Cintas Center · at Xavier
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | XAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects XAV 90–68 · win probability XAV 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: XAV has more of the edges
PFW 2, XAV 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
XAV offense vs PFW defense
Offense 31st of 366 against a defense 291st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
PFW has played the 209th-hardest schedule, XAV the 34th. A record against a soft schedule means less
PFW offense vs XAV defense
Offense 218th of 366 against a defense 89th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
PFW hits 34.2% and allows 37.9%; XAV hits 36.5% and allows 34.8%. Threes are 45.4% and 40.6% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PFW 22.9%, XAV 26.5%. Defensive: PFW 65.5%, XAV 70.5%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PFW 14.5%, XAV 14.0%. Forced: PFW 19.1%, XAV 15.5%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: PFW plays 69.0 a game (179th fastest), XAV 71.8 (44th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: PFW 30.6, XAV 28.1. Allowed: PFW 28.6, XAV 32.6
Home court
XAV at home. This season: XAV 0-0 at home, PFW 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PFW 29%, XAV 14%. Transfers in: PFW 2, XAV 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: PFW 52.6 and allows 56.1; XAV 51.8 and allows 54.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | XAV -22.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | PFW 67.5 · XAV 90.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | XAV -13.4 | — |
| 1H total | 73.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | PFW 30.2 · XAV 43.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 9-1 90% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Purdue FW
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-90 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 68-94 | +24.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 71-83 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 77-85 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-91 | +19.5 | L −11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 90-77 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 92-101 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 79-77 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-65 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 81-77 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-69 | +11.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-77 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 54-72 | -8.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-71 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 79-74 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 100-82 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-76 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 65-74 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 61-90 | -2.5 | L −31.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 59-76 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-78 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-87 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 92-86 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-81 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 56-64 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GCU
L 71-90
−4.5
7
@
OSU
L 68-94
−1.5
12
@
WMU
L 71-83
−15.5
18
@
UTAH
L 77-85
+5.5
21
@
SLU
L 60-91
−11.5
25
vs
CHST
W 90-77
+0.5
3
@
OAK
L 92-101
−4.5
6
vs
NKU
W 79-77
+0.5
10
vs
EMU
W 80-65
+11.5
14
vs
DETM
W 81-77
−5.5
21
@
ND
W 72-69
+14.5
29
@
MILW
L 55-77
−18.5
1
vs
GB
L 54-72
−26.5
4
vs
CLE
W 74-71
−8.5
7
@
YSU
W 71-69
+6.5
11
@
RMU
W 79-74
+9.5
18
vs
MILW
W 100-82
+14.5
21
@
DETM
W 83-76
+4.5
28
vs
OAK
L 65-74
−7.5
31
vs
RMU
W 83-71
+9.5
4
vs
YSU
L 61-90
−31.5
7
@
WRST
L 68-73
+1.5
12
@
GB
L 59-76
−18.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 83-78
−2.5
18
@
NKU
L 71-87
−10.5
22
@
CLE
W 92-86
+2.5
25
vs
WRST
L 70-74
−2.5
28
@
IUIN
W 87-81
+4.5
3
@
GB
L 56-64
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GCU
L 71-90
+5.5
7
@
OSU
L 68-94
+2.5
12
@
WMU
L 71-83
−7.5
18
@
UTAH
L 77-85
+0.5
21
@
SLU
L 60-91
−15.5
25
vs
CHST
W 90-77
+17.5
3
@
OAK
L 92-101
+30.5
6
vs
NKU
W 79-77
+2.5
10
vs
EMU
W 80-65
−2.5
14
vs
DETM
W 81-77
+4.5
21
@
ND
W 72-69
−8.5
29
@
MILW
L 55-77
−24.5
1
vs
GB
L 54-72
−19.5
4
vs
CLE
W 74-71
−14.5
7
@
YSU
W 71-69
−5.5
11
@
RMU
W 79-74
+6.5
18
vs
MILW
W 100-82
+33.5
21
@
DETM
W 83-76
+3.5
28
vs
OAK
L 65-74
−23.5
31
vs
RMU
W 83-71
+8.5
4
vs
YSU
L 61-90
+3.5
7
@
WRST
L 68-73
−9.5
12
@
GB
L 59-76
−9.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 83-78
+1.5
18
@
NKU
L 71-87
+4.5
22
@
CLE
W 92-86
+14.5
25
vs
WRST
L 70-74
−6.5
28
@
IUIN
W 87-81
+4.5
3
@
GB
L 56-64
−25.5
over 16under 13avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Xavier
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-9
73% overs · avg +6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 66-62 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 74-69 | -24.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 68-87 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-81 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-69 | -10.5 | W +19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 77-78 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 78-68 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 88-67 | -13.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 96-74 | -27.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 79-74 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 75-57 | -18.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 57-98 | -2.5 | L −43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 80-77 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 67-90 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 65-66 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 97-84 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-75 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 93-94 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 83-88 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-86 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-66 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 60-92 | +16.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 82-87 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 96-88 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 89-92 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 84-94 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-84 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 68-77 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 89-87 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-93 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−8.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−19.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−22.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−3.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+19.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
