Enterprise Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIZ 78–77 · win probability MIZ 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SLU has more of the edges
SLU 3, MIZ 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
SLU hits 39.9% and allows 30.3%; MIZ hits 35.0% and allows 36.8%. Threes are 45.1% and 36.4% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: SLU 33.7, MIZ 42.1. Allowed: SLU 37.1, MIZ 35.5
Shooting
Effective FG%: SLU 59.7 and allows 45.2; MIZ 55.0 and allows 51.5
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SLU plays 72.1 a game (32nd fastest), MIZ 68.8 (191st). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SLU 63%, MIZ 33%. Transfers in: SLU 2, MIZ 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
SLU has played the 99th-hardest schedule, MIZ the 45th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SLU 30.7%, MIZ 34.9%. Defensive: SLU 72.8%, MIZ 68.3%
Even
MIZ offense vs SLU defense
Offense 52nd of 366 against a defense 87th, on the model’s ratings
Even
SLU offense vs MIZ defense
Offense 61st of 366 against a defense 49th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SLU 17.2%, MIZ 17.7%. Forced: SLU 15.9%, MIZ 16.6%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MIZ -1.3 | — |
| Total | — | 154.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | SLU 76.7 · MIZ 78 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MIZ -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | SLU 35.8 · MIZ 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Louis
34 games played
Straight up
28-6
82% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-17
50% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-67 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 108-86 | -30.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 109-66 | -24.5 | W +18.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 78-64 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-60 | -19.5 | W +11.5 | 166.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 71-70 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 77-78 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 91-70 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 107-65 | -24.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-75 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 112-53 | -26.5 | W +32.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 93-79 | -34.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 102-79 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-72 | -17.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 78-56 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-63 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-77 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 97-62 | -8.5 | W +26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 102-71 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 91-82 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-58 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 86-59 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 88-75 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-77 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 91-76 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 79-65 | -21.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 57-86 | -7.5 | L −36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 88-81 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 69-70 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 102-77 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 167.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 72-95 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
−8.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+18.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
+5.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
+11.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−0.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−2.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+13.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+17.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
−2.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+32.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
−20.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+3.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
+10.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
−5.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
+4.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
+10.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−4.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
+26.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−7.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
+1.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
+9.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
+5.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+1.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−7.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−36.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+0.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−5.5
19
vs
UGA
W 102-77
+26.5
21
vs
MICH
L 72-95
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SEMO
W 92-67
+5.5
6
vs
CHST
W 108-86
+38.5
10
vs
LIN
W 109-66
+9.5
15
vs
GCU
W 78-64
−25.5
21
vs
PFW
W 91-60
−15.5
27
vs
SCU
W 71-70
−17.5
28
vs
STAN
L 77-78
−5.5
2
@
LMU
W 91-70
+10.5
7
vs
CMU
W 107-65
+11.5
13
vs
SF
W 85-75
+4.5
17
vs
BCU
W 112-53
+7.5
21
vs
UNH
W 93-79
+14.5
31
vs
JOES
W 102-79
+19.5
7
@
VCU
W 71-62
−38.5
10
@
LAS
W 84-72
+3.5
14
vs
FOR
W 78-56
−20.5
17
vs
RICH
W 88-63
−11.5
20
@
DUQ
W 81-77
−7.5
23
@
SBU
W 97-62
−0.5
27
vs
GW
W 79-76
−12.5
30
vs
DAY
W 102-71
+21.5
3
@
DAV
W 91-82
+21.5
7
vs
LAS
W 82-58
−13.5
13
@
LUC
W 86-59
−10.5
17
@
URI
L 76-81
+5.5
20
vs
VCU
W 88-75
−1.5
24
@
DAY
L 62-77
−18.5
28
vs
DUQ
W 91-76
+6.5
4
vs
LUC
W 79-65
−11.5
7
@
GMU
L 57-86
−3.5
13
vs
GW
W 88-81
+10.5
14
vs
DAY
L 69-70
−6.5
19
vs
UGA
W 102-77
+11.5
21
vs
MICH
L 72-95
+5.5
over 17under 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Missouri
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
