Broadview Arena · at Buffalo
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BUF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BUF 78–73 · win probability BUF 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BUF has more of the edges
PFW 1, BUF 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
PFW hits 34.2% and allows 37.9%; BUF hits 37.9% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 45.4% and 45.5% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PFW 22.9%, BUF 27.1%. Defensive: PFW 65.5%, BUF 68.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: PFW 30.6, BUF 39.6. Allowed: PFW 28.6, BUF 31.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PFW 14.5%, BUF 16.2%. Forced: PFW 19.1%, BUF 17.8%
BUF offense vs PFW defense
Offense 215th of 366 against a defense 291st, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: PFW 52.6 and allows 56.1; BUF 55.4 and allows 55.1
Home court
BUF at home. This season: BUF 0-0 at home, PFW 0-0 away
Even
PFW offense vs BUF defense
Offense 218th of 366 against a defense 257th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PFW 29%, BUF 8%. Transfers in: PFW 2, BUF 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: PFW plays 69.0 a game (179th fastest), BUF 68.2 (219th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
PFW has played the 209th-hardest schedule, BUF the 198th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BUF -5.3 | — |
| Total | — | 151.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | PFW 72.9 · BUF 78.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BUF -3.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | PFW 33.8 · BUF 36.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Purdue FW
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-90 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 68-94 | +24.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 71-83 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 77-85 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-91 | +19.5 | L −11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 90-77 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 92-101 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 79-77 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 80-65 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 81-77 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-69 | +11.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-77 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 54-72 | -8.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-71 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 79-74 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 100-82 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-76 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 65-74 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 61-90 | -2.5 | L −31.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 59-76 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-78 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 71-87 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 92-86 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-81 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 56-64 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GCU
L 71-90
−4.5
7
@
OSU
L 68-94
−1.5
12
@
WMU
L 71-83
−15.5
18
@
UTAH
L 77-85
+5.5
21
@
SLU
L 60-91
−11.5
25
vs
CHST
W 90-77
+0.5
3
@
OAK
L 92-101
−4.5
6
vs
NKU
W 79-77
+0.5
10
vs
EMU
W 80-65
+11.5
14
vs
DETM
W 81-77
−5.5
21
@
ND
W 72-69
+14.5
29
@
MILW
L 55-77
−18.5
1
vs
GB
L 54-72
−26.5
4
vs
CLE
W 74-71
−8.5
7
@
YSU
W 71-69
+6.5
11
@
RMU
W 79-74
+9.5
18
vs
MILW
W 100-82
+14.5
21
@
DETM
W 83-76
+4.5
28
vs
OAK
L 65-74
−7.5
31
vs
RMU
W 83-71
+9.5
4
vs
YSU
L 61-90
−31.5
7
@
WRST
L 68-73
+1.5
12
@
GB
L 59-76
−18.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 83-78
−2.5
18
@
NKU
L 71-87
−10.5
22
@
CLE
W 92-86
+2.5
25
vs
WRST
L 70-74
−2.5
28
@
IUIN
W 87-81
+4.5
3
@
GB
L 56-64
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GCU
L 71-90
+5.5
7
@
OSU
L 68-94
+2.5
12
@
WMU
L 71-83
−7.5
18
@
UTAH
L 77-85
+0.5
21
@
SLU
L 60-91
−15.5
25
vs
CHST
W 90-77
+17.5
3
@
OAK
L 92-101
+30.5
6
vs
NKU
W 79-77
+2.5
10
vs
EMU
W 80-65
−2.5
14
vs
DETM
W 81-77
+4.5
21
@
ND
W 72-69
−8.5
29
@
MILW
L 55-77
−24.5
1
vs
GB
L 54-72
−19.5
4
vs
CLE
W 74-71
−14.5
7
@
YSU
W 71-69
−5.5
11
@
RMU
W 79-74
+6.5
18
vs
MILW
W 100-82
+33.5
21
@
DETM
W 83-76
+3.5
28
vs
OAK
L 65-74
−23.5
31
vs
RMU
W 83-71
+8.5
4
vs
YSU
L 61-90
+3.5
7
@
WRST
L 68-73
−9.5
12
@
GB
L 59-76
−9.5
15
vs
IUIN
W 83-78
+1.5
18
@
NKU
L 71-87
+4.5
22
@
CLE
W 92-86
+14.5
25
vs
WRST
L 70-74
−6.5
28
@
IUIN
W 87-81
+4.5
3
@
GB
L 56-64
−25.5
over 16under 13avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Buffalo
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-79 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-53 | +18.5 | W +31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 94-90 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-70 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 73-71 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 71-53 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 70-73 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 88-71 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 81-67 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 85-72 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 80-91 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 81-87 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 102-105 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 207 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-82 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-78 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 83-95 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-81 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 63-53 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 70-72 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 86-82 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 85-99 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-75 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-67 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 78-99 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-73 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USM
