Tucker Center · at Florida St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FSU 83–70 · win probability FSU 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FSU has more of the edges
TROY 2, FSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TROY 17.3%, FSU 15.2%. Forced: TROY 16.7%, FSU 19.0%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TROY 34.5%, FSU 30.8%. Defensive: TROY 68.3%, FSU 65.9%
Context
Schedule so far
TROY has played the 166th-hardest schedule, FSU the 73rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
TROY hits 33.0% and allows 31.6%; FSU hits 33.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 45.9% and 50.6% of their shots
FSU offense vs TROY defense
Offense 73rd of 366 against a defense 162nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FSU at home. This season: FSU 0-0 at home, TROY 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: TROY plays 69.6 a game (141st fastest), FSU 71.8 (41st). Faster games mean more points
TROY offense vs FSU defense
Offense 143rd of 366 against a defense 98th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TROY 51.5 and allows 50.2; FSU 52.3 and allows 52.2
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TROY 36.2, FSU 34.7. Allowed: TROY 31.4, FSU 32.7
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TROY 11%, FSU 9%. Transfers in: TROY 6, FSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FSU -12.8 | — |
| Total | — | 152.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | TROY 69.8 · FSU 82.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FSU -7.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | TROY 31.9 · FSU 39.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TROY 1–0 FSUTROY leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · TROY 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2022-23 | TROY 79 @ FSU 72 | FSU -9.5 | TROY W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Troy
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 103-97 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 200 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 64-61 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 85-94 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 108-107 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 106-107 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 159.5 | O 213 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 68-75 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 89-93 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 86-85 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 100-80 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 59-49 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 74-86 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-70 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 91-65 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 99-74 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-77 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 64-73 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 44-66 | -7.5 | L −29.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-74 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-69 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 77-76 | -17.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-65 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 78-59 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-65 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-70 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-61 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-76 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+9.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
+5.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−6.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
−13.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+15.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+17.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−9.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−11.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
−21.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+7.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
+2.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+11.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
+0.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−7.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+10.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+17.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+21.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+0.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−18.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−29.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
+4.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
+12.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−17.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−9.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−16.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−13.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+7.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−3.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+2.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
+10.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−15.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+57.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
−27.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−3.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
+21.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+77.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+53.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−16.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−13.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
+31.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+15.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
−22.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+34.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
−40.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−0.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+23.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+10.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+7.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+1.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−10.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−27.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
−7.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
−9.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−4.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−10.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−0.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−23.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+2.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−8.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+5.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
−14.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−16.5
over 14under 18avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Florida St
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
20-13
61% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 108-76 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-64 | -24.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 76-78 | +17.5 | W +15.5 | 180.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 87-73 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-72 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-59 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 59-95 | -1.5 | L −37.5 | 174.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-107 | -1.5 | L −35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-82 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 95-103 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 165.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-97 | +6.5 | L −21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 96-49 | -40.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 87-63 | -23.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 66-79 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-91 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 69-113 | +4.5 | L −39.5 | 160.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 65-63 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 80-83 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 63-61 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-79 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 58-61 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 92-69 | +4.5 | W +27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 80-72 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +8.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-71 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 95-89 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 79-80 | +16.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+4.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
+12.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
+15.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
+7.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
+3.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−37.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
−35.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
−2.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
−20.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
−21.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
+6.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
+0.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−0.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+12.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
−39.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
−3.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+0.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
+12.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
+8.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−1.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+4.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+4.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
+5.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+27.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
−3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
+13.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
−7.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
+3.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
−0.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+11.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+4.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+15.5
covered 20didn’t cover 13avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
ALCN
W 108-76
+27.5
7
vs
ALST
W 101-64
−1.5
11
@
FLA
L 76-78
−26.5
18
vs
UTM
W 87-73
−5.5
21
vs
GASO
W 98-72
−5.5
25
vs
CSUB
W 89-59
−11.5
28
vs
TA&M
L 59-95
−20.5
2
vs
UGA
L 73-107
+3.5
6
vs
HOU
L 67-82
+0.5
13
vs
MASS
L 95-103
+32.5
16
@
DAY
L 69-97
+3.5
19
vs
MVSU
W 96-49
−19.5
22
vs
JAX
W 87-63
−9.5
30
@
UNC
L 66-79
−21.5
3
vs
DUKE
L 87-91
+14.5
10
vs
NCSU
L 69-113
+21.5
13
@
SYR
L 86-94
+19.5
17
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−31.5
20
@
MIA
W 65-63
−35.5
24
@
SMU
L 80-83
−0.5
28
vs
CAL
W 63-61
−33.5
31
vs
STAN
W 88-80
+15.5
7
@
ND
W 82-79
+6.5
10
vs
UVA
L 58-61
−36.5
14
@
VT
W 92-69
+4.5
17
vs
BC
W 80-72
+3.5
21
@
CLEM
W 70-65
−10.5
24
vs
MIA
L 73-83
+3.5
28
@
GT
W 80-71
−7.5
4
@
PITT
W 75-74
+4.5
7
vs
SMU
W 91-78
+10.5
11
vs
CAL
W 95-89
+29.5
12
vs
DUKE
L 79-80
+8.5
over 17under 16avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Troy 2, Florida St 2, even 1
TroyBetterFlorida St
G R. Davis TR9.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 14
→FSUBig
G K. Taylor TR19.8 pts · 5 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 90
G D. Oday TR18.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 95
←TROYSmall
G A. Robinson TR8.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 73
G J. Hutchinson TR12.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 76
=Even
F S. Rancik TR12.3 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 82
F C. Diggs TR10.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 59
←TROYSmall
F C. Schwieger TR5.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
F K. Kiel3.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
→FSUBig
F S. Abaev TR7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
TroyBetterFlorida St
TROY offense143rd of 366 · -4.3
=Even
FSU defense98th of 366 · -0.7
TROY defense162nd of 366 · -3.6
→FSUSmall
FSU offense73rd of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt+1.4 · 3 players
→FSUSmall
Backcourt+3.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
→FSUSmall
Frontcourt+1.4 · 3 players
Bench-2.0 · 4 players
→FSUSmall
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestTROY betterFSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Davis31 min · TRD. Oday30 min · TRJ. Hutchinson29 min · TRH. Awata2 minJ. KontuniemiNewR. ValakouNew
Forwards
C. Diggs23 min · TRK. Kiel16 minM. Ikegwuruka13 min · TRS. Walters9 min · TRE. Griffin5 min
Centers
A. PachecoNew
Guards
K. Taylor36 min · TRA. Robinson27 min · TRJ. Crawford1 minJ. LopezNewA. RobinsonNewB. BassNew
Forwards
S. Rancik28 min · TRC. Schwieger20 min · TRS. Abaev16 min · TRA. Swinton16 minC. PaulNew
Centers
M. PonderNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.3 #110 | Points per game | 80.4 #58 |
| 1.11 #113 | Points per possession | 1.12 #101 |
| 69.6 #141 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #41 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #171 | Effective FG% | 52.3 #132 |
| 33.0 #229 | 3-point % | 33.1 #226 |
| 45.9 #47 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.6 #13 |
| 36.2 #147 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #191 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #226 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #80 |
| 34.5 #59 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.8 #170 |
| 15.0 #86 | Assists per game | 14.3 #124 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #178 | Points allowed | 77.9 #264 |
| 1.07 #128 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #178 |
| 50.2 #111 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.2 #226 |
| 31.6 #47 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #228 |
| 16.7 #173 | Turnovers forced | 19.0 #51 |
| 68.3 #243 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.9 #319 |
| 7.2 #107 | Steals per game | 7.9 #44 |
| 3.3 #169 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #84 |
Troy
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska47–76
- Wvs GA Southern77–61
- Wvs Southern Miss78–70
- Wvs UL Monroe80–65
- Wvs Louisiana78–59
A week or more of rest.
Florida St
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke79–80
- Wvs California95–89
- Wvs SMU91–78
- W@ Pitt75–74
- W@ Georgia Tech80–71
A week or more of rest.