Lee's Family Forum · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCSB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCSB 74–74 · win probability UCSB 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: YALE has more of the edges
YALE 2, UCSB 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: YALE 35.1, UCSB 36.8. Allowed: YALE 26.8, UCSB 42.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: YALE 14.0%, UCSB 18.8%. Forced: YALE 16.2%, UCSB 16.8%
Context
Schedule so far
YALE has played the 141st-hardest schedule, UCSB the 203rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: YALE plays 66.4 a game (301st fastest), UCSB 68.2 (218th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: YALE 55.6 and allows 51.6; UCSB 54.7 and allows 52.6
Even
Three-pointers
YALE hits 39.4% and allows 35.0%; UCSB hits 37.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 36.1% and 44.1% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: YALE 42%, UCSB 53%. Transfers in: YALE 0, UCSB 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: YALE 34.2%, UCSB 31.0%. Defensive: YALE 70.3%, UCSB 74.5%
Even
UCSB offense vs YALE defense
Offense 150th of 366 against a defense 136th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
YALE offense vs UCSB defense
Offense 125th of 366 against a defense 128th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | YALE -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 147.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | YALE 73.9 · UCSB 73.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | YALE -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | YALE 34.6 · UCSB 34.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Yale
29 games played
Straight up
22-7
76% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 97-68 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 97-60 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-79 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 77-86 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-67 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 97-94 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-74 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-66 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 93-82 | -17.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 78-102 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 70-53 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-76 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 102-68 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 91-74 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 83-68 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-69 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 87-81 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 83-70 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-70 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-72 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 60-54 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-53 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 84-88 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+23.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+30.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
−13.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
−17.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−11.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
+4.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+4.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
−3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
+1.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
−6.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
−8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
+8.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−23.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
+24.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+7.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
+10.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−0.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−13.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
−3.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
−0.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+3.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
−3.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−5.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−7.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−0.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
+10.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+6.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
−13.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−5.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+17.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+0.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
+14.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
+9.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−8.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
−11.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+34.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
+3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
−2.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
+29.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
+8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
−19.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−6.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
−4.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+14.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
−20.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−4.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−9.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
+9.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
+20.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+1.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
+12.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−6.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−23.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−33.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
−6.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+0.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
+27.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−13.5
