Sat, Oct 31, 2026, 3:30 PM EDTWeek 9 · at Indiana · Conference game
4-2 · Power #65
11
projected
@
6-1 · Power #7
34
projected
MINN 5%
95% IU
Spread
IU -22.5
no move since the open
Total
45.5
model 45.5
Spread edge
IU by 4
lean · context
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
DraftKings via ESPNupdated 11:15 PM ET
SourceDraftKings via ESPN odds feed
OpenIU -22.5
CurrentIU -22.5
Total45.5
Last update11:15 PM ET
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Market

Open → current
Spread
No change since the open
Total
No change since the open
Line movement
Opening and current line · tap a dot
Opened IU -22.5 · unchangedmodel IU -26.5
Opened 45.5 · unchangedmodel 45.5 matches the line
Openline modelNow
Line watch · Not moved yetModel vs the opening line: IU by 4.0 pts (open -22.5, now -22.5). In 2025–2026, with a 4+ pt gap, lines moved toward the ratings in 74.6% of the 264 games where the line moved (295 at that gap), but those sides covered 53.1% at the opener, above the 52.4% break-even, but not by a statistically reliable margin: it predicts the line, not the result.
Line context
Home favorites of 21.5–23.5 since 2023: won 95%, covered 51% (99 games)ⓘ
DraftKings via ESPNupdated 11:15 PM ET
SourceDraftKings via ESPN odds feed
OpenIU -22.5
CurrentIU -22.5
Total45.5
Last update11:15 PM ET
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Prices

DraftKings · current prices
BookSpreadTotalMoneyline
MINNIUOverUnderMINNIU
DraftKingsDK+22.5-110-22.5-11045.5-11045.5-110+1100-2100

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like IU as a 22.5-point home favorite against MINN, the favorite won 8, covered 4, and 4 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
Favorite won
8 of 1080%
Normal range · usually 94%
Favorite covered
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 46%
Went over
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 51%

All three sit in the normal range for favorites of this size, so history shows no clear lean. Average result: favorite by 20.2 against an average line of 21.6; 44.8 points a game (usually 53.8). Of the 4 overs, 1 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Very close
2025 · Week 6 · very close · similar situation & rest
-23.542–3 W O42.5
Very close
2025 · Week 7 · very close · similar situation & rest
-20.521–22 L U46.5
Very close
2025 · Week 12 · very close · similar rest & total
-24.548–9 W O48.5
Very close
2023 · Week 9 · very close · similar situation & rest
-20.535–6 W U49.5
Very close
2024 · Week 7 · very close · similar situation & rest
-2127–25 L O50
Very close
2024 · Week 14 · very close · similar rest & season form
-2010–13 L U41.5
Very close
2024 · Week 6 · very close · similar situation & rest
-22.531–10 L U53
Very close
2024 · Week 13 · very close · similar rest & total
-18.531–14 L U47
Very close
2024 · Week 12 · very close · similar rest & team ratings
-21.535–14 L U51
Close
2023 · Week 12 · close · similar total & spread
-23.545–7 W O47.5
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2023 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Model view

Power-rating model, before kickoff
Model Favorite
Indiana 95%
Projected MINN 11 – IU 34 · Model Favorite won 73.7% in backtest
Model line
IU -26.5
Market IU -22.5
Against the spread
Lean IU -22.5
4-pt edge · No edge, context only · 1278-1338 (48.9%)
Total
No lean
Model 45.5 · Below the 5-point lean threshold.
How the model gets there (points from IU’s side; the model line rounds to the half point)
SpreadIU rating edge+23.4+Home field+2.5+Travel+0.6=Model marginIU by 26.5
TotalScoring ratings45.5=Model total45.5

Signals

The data signal, and 3 trends and market moves behind it
Moderate Minnesota ATS trend
Moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
No clear signal on the total

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

Indiana ATS struggles (1-6)
Indiana have covered only 14% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 262-295 (47%)
Indiana home ATS weakness (0-5)
Weak against the spread at home this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 216-236 (48%)
Indiana 1-5 ATS as a favorite
Struggling to cover in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 221-216 (51%)

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
MINN+1.1 →+0.5▼ 0.6#67
IU+23.3 →+21.7▼ 1.6#7
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW8

MINN
Longer bar = better
IU
#96
Offense
IU better ▶
#18
#54
Defense
IU better ▶
#14
+0.2 #60
Turnovers
IU better ▶
+0.4 #44
63 plays #106
Pace
◀ MINN faster
61 plays #123
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When MINN has the ball
Advantage: IU defense
MINN offIU defEdge
Points / game 28.8 #72 12.9 #4 IU
Yards / play 5.43 #106 4.32 #8 IU
PPA / play +0.03 #115 −0.01 #24 IU
Success rate 41% #90 35% #19 IU
When IU has the ball
Advantage: IU offense
IU offMINN defEdge
Points / game 36.6 #24 21.8 #54 IU
Yards / play 7.42 #4 5.01 #41 IU
PPA / play +0.36 #2 +0.05 #51 IU
Success rate 47% #42 41% #70 IU

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams
MINN scoring against the IU defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
MINN scored
8.0
#34
7.3
#95
15.3
#66
6.7
#54
6.8
#71
13.5
#65
IU allowed
1.9
#7
1.9
#2
3.7
#1
3.9
#45
5.3
#45
9.1
#40
IU scoring against the MINN defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
IU scored
7.0
#50
10.7
#37
17.7
#42
8.3
#23
10.6
#9
18.9
#11
MINN allowed
4.0
#46
9.2
#105
13.2
#86
1.7
#8
7.0
#89
8.7
#32

Game conditions

Before kickoff
Home field
IU +2.5
home-field points in the model
Weather
No forecast
Venue not known yet
Rest
MINN7d
IU7d
Even
Tempo
Slow 123 plays
slowavg 133fast

News & sentiment

ESPN and Google News headlines
Recent ESPN and Google News headlines for both teams, injury and suspension mentions, and a keyword-based read on the tone of coverage.