McArthur Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GMU 77–69 · win probability GMU 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GMU has more of the edges
BRAD 1, GMU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRAD 35.9, GMU 41.1. Allowed: BRAD 38.2, GMU 28.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRAD 13.9%, GMU 15.8%. Forced: BRAD 18.9%, GMU 15.5%
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRAD 51.1 and allows 52.8; GMU 52.7 and allows 49.5
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BRAD plays 69.9 a game (125th fastest), GMU 64.7 (351st). Faster games mean more points
BRAD offense vs GMU defense
Offense 175th of 366 against a defense 64th, on the model’s ratings
GMU offense vs BRAD defense
Offense 106th of 366 against a defense 185th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRAD 27.4%, GMU 31.3%. Defensive: BRAD 72.2%, GMU 71.7%
Even
Three-pointers
BRAD hits 36.1% