The Thunderdome · at Santa Barbara
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCSB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NEV 75–71 · win probability NEV 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NEV has more of the edges
NEV 3, UCSB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NEV 14.8%, UCSB 18.8%. Forced: NEV 17.0%, UCSB 16.8%
Context
Schedule so far
NEV has played the 94th-hardest schedule, UCSB the 203rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NEV 44.8, UCSB 36.8. Allowed: NEV 38.9, UCSB 42.4
UCSB offense vs NEV defense
Offense 150th of 366 against a defense 73rd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: NEV 50.0 and allows 51.1; UCSB 54.7 and allows 52.6
Home court
UCSB at home. This season: UCSB 0-0 at home, NEV 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NEV 38%, UCSB 53%. Transfers in: NEV 5, UCSB 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
NEV offense vs UCSB defense
Offense 104th of 366 against a defense 128th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
NEV hits 35.8% and allows 33.7%; UCSB hits 37.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 32.3% and 44.1% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NEV 32.2%, UCSB 31.0%. Defensive: NEV 73.1%, UCSB 74.5%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: NEV plays 67.7 a game (243rd fastest), UCSB 68.2 (218th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NEV -3.7 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | NEV 74.9 · UCSB 71.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NEV -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | NEV 35.3 · UCSB 33 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NEV 1–0 UCSBNEV leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NEV 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025-26 | UCSB 64 @ NEV 77 | NEV -5.5 | NEV W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nevada
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Against the spread
22-1559%
3 straight covers3 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-50 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 86-81 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 83-98 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 71-75 | -12.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-64 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-83 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-65 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 76-70 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 78-64 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 81-66 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 66-65 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 68-73 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-83 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-71 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-66 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-54 | -16.5 | W +16.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 66-60 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-76 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 87-91 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-59 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-71 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 71-87 | -10.5 | L −26.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-77 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 67-60 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 83-85 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 73-83 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-59 | -24.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 80-45 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-80 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-79 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 89-75 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 25 | @ | L 69-75 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
+17.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
−12.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
−6.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
−8.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
−16.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
+7.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
−13.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+21.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
+0.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
+16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
−2.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+18.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
+14.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−3.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−6.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+5.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
+4.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+16.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+1.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
+2.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+5.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+2.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−1.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−6.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
−26.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+8.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
+5.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
−3.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
−11.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−9.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
+15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+7.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−6.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+5.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
+2.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
+2.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
−9.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
+15.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
+14.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
+36.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
+2.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
−6.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
+3.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+3.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
−3.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
−3.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
+1.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+5.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
−2.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−15.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−0.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+31.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
−14.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+12.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+3.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+2.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
