Gonzaga Bulldogs vs Purdue Boilermakers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:30 PM ETT-Mobile Arena · Neutral site

#17GONZGonzaga AP #15

LineGONZ -5.5moved 1 toward GONZ

Total154.5down 1 from 155.5

Season records: Gonzaga and Purdue
GONZ	This season	PUR
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects GONZ 79–73 · win probability GONZ 68%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

GONZ -5.5

moved 1 toward GONZ

Total

154.5

model 151.5 · Under by 3

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public on the spread

98% PUR

80% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: GONZ has more of the edges

GONZ 2, PUR 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

GONZBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: GONZ 13.7%, PUR 13.7%. Forced: GONZ 19.9%, PUR 15.3%

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: GONZ plays 70.4 a game (98th fastest), PUR 65.4 (333rd). Faster games mean more points

GONZSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: GONZ 55.6 and allows 46.3; PUR 57.6 and allows 52.4

Context

Schedule so far

GONZ has played the 84th-hardest schedule, PUR the 6th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: GONZ 21%, PUR 43%. Transfers in: GONZ 5, PUR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

PUR offense vs GONZ defense

Offense 38th of 366 against a defense 21st, on the model’s ratings

Even

Three-pointers

GONZ hits 33.3% and allows 30.6%; PUR hits 38.3% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 30.8% and 40.2% of their shots

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: GONZ 31.0, PUR 28.6. Allowed: GONZ 30.9, PUR 25.5

Context

Neutral floor

No home court: the model takes it out of the line

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: GONZ 34.8%, PUR 36.4%. Defensive: GONZ 74.3%, PUR 72.9%

Even

GONZ offense vs PUR defense

Offense 14th of 366 against a defense 18th, on the model’s ratings

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Neutral-site favorites of 3 to 6.5	928	66%	50%	47%
Non-conference games at this spread	1736	67%	50%	49%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenGONZ -4.5

1 → GONZ

NowGONZ -5.5

1 pt toward GONZ

Total

Open155.5

▼ 1

Now154.5

Down 1 since the open

Moneyline

GONZ -241 · PUR +197

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened GONZ -4.5 · now GONZ -5.5 · moved 1 toward GONZmodel GONZ -5.5 matches the line

model GONZ -5.5 = line ✓

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

GONZ -5.5Spread

PUR +5.5

Bets

98%

Money

20%80%

Money is 18 pts ahead of bets on GONZ -5.5

Over 154.5TotalUnder 154.5

Bets

35%65%

Money

34%66%

GONZWinner

PUR

Bets

90%10%

Money

98%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 7:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	GONZ	PUR	Over	Under	GONZ	PUR
BetMGMMGM	+5.5-105	-5.5-115	154.5-105	154.5-115	-225	+185
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	+5.5-110	-5.5-110	153.5-120	153.5+100	-245	+203
BetRiversBetRivers	+5.5-110	-5.5-113	153.5-115	153.5-108	-230	+170
BetUSBetUS	+5.5-110	-5.5-110	153.5-120	153.5+100	-245	+205
BovadaBovada	+5-115	-5-105	154-105	154-115	-225	+185
DraftKingsDK	+5.5-105	-5.5-115	154.5-108	154.5-112	-238	+195
FanDuelFD	+5.5-108	-5.5-112	154.5-110	154.5-110	-245	+198
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	+5.5-106	-5.5-106	153.5-119	153.5+102	-245	+203

Prices from The Odds API, updated 8:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	GONZ -5.5	GONZ -5.5	—
Total	154.5	151.5	Under 3.0
Projected score	—	GONZ 78.5 · PUR 73

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	GONZ -3.4	—
1H total	70.8	—
1H projected score	GONZ 37.1 · PUR 33.7	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Neutral	Role
GONZ LLWLL	18-17	51%	4-6	18-17
PUR WWWLL	17-22	44%	6-5	3-2

Venue/role: GONZ neutral site, as favorite; PUR neutral site, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
GONZ UUUUU	11-24	31%	31-4
PUR OOOOU	20-19	51%	30-9

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
GONZ	8-2 80%	5-5 50%	1-9 10%
PUR	8-2 80%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Gonzaga

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs NMSU	No recent meeting
Nov 14	vs LSU	No recent meeting
Nov 17	vs MTST	No recent meeting

