The Sobrato Center · at San Francisco
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNLV 78–73 · win probability UNLV 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNLV has more of the edges
UNLV 4, SF 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNLV 40.6, SF 40.1. Allowed: UNLV 44.9, SF 29.6
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNLV plays 71.3 a game (57th fastest), SF 67.3 (271st). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNLV 30.2%, SF 31.4%. Defensive: UNLV 68.0%, SF 71.0%
UNLV offense vs SF defense
Offense 90th of 366 against a defense 165th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNLV 43%, SF 3%. Transfers in: UNLV 7, SF 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
SF offense vs UNLV defense
Offense 178th of 366 against a defense 114th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNLV 17.1%, SF 15.9%. Forced: UNLV 17.4%, SF 14.1%
Home court
SF at home. This season: SF 0-0 at home, UNLV 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
UNLV hits 35.2% and allows 35.2%; SF hits 34.6% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 36.4% and 46.1% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
UNLV has played the 87th-hardest schedule, SF the 98th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNLV 53.5 and allows 52.3; SF 51.3 and allows 50.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNLV -5.4 | — |
| Total | — | 150.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNLV 78.1 · SF 72.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNLV -3.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNLV 36.9 · SF 33.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNLV 0–2 SFSF leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · SF has won the last 2 meetings · UNLV 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | SF 75 @ UNLV 73 | UNLV -6.5 | SF W |
| Dec 4, 2021-22 | UNLV 62 @ SF 83 | SF -10 | SF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNLV
34 games played
Straight up
17-17
50% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-14
59% overs · avg +3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 81-86 | -16.5 | L −21.5 | 146.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 101-69 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 93-102 | -10.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 92-78 | +9.5 | W +23.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 99-85 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 67-74 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 76-115 | +13.5 | L −25.5 | 181.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 65-80 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 75-74 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 60-63 | -12.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-72 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 67-39 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 66-98 | +4.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 62-70 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 89-85 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-62 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 86-76 | +15.5 | W +25.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 71-82 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 61-89 | +3.5 | L −24.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 76-89 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 96-98 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 82-75 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 86-83 | +10.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 86-91 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 91-66 | -16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-80 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 85-83 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 92-65 | +7.5 | W +34.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 86-89 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 73-70 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 60-80 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 22 | @ | L 66-77 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UTM
L 81-86
−21.5
8
vs
UTC
W 101-69
+24.5
11
vs
MONT
L 93-102
−19.5
16
@
MEM
W 92-78
+23.5
20
vs
JOES
W 99-85
+3.5
24
vs
MD
L 67-74
−4.5
25
vs
ALA
L 76-115
−25.5
27
vs
RUTG
L 65-80
−19.5
7
@
STAN
W 75-74
+10.5
13
vs
TNST
L 60-63
−15.5
20
vs
FRES
W 84-72
+3.5
3
vs
AF
W 67-39
+13.5
6
@
WYO
L 66-98
−27.5
9
@
CSU
L 62-70
−1.5
13
vs
BOIS
W 89-85
+5.5
17
@
SJSU
W 76-62
+6.5
20
@
USU
W 86-76
+25.5
24
vs
SDSU
L 71-82
−7.5
27
vs
UNM
L 61-89
−24.5
30
@
NEV
L 76-89
−5.5
3
@
FRES
L 96-98
−3.5
7
vs
GCU
W 80-78
+4.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 82-75
−5.5
13
@
BOIS
W 86-83
+13.5
18
vs
CSU
L 86-91
−7.5
21
@
AF
W 91-66
+8.5
25
@
GCU
L 67-80
−5.5
28
vs
NEV
W 85-83
+3.5
3
vs
USU
W 92-65
+34.5
6
@
SDSU
L 86-89
+6.5
11
vs
WYO
W 73-70
+0.5
12
vs
USU
L 60-80
−11.5
17
@
UCI
W 75-72
+1.5
22
@
TLSA
L 66-77
−6.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UTM
L 81-86
+20.5
8
vs
UTC
W 101-69
+14.5
11
vs
MONT
L 93-102
+37.5
16
@
MEM
W 92-78
+6.5
20
vs
JOES
W 99-85
+22.5
24
vs
MD
L 67-74
−23.5
25
vs
ALA
L 76-115
+9.5
27
vs
RUTG
L 65-80
−8.5
7
@
STAN
W 75-74
−15.5
13
vs
TNST
L 60-63
−38.5
20
vs
FRES
W 84-72
−3.5
3
vs
AF
W 67-39
−36.5
6
@
WYO
L 66-98
+9.5
9
@
CSU
L 62-70
−19.5
13
vs
BOIS
W 89-85
+23.5
17
@
SJSU
W 76-62
−8.5
20
@
USU
W 86-76
+5.5
24
vs
SDSU
L 71-82
+3.5
27
vs
UNM
L 61-89
−5.5
30
@
NEV
L 76-89
+17.5
3
@
FRES
L 96-98
+40.5
7
vs
GCU
W 80-78
+9.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 82-75
+7.5
13
@
BOIS
W 86-83
+15.5
18
vs
CSU
L 86-91
+29.5
21
@
AF
W 91-66
+3.5
25
@
GCU
L 67-80
−3.5
28
vs
NEV
W 85-83
+17.5
3
vs
USU
W 92-65
+0.5
6
@
SDSU
L 86-89
+21.5
11
vs
WYO
W 73-70
−10.5
12
vs
USU
L 60-80
−16.5
17
@
UCI
W 75-72
−6.5
22
@
TLSA
L 66-77
−18.5
over 20under 14avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
San Francisco
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-70 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-64 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-64 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-81 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 63-65 | -16.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 65-62 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-85 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 85-71 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-64 | -25.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-59 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 62-70 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 74-64 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-68 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 82-84 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 80-60 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 85-80 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-68 | +15.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 73-88 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-82 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 75-84 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-79 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 63-90 | -8.5 | L −35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 92-79 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 59-80 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-94 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 72-61 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-65 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 77-78 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−3.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−3.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
+1.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+3.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+13.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−11.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
−21.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−18.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
+7.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+2.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+2.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+4.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
+10.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−2.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
−0.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
+12.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
−8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
−0.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
+13.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
−5.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+0.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
−17.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−13.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
−35.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+7.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−5.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
−14.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
+14.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+10.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−11.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−4.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
−7.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+4.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+1.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−2.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
+3.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−17.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
−23.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+4.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+12.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+12.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
−20.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−14.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
+24.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
−0.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
+8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
+18.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
−15.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
+10.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+30.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
+13.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−9.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
+12.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+22.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−12.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
+8.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
−9.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+0.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
+10.5
over 17under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: UNLV 0, San Francisco 0, even 5
UNLVBetterSan Francisco
G D. Williams15.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 64
=No call
G A. Bashir TR2.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
G A. Storr TR15.5 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 97
=No call
G A. Braccia0.4 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
G I. Williamson8.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 25
=Even
F B. Oosterbaan TR7.6 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 31
F T. Jones11.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 91
=No call
F N. Newbury NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F M. Thomas TR10.8 pts · 8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
=No call
C I. Diagne TR1.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
UNLVBetterSan Francisco
UNLV offense90th of 366 · -0.2
←UNLVSmall
SF defense165th of 366 · -3.7
UNLV defense114th of 366 · -1.5
←UNLVSmall
SF offense178th of 366 · -5.5
Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players
←UNLVSmall
Backcourt-0.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt+4.3 · 2 players
←UNLVBig
Frontcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUNLV betterSF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Williams33 minA. Storr26 min · TRI. Williamson23 minS. Mack16 min · TRC. Miles14 min · TRJ. Cunningham3 min
Forwards
T. Jones27 minM. Thomas27 min · TRT. Harris13 min · TRM. Loum11 min · TRJ. KissNew
Centers
J. Foumena10 min · TR
Guards
A. Bashir10 min · TRA. Braccia5 minW. FodeNewM. MageeNewY. VitlemNewD. BordonNew
Forwards
B. Oosterbaan25 min · TRN. NewburyNewA. TysonNewG. KnudsenNewD. WileyNewJ. PihtovsNew
Centers
I. Diagne7 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.6 #88 | Points per game | 73.9 #198 |
| 1.10 #134 | Points per possession | 1.10 #131 |
| 71.3 #57 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #271 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.5 #81 | Effective FG% | 51.3 #184 |
| 35.2 #102 | 3-point % | 34.6 #140 |
| 36.4 #243 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.1 #45 |
| 40.6 #51 | Free throw rate | 40.1 #59 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #209 | Turnover rate | 15.9 #129 |
| 30.2 #189 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.4 #148 |
| 14.1 #137 | Assists per game | 13.6 #174 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.3 #306 | Points allowed | 73.8 #149 |
| 1.11 #250 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #206 |
| 52.3 #231 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #143 |
| 35.2 #259 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #187 |
| 17.4 #127 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #331 |
| 68.0 #256 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.0 #105 |
| 7.3 #102 | Steals per game | 5.1 #332 |
| 4.7 #26 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #238 |
UNLV
17-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Tulsa66–77
- W@ UC Irvine75–72
- Lvs Utah State60–80
- Wvs Wyoming73–70
- L@ San Diego St86–89
A week or more of rest.
San Francisco
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oregon St77–78
- Wvs Portland82–65
- W@ Pacific72–61
- Lvs Santa Clara73–94
- Lvs Gonzaga59–80
A week or more of rest.