+9.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+15.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+7.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
−5.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+6.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−0.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
−43.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
−11.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
−6.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
+4.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+14.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+15.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+7.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+3.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
−12.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−2.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
−15.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+11.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+6.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+1.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−0.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
−4.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+2.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
−7.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
−1.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+6.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
−7.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRST
W 66-62
−11.5
6
vs
LEM
W 74-69
−13.5
10
vs
SCU
L 68-87
−0.5
14
@
IOWA
L 62-81
−0.5
18
vs
ODU
W 99-69
+17.5
21
vs
UGA
L 77-78
−10.5
23
vs
WVU
W 78-68
+5.5
28
vs
AMCC
W 88-67
+8.5
1
vs
SFPA
W 96-74
+17.5
5
vs
CIN
W 79-74
+5.5
12
vs
MOST
W 75-57
−19.5
17
vs
CREI
L 57-98
+3.5
20
@
GTWN
W 80-77
+7.5
31
vs
CONN
L 67-90
+12.5
3
@
DEP
L 77-86
+13.5
7
@
MARQ
L 65-66
−26.5
10
vs
PROV
W 97-84
+15.5
14
vs
BTLR
W 89-75
+2.5
21
@
CREI
L 93-94
+31.5
24
vs
SJU
L 83-88
+11.5
28
@
HALL
L 68-86
+8.5
31
vs
DEP
W 68-66
−16.5
3
@
CONN
L 60-92
+4.5
9
@
SJU
L 82-87
+9.5
14
vs
MARQ
W 96-88
+26.5
17
vs
VILL
L 89-92
+28.5
21
@
BTLR
L 75-80
−4.5
25
@
PROV
L 84-94
+7.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 91-84
+19.5
3
vs
HALL
L 68-77
+0.5
7
@
VILL
L 78-91
+15.5
11
vs
MARQ
W 89-87
+18.5
12
vs
CONN
L 68-93
+10.5
over 24under 9avg +6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Xavier has the better starters
Position by position: Purdue FW 0, Xavier 4, even 1
Purdue FWBetterXavier
G D. Craig13.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 68
→XAVSmall
G C. Westry TR15.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 5.6 ast
Score 97
G A. Williamson TR7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 16
→XAVBig
G T. Washington TR11.9 pts · 4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 82
G C. Morgan2.3 pts · 1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 2
→XAVBig
F N. Chitikoudis TR11.1 pts · 7.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 66
G E. Mosley2.8 pts · 1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
→XAVBig
F J. Milicevic12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 75
F A. Isaac TR9.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 63
=Even
F R. Aligbe TR9.4 pts · 7.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 74
Purdue FWBetterXavier
PFW offense218th of 366 · -6.7
→XAVBig
XAV defense89th of 366 · -0.2
PFW defense291st of 366 · -7.3
→XAVBig
XAV offense31st of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt-5.6 · 4 players
→XAVBig
Backcourt+6.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.4 · 1 player
→XAVSmall
Frontcourt+3.1 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
→XAVBig
Bench+5.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPFW betterXAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Craig30 minA. Williamson23 min · TRC. Morgan14 minE. Mosley12 minM. Shrout3 minD. LewisNew
Forwards
A. Isaac24 min · TRE. OrtizNewQ. MorganNewA. WalkerNew
Guards
C. Westry31 min · TRT. Washington28 min · TRR. Dominguez23 min · TRB. Appelhans13 min · TRM. Wolf2 minK. HouseNew
Forwards
N. Chitikoudis27 min · TRJ. Milicevic26 minR. Aligbe25 min · TRM. Nwoko22 min · TRH. Thole1 minG. PozzatoNew
Centers
K. WestphalNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.2 #189 | Points per game | 78.4 #91 |
| 1.07 #204 | Points per possession | 1.09 #149 |
| 69.0 #179 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #44 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.6 #125 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #155 |
| 34.2 #163 | 3-point % | 36.5 #39 |
| 45.4 #60 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.6 #156 |
| 30.6 #292 | Free throw rate | 28.1 #341 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.5 #43 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #21 |
| 22.9 #351 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.5 #311 |
| 13.1 #207 | Assists per game | 17.4 #15 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.8 #286 | Points allowed | 80.6 #329 |
| 1.14 #311 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #276 |
| 56.1 #345 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.1 #302 |
| 37.9 #355 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.8 #237 |
| 19.1 #44 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #253 |
| 65.5 #327 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #136 |
| 7.9 #42 | Steals per game | 6.5 #181 |
| 3.0 #224 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #77 |
Purdue FW
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Green Bay56–64
- W@ IU Indy87–81
- Lvs Wright St70–74
- W@ Cleveland St92–86
- L@ N Kentucky71–87
A week or more of rest.
Xavier
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn68–93
- Wvs Marquette89–87
- L@ Villanova78–91
- Lvs Seton Hall68–77
- Wvs Georgetown91–84
A week or more of rest.