John M. Belk Arena · at Davidson
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAV 81–63 · win probability DAV 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAV has more of the edges
UPST 0, DAV 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UPST offense vs DAV defense
Offense 299th of 366 against a defense 84th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UPST hits 31.4% and allows 35.6%; DAV hits 35.4% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 35.6% and 44.5% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
UPST has played the 281st-hardest schedule, DAV the 91st. A record against a soft schedule means less
DAV offense vs UPST defense
Offense 149th of 366 against a defense 338th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UPST plays 70.5 a game (97th fastest), DAV 65.0 (347th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UPST 18.1%, DAV 15.8%. Forced: UPST 16.5%, DAV 17.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: UPST 48.3 and allows 51.0; DAV 52.6 and allows 50.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UPST 9%, DAV 49%. Transfers in: UPST 3, DAV 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
DAV at home. This season: DAV 0-0 at home, UPST 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UPST 32.8, DAV 31.0. Allowed: UPST 36.0, DAV 37.1
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UPST 29.2%, DAV 28.1%. Defensive: UPST 68.6%, DAV 70.0%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAV -17.4 | — |
| Total | — | 143.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UPST 63.1 · DAV 80.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAV -10.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | UPST 28.5 · DAV 38.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UPST 0–1 DAVDAV leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UPST 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2023-24 | UPST 59 @ DAV 62 | DAV -15.5 | UPST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SC Upstate
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-87 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 5 | @ | W 67-66 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-73 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 84-88 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 82-67 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +25.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 62-80 | +29.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 78-72 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-74 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-76 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-81 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-83 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 65-67 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-76 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-94 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-95 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-68 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-74 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-71 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-61 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 64-65 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+2.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
+10.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
+1.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
−6.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−5.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+7.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
+16.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+4.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
+8.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
+11.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
−4.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−8.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
−7.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−15.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
−3.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
−15.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−11.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
+6.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
−2.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+7.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
−10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
−0.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
+9.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+3.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−4.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−1.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−11.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+9.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
−31.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
−22.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
+21.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−17.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+0.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
−22.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+18.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
−4.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
−9.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
+2.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−13.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
+25.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−36.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
+6.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−21.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
−22.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
+3.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+43.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
+10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
+9.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
−26.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+8.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−22.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−14.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−14.5
over 14under 15avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Davidson
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 85-69 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 62-55 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-87 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 59-49 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-94 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 79-63 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 61-70 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-47 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 63-68 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-90 | +14.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 83-89 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-56 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 45-70 | -2.5 | L −27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-79 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-54 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 82-91 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 84-64 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 59-70 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 65-63 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-63 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 67-56 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 71-64 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 67-70 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 64-59 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 58-70 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 80-84 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+11.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
+8.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
−0.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
+11.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
−24.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+2.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
−2.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−0.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
+21.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
−14.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
−8.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
+4.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+13.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−27.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+14.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
+0.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−0.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
+26.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
−0.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+10.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−5.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−3.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−5.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
+14.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
−3.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
−4.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
+9.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−0.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−9.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+0.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
−26.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
+33.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
−32.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
+6.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+18.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
+4.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−6.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
−5.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
+11.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
+21.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
−21.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+6.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−19.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+12.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
−4.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−4.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−22.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
−7.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
+21.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−11.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−13.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−9.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
−19.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
+1.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
+0.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−9.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−5.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+9.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: SC Upstate 1, Davidson 1, even 3
SC UpstateBetterDavidson
G C. Rich0 pts · 0 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G N. Janowski TR16.7 pts · 5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
F M. Webb TR9.9 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 56
←UPSTSmall
G S. Brown7.9 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 33
F D. Tubek TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G N. Coval6.2 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
F Z. Johnson TR0 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Scovens11.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
C C. Collier1.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 10
→DAVSmall
C I. Platteeuw3.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 43
SC UpstateBetterDavidson
UPST offense299th of 366 · -9.2
→DAVBig
DAV defense84th of 366 · +0.0
UPST defense338th of 366 · -8.9
→DAVBig
DAV offense149th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 4 players
→DAVBig
Frontcourt+2.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUPST betterDAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Rich5 minA. Allen-JohnsonNewW. TessemaNewR. NaugleNewJ. PattersonNewN. MvulaNew
Forwards
M. Webb27 min · TRD. Tubek7 min · TRZ. Johnson2 min · TRK. PayneNewD. EdmondNewA. PerottiNew
Centers
C. Collier14 min
Guards
N. Janowski32 min · TRS. Brown24 minN. Coval19 minP. Kavu1 minJ. CarterNewE. HeinonenNew
Forwards
J. Scovens25 minJ. Roberts12 minJ. Keith9 min · TRJ. Nowland1 minQ. BashiruNewT. StoiberNew
Centers
I. Platteeuw15 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.0 #265 | Points per game | 69.9 #289 |
| 1.00 #324 | Points per possession | 1.08 #189 |
| 70.5 #97 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #347 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.3 #307 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #121 |
| 31.4 #308 | 3-point % | 35.4 #92 |
| 35.6 #256 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.5 #79 |
| 32.8 #239 | Free throw rate | 31.0 #283 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #274 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #124 |
| 29.2 #231 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #265 |
| 11.7 #304 | Assists per game | 13.4 #184 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.7 #210 | Points allowed | 68.5 #40 |
| 1.08 #170 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #94 |
| 51.0 #156 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #132 |
| 35.6 #289 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #92 |
| 16.5 #185 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #121 |
| 68.6 #224 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #157 |
| 6.1 #220 | Steals per game | 6.4 #189 |
| 4.7 #24 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #66 |
SC Upstate
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gardner-Webb64–65
- Wvs Gardner-Webb71–61
- L@ Radford59–71
- Wvs Presbyterian76–74
- L@ Winthrop64–68
A week or more of rest.
Davidson
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Oklahoma St80–84
- Lvs Saint Joseph's58–70
- Wvs Loyola Chicago64–59
- W@ St Bonaventure68–63
- Lvs Saint Joseph's67–70
A week or more of rest.