Benchmark International Arena · Neutral site · NCAA Tournament
Closing line
TTU -6.5✓ TTU covered by 13.5
Closing total154.5Over by 7.5
| This season | TTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-5 | Record | 22-10 |
| 17-15 | ATS | 16-16 |
| 14-18 | O/U | 14-18 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: AKR 73–84 TTU · ✓ TTU (83%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKR | 35 | 36 | 71 |
| TTU | 40 | 51 | 91 |
1st half: AKR 35, TTU 40 (TTU by 5). The model had TTU by 6.5 and a total of 73.6 (actual 75).
Team stats
| AKR | TTU | |
|---|---|---|
| 25-58 43% | Field goals | 34-53 64% |
| 5-19 26% | 3-pointers | 11-20 55% |
| 16-20 80% | Free throws | 12-19 63% |
| 25 11 off | Rebounds | 32 7 off |
| 12 | Assists | 17 |
| 5 | Steals | 9 |
| 4 | Blocks | 5 |
| 9 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 13 | Fouls | 16 |
| 34 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 0 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| AKR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evan Mahaffey F | 35 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-2 |
| Amani Lyles F | 32 | 26 | 3 | 2 | 8-14 | 2-6 |
| Tavari Johnson G | 30 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2-10 | 0-0 |
| Bowen Hardman G | 21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Zach Halligan F | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Shammah Scott G | 33 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-5 |
| Sharron Young G | 19 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-3 |
| Eric Mahaffey G | 18 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
| Marvin Musiime-Kamali F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Chabi Barre F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Conner Groce G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Ognjen Stankovic F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Rich Brisco, Cody Head, Tai Perkins, Josh Henderson
| TTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Anderson G | 39 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
| Jaylen Petty G | 38 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 9-14 | 5-7 |
| Donovan Atwell G | 35 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-6 |
| LeJuan Watts G | 24 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6-8 | 0-1 |
| Luke Bamgboye F | 14 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Josiah Moseley F | 25 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 7-8 | 0-0 |
| Tyeree Bryan G | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jack Francis G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jazz Henderson Jr. G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Leon Horner G | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Nolan Groves G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Marial Akuentok F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: JT Toppin, LaTrell Hoover
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenTTU -10.5
4 → AKR
CloseTTU -6.5
4 pts toward AKR
Total
Open155.5
▼ 1
Close154.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
AKR +220 · TTU -270
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened TTU -10.5 · closed TTU -6.5 · moved 4 toward AKRmodel TTU -11
model TTU -11
Opened 155.5 · closed 154.5 · moved 1 downmodel 157.5
model 157.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | TTU -6.5 | TTU -11.1 | TTU +4.6 | W TTU covered |
| Total | 154.5 | 157.5 | Over 3.0 | W Over |
| Projected score | — | AKR 73.2 · TTU 84.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TTU -6.5 | TTU -5.0 |
| 1H total | 73.6 | 75 |
| 1H projected score | AKR 33.6 · TTU 40 | AKR 35 · TTU 40 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-0 100% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Akron
32 games played
Straight up
27-5
84% wins
Against the spread
17-15
53% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg 0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-71 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 104-69 | -13.5 | W +21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 79-97 | +18.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 96-75 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-59 | -11.5 | W +26.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 94-97 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 105-81 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 97-77 | -23.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-71 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 100-115 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 168.5 | O 215 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 93-72 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-76 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 177.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 82-69 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 77-67 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-77 | -20.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 104-89 | -21.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 82-63 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 86-65 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 91-81 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 69-52 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 66-64 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-79 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 99-92 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 90-73 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 78-65 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 99-85 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 92-70 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | U 162 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-64 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-55 | -23.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 73-70 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 75-68 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-76 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+5.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+21.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+0.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
+9.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
+26.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