−17.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+17.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+36.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−21.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−11.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
+16.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+10.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
−21.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
+17.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
+12.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−11.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
−15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+26.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−0.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+4.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
−10.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
−7.5
over 20under 17avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Santa Barbara
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-74 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 92-87 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 64-77 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-70 | -10.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 84-77 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 109-84 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 53-68 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-67 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 79-61 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 84-95 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 65-74 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 86-93 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 75-69 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-62 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 107-67 | -8.5 | W +31.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 74-71 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 62-48 | +4.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-69 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 79-89 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 83-85 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 70-59 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-64 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-64 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
SJSU
W 85-74
+1.5
11
@
SAC
W 92-87
−2.5
17
vs
LMU
L 74-78
−7.5
22
@
NEV
L 64-77
−7.5
28
vs
LEH
W 72-70
−8.5
29
vs
SEA
W 74-71
+5.5
4
vs
LBSU
W 84-77
−6.5
6
vs
CSUB
W 109-84
+12.5
13
vs
UVU
L 53-68
−9.5
17
@
GB
L 64-67
−10.5
22
vs
PORT
W 79-61
+8.5
1
@
CSUF
L 84-95
−14.5
3
@
CSUN
L 65-74
−6.5
8
vs
UCD
L 86-93
−11.5
15
@
CSUB
W 75-69
−1.5
17
vs
HAW
W 77-62
+17.5
22
vs
CP
W 107-67
+31.5
24
@
LBSU
W 74-71
−1.5
29
@
UCSD
W 62-48
+18.5
31
vs
CSUF
W 83-69
+5.5
5
@
UCD
L 75-85
−13.5
7
vs
UCI
W 84-79
+2.5
12
@
UCR
W 76-68
+1.5
14
@
CP
L 79-89
−13.5
19
vs
CSUN
L 83-85
−7.5
21
@
HAW
L 75-78
+2.5
26
vs
UCR
W 70-59
+0.5
28
@
UCI
L 60-64
−0.5
7
vs
UCSD
L 63-64
−3.5
11
vs
UCD
L 73-79
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
SJSU
W 85-74
+12.5
11
@
SAC
W 92-87
+17.5
17
vs
LMU
L 74-78
+6.5
22
@
NEV
L 64-77
−6.5
28
vs
LEH
W 72-70
−4.5
29
vs
SEA
W 74-71
+2.5
4
vs
LBSU
W 84-77
+19.5
6
vs
CSUB
W 109-84
+47.5
13
vs
UVU
L 53-68
−25.5
17
@
GB
L 64-67
−9.5
22
vs
PORT
W 79-61
−7.5
1
@
CSUF
L 84-95
+23.5
3
@
CSUN
L 65-74
−17.5
8
vs
UCD
L 86-93
+31.5
15
@
CSUB
W 75-69
−0.5
17
vs
HAW
W 77-62
−4.5
22
vs
CP
W 107-67
+14.5
24
@
LBSU
W 74-71
+0.5
29
@
UCSD
W 62-48
−35.5
31
vs
CSUF
W 83-69
−1.5
5
@
UCD
L 75-85
+12.5
7
vs
UCI
W 84-79
+21.5
12
@
UCR
W 76-68
−1.5
14
@
CP
L 79-89
+8.5
19
vs
CSUN
L 83-85
+11.5
21
@
HAW
L 75-78
+7.5
26
vs
UCR
W 70-59
−16.5
28
@
UCI
L 60-64
−14.5
7
vs
UCSD
L 63-64
−14.5
11
vs
UCD
L 73-79
+12.5
over 16under 14avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nevada has the better starters
Position by position: Nevada 3, Santa Barbara 1, even 1
NevadaBetterSanta Barbara
G S. Phipps TR13.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 77
←NEVSmall
G V. Vartiainen TR12.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 52
G K. Kensie TR10.8 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 54
→UCSBBig
G M. Little12.7 pts · 5.6 reb · 4.8 ast
Score 91
G P. Bandelj TR12.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 57
=Even
G C. Shaw11.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 62
G V. Weems10.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 84
←NEVBig
G R. Smith TR6.6 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 43
F E. Price12.8 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 91
←NEVBig
C E. Dibami TR9.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 45
NevadaBetterSanta Barbara
NEV offense104th of 366 · -1.4
=Even
UCSB defense128th of 366 · -2.3
NEV defense73rd of 366 · +0.7
←NEVSmall
UCSB offense150th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt+2.1 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt+1.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt+3.4 · 1 player
←NEVBig
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Bench-1.3 · 4 players
←NEVSmall
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNEV betterUCSB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Phipps34 min · TRK. Kensie31 min · TRP. Bandelj31 min · TRV. Weems25 minP. White14 minM. Walker8 min
Forwards
E. Price30 minH. LucasNewK. SnyderNew
Centers
S. Majok12 min · TRC. Lath4 min · TR
Guards
V. Vartiainen31 min · TRM. Little30 minC. Shaw29 minR. Smith28 min · TRM. McGhee21 minL. Zuffelato4 min
Forwards
A. Chol24 min · TRM. Simcoe9 minD. Duru7 min · TRK. Keat Tong6 minK. Haughy2 minJ. Simcoe2 min
Centers
E. Dibami29 min · TRM. John WuolNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.0 #141 | Points per game | 76.7 #127 |
| 1.12 #96 | Points per possession | 1.13 #87 |
| 67.7 #243 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #218 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #236 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #47 |
| 35.8 #70 | 3-point % | 37.4 #23 |
| 32.3 #326 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.1 #87 |
| 44.8 #6 | Free throw rate | 36.8 #134 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #56 | Turnover rate | 18.8 #312 |
| 32.2 #119 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.0 #165 |
| 14.5 #119 | Assists per game | 14.1 #140 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #92 | Points allowed | 73.7 #148 |
| 1.06 #101 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #156 |
| 51.1 #166 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #244 |
| 33.7 #168 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #177 |
| 17.0 #150 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #170 |
| 73.1 #33 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.5 #14 |
| 6.6 #168 | Steals per game | 6.2 #216 |
| 3.8 #106 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #322 |
Nevada
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-9 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Auburn69–75
- Wvs Liberty73–63
- Wvs Murray St89–75
- Lvs Utah State66–79
- Wvs Grand Canyon84–80
A week or more of rest.
Santa Barbara
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Davis73–79
- Lvs UC San Diego63–64
- L@ UC Irvine60–64
- Wvs UC Riverside70–59
- L@ Hawai'i75–78
A week or more of rest.