W 85-79
+2.5
7
vs
GB
W 83-76
+3.5
11
@
DEP
W 66-53
+31.5
18
vs
UVM
W 94-90
+5.5
24
vs
VMI
W 78-70
+2.5
26
vs
BUCK
W 73-71
−2.5
29
@
CAN
W 71-53
+8.5
6
vs
SBU
L 69-77
−2.5
9
@
UMBC
W 83-79
+0.5
14
@
ECU
L 70-73
−1.5
20
@
WMU
W 88-71
+14.5
31
@
NIU
W 81-67
+7.5
3
vs
BALL
W 85-72
+6.5
10
@
OHIO
L 80-91
−6.5
13
vs
KENT
L 81-87
−3.5
17
@
M-OH
L 102-105
+7.5
20
vs
AKR
L 63-82
−10.5
23
vs
MASS
L 67-68
−2.5
27
@
BGSU
W 89-78
+18.5
31
vs
OHIO
L 83-95
−14.5
3
vs
M-OH
L 71-73
+2.5
7
@
USA
L 69-81
−8.5
11
@
BALL
W 63-53
+11.5
17
vs
NIU
L 70-72
−11.5
21
@
MASS
W 86-82
+11.5
24
@
AKR
L 85-99
+1.5
28
vs
CMU
L 70-75
−10.5
3
vs
EMU
W 72-67
−0.5
6
@
TOL
L 78-99
−15.5
12
vs
AKR
L 70-73
+9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USM
W 85-79
+10.5
7
vs
GB
W 83-76
+11.5
11
@
DEP
W 66-53
−34.5
18
vs
UVM
W 94-90
+42.5
24
vs
VMI
W 78-70
−2.5
26
vs
BUCK
W 73-71
−2.5
29
@
CAN
W 71-53
−15.5
6
vs
SBU
L 69-77
+1.5
9
@
UMBC
W 83-79
+16.5
14
@
ECU
L 70-73
−3.5
20
@
WMU
W 88-71
+8.5
31
@
NIU
W 81-67
−4.5
3
vs
BALL
W 85-72
+11.5
10
@
OHIO
L 80-91
+14.5
13
vs
KENT
L 81-87
+2.5
17
@
M-OH
L 102-105
+44.5
20
vs
AKR
L 63-82
−21.5
23
vs
MASS
L 67-68
−24.5
27
@
BGSU
W 89-78
+16.5
31
vs
OHIO
L 83-95
+21.5
3
vs
M-OH
L 71-73
−21.5
7
@
USA
L 69-81
+4.5
11
@
BALL
W 63-53
−25.5
17
vs
NIU
L 70-72
−3.5
21
@
MASS
W 86-82
+16.5
24
@
AKR
L 85-99
+23.5
28
vs
CMU
L 70-75
−6.5
3
vs
EMU
W 72-67
−4.5
6
@
TOL
L 78-99
+21.5
12
vs
AKR
L 70-73
−15.5
over 16under 14avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Buffalo has the better starters
Position by position: Purdue FW 1, Buffalo 2, even 2
Purdue FWBetterBuffalo
G D. Craig13.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 68
←PFWSmall
G D. Steffe TR9.9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 39
G A. Williamson TR7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 16
=Even
G D. Ducommun TR10.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 15
G C. Morgan2.3 pts · 1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 2
→BUFBig
G J. Starling TR10.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 55
G E. Mosley2.8 pts · 1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
→BUFSmall
F J. Pitre TR5.9 pts · 6.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
F A. Isaac TR9.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 63
=Even
F A. Lorick TR10.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 75
Purdue FWBetterBuffalo
PFW offense218th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
BUF defense257th of 366 · -6.7
PFW defense291st of 366 · -7.3
→BUFSmall
BUF offense215th of 366 · -6.6
Backcourt-5.6 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.4 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
←PFWBig
Bench-3.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestPFW betterBUF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Craig30 minA. Williamson23 min · TRC. Morgan14 minE. Mosley12 minM. Shrout3 minD. LewisNew
Forwards
A. Isaac24 min · TRE. OrtizNewQ. MorganNewA. WalkerNew
Guards
D. Steffe31 min · TRD. Ducommun31 min · TRJ. Starling29 min · TRM. Tyne19 min · TRK. Jones10 minH. Reede9 min · TR
Forwards
J. Pitre25 min · TRA. Lorick22 min · TRM. Buteliauskas6 minB. JohnNewT. KuskaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.2 #189 | Points per game | 77.5 #106 |
| 1.07 #204 | Points per possession | 1.14 #73 |
| 69.0 #179 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #219 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.6 #125 | Effective FG% | 55.4 #30 |
| 34.2 #163 | 3-point % | 37.9 #20 |
| 45.4 #60 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.5 #57 |
| 30.6 #292 | Free throw rate | 39.6 #65 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.5 #43 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #152 |
| 22.9 #351 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.1 #291 |
| 13.1 #207 | Assists per game | 14.1 #138 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.8 #286 | Points allowed | 77.0 #244 |
| 1.14 #311 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #279 |
| 56.1 #345 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.1 #333 |
| 37.9 #355 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #252 |
| 19.1 #44 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #105 |
| 65.5 #327 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #209 |
| 7.9 #42 | Steals per game | 7.6 #72 |
| 3.0 #224 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #262 |
Purdue FW
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Green Bay56–64
- W@ IU Indy87–81
- Lvs Wright St70–74
- W@ Cleveland St92–86
- L@ N Kentucky71–87
A week or more of rest.
Buffalo
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron70–73
- L@ Toledo78–99
- Wvs E Michigan72–67
- Lvs C Michigan70–75
- L@ Akron85–99
A week or more of rest.