Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NEV 78–68 · win probability NEV 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NEV has more of the edges
NEV 6, SF 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NEV 14.8%, SF 15.9%. Forced: NEV 17.0%, SF 14.1%
SF offense vs NEV defense
Offense 178th of 366 against a defense 73rd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NEV 44.8, SF 40.1. Allowed: NEV 38.9, SF 29.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NEV 38%, SF 3%. Transfers in: NEV 5, SF 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
NEV offense vs SF defense
Offense 104th of 366 against a defense 165th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NEV 32.2%, SF 31.4%. Defensive: NEV 73.1%, SF 71.0%
Three-pointers
NEV hits 35.8% and allows 33.7%; SF hits 34.6% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 32.3% and 46.1% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NEV 50.0 and allows 51.1; SF 51.3 and allows 50.8
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: NEV plays 67.7 a game (243rd fastest), SF 67.3 (271st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Schedule so far
NEV has played the 94th-hardest schedule, SF the 98th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NEV -9.8 | — |
| Total | — | 146.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | NEV 78.1 · SF 68.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NEV -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | NEV 37.2 · SF 31.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NEV 1–1 SFSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · NEV 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025-26 | SF 65 vs NEV 81 | NEV +5.5 | NEV W |
| Nov 18, 2021-22 | NEV 70 @ SF 73 | SF -6.5 | NEV W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nevada
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Against the spread
22-1559%
3 straight covers3 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-50 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 86-81 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 83-98 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 71-75 | -12.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-64 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-83 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-65 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 76-70 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 78-64 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 81-66 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 66-65 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 68-73 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-83 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-71 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-66 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-54 | -16.5 | W +16.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 66-60 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-76 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 87-91 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-59 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-71 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 71-87 | -10.5 | L −26.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-77 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 67-60 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 83-85 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 73-83 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-59 | -24.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 80-45 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-80 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-79 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 89-75 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 25 | @ | L 69-75 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
+17.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
−12.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
−6.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
−8.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
−16.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
+7.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
−13.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+21.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
+0.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
+16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
−2.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+18.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
+14.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−3.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−6.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+5.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
+4.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+16.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+1.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
+2.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+5.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+2.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−1.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−6.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
−26.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+8.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
+5.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
−3.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
−11.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−9.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
+15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+7.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−6.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+5.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
+2.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
+2.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
−9.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
+15.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
+14.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
+36.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
+2.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
−6.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
+3.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+3.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
−3.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
−3.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
+1.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+5.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
−2.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−15.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−0.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+31.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
−14.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+12.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+3.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+2.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
−17.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+17.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+36.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−21.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−11.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
+16.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+10.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
−21.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
+17.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
+12.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−11.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
−15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+26.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−0.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+4.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
−10.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
−7.5
over 20under 17avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
San Francisco
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-70 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-64 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-64 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-81 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 63-65 | -16.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 65-62 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-85 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 85-71 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-64 | -25.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-59 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 62-70 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 74-64 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-68 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 82-84 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 80-60 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 85-80 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-68 | +15.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 73-88 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-82 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 75-84 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-79 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 63-90 | -8.5 | L −35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 92-79 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 59-80 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-94 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 72-61 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-65 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 77-78 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−3.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−3.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
+1.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+3.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+13.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−11.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
−21.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−18.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
+7.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+2.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+2.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+4.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
+10.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−2.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
−0.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
+12.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
−8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
−0.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
+13.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
−5.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+0.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
−17.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−13.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
−35.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+7.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−5.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
−14.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
+14.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+10.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−11.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−4.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
−7.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+4.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+1.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−2.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
+3.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−17.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
−23.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+4.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+12.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+12.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
−20.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−14.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
+24.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
−0.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
+8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
+18.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
−15.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
+10.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+30.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
+13.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−9.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
+12.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+22.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−12.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
+8.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
−9.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+0.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
+10.5
over 17under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nevada has the better starters
Position by position: Nevada 1, San Francisco 0, even 4
NevadaBetterSan Francisco
G S. Phipps TR13.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 77
=No call
G A. Bashir TR2.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
G K. Kensie TR10.8 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 54
=No call
G A. Braccia0.4 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
G P. Bandelj TR12.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 57
←NEVSmall
F B. Oosterbaan TR7.6 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 31
G V. Weems10.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 84
=No call
F N. Newbury NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F E. Price12.8 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 91
=No call
C I. Diagne TR1.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
NevadaBetterSan Francisco
NEV offense104th of 366 · -1.4
←NEVSmall
SF defense165th of 366 · -3.7
NEV defense73rd of 366 · +0.7
←NEVSmall
SF offense178th of 366 · -5.5
Backcourt+2.1 · 4 players
←NEVSmall
Backcourt-0.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.4 · 1 player
←NEVBig
Frontcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Bench-1.3 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestNEV betterSF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Phipps34 min · TRK. Kensie31 min · TRP. Bandelj31 min · TRV. Weems25 minP. White14 minM. Walker8 min
Forwards
E. Price30 minH. LucasNewK. SnyderNew
Centers
S. Majok12 min · TRC. Lath4 min · TR
Guards
A. Bashir10 min · TRA. Braccia5 minW. FodeNewM. MageeNewY. VitlemNewD. BordonNew
Forwards
B. Oosterbaan25 min · TRN. NewburyNewA. TysonNewG. KnudsenNewD. WileyNewJ. PihtovsNew
Centers
I. Diagne7 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.0 #141 | Points per game | 73.9 #198 |
| 1.12 #96 | Points per possession | 1.10 #131 |
| 67.7 #243 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #271 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #236 | Effective FG% | 51.3 #184 |
| 35.8 #70 | 3-point % | 34.6 #140 |
| 32.3 #326 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.1 #45 |
| 44.8 #6 | Free throw rate | 40.1 #59 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #56 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #129 |
| 32.2 #119 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.4 #148 |
| 14.5 #119 | Assists per game | 13.6 #174 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #92 | Points allowed | 73.8 #149 |
| 1.06 #101 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #206 |
| 51.1 #166 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #143 |
| 33.7 #168 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #187 |
| 17.0 #150 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #331 |
| 73.1 #33 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.0 #105 |
| 6.6 #168 | Steals per game | 5.1 #332 |
| 3.8 #106 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #238 |
Nevada
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-9 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Auburn69–75
- Wvs Liberty73–63
- Wvs Murray St89–75
- Lvs Utah State66–79
- Wvs Grand Canyon84–80
A week or more of rest.
San Francisco
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oregon St77–78
- Wvs Portland82–65
- W@ Pacific72–61
- Lvs Santa Clara73–94
- Lvs Gonzaga59–80
A week or more of rest.