over 15under 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Santa Barbara
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-74 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 92-87 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 74-78 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 64-77 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-70 | -10.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-71 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 84-77 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 109-84 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 53-68 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-67 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 79-61 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 84-95 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 65-74 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 86-93 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 75-69 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-62 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 107-67 | -8.5 | W +31.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 74-71 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 62-48 | +4.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-69 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 76-68 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 79-89 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 83-85 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 70-59 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 60-64 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-64 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
SJSU
W 85-74
+1.5
11
@
SAC
W 92-87
−2.5
17
vs
LMU
L 74-78
−7.5
22
@
NEV
L 64-77
−7.5
28
vs
LEH
W 72-70
−8.5
29
vs
SEA
W 74-71
+5.5
4
vs
LBSU
W 84-77
−6.5
6
vs
CSUB
W 109-84
+12.5
13
vs
UVU
L 53-68
−9.5
17
@
GB
L 64-67
−10.5
22
vs
PORT
W 79-61
+8.5
1
@
CSUF
L 84-95
−14.5
3
@
CSUN
L 65-74
−6.5
8
vs
UCD
L 86-93
−11.5
15
@
CSUB
W 75-69
−1.5
17
vs
HAW
W 77-62
+17.5
22
vs
CP
W 107-67
+31.5
24
@
LBSU
W 74-71
−1.5
29
@
UCSD
W 62-48
+18.5
31
vs
CSUF
W 83-69
+5.5
5
@
UCD
L 75-85
−13.5
7
vs
UCI
W 84-79
+2.5
12
@
UCR
W 76-68
+1.5
14
@
CP
L 79-89
−13.5
19
vs
CSUN
L 83-85
−7.5
21
@
HAW
L 75-78
+2.5
26
vs
UCR
W 70-59
+0.5
28
@
UCI
L 60-64
−0.5
7
vs
UCSD
L 63-64
−3.5
11
vs
UCD
L 73-79
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
SJSU
W 85-74
+12.5
11
@
SAC
W 92-87
+17.5
17
vs
LMU
L 74-78
+6.5
22
@
NEV
L 64-77
−6.5
28
vs
LEH
W 72-70
−4.5
29
vs
SEA
W 74-71
+2.5
4
vs
LBSU
W 84-77
+19.5
6
vs
CSUB
W 109-84
+47.5
13
vs
UVU
L 53-68
−25.5
17
@
GB
L 64-67
−9.5
22
vs
PORT
W 79-61
−7.5
1
@
CSUF
L 84-95
+23.5
3
@
CSUN
L 65-74
−17.5
8
vs
UCD
L 86-93
+31.5
15
@
CSUB
W 75-69
−0.5
17
vs
HAW
W 77-62
−4.5
22
vs
CP
W 107-67
+14.5
24
@
LBSU
W 74-71
+0.5
29
@
UCSD
W 62-48
−35.5
31
vs
CSUF
W 83-69
−1.5
5
@
UCD
L 75-85
+12.5
7
vs
UCI
W 84-79
+21.5
12
@
UCR
W 76-68
−1.5
14
@
CP
L 79-89
+8.5
19
vs
CSUN
L 83-85
+11.5
21
@
HAW
L 75-78
+7.5
26
vs
UCR
W 70-59
−16.5
28
@
UCI
L 60-64
−14.5
7
vs
UCSD
L 63-64
−14.5
11
vs
UCD
L 73-79
+12.5
over 16under 14avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Yale 1, Santa Barbara 1, even 3
YaleBetterSanta Barbara
G T. Mullin11.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 63
=Even
G V. Vartiainen TR12.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 52
G J. Brathwaite6.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 35
→UCSBBig
G M. Little12.7 pts · 5.6 reb · 4.8 ast
Score 91
G C. Wallace1.2 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Shaw11.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 62
F R. Fox9.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 76
←YALESmall
G R. Smith TR6.6 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 43
F J. Sullivan1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C E. Dibami TR9.5 pts · 7.3 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 45
YaleBetterSanta Barbara
YALE offense125th of 366 · -3.3
=Even
UCSB defense128th of 366 · -2.3
YALE defense136th of 366 · -2.8
=Even
UCSB offense150th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
→UCSBSmall
Backcourt+1.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
←YALESmall
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestYALE betterUCSB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Mullin28 minJ. Brathwaite19 minC. Wallace4 minJ. Basima3 minA. Loving3 minJ. Tsai2 min
Forwards
R. Fox18 minJ. Sullivan5 minD. Ogunyemi3 minC. MayNewT. WinklerNewC. BolteNew
Centers
J. OwareNew
Guards
V. Vartiainen31 min · TRM. Little30 minC. Shaw29 minR. Smith28 min · TRM. McGhee21 minL. Zuffelato4 min
Forwards
A. Chol24 min · TRM. Simcoe9 minD. Duru7 min · TRK. Keat Tong6 minK. Haughy2 minJ. Simcoe2 min
Centers
E. Dibami29 min · TRM. John WuolNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.1 #64 | Points per game | 76.7 #127 |
| 1.21 #10 | Points per possession | 1.13 #87 |
| 66.4 #301 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #218 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #26 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #47 |
| 39.4 #3 | 3-point % | 37.4 #23 |
| 36.1 #247 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.1 #87 |
| 35.1 #172 | Free throw rate | 36.8 #134 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.0 #22 | Turnover rate | 18.8 #312 |
| 34.2 #62 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.0 #165 |
| 15.8 #53 | Assists per game | 14.1 #140 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.8 #102 | Points allowed | 73.7 #148 |
| 1.08 #166 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #156 |
| 51.6 #192 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #244 |
| 35.0 #250 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #177 |
| 16.2 #207 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #170 |
| 70.3 #147 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.5 #14 |
| 5.3 #314 | Steals per game | 6.2 #216 |
| 3.2 #193 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #322 |
Yale
22-7 in 2025-26 overall · 12-4 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Wilmington67–68
- Lvs Penn84–88
- Wvs Cornell88–76
- Wvs Princeton78–53
- W@ Columbia60–54
A week or more of rest.
Santa Barbara
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Davis73–79
- Lvs UC San Diego63–64
- L@ UC Irvine60–64
- Wvs UC Riverside70–59
- L@ Hawai'i75–78
A week or more of rest.