James A. Rhodes Arena · at Akron · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AKR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AKR 79–69 · win probability AKR 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: AKR has more of the edges
BALL 0, AKR 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: BALL 47.0 and allows 52.7; AKR 58.1 and allows 51.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BALL 27.1%, AKR 33.4%. Defensive: BALL 69.0%, AKR 70.1%
Three-pointers
BALL hits 31.4% and allows 34.8%; AKR hits 38.2% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 39.4% and 44.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BALL plays 65.9 a game (317th fastest), AKR 71.1 (70th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
BALL has played the 236th-hardest schedule, AKR the 159th. A record against a soft schedule means less
AKR offense vs BALL defense
Offense 101st of 366 against a defense 159th, on the model’s ratings
BALL offense vs AKR defense
Offense 221st of 366 against a defense 168th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
AKR at home. This season: AKR 0-0 at home, BALL 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BALL 31.6, AKR 29.2. Allowed: BALL 32.1, AKR 30.4
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BALL 16.2%, AKR 15.5%. Forced: BALL 18.7%, AKR 18.3%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BALL 25%, AKR 28%. Transfers in: BALL 9, AKR 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AKR -9.9 | — |
| Total | — | 148.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | BALL 69.3 · AKR 79.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AKR -5.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BALL 31.9 · AKR 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 9-1 90% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
BALL 1–8 AKRAKR leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · AKR has won the last 6 meetings · BALL 7-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025-26 | AKR 78 @ BALL 65 | BALL +13.5 | BALL W |
| Jan 13, 2025-26 | BALL 77 @ AKR 87 | AKR -20.5 | BALL W |
| Feb 25, 2024-25 | AKR 87 @ BALL 82 | BALL +6.5 | BALL W |
| Feb 4, 2024-25 | BALL 73 @ AKR 81 | AKR -13.5 | BALL W |
| Jan 9, 2023-24 | AKR 80 @ BALL 76 | BALL +7.5 | BALL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Ball State
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-20
31% overs · avg −5.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 55-86 | +26.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-68 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 52-70 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 73-80 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 37-55 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 140.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 96-85 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-64 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-68 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 64-69 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 77-86 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 72-85 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 52-74 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-79 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 77-87 | +20.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 68-67 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 58-53 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-73 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 52-77 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 73-68 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 53-63 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 68-75 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 57-69 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 65-78 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 74-73 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-43 | +1.5 | W +37.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 74-71 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-69 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UL
W 75-64
+6.5
11
@
WIS
L 55-86
−4.5
15
vs
LR
L 62-68
−8.5
22
@
INST
L 52-70
−10.5
28
vs
MONM
L 73-80
−4.5
29
@
LAF
L 37-55
−19.5
30
vs
LEM
W 96-85
+12.5
3
@
EVAN
L 52-64
−5.5
9
vs
SDST
L 64-68
+1.5
14
@
CAM
L 64-69
+3.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
−1.5
3
@
BUF
L 72-85
−6.5
6
vs
EMU
L 52-74
−23.5
10
@
MASS
L 71-79
+2.5
13
@
AKR
L 77-87
+10.5
16
vs
OHIO
W 76-71
+10.5
20
@
CMU
W 68-67
−0.5
24
vs
NIU
W 58-53
−0.5
31
@
TOL
L 55-73
−9.5
3
@
BGSU
L 52-77
−13.5
7
@
ULM
W 73-68
+0.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-63
−11.5
14
vs
KENT
L 68-75
+0.5
17
@
OHIO
L 57-69
−2.5
20
vs
AKR
L 65-78
+0.5
24
vs
MASS
W 74-73
+4.5
28
@
NIU
W 79-43
+37.5
3
@
WMU
W 74-71
+4.5
6
vs
CMU
W 85-69
+13.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UL
W 75-64
−2.5
11
@
WIS
L 55-86
−15.5
15
vs
LR
L 62-68
−16.5
22
@
INST
L 52-70
−32.5
28
vs
MONM
L 73-80
+16.5
29
@
LAF
L 37-55
−48.5
30
vs
LEM
W 96-85
+40.5
3
@
EVAN
L 52-64
−20.5
9
vs
SDST
L 64-68
−10.5
14
@
CAM
L 64-69
−12.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
+15.5
3
@
BUF
L 72-85
+11.5
6
vs
EMU
L 52-74
−11.5
10
@
MASS
L 71-79
+2.5
13
@
AKR
L 77-87
+11.5
16
vs
OHIO
W 76-71
−0.5
20
@
CMU
W 68-67
−7.5
24
vs
NIU
W 58-53
−30.5
31
@
TOL
L 55-73
−18.5
3
@
BGSU
L 52-77
−8.5
7
@
ULM
W 73-68
−2.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-63
−25.5
14
vs
KENT
L 68-75
−0.5
17
@
OHIO
L 57-69
−19.5
20
vs
AKR
L 65-78
−4.5
24
vs
MASS
W 74-73
+3.5
28
@
NIU
W 79-43
−11.5
3
@
WMU
W 74-71
+6.5
6
vs
CMU
W 85-69
+19.5
over 9under 20avg −5.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Akron
33 games played
Straight up
27-6
82% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
17-1652%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-71 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 104-69 | -13.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 79-97 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-59 | -11.5 | W +26.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 94-97 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 105-81 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 97-77 | -23.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-71 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 100-115 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 93-72 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-76 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 177.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 82-69 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-77 | -20.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 104-89 | -21.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 82-63 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 86-65 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 91-81 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 69-52 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 66-64 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-79 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 99-92 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 90-73 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 78-65 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 99-85 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 92-70 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | U 162 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-64 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-55 | -23.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-70 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 75-68 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-76 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-91 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+5.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+21.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+0.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