Purdue

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs VAL	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs ILST	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs OHIO	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

GONZ 0–3 PURPUR leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · PUR has won the last 3 meetings · GONZ 0-3 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Mar 29, 2023-24	GONZ 68 vs PUR 80	PUR -4.5	PUR W
Nov 20, 2023-24	PUR 73 vs GONZ 63	GONZ +5.5	PUR W
Nov 25, 2022-23	PUR 84 vs GONZ 66	GONZ -6.5	PUR W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Gonzaga

35 games played

Straight up

31-4

89% wins

Against the spread

18-17

51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

11-24

31% overs · avg −5.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

31-489%

W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1751%

W W W L W W W L W W L L L W L L W L W W L L L L W W W W L W L L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

11-2431%

U U U U O O O U U O O O O U O U U O U U U U U O U U O U U U U U U U U

8 straight unders0 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsTXSO	W 98-43	-29.5	W +25.5	157.5	U 141
Nov 8	vsOU	W 83-68	-10.5	W +4.5	166.5	U 151
Nov 11	vsCREI	W 90-63	-12.5	W +14.5	164.5	U 153
Nov 14	@ASU	W 77-65	-13.5	L −1.5	158.5	U 142
Nov 17	vsSUU	W 122-50	-35.5	W +36.5	160.5	O 172
Nov 24	vsALA	W 95-85	-4.5	W +5.5	178.5	O 180
Nov 25	vsMD	W 100-61	-14.5	W +24.5	157.5	O 161
Nov 26	vsMICH	L 61-101	-3.5	L −43.5	165.5	U 162
Dec 5	vsUK	W 94-59	-5.5	W +29.5	159.5	U 153
Dec 7	vsUNF	W 109-58	-42.5	W +8.5	166.5	O 167
Dec 13	vsUCLA	W 82-72	-10.5	L −0.5	147.5	O 154
Dec 17	vsCAM	W 98-70	-36.5	L −8.5	160.5	O 168
Dec 21	vsORE	W 91-82	-12.5	L −3.5	155.5	O 173
Dec 28	@PEPP	W 96-56	-29.5	W +10.5	152.5	U 152
Dec 30	@USD	W 99-93	-29.5	L −23.5	160.5	O 192
Jan 2	vsSEA	W 80-72	-24.5	L −16.5	155.5	U 152
Jan 4	vsLMU	W 82-47	-25.5	W +9.5	154.5	U 129
Jan 8	vsSCU	W 89-77	-17.5	L −5.5	163.5	O 166
Jan 15	@WSU	W 86-65	-16.5	W +4.5	155.5	U 151
Jan 17	@SEA	W 71-50	-9.5	W +11.5	150.5	U 121
Jan 21	vsPEPP	W 84-60	-28.5	L −4.5	150.5	U 144
Jan 24	vsSF	W 68-66	-15.5	L −13.5	149.5	U 134
Jan 31	vsSMC	W 73-65	-8.5	L −0.5	144.5	U 138
Feb 4	@PORT	L 80-87	-22.5	L −29.5	152.5	O 167
Feb 7	@ORST	W 81-61	-19.5	W +0.5	149.5	U 142
Feb 10	vsWSU	W 83-53	-21.5	W +8.5	156.5	U 136
Feb 14	@SCU	W 94-86	-4.5	W +3.5	158.5	O 180
Feb 18	@SF	W 80-59	-15.5	W +5.5	151.5	U 139
Feb 21	vsPAC	W 71-62	-22.5	L −13.5	144.5	U 133
Feb 25	vsPORT	W 89-48	-26.5	W +14.5	150.5	U 137
Feb 28	@SMC	L 59-70	-2.5	L −13.5	143.5	U 129
Mar 9	vsORST	W 65-56	-20.5	L −11.5	145.5	U 121
Mar 10	vsSCU	W 79-68	-8.5	W +2.5	157.5	U 147
Mar 19	vsKENN	W 73-64	-20.5	L −11.5	152.5	U 137
Mar 21	vsTEX	L 68-74	-5.5	L −11.5	146.5	U 142

