Cintas Center · at Xavier
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | XAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects XAV 92–64 · win probability XAV 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: XAV has more of the edges
TXSO 0, XAV 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
TXSO has played the 329th-hardest schedule, XAV the 33rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
XAV offense vs TXSO defense
Offense 31st of 366 against a defense 323rd, on the model’s ratings
TXSO offense vs XAV defense
Offense 311th of 366 against a defense 89th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TXSO 18.5%, XAV 14.0%. Forced: TXSO 16.5%, XAV 15.5%
Three-pointers
TXSO hits 33.1% and allows 34.1%; XAV hits 36.5% and allows 34.8%. Threes are 32.5% and 40.6% of their shots
Home court
XAV at home. This season: XAV 0-0 at home, TXSO 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TXSO 37%, XAV 14%. Transfers in: TXSO 4, XAV 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TXSO 49.7 and allows 52.5; XAV 51.8 and allows 54.1
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TXSO 38.2, XAV 28.1. Allowed: TXSO 44.0, XAV 32.6
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: TXSO plays 71.8 a game (40th fastest), XAV 71.8 (44th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TXSO 28.8%, XAV 26.5%. Defensive: TXSO 68.8%, XAV 70.5%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | XAV -28.4 | — |
| Total | — | 156.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | TXSO 64 · XAV 92.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | XAV -16.8 | — |
| 1H total | 73.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | TXSO 28.2 · XAV 44.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 9-1 90% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TXSO 0–1 XAVXAV leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TXSO 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024-25 | TXSO 69 @ XAV 78 | XAV -25.5 | TXSO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Texas Southern
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
9-19
32% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 43-98 | +29.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-104 | +29.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 67-77 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 74-109 | +36.5 | W +1.5 | 164.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 70-82 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-89 | +21.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 72-108 | +34.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 67-84 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-74 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-51 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 89-94 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-74 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 96-64 | -2.5 | W +29.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-85 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 62-57 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 74-73 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 83-64 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-72 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 92-87 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-57 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 59-70 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 74-85 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−25.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
−4.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−5.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+1.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−4.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−14.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
−1.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
−2.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
−4.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
−11.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−9.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
+20.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
−2.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+16.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+29.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
−8.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
+6.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−2.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+1.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
+5.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
+20.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−12.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
−0.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
+18.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−12.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
−9.5
covered 9didn’t cover 19avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GONZ
L 43-98
−16.5
6
@
TA&M
L 70-104
+12.5
12
vs
SAM
L 90-93
+29.5
15
@
TXST
L 67-77
−0.5
20
@
VAN
L 74-109
+18.5
6
vs
SHSU
L 70-82
−6.5
14
@
MINN
L 53-89
−2.5
17
@
NCSU
L 72-108
+27.5
22
vs
ACU
L 68-75
+4.5
3
@
SOU
L 73-84
+3.5
5
@
GRAM
L 67-84
+4.5
10
vs
UAPB
L 66-74
−22.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 84-51
−7.5
17
@
ALCN
W 72-71
−3.5
19
@
JKST
L 89-94
+29.5
24
vs
AAMU
W 89-74
+17.5
27
vs
ALST
W 96-64
+4.5
31
@
PV
L 78-85
+5.5
7
@
FAMU
W 62-57
−27.5
9
@
BCU
L 69-79
−4.5
14
vs
GRAM
W 82-79
+21.5
16
vs
SOU
W 74-73
−4.5
19
@
UAPB
W 83-64
−5.5
21
@
MVSU
L 71-72
−0.5
26
vs
ALCN
W 92-87
+33.5
28
vs
JKST
W 82-57
−13.5
5
vs
PV
L 59-70
−25.5
12
vs
AAMU
L 74-85
+16.5
over 14under 14avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Xavier
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-9
73% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 66-62 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 74-69 | -24.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 68-87 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-69 | -10.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 77-78 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 78-68 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 88-67 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 96-74 | -27.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 75-57 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 57-98 | -2.5 | L −43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 80-77 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 67-90 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 65-66 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 97-84 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-75 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 93-94 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 83-88 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-86 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-66 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 60-92 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 82-87 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 96-88 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 89-92 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 84-94 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-84 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 68-77 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 89-87 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-93 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−8.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−19.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−22.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−3.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+19.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