−4.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+11.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
−3.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
+10.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
−19.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+5.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−7.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−10.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
+5.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
−10.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
−6.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
+10.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
+14.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
−2.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
+6.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−10.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−12.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
−5.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−0.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
−1.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
+18.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
+1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
+15.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−9.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
+0.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−4.5
covered 17didn’t cover 15avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JMU
W 85-71
+2.5
8
vs
PRIN
W 104-69
+16.5
16
@
PUR
L 79-97
+12.5
21
vs
IONA
W 96-75
−2.5
23
vs
EVAN
W 97-59
−0.5
24
vs
YALE
L 94-97
+34.5
29
vs
MILW
W 105-81
+19.5
3
vs
BUCK
W 97-77
+16.5
6
@
TULN
W 88-71
−3.5
13
vs
MUR
L 100-115
+46.5
19
vs
EMU
W 93-72
+9.5
3
@
M-OH
L 73-76
−28.5
6
vs
CMU
W 82-69
−13.5
9
@
BGSU
W 77-67
−19.5
13
vs
BALL
W 87-77
+11.5
17
vs
WMU
W 104-89
+29.5
20
@
BUF
W 82-63
−21.5
23
@
OHIO
W 86-65
−16.5
27
vs
TOL
W 91-81
+3.5
30
vs
KENT
W 69-52
−45.5
3
@
EMU
W 66-64
−23.5
7
@
TROY
L 69-79
−9.5
13
vs
MASS
W 99-92
+27.5
17
@
WMU
W 90-73
+2.5
20
@
BALL
W 78-65
−4.5
24
vs
BUF
W 99-85
+23.5
27
@
KENT
W 92-70
−4.5
3
@
CMU
W 77-64
−17.5
6
vs
NIU
W 94-55
−6.5
12
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−15.5
13
vs
KENT
W 75-68
−20.5
14
vs
TOL
W 79-76
−2.5
over 14under 18avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Texas Tech
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 98-60 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 98-77 | -31.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 77-81 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-63 | -27.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 84-83 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 56-86 | +3.5 | L −26.5 | 153.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 82-50 | -29.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 76-72 | -19.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 82-58 | -5.5 | W +18.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 86-93 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 101-90 | -25.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 87-57 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 102-80 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 167.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 65-69 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 73-71 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 88-74 | -17.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-71 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 92-73 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 90-86 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 80-88 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 61-64 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 78-44 | -13.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-75 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 67-72 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-72 | -12.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 80-68 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 82-73 | +10.5 | W +19.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 65-73 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-82 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 53-75 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LIN
W 98-60
+8.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 98-77
−10.5
11
@
ILL
L 77-81
−0.5
14
vs
MILW
W 80-63
−10.5
20
vs
WAKE
W 84-83
−8.5
21
vs
PUR
L 56-86
−26.5
26
vs
NOLA
W 82-50
+2.5
30
vs
WYO
W 76-72
−15.5
7
vs
LSU
W 82-58
+18.5
13
vs
ARK
L 86-93
−9.5
16
vs
UNCO
W 101-90
−14.5
20
vs
DUKE
W 82-81
+10.5
28
vs
WIN
W 87-57
+12.5
3
vs
OKST
W 102-80
+9.5
6
@
HOU
L 65-69
+3.5
10
@
COLO
W 73-71
−3.5
14
vs
UTAH
W 88-74
−3.5
17
vs
BYU
W 84-71
+10.5
20
@
BAY
W 92-73
+17.5
24
vs
HOU
W 90-86
+5.5
31
@
UCF
L 80-88
−13.5
2
vs
KU
L 61-64
−6.5
8
@
WVU
W 70-63
+2.5
11
vs
COLO
W 78-44
+20.5
14
@
ARIZ
W 78-75
+11.5
17
@
ASU
L 67-72
−12.5
21
vs
KSU
W 100-72
+15.5
24
vs
CIN
W 80-68
+5.5
28
@
ISU
W 82-73
+19.5
3
vs
TCU
L 65-73
−16.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-82
−3.5
12
vs
ISU
L 53-75
−14.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LIN
W 98-60
+11.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 98-77
+18.5
11
@
ILL
L 77-81
−10.5
14
vs
MILW
W 80-63
−22.5
20
vs
WAKE
W 84-83
+6.5
21
vs
PUR
L 56-86
−11.5
26
vs
NOLA
W 82-50
−25.5
30
vs
WYO
W 76-72
−4.5
7
vs
LSU
W 82-58
−14.5
13
vs
ARK
L 86-93
+23.5
16
vs
UNCO
W 101-90
+38.5
20
vs
DUKE
W 82-81
+10.5
28
vs
WIN
W 87-57
−19.5
3
vs
OKST
W 102-80
+14.5
6
@
HOU
L 65-69
−8.5
10
@
COLO
W 73-71
−17.5
14
vs
UTAH
W 88-74
+2.5
17
vs
BYU
W 84-71
−10.5
20
@
BAY
W 92-73
+10.5
24
vs
HOU
W 90-86
+34.5
31
@
UCF
L 80-88
+8.5
2
vs
KU
L 61-64
−30.5
8
@
WVU
W 70-63
−6.5
11
vs
COLO
W 78-44
−33.5
14
@
ARIZ
W 78-75
−3.5
17
@
ASU
L 67-72
−17.5
21
vs
KSU
W 100-72
+13.5
24
vs
CIN
W 80-68
+4.5
28
@
ISU
W 82-73
+9.5
3
vs
TCU
L 65-73
−9.5
7
@
BYU
L 76-82
−1.5
12
vs
ISU
L 53-75
−15.5
over 14under 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Akron
27-5 overall · 20-1 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Toledo79–76
- Wvs Kent State75–68
- Wvs Buffalo73–70
- Wvs N Illinois94–55
- W@ C Michigan77–64
6 days since their last game.
Texas Tech
22-10 overall · 12-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa State53–75
- L@ BYU76–82
- Lvs TCU65–73
- W@ Iowa State82–73
- Wvs Cincinnati80–68
A week or more of rest.