4 #312 | 3-point % | 33.1 #226 |
| 39.4 #186 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.6 #13 |
| 31.6 #263 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #191 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #151 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #80 |
| 27.1 #290 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.8 #170 |
| 12.4 #259 | Assists per game | 14.3 #124 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #88 | Points allowed | 77.9 #264 |
| 1.09 #184 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #178 |
| 52.7 #253 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.2 #226 |
| 34.8 #239 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #228 |
| 18.7 #60 | Turnovers forced | 19.0 #51 |
| 69.0 #204 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.9 #319 |
| 7.5 #88 | Steals per game | 7.9 #44 |
| 2.7 #286 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #84 |
Ball State
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-11 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs C Michigan85–69
- W@ W Michigan74–71
- W@ N Illinois79–43
- Wvs UMass74–73
- Lvs Akron65–78
A week or more of rest.
Florida St
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke79–80
- Wvs California95–89
- Wvs SMU91–78
- W@ Pitt75–74
- W@ Georgia Tech80–71
A week or more of rest.