Curry Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SIU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LIB 71–71 · win probability LIB 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LIB has more of the edges
LIB 4, SIU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIB 19.3%, SIU 30.9%. Defensive: LIB 66.9%, SIU 72.7%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: LIB plays 65.1 a game (343rd fastest), SIU 70.6 (91st). Faster games mean more points
SIU offense vs LIB defense
Offense 227th of 366 against a defense 138th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIB 13.4%, SIU 17.1%. Forced: LIB 17.0%, SIU 18.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIB 59.1 and allows 52.7; SIU 49.1 and allows 49.0
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIB 47%, SIU 22%. Transfers in: LIB 2, SIU 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIB 31.4, SIU 31.3. Allowed: LIB 27.0, SIU 31.4
Even
LIB offense vs SIU defense
Offense 202nd of 366 against a defense 181st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
LIB hits 38.6% and allows 37.7%; SIU hits 27.8% and allows 30.4%. Threes are 47.7% and 29.2% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
LIB has played the 148th-hardest schedule, SIU the 139th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LIB -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 142.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIB 71.3 · SIU 70.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LIB -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 66.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIB 33.5 · SIU 33 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Liberty
31 games played
Straight up
23-8
74% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 90-75 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 88-68 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 79-73 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-74 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 92-50 | -30.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 45-85 | +12.5 | L −27.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 64-61 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 97-94 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 81-73 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 78-69 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 72-56 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 73-71 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 80-69 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-69 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-51 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 136.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 75-69 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-76 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 77-75 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 73-64 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 90-89 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-94 | -7.5 | L −28.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 65-74 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 81-78 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 71-76 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-72 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 69-77 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 77-71 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 21 | @ | L 63-73 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
COFC
W 90-75
+5.5
9
vs
FAU
W 88-68
+12.5
24
vs
UVM
W 79-73
−2.5
25
vs
TOW
L 69-72
−9.5
26
vs
BRAD
L 64-74
−14.5
6
vs
COPP
W 92-50
+11.5
10
@
NCSU
L 45-85
−27.5
20
@
DAY
W 64-61
+12.5
28
@
FIU
W 97-94
−1.5
2
vs
KENN
W 81-73
+0.5
4
vs
JXST
W 78-69
−0.5
8
@
LT
W 72-56
+11.5
10
@
SHSU
W 82-74
+6.5
15
vs
NMSU
W 73-71
−6.5
17
vs
UTEP
W 80-69
−2.5
21
@
WKU
W 76-69
+5.5
24
vs
DEL
W 67-51
+0.5
29
@
MTSU
W 81-65
+14.5
4
@
DEL
W 75-69
−4.5
7
vs
MOST
W 79-76
−6.5
11
@
NMSU
W 77-75
−1.5
14
@
UTEP
W 73-64
+2.5
19
vs
FIU
W 90-89
−8.5
21
vs
WKU
L 73-94
−28.5
26
@
KENN
L 65-74
−10.5
28
@
JXST
W 81-78
−0.5
5
vs
LT
L 71-76
−13.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 79-72
+2.5
11
vs
MOST
L 69-77
−12.5
17
@
GMU
W 77-71
+8.5
21
@
NEV
L 63-73
−2.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
COFC
W 90-75
+19.5
9
vs
FAU
W 88-68
+3.5
24
vs
UVM
W 79-73
+10.5
25
vs
TOW
L 69-72
+3.5
26
vs
BRAD
L 64-74
−6.5
6
vs
COPP
W 92-50
−1.5
10
@
NCSU
L 45-85
−19.5
20
@
DAY
W 64-61
−17.5
28
@
FIU
W 97-94
+38.5
2
vs
KENN
W 81-73
−4.5
4
vs
JXST
W 78-69
+12.5
8
@
LT
W 72-56
−7.5
10
@
SHSU
W 82-74
+1.5
15
vs
NMSU
W 73-71
−1.5
17
vs
UTEP
W 80-69
+11.5
21
@
WKU
W 76-69
−3.5
24
vs
DEL
W 67-51
−16.5
29
@
MTSU
W 81-65
+9.5
4
@
DEL
W 75-69
+11.5
7
vs
MOST
W 79-76
+14.5
11
@
NMSU
W 77-75
+7.5
14
@
UTEP
W 73-64
−2.5
19
vs
FIU
W 90-89
+26.5
21
vs
WKU
L 73-94
+19.5
26
@
KENN
L 65-74
−13.5
28
@
JXST
W 81-78
+19.5
5
vs
LT
L 71-76
+10.5
7
vs
SHSU
W 79-72
−1.5
11
vs
MOST
L 69-77
+3.5
17
@
GMU
W 77-71
+6.5
21
@
NEV
L 63-73
−10.5
over 18under 13avg +4 ptslonger = bigger margin
S Illinois
31 games played
Straight up
15-16
48% wins
Against the spread
16-15
52% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-22
