McKale Center at ALKEME Arena · at Arizona
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARIZ 95–56 · win probability ARIZ 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARIZ has more of the edges
TNTC 0, ARIZ 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
TNTC has played the 353rd-hardest schedule, ARIZ the 11th. A record against a soft schedule means less
ARIZ offense vs TNTC defense
Offense 4th of 366 against a defense 288th, on the model’s ratings
TNTC offense vs ARIZ defense
Offense 276th of 366 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
TNTC hits 31.1% and allows 35.8%; ARIZ hits 36.6% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 36.5% and 26.4% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: TNTC 48.9 and allows 51.5; ARIZ 54.7 and allows 45.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TNTC 19.1%, ARIZ 15.1%. Forced: TNTC 15.0%, ARIZ 16.2%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TNTC 31.3%, ARIZ 38.4%. Defensive: TNTC 69.3%, ARIZ 73.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: TNTC 35.5, ARIZ 43.9. Allowed: TNTC 31.3, ARIZ 27.1
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: TNTC plays 68.3 a game (214th fastest), ARIZ 71.6 (49th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ARIZ at home. This season: ARIZ 0-0 at home, TNTC 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TNTC 18%, ARIZ 29%. Transfers in: TNTC 6, ARIZ 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARIZ -39.2 | — |
| Total | — | 151.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | TNTC 55.9 · ARIZ 95.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARIZ -23.2 | — |
| 1H total | 70.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | TNTC 23.7 · ARIZ 46.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tennessee Tech
28 games played
Straight up
10-18
36% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-14
50% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-82 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-70 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 59-61 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 88-84 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 54-104 | +37.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 81-123 | +34.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-83 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 87-59 | +1.5 | W +29.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 85-74 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 62-86 | +2.5 | L −21.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 76-88 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 58-77 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 61-71 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 59-54 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 54-71 | -5.5 | L −22.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 70-76 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 68-89 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-62 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-77 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 90-85 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 97-72 | -9.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 54-60 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 66-73 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 62-52 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-57 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 49-64 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 73-89 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WKU
L 70-82
+2.5
7
@
CLT
L 65-70
+7.5
17
vs
WGA
L 59-61
−6.5
19
@
UPST
W 88-84
+6.5
26
@
UK
L 54-104
−12.5
29
@
UGA
L 81-123
−7.5
3
@
LIP
L 80-83
+7.5
6
@
WGA
W 87-59
+29.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 85-74
+13.5
20
vs
UTM
L 62-86
−21.5
30
vs
TNST
L 76-88
−10.5
1
@
LR
L 58-77
−17.5
8
@
EIU
L 61-71
−11.5
10
@
WIU
W 59-54
+1.5
15
vs
USI
L 54-71
−22.5
17
vs
MORE
L 70-76
−7.5
22
@
LIN
L 68-89
−12.5
24
@
SIUE
L 58-62
+3.5
31
vs
LR
W 87-77
+11.5
2
@
TNST
W 90-85
+12.5
5
vs
WIU
W 97-72
+15.5
7
vs
EIU
L 54-60
−10.5
12
@
MORE
L 66-73
−2.5
14
@
USI
W 82-74
+6.5
19
vs
SIUE
W 62-52
+11.5
21
vs
LIN
W 72-57
+16.5
26
@
UTM
L 49-64
−7.5
28
@
SEMO
L 73-89
−8.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WKU
L 70-82
−1.5
7
@
CLT
L 65-70
−11.5
17
vs
WGA
L 59-61
−32.5
19
@
UPST
W 88-84
+21.5
26
@
UK
L 54-104
+0.5
29
@
UGA
L 81-123
+43.5
3
@
LIP
L 80-83
+10.5
6
@
WGA
W 87-59
−4.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 85-74
+3.5
20
vs
UTM
L 62-86
+2.5
30
vs
TNST
L 76-88
+8.5
1
@
LR
L 58-77
−9.5
8
@
EIU
L 61-71
−8.5
10
@
WIU
W 59-54
−30.5
15
vs
USI
L 54-71
−17.5
17
vs
MORE
L 70-76
+4.5
22
@
LIN
L 68-89
+5.5
24
@
SIUE
L 58-62
−15.5
31
vs
LR
W 87-77
+22.5
2
@
TNST
W 90-85
+21.5
5
vs
WIU
W 97-72
+25.5
7
vs
EIU
L 54-60
−26.5
12
@
MORE
L 66-73
−4.5
14
@
USI
W 82-74
+15.5
19
vs
SIUE
W 62-52
−20.5
21
vs
LIN
W 72-57
−22.5
26
@
UTM
L 49-64
−21.5
28
@
SEMO
L 73-89
+20.5
over 14under 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arizona
39 games played
Straight up
36-3
92% wins
Against the spread
23-16
59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-19
51% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-87 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 93-67 | -33.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-49 | -35.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 71-67 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 103-73 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 98-61 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 97-68 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 96-75 | -2.5 | W +18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 96-62 | -34.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 68-45 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 107-71 | -39.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 99-71 | -31.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 97-78 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-76 | -17.5 | W +7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 86-73 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-82 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-77 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-51 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-53 | -17.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-74 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-47 | -20.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 78-82 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 75-78 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-68 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-66 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 73-57 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 89-79 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-59 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-74 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 92-58 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 78-66 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 109-88 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
| Mar 28 | vs | W 79-64 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 73-91 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+9.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−7.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−0.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
+2.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
+8.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