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

TXSO

W 98-43

+25.5

W 83-68

+4.5

CREI

W 90-63

+14.5

ASU

W 77-65

−1.5

SUU

W 122-50

+36.5

ALA

W 95-85

+5.5

W 100-61

+24.5

MICH

L 61-101

−43.5

W 94-59

+29.5

UNF

W 109-58

+8.5

UCLA

W 82-72

−0.5

CAM

W 98-70

−8.5

ORE

W 91-82

−3.5

PEPP

W 96-56

+10.5

USD

W 99-93

−23.5

SEA

W 80-72

−16.5

LMU

W 82-47

+9.5

SCU

W 89-77

−5.5

WSU

W 86-65

+4.5

SEA

W 71-50

+11.5

PEPP

W 84-60

−4.5

W 68-66

−13.5

SMC

W 73-65

−0.5

PORT

L 80-87

−29.5

ORST

W 81-61

+0.5

WSU

W 83-53

+8.5

SCU

W 94-86

+3.5

W 80-59

+5.5

PAC

W 71-62

−13.5

PORT

W 89-48

+14.5

SMC

L 59-70

−13.5

ORST

W 65-56

−11.5

SCU

W 79-68

+2.5

KENN

W 73-64

−11.5

TEX

L 68-74

−11.5

covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

TXSO

W 98-43

−16.5

W 83-68

−15.5

CREI

W 90-63

−11.5

ASU

W 77-65

−16.5

SUU

W 122-50

+11.5

ALA

W 95-85

+1.5

W 100-61

+3.5

MICH

L 61-101

−3.5

W 94-59

−6.5

UNF

W 109-58

+0.5

UCLA

W 82-72

+6.5

CAM

W 98-70

+7.5

ORE

W 91-82

+17.5

PEPP

W 96-56

−0.5

USD

W 99-93

+31.5

SEA

W 80-72

−3.5

LMU

W 82-47

−25.5

SCU

W 89-77

+2.5

WSU

W 86-65

−4.5

SEA

W 71-50

−29.5

PEPP

W 84-60

−6.5

W 68-66

−15.5

SMC

W 73-65

−6.5

PORT

L 80-87

+14.5

ORST

W 81-61

−7.5

WSU

W 83-53

−20.5

SCU

W 94-86

+21.5

W 80-59

−12.5

PAC

W 71-62

−11.5

PORT

W 89-48

−13.5

SMC

L 59-70

−14.5

ORST

W 65-56

−24.5

SCU

W 79-68

−10.5

KENN

W 73-64

−15.5

TEX

L 68-74

−4.5

over 11under 24avg −5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Purdue

39 games played

Straight up

30-9

77% wins

Against the spread

17-22

44% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-19

51% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

30-977%

W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W L L L W W W W L W L L W L W W W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2244%

L L W L L W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L W L W W L W L L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

20-1951%

U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O O U U O U O U O U O O O O U O O U U O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	vsEVAN	W 82-51	-33.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 133
Nov 7	vsOAK	W 87-77	-31.5	L −21.5	158.5	O 164
Nov 13	@ALA	W 87-80	+3.5	W +10.5	172.5	U 167
Nov 16	vsAKR	W 97-79	-18.5	L −0.5	163.5	O 176
Nov 20	vsMEM	W 80-71	-14.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 21	vsTTU	W 86-56	-3.5	W +26.5	153.5	U 142
Nov 28	vsEIU	W 109-62	-40.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 171
Dec 2	@RUTG	W 81-65	-13.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	vsISU	L 58-81	-4.5	L −27.5	154.5	U 139
Dec 10	vsMINN	W 85-57	-19.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 142
Dec 13	vsMARQ	W 79-59	-16.5	W +3.5	154.5	U 138
Dec 20	vsAUB	W 88-60	-7.5	W +20.5	152.5	U 148
Dec 29	vsKENT	W 101-60	-24.5	W +16.5	155.5	O 161
Jan 3	@WIS	W 89-73	-5.5	W +10.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 7	vsWASH	W 81-73	-16.5	L −8.5	154.5	U 154
Jan 10	vsPSU	W 93-85	-22.5	L −14.5	152.5	O 178
Jan 14	vsIOWA	W 79-72	-10.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 151
Jan 17	@USC	W 69-64	-9.5	L −4.5	155.5	U 133
Jan 20	@UCLA	L 67-69	-5.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 136
Jan 24	vsILL	L 82-88	-5.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 170
Jan 27	@IU	L 67-72	-4.5	L −9.5	150.5	U 139
Feb 1	@MD	W 93-63	-15.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 156
Feb 7	vsORE	W 68-64	-19.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 132
Feb 10	@NEB	W 80-77	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	O 157
Feb 14	@IOWA	W 78-57	-2.5	W +18.5	142.5	U 135
Feb 17	vsMICH	L 80-91	+2.5	L −8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 20	vsIU	W 93-64	-11.5	W +17.5	150.5	O 157
Feb 26	vsMSU	L 74-76	-5.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 150
Mar 1	@OSU	L 74-82	-6.5	L −14.5	149.5	O 156
Mar 4	@NU	W 70-66	-12.5	L −8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	vsWIS	L 93-97	-9.5	L −13.5	154.5	O 190
Mar 12	vsNU	W 81-68	-13.5	L −0.5	139.5	O 149
Mar 13	vsNEB	W 74-58	-4.5	W +11.5	145.5	U 132
Mar 14	vsUCLA	W 73-66	-7.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 15	vsMICH	W 80-72	+4.5	W +12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 20	vsQUC	W 104-71	-25.5	W +7.5	159.5	O 175
Mar 22	vsMIA	W 79-69	-8.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 148
Mar 26	vsTEX	W 79-77	-8.5	L −6.5	146.5	O 156
Mar 28	vsARIZ	L 64-79	+5.5	L −9.5	152.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−2.5