29% overs · avg −5.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-78 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 81-86 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 85-92 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 79-59 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 58-74 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-65 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 86-84 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 162.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 83-54 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 84-93 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 69-73 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 75-70 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 68-67 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 57-70 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-76 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 65-50 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 130.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 66-68 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 54-50 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 81-91 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 80-65 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 86-60 | -12.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 60-70 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 66-61 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 59-57 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 66-55 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 81-67 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 63-67 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
KC
W 101-78
+10.5
12
@
NEV
L 81-86
+6.5
17
@
NDSU
L 85-92
−5.5
23
vs
DEL
W 79-59
+11.5
24
vs
UAB
L 73-81
−5.5
26
@
MEM
L 58-74
−5.5
29
vs
LR
W 74-65
−4.5
3
@
HPU
W 86-84
+11.5
10
vs
UTM
W 83-54
+20.5
13
@
RICH
L 84-93
−5.5
18
vs
ILST
L 68-75
−8.5
21
@
BRAD
L 69-73
+2.5
29
@
MUR
L 81-84
+3.5
1
vs
VAL
W 75-70
−2.5
4
@
BEL
W 68-67
+7.5
7
@
UIC
L 57-70
−14.5
14
vs
DRKE
L 73-76
−8.5
17
vs
BEL
L 68-73
−1.5
21
@
VAL
L 63-69
−4.5
28
vs
UNI
W 65-50
+16.5
31
vs
UIC
L 66-68
−5.5
3
@
ILST
W 54-50
+12.5
6
vs
MUR
L 81-91
−8.5
9
@
INST
W 80-65
+13.5
12
vs
EVAN
W 86-60
+13.5
15
vs
BRAD
L 60-70
−12.5
18
@
DRKE
W 66-61
+3.5
21
@
UNI
W 59-57
+8.5
25
vs
INST
W 66-55
+2.5
1
@
EVAN
W 81-67
+4.5
5
vs
DRKE
L 63-67
−9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
KC
W 101-78
+37.5
12
@
NEV
L 81-86
+14.5
17
@
NDSU
L 85-92
+23.5
23
vs
DEL
W 79-59
−15.5
24
vs
UAB
L 73-81
−7.5
26
@
MEM
L 58-74
−24.5
29
vs
LR
W 74-65
−2.5
3
@
HPU
W 86-84
+7.5
10
vs
UTM
W 83-54
−9.5
13
@
RICH
L 84-93
+23.5
18
vs
ILST
L 68-75
−10.5
21
@
BRAD
L 69-73
−10.5
29
@
MUR
L 81-84
−0.5
1
vs
VAL
W 75-70
−0.5
4
@
BEL
W 68-67
−23.5
7
@
UIC
L 57-70
−19.5
14
vs
DRKE
L 73-76
+4.5
17
vs
BEL
L 68-73
−10.5
21
@
VAL
L 63-69
−10.5
28
vs
UNI
W 65-50
−15.5
31
vs
UIC
L 66-68
−8.5
3
@
ILST
W 54-50
−36.5
6
vs
MUR
L 81-91
+14.5
9
@
INST
W 80-65
−1.5
12
vs
EVAN
W 86-60
+3.5
15
vs
BRAD
L 60-70
−16.5
18
@
DRKE
W 66-61
−22.5
21
@
UNI
W 59-57
−18.5
25
vs
INST
W 66-55
−26.5
1
@
EVAN
W 81-67
+8.5
5
vs
DRKE
L 63-67
−10.5
over 9under 22avg −5.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Liberty 0, S Illinois 0, even 5
LibertyBetterS Illinois
G C. Campbell TR12.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 67
=Even
G J. Haynes7.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 71
G E. Sancomb10 pts · 6 reb · 4 ast
Score 55
=No call
G C. Hawkins1.1 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
G C. Campbell TR9 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 31
=Even
F M. Pikaar1.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 19
G Z. Carter2.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 27
=No call
F D. Hill NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F D. Claussen2 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
Score 50
=No call
C J. Webber1.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
LibertyBetterS Illinois
LIB offense202nd of 366 · -6.3
=Even
SIU defense181st of 366 · -4.1
LIB defense138th of 366 · -2.9
←LIBSmall
SIU offense227th of 366 · -7.0
Backcourt-2.8 · 4 players
→SIUSmall
Backcourt+0.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.0 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestLIB betterSIU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Campbell35 min · TRE. Sancomb34 minC. Campbell29 min · TRZ. Carter12 minM. SheltonNewE. HerbertNew
Forwards
D. Claussen33 minR. Jones5 minB. Kester3 minD. Grimes3 minT. Drain2 minT. Sorensen2 min
Guards
J. Haynes21 minC. Hawkins5 minB. McClureNewJ. FugateNewL. WalshNewJ. JacksonNew
Forwards
M. Pikaar11 minD. HillNewD. PauliukonisNewP. RanieriNewT. LaurNew
Centers
J. Webber7 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.8 #146 | Points per game | 72.7 #229 |
| 1.17 #41 | Points per possession | 1.03 #285 |
| 65.1 #343 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #91 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.1 #4 | Effective FG% | 49.1 #286 |
| 38.6 #8 | 3-point % | 27.8 #363 |
| 47.7 #28 | 3-point attempt rate | 29.2 #355 |
| 31.4 #273 | Free throw rate | 31.3 #275 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.4 #13 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #207 |
| 19.3 #365 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.9 #167 |
| 16.5 #36 | Assists per game | 13.3 #188 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.2 #110 | Points allowed | 70.5 #62 |
| 1.11 #234 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #25 |
| 52.7 #251 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.0 #70 |
| 37.7 #353 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.4 #17 |
| 17.0 #149 | Turnovers forced | 18.5 #74 |
| 66.9 #302 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.7 #44 |
| 6.2 #218 | Steals per game | 8.0 #38 |
| 3.3 #178 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #157 |
Liberty
23-8 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Nevada63–73
- W@ George Mason77–71
- Lvs Missouri St69–77
- Wvs Sam Houston79–72
- Lvs Louisiana Tech71–76
A week or more of rest.
S Illinois
15-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Drake63–67
- W@ Evansville81–67
- Wvs Indiana St66–55
- W@ Northern Iowa59–57
- W@ Drake66–61
A week or more of rest.