−2.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+1.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+17.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
+18.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
−0.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
+9.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
−3.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
−3.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+1.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+7.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+5.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
−14.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−2.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
+12.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
+17.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+1.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−1.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
+16.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
−9.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−11.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−4.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
+13.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
−0.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
+13.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
+8.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
−3.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
+6.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
−1.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+3.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+3.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
+0.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+12.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
+9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
−19.5
covered 23didn’t cover 16avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+15.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−2.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−30.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
−19.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
−18.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
+21.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+12.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+2.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
−7.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
+12.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
−40.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
+23.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
+10.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+12.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+5.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+1.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
+3.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−4.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
−24.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
−2.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+2.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−2.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
−37.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
+7.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−3.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−22.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
−3.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
+11.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
−6.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
−19.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
+11.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
−19.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
+17.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+14.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+2.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
−9.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+30.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
−9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
+6.5
over 20under 19avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arizona has the better starters
Position by position: Tennessee Tech 0, Arizona 3, even 2
Tennessee TechBetterArizona
G T. Mosquera TR13.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 55
=Even
G D. Dixon TR6.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 55
G T. Owens7.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 17
→ARIZBig
G J. Mandaquit TR5.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 62
G D. Hackett TR13.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 78
=Even
F I. Kharchenkov10.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
G C. Newton TR10.5 pts · 2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 55
→ARIZBig
F R. Godfrey TR12 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 96
G C. Hollenbeck TR5 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 6
→ARIZBig
C M. Krivas10.4 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
Tennessee TechBetterArizona
TNTC offense276th of 366 · -8.4
→ARIZBig
ARIZ defense7th of 366 · +8.8
TNTC defense288th of 366 · -7.2
→ARIZBig
ARIZ offense4th of 366 · +11.0
Backcourt-4.8 · 5 players
→ARIZBig
Backcourt-0.3 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+10.8 · 3 players
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
→ARIZSmall
Bench-0.1 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestTNTC betterARIZ betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Mosquera32 min · TRT. Owens28 minD. Hackett28 min · TRC. Newton26 min · TRC. Hollenbeck17 min · TRC. GonzalesNew
Forwards
D. Christensen13 min · TRM. Turner8 minC. Sanders8 min · TRD. GreenNewS. ArnoldNewK. FoxNew
Guards
D. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Mandaquit20 min · TRA. Arnold2 minJ. Cook1 minB. JamesNewC. HolmesNew
Forwards
I. Kharchenkov28 minR. Godfrey25 min · TRE. Otten15 min · TRU. Jarusevicius11 min · TRM. MawutNewE. AiyamenkhueNew
Centers
M. Krivas25 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 #280 | Points per game | 86.2 #11 |
| 1.03 #287 | Points per possession | 1.21 #11 |
| 68.3 #214 | Pace (possessions) | 71.6 #49 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.9 #293 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #45 |
| 31.1 #316 | 3-point % | 36.6 #37 |
| 36.5 #238 | 3-point attempt rate | 26.4 #363 |
| 35.5 #164 | Free throw rate | 43.9 #11 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.1 #325 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #76 |
| 31.3 #151 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.4 #5 |
| 11.0 #337 | Assists per game | 16.4 #38 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.6 #207 | Points allowed | 69.4 #53 |
| 1.11 #231 | Points allowed per possession | 0.97 #6 |
| 51.5 #186 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.3 #4 |
| 35.8 #295 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #42 |
| 15.0 #285 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #209 |
| 69.3 #192 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.1 #34 |
| 5.4 #312 | Steals per game | 7.4 #95 |
| 2.7 #275 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #55 |
Tennessee Tech
10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ SE Missouri73–89
- L@ UT Martin49–64
- Wvs Lindenwood Lions72–57
- Wvs SIUE62–52
- W@ Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles82–74
A week or more of rest.
Arizona
36-3 in 2025-26 overall · 19-2 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan73–91
- Wvs Purdue79–64
- Wvs Arkansas109–88
- Wvs Utah State78–66
- Wvs Long Island92–58
A week or more of rest.