+9.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+15.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+7.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
−5.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+6.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−0.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
−43.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
−11.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
−6.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
+4.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+14.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+15.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+7.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+3.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
−12.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−2.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
−15.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+11.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+6.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+1.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−0.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
−4.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+2.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
−7.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
−1.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+6.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
−7.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−11.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−13.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−0.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−0.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+17.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
−10.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+5.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+8.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
+17.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+5.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−19.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
+3.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
+12.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
+13.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
−26.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+15.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+2.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+31.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+11.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
+8.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−16.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
+4.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+9.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+26.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+28.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−4.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
+7.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+19.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
+0.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
+15.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+18.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
+10.5
over 24under 9avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Xavier has the better starters
Position by position: Texas Southern 0, Xavier 3, even 2
Texas SouthernBetterXavier
G K. Bilal TR5.6 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 23
→XAVBig
G C. Westry TR15.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G C. Patterson6.4 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Washington TR11.9 pts · 4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 82
G B. Vungo TR3.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F N. Chitikoudis TR11.1 pts · 7.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 66
F A. Andrews2.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 7
→XAVBig
F J. Milicevic12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 75
C J. Gorecki2.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
→XAVBig
F R. Aligbe TR9.4 pts · 7.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 74
Texas SouthernBetterXavier
TXSO offense311th of 366 · -9.7
→XAVBig
XAV defense89th of 366 · -0.2
TXSO defense323rd of 366 · -8.4
→XAVBig
XAV offense31st of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→XAVBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-4.1 · 2 players
→XAVBig
Frontcourt+3.1 · 3 players
Bench-4.2 · 5 players
→XAVBig
Bench+5.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTXSO betterXAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Bilal21 min · TRC. Patterson16 minB. Vungo12 min · TRA. Nedal12 minJ. Hamilton7 minJ. Kimbrough4 min · TR
Forwards
A. Andrews13 minJ. Akpovwa9 minX. Wedlow3 min · TRJ. FarmerNew
Centers
J. Gorecki17 min
Guards
C. Westry31 min · TRT. Washington28 min · TRR. Dominguez23 min · TRB. Appelhans13 min · TRM. Wolf2 minK. HouseNew
Forwards
N. Chitikoudis27 min · TRJ. Milicevic26 minR. Aligbe25 min · TRM. Nwoko22 min · TRH. Thole1 minG. PozzatoNew
Centers
K. WestphalNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #204 | Points per game | 78.4 #91 |
| 1.03 #293 | Points per possession | 1.09 #149 |
| 71.8 #40 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #44 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.7 #251 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #155 |
| 33.1 #224 | 3-point % | 36.5 #39 |
| 32.5 #324 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.6 #156 |
| 38.2 #96 | Free throw rate | 28.1 #341 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.5 #297 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #21 |
| 28.8 #237 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.5 #311 |
| 11.1 #332 | Assists per game | 17.4 #15 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.0 #318 | Points allowed | 80.6 #329 |
| 1.12 #260 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #276 |
| 52.5 #240 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.1 #302 |
| 34.1 #190 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.8 #237 |
| 16.5 #188 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #253 |
| 68.8 #211 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #136 |
| 6.6 #167 | Steals per game | 6.5 #181 |
| 3.3 #173 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #77 |
Texas Southern
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alabama A&M74–85
- Lvs Prairie View59–70
- Wvs Jackson St82–57
- Wvs Alcorn St92–87
- L@ Miss Valley St71–72
A week or more of rest.
Xavier
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn68–93
- Wvs Marquette89–87
- L@ Villanova78–91
- Lvs Seton Hall68–77
- Wvs Georgetown91–84
A week or more of rest.