Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NEV 77–75 · win probability NEV 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
NEV 2, SCU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: NEV 44.8, SCU 25.5. Allowed: NEV 38.9, SCU 38.2
Shooting
Effective FG%: NEV 50.0 and allows 51.1; SCU 54.5 and allows 52.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NEV 32.2%, SCU 36.4%. Defensive: NEV 73.1%, SCU 67.9%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NEV plays 67.7 a game (243rd fastest), SCU 69.7 (135th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NEV 14.8%, SCU 15.3%. Forced: NEV 17.0%, SCU 20.1%
Even
NEV offense vs SCU defense
Offense 104th of 366 against a defense 137th, on the model’s ratings
Even
SCU offense vs NEV defense
Offense 93rd of 366 against a defense 73rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NEV has played the 94th-hardest schedule, SCU the 86th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NEV 38%, SCU 42%. Transfers in: NEV 5, SCU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
NEV hits 35.8% and allows 33.7%; SCU hits 34.9% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 32.3% and 45.0% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NEV -1.5 | — |
| Total | — | 152.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | NEV 76.8 · SCU 75.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NEV -1.0 | — |
| 1H total | 71.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | NEV 36 · SCU 35 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NEV 1–2 SCUSCU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · NEV 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025-26 | NEV 83 @ SCU 98 | SCU -6.5 | SCU W |
| Nov 16, 2024-25 | SCU 59 @ NEV 85 | NEV -7.5 | NEV W |
| Nov 16, 2021-22 | NEV 74 @ SCU 96 | SCU +2 | SCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Nevada
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Against the spread
22-1559%
3 straight covers3 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-50 | -9.5 | W +17.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 86-81 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 83-98 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 71-75 | -12.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-64 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-83 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-65 | +5.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 76-70 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 78-64 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 81-66 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 66-65 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 68-73 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 92-83 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-71 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-66 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 87-54 | -16.5 | W +16.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 66-60 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-76 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 87-91 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-59 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-71 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 71-87 | -10.5 | L −26.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-77 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 67-60 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 83-85 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 73-83 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-59 | -24.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 80-45 | -19.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-80 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 66-79 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 89-75 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 25 | @ | L 69-75 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
+17.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
−12.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
−6.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
−8.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
−16.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
+7.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
−13.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+21.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
+0.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
+16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
−2.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+18.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
+14.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−3.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−6.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+5.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
+4.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+16.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+1.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
+2.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+5.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+2.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−1.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−6.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
−26.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+8.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
+5.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
−3.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
−11.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−9.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
+15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+7.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−6.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+5.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
+2.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
+2.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LT
W 77-50
−9.5
8
vs
PAC
W 78-77
+15.5
12
vs
SIU
W 86-81
+14.5
15
@
SCU
L 83-98
+36.5
18
vs
UCD
L 71-75
+2.5
22
vs
UCSB
W 77-64
−6.5
27
vs
WASH
L 66-83
+3.5
28
vs
SF
W 81-65
+3.5
2
vs
UCSD
W 76-70
−3.5
7
@
WSU
W 78-64
−3.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 78-75
+1.5
20
vs
BOIS
W 81-66
+5.5
30
@
CSU
W 75-62
−2.5
3
@
FRES
W 66-65
−15.5
6
vs
SDSU
L 68-73
−0.5
10
vs
WYO
W 92-83
+31.5
14
@
USU
L 62-71
−14.5
17
@
AF
W 81-66
+12.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 87-54
+3.5
24
@
UNM
L 73-80
+2.5
27
vs
GCU
W 66-60
−17.5
30
vs
UNLV
W 89-76
+17.5
3
@
BOIS
L 87-91
+36.5
7
vs
FRES
W 69-59
−21.5
14
@
SDSU
L 57-71
−11.5
17
@
SJSU
L 71-87
+16.5
21
vs
USU
W 80-77
+10.5
24
vs
UNM
W 67-60
−21.5
28
@
UNLV
L 83-85
+17.5
3
@
WYO
L 73-83
+12.5
7
vs
AF
W 74-59
−11.5
11
vs
AF
W 80-45
−15.5
12
vs
GCU
W 84-80
+26.5
13
vs
USU
L 66-79
−0.5
18
vs
MUR
W 89-75
+4.5
21
vs
LIB
W 73-63
−10.5
25
@
AUB
L 69-75
−7.5
over 20under 17avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Santa Clara
34 games played
Straight up
25-9
74% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1653%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 79-67 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-68 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 98-83 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 64-55 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-43 | -19.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 70-71 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-75 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-80 | -20.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-98 | +1.5 | L −25.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 79-82 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 63-60 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 78-80 | -15.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 102-64 | -7.5 | W +30.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 92-85 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 82-63 | -20.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 98-70 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 77-89 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 103-72 | -11.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 85-69 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 62-54 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-73 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 88-73 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-73 | -8.5 | W +22.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-56 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 96-92 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-72 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-86 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 93-72 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-68 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 76-71 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 68-79 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 84-89 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
MCN
W 79-67
+5.5
10
@
XAV
W 87-68
+22.5
15
vs
NEV
W 98-83
+8.5
18
vs
IDST
W 64-55
−5.5
21
vs
UL
W 80-43
+17.5
27
vs
SLU
L 70-71
+0.5
28
vs
MINN
W 86-75
+5.5
3
vs
UTU
W 90-80
−10.5
6
@
UNM
L 71-98
−25.5
13
vs
ASU
L 79-82
−4.5
17
vs
UNT
W 63-60
−9.5
20
vs
LUC
L 78-80
−17.5
28
@
ORST
W 102-64
+30.5
30
@
PORT
W 92-85
−6.5
2
vs
PEPP
W 82-63
−1.5
4
vs
USD
W 98-70
+10.5
8
@
GONZ
L 77-89
+5.5
10
vs
LMU
W 103-72
+19.5
14
vs
PAC
W 85-69
+3.5
17
vs
SMC
W 62-54
+6.5
24
@
USD
W 85-73
−1.5
28
vs
SF
W 88-73
+5.5
31
@
LMU
W 104-73
+22.5
4
@
PAC
W 71-56
+8.5
7
@
WSU
W 96-92
−4.5
11
vs
SEA
W 84-72
−0.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 86-94
−3.5
21
@
SF
W 94-73
+14.5
25
@
SMC
L 67-86
−13.5
28
vs
ORST
W 93-72
+5.5
8
vs
PAC
W 76-68
−1.5
9
vs
SMC
W 76-71
+9.5
10
vs
GONZ
L 68-79
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 84-89
−1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
MCN
W 79-67
−5.5
10
@
XAV
W 87-68
−0.5
15
vs
NEV
W 98-83
+36.5
18
vs
IDST
W 64-55
−22.5
21
vs
UL
W 80-43
−17.5
27
vs
SLU
L 70-71
−17.5
28
vs
MINN
W 86-75
+22.5
3
vs
UTU
W 90-80
+25.5
6
@
UNM
L 71-98
+15.5
13
vs
ASU
L 79-82
+6.5
17
vs
UNT
W 63-60
−16.5
20
vs
LUC
L 78-80
+6.5
28
@
ORST
W 102-64
+15.5
30
@
PORT
W 92-85
+19.5
2
vs
PEPP
W 82-63
−5.5
4
vs
USD
W 98-70
+6.5
8
@
GONZ
L 77-89
+2.5
10
vs
LMU
W 103-72
+21.5
14
vs
PAC
W 85-69
−0.5
17
vs
SMC
W 62-54
−36.5
24
@
USD
W 85-73
−4.5
28
vs
SF
W 88-73
+10.5
31
@
LMU
W 104-73
+23.5
4
@
PAC
W 71-56
−24.5
7
@
WSU
W 96-92
+27.5
11
vs
SEA
W 84-72
+8.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 86-94
+21.5
21
@
SF
W 94-73
+8.5
25
@
SMC
L 67-86
−0.5
28
vs
ORST
W 93-72
+11.5
8
vs
PAC
W 76-68
−4.5
9
vs
SMC
W 76-71
−3.5
10
vs
GONZ
L 68-79
−10.5
20
vs
UK
L 84-89
+15.5
over 19under 15avg +4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Nevada has the better starters
Position by position: Nevada 3, Santa Clara 0, even 2
NevadaBetterSanta Clara
G S. Phipps TR13.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 77
←NEVSmall
G J. Ensminger6.4 pts · 5.5 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 53
G K. Kensie TR10.8 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 54
=Even
G D. Castillo TR10.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
G P. Bandelj TR12.7 pts · 3.9 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 57
=Even
G S. Gavalyugov9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 61
G V. Weems10.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 84
←NEVBig
G T. Darlan5.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 35
F E. Price12.8 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 91
←NEVBig
G F. Zugic TR5.2 pts · 2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
NevadaBetterSanta Clara
NEV offense104th of 366 · -1.4
=Even
SCU defense137th of 366 · -2.8
NEV defense73rd of 366 · +0.7
=Even
SCU offense93rd of 366 · -0.4
Backcourt+2.1 · 4 players
←NEVBig
Backcourt-2.9 · 5 players
Frontcourt+3.4 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-1.3 · 4 players
→SCUSmall
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestNEV betterSCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Phipps34 min · TRK. Kensie31 min · TRP. Bandelj31 min · TRV. Weems25 minP. White14 minM. Walker8 min
Forwards
E. Price30 minH. LucasNewK. SnyderNew
Centers
S. Majok12 min · TRC. Lath4 min · TR
Guards
J. Ensminger29 minD. Castillo28 min · TRS. Gavalyugov20 minT. Darlan18 minF. Zugic16 min · TRK. Cochran12 min
Forwards
C. TadjoNewN. BadibangaNew
Centers
F. Chukwudebelu6 minS. Gueye4 min · TRA. EnsorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.0 #141 | Points per game | 82.9 #30 |
| 1.12 #96 | Points per possession | 1.18 #37 |
| 67.7 #243 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #135 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #236 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #53 |
| 35.8 #70 | 3-point % | 34.9 #125 |
| 32.3 #326 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.0 #67 |
| 44.8 #6 | Free throw rate | 25.5 #363 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.8 #56 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #86 |
| 32.2 #119 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.4 #20 |
| 14.5 #119 | Assists per game | 16.6 #33 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #92 | Points allowed | 73.5 #141 |
| 1.06 #101 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #117 |
| 51.1 #166 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #213 |
| 33.7 #168 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #127 |
| 17.0 #150 | Turnovers forced | 20.1 #20 |
| 73.1 #33 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #262 |
| 6.6 #168 | Steals per game | 8.7 #14 |
| 3.8 #106 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #125 |
Nevada
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-9 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Auburn69–75
- Wvs Liberty73–63
- Wvs Murray St89–75
- Lvs Utah State66–79
- Wvs Grand Canyon84–80
A week or more of rest.
Santa Clara
25-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kentucky84–89
- Lvs Gonzaga68–79
- Wvs Saint Mary's76–71
- Wvs Pacific76–68
- Wvs Oregon St93–72
A week or more of rest.