OAK

W 87-77

−21.5

ALA

W 87-80

+10.5

AKR

W 97-79

−0.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

+26.5

EIU

W 109-62

+6.5

RUTG

W 81-65

+2.5

ISU

L 58-81

−27.5

MINN

W 85-57

+8.5

MARQ

W 79-59

+3.5

AUB

W 88-60

+20.5

KENT

W 101-60

+16.5

WIS

W 89-73

+10.5

WASH

W 81-73

−8.5

PSU

W 93-85

−14.5

IOWA

W 79-72

−3.5

USC

W 69-64

−4.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−7.5

ILL

L 82-88

−11.5

L 67-72

−9.5

W 93-63

+14.5

ORE

W 68-64

−15.5

NEB

W 80-77

+5.5

IOWA

W 78-57

+18.5

MICH

L 80-91

−8.5

W 93-64

+17.5

MSU

L 74-76

−7.5

OSU

L 74-82

−14.5

W 70-66

−8.5

WIS

L 93-97

−13.5

W 81-68

−0.5

NEB

W 74-58

+11.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−0.5

MICH

W 80-72

+12.5

QUC

W 104-71

+7.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

−6.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 22avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

EVAN

W 82-51

−17.5

OAK

W 87-77

+5.5

ALA

W 87-80

−5.5

AKR

W 97-79

+12.5

MEM

W 80-71

−5.5

TTU

W 86-56

−11.5

EIU

W 109-62

+29.5

RUTG

W 81-65

−0.5

ISU

L 58-81

−15.5

MINN

W 85-57

−1.5

MARQ

W 79-59

−16.5

AUB

W 88-60

−4.5

KENT

W 101-60

+5.5

WIS

W 89-73

+8.5

WASH

W 81-73

−0.5

PSU

W 93-85

+25.5

IOWA

W 79-72

+5.5

USC

W 69-64

−22.5

UCLA

L 67-69

−11.5

ILL

L 82-88

+17.5

L 67-72

−11.5

W 93-63

+7.5

ORE

W 68-64

−12.5

NEB

W 80-77

+10.5

IOWA

W 78-57

−7.5

MICH

L 80-91

+14.5

W 93-64

+6.5

MSU

L 74-76

+6.5

OSU

L 74-82

+6.5

W 70-66

−9.5

WIS

L 93-97

+35.5

W 81-68

+9.5

NEB

W 74-58

−13.5

UCLA

W 73-66

−4.5

MICH

W 80-72

+2.5

QUC

W 104-71

+15.5

MIA

W 79-69

+1.5

TEX

W 79-77

+9.5

ARIZ

L 64-79

−9.5

over 20under 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Gonzaga has the better starters

Position by position: Gonzaga 2, Purdue 0, even 3

GonzagaBetterPurdue

G J. Bennett TR15.8 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.9 ast Score 85

Even

G C. Cox8.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

G X. Lee TR11.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 4.2 ast Score 94