+9.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
+26.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
−4.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+11.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
−3.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
+10.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
−19.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+5.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−7.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−10.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
+5.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
−10.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
−6.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
+10.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
+14.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
−2.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
+6.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−10.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−12.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
−5.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−0.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
−1.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
+18.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
+1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
+15.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−9.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
+0.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−4.5
20
vs
TTU
L 71-91
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+2.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+16.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+12.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
−2.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
−0.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
+34.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+19.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
+16.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
−3.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
+46.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+9.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−28.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−13.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
−19.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
+11.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
+29.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
−21.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
−16.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
+3.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
−45.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−23.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−9.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
+27.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−4.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
+23.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
−4.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
−17.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
−6.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−15.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
−20.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−2.5
20
vs
TTU
L 71-91
+7.5
over 15under 18avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Akron has the better starters
Position by position: Ball State 1, Akron 3, even 1
Ball StateBetterAkron
G Z. Collins TR11.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 73
=Even
G T. Staveskie TR17.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 74
G S. Blake TR10.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 53
→AKRSmall
G T. Pence TR9.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 86
G J. Guy-King TR10 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 50
→AKRSmall
F E. Mahaffey9.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 69
G K. Parker TR10.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 78
←BALLBig
F M. Burton TR5.5 pts · 5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 14
F M. Jones4.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
→AKRBig
F B. Hammer TR4.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
Ball StateBetterAkron
BALL offense221st of 366 · -6.7
=Even
AKR defense168th of 366 · -3.7
BALL defense159th of 366 · -3.5
→AKRSmall
AKR offense101st of 366 · -1.1
Backcourt+0.6 · 4 players
→AKRSmall
Backcourt+2.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 1 player
→AKRSmall
Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players
Bench-1.4 · 5 players
←BALLSmall
Bench-2.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestBALL betterAKR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Collins31 min · TRS. Blake29 min · TRJ. Guy-King23 min · TRK. Parker21 min · TRJ. Hart19 minT. Lewis18 min · TR
Forwards
M. Jones31 minB. Durodola19 min · TRK. WrightNewK. McGrewNew
Centers
J. Smith9 min · TR
Guards
T. Staveskie36 min · TRT. Pence24 min · TRC. HeadNewT. PerkinsNewJ. HendersonNewE. WilsonNew
Forwards
E. Mahaffey29 minM. Burton25 min · TRB. Hammer14 min · TRZ. Halligan12 minC. White9 min · TRM. Musiime-Kamali9 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.1 #345 | Points per game | 86.4 #8 |
| 1.00 #325 | Points per possession | 1.22 #6 |
| 65.9 #317 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #70 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.0 #336 | Effective FG% | 58.1 #9 |
| 31.4 #312 | 3-point % | 38.2 #15 |
| 39.4 #186 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #74 |
| 31.6 #263 | Free throw rate | 29.2 #327 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #151 | Turnover rate | 15.5 #104 |
| 27.1 #290 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.4 #78 |
| 12.4 #259 | Assists per game | 17.7 #12 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #88 | Points allowed | 75.0 #188 |
| 1.09 #184 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #98 |
| 52.7 #253 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #173 |
| 34.8 #239 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #284 |
| 18.7 #60 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #86 |
| 69.0 #204 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #156 |
| 7.5 #88 | Steals per game | 7.2 #108 |
| 2.7 #286 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #240 |
Ball State
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-11 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs C Michigan85–69
- W@ W Michigan74–71
- W@ N Illinois79–43
- Wvs UMass74–73
- Lvs Akron65–78
A week or more of rest.
Akron
27-6 in 2025-26 overall · 20-1 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas Tech71–91
- Wvs Toledo79–76
- Wvs Kent State75–68
- Wvs Buffalo73–70
- Wvs N Illinois94–55
A week or more of rest.