14-1942%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 88-67 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 89-84 | -25.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 106-68 | -23.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-60 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-73 | -35.5 | L −17.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 102-68 | -24.5 | W +9.5 | 171.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 98-66 | -34.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-59 | -31.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-76 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 60-80 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 85-77 | -26.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-60 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 48-91 | +8.5 | L −34.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 76-74 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 73-68 | +12.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-76 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 84-74 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 70-78 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-87 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 64-90 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 84-79 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 78-59 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 86-85 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 68-85 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 81-80 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 86-94 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 73-69 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 88-64 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 64-80 | -1.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 84-88 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 72-78 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 66-80 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HOW
W 88-67
+0.5
7
vs
SEMO
W 89-84
−20.5
9
vs
VMI
W 106-68
+14.5
12
vs
MINN
W 83-60
+15.5
17
vs
PV
W 91-73
−17.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 102-68
+9.5
25
vs
SCST
W 98-66
−2.5
28
vs
CLE
W 86-59
−4.5
2
@
ND
L 71-76
−6.5
7
vs
KU
L 60-80
−14.5
11
vs
ALST
W 85-77
−18.5
14
vs
BCU
W 82-60
+1.5
22
vs
ILL
L 48-91
−34.5
3
vs
FLA
W 76-74
+9.5
7
@
UK
W 73-68
+17.5
10
@
MISS
L 69-76
−5.5
14
vs
AUB
W 84-74
+11.5
17
@
LSU
L 70-78
−6.5
20
vs
UGA
L 72-74
−3.5
24
vs
OU
W 88-87
−3.5
27
@
ALA
L 64-90
−15.5
31
vs
MSST
W 84-79
−1.5
7
@
SC
W 78-59
+15.5
11
@
TA&M
W 86-85
+8.5
14
vs
TEX
L 68-85
−19.5
18
vs
VAN
W 81-80
+4.5
21
@
ARK
L 86-94
+1.5
24
vs
TENN
W 73-69
+7.5
28
@
MSST
W 88-64
+22.5
3
@
OU
L 64-80
−17.5
7
vs
ARK
L 84-88
−6.5
12
vs
UK
L 72-78
−3.5
20
vs
MIA
L 66-80
−12.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HOW
W 88-67
−3.5
7
vs
SEMO
W 89-84
+15.5
9
vs
VMI
W 106-68
+12.5
12
vs
MINN
W 83-60
−15.5
17
vs
PV
W 91-73
−2.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 102-68
−1.5
25
vs
SCST
W 98-66
+3.5
28
vs
CLE
W 86-59
−25.5
2
@
ND
L 71-76
+0.5
7
vs
KU
L 60-80
−10.5
11
vs
ALST
W 85-77
+6.5
14
vs
BCU
W 82-60
−4.5
22
vs
ILL
L 48-91
−14.5
3
vs
FLA
W 76-74
−4.5
7
@
UK
W 73-68
−9.5
10
@
MISS
L 69-76
+1.5
14
vs
AUB
W 84-74
+4.5
17
@
LSU
L 70-78
−0.5
20
vs
UGA
L 72-74
−17.5
24
vs
OU
W 88-87
+23.5
27
@
ALA
L 64-90
−13.5
31
vs
MSST
W 84-79
+16.5
7
@
SC
W 78-59
−10.5
11
@
TA&M
W 86-85
+10.5
14
vs
TEX
L 68-85
+2.5
18
vs
VAN
W 81-80
+6.5
21
@
ARK
L 86-94
+20.5
24
vs
TENN
W 73-69
−1.5
28
@
MSST
W 88-64
−2.5
3
@
OU
L 64-80
−9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 84-88
+8.5
12
vs
UK
L 72-78
+1.5
20
vs
MIA
L 66-80
+1.5
over 16under 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Saint Louis has the better starters
Position by position: Saint Louis 2, Missouri 0, even 3
Saint LouisBetterMissouri
G Q. Jones9 pts · 3.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 51
=Even
G J. Crawford TR14.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 44
G T. Green11.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 86
←SLUSmall
G C. Stansberry TR14.6 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast
Score 69
G A. McCottry10.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 84
←SLUBig
G K. Davis TR8.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 48
F I. Sharma9.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 67
=Even
G T. Pierce10.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 80
F A. Michaeli TR7.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 58
=Even
F B. Tiller TR7.9 pts · 6.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 68
Saint LouisBetterMissouri
SLU offense61st of 366 · +2.6
=Even
MIZ defense49th of 366 · +2.0
SLU defense87th of 366 · -0.1
=Even
MIZ offense52nd of 366 · +3.3
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
←SLUSmall
Backcourt-0.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.6 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+0.8 · 1 player
Bench+3.7 · 5 players
←SLUSmall
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSLU betterMIZ betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Q. Jones27 minT. Green24 minA. McCottry23 minK. Thames17 minC. Hutson4 minI. Holmes2 min
Forwards
I. Sharma22 minA. Michaeli18 min · TRE. Strong17 min · TRJ. Kerr6 minS. PearsonNewB. DiakiteNew
Guards
J. Crawford32 min · TRC. Stansberry30 min · TRK. Davis30 min · TRT. Pierce28 minJ. Jones26 min · TRA. Boateng12 min
Forwards
B. Tiller26 min · TRJ. Carey18 min · TRL. Northweather12 minN. Randall6 minT. BryantNew
Centers
T. Burns9 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.4 #7 | Points per game | 79.2 #78 |
| 1.20 #14 | Points per possession | 1.15 #65 |
| 72.1 #32 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #191 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.7 #2 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #36 |
| 39.9 #2 | 3-point % | 35.0 #112 |
| 45.1 #64 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.4 #240 |
| 33.7 #221 | Free throw rate | 42.1 #28 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #218 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #255 |
| 30.7 #173 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.9 #48 |
| 18.3 #8 | Assists per game | 14.2 #132 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.6 #94 | Points allowed | 75.5 #204 |
| 0.99 #21 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #224 |
| 45.2 #3 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #183 |
| 30.3 #14 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.8 #341 |
| 15.9 #224 | Turnovers forced | 16.6 #182 |
| 72.8 #43 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #238 |
| 7.1 #117 | Steals per game | 6.6 #162 |
| 3.4 #168 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #140 |
Saint Louis
28-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-4 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan72–95
- Wvs Georgia102–77
- Lvs Dayton69–70
- Wvs G Washington88–81
- L@ George Mason57–86
A week or more of rest.
Missouri
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Miami66–80
- Lvs Kentucky72–78
- Lvs Arkansas84–88
- L@ Oklahoma64–80
- W@ Mississippi St88–64
A week or more of rest.