GONZSmall

G G. Harris4.6 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

F C. Wiggins TR13.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.9 ast Score 81

Even

G J. Benter4.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.8 ast Score 75

F B. Huff17.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.5 ast Score 99

GONZBig

G O. Mayer5.5 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 64

C M. Diop TR13.6 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.1 ast Score 86

Even

C D. Jacobsen5.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 88

GonzagaBetterPurdue

GONZ offense14th of 366 · +9.4

Even

PUR defense18th of 366 · +6.0

GONZ defense21st of 366 · +5.3

Even

PUR offense38th of 366 · +5.0

Backcourt+5.5 · 2 players

GONZBig

Backcourt+2.4 · 4 players

Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players

GONZBig

Frontcourt+1.8 · 1 player

Bench+2.8 · 2 players

GONZSmall

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestGONZ betterPUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Gonzaga

Guards

J. Bennett35 min · TRX. Lee27 min · TRD. Fogle17 minI. Harwell14 min · TRN. De SousaNewA. MetzNew

Forwards

C. Wiggins28 min · TRB. Huff26 minI. AlmansaNewP. JeffersonNewS. FunchesNewL. FosterNew

Centers

M. Diop30 min · TR

Purdue

Guards

C. Cox24 minG. Harris16 minJ. Benter15 minO. Mayer14 minJ. Rayl2 minJ. Lusk2 min

Forwards

S. KingNewC. PierceNewE. ShahrvinNewR. BurgessNewR. KnightNew

Centers

D. Jacobsen13 minS. HuanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

GONZ84.3 #17

PUR81.6 #35

Points per possession

GONZ1.20 #13

PUR1.25 #2

Pace (possessions)

GONZ70.4 #98

PUR65.4 #333

Shooting

Effective FG%

GONZ55.6 #25

PUR57.6 #10

3-point %

GONZ33.3 #212

PUR38.3 #11

3-point attempt rate

GONZ30.8 #342

PUR40.2 #164

Free throw rate

GONZ31.0 #282

PUR28.6 #336

Possessions

Turnover rate

GONZ13.7 #17

PUR13.7 #16

Offensive rebound rate

GONZ34.8 #52

PUR36.4 #19

Assists per game

GONZ18.4 #7

PUR19.6 #2

Defense

Points allowed

GONZ66.2 #15

PUR70.5 #65

Points allowed per possession

GONZ0.94 #1

PUR1.08 #162

Opponent effective FG%

GONZ46.3 #15

PUR52.4 #232

Opponent 3-point %

GONZ30.6 #23

PUR34.1 #192

Turnovers forced

GONZ19.9 #25

PUR15.3 #263

Defensive rebound rate

GONZ74.3 #16

PUR72.9 #39

Steals per game

GONZ8.4 #23

PUR5.5 #297

Blocks per game

GONZ3.7 #116

PUR2.8 #257

GONZ		PUR
Scoring
84.3 #17	Points per game	81.6 #35
1.20 #13	Points per possession	1.25 #2
70.4 #98	Pace (possessions)	65.4 #333
Shooting
55.6 #25	Effective FG%	57.6 #10
33.3 #212	3-point %	38.3 #11
30.8 #342	3-point attempt rate	40.2 #164
31.0 #282	Free throw rate	28.6 #336
Possessions
13.7 #17	Turnover rate	13.7 #16
34.8 #52	Offensive rebound rate	36.4 #19
18.4 #7	Assists per game	19.6 #2
Defense
66.2 #15	Points allowed	70.5 #65
0.94 #1	Points allowed per possession	1.08 #162
46.3 #15	Opponent effective FG%	52.4 #232
30.6 #23	Opponent 3-point %	34.1 #192
19.9 #25	Turnovers forced	15.3 #263
74.3 #16	Defensive rebound rate	72.9 #39
8.4 #23	Steals per game	5.5 #297
3.7 #116	Blocks per game	2.8 #257

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Gonzaga

31-4 in 2025-26 overall · 18-2 in conference · Pac-12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Texas68–74
Wvs Kennesaw St73–64
Wvs Santa Clara79–68
Wvs Oregon St65–56
L@ Saint Mary's59–70

A week or more of rest.

Purdue

30-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arizona64–79
Wvs Texas79–77
Wvs Miami79–69
Wvs Queens University Royals104–71
Wvs Michigan80–72

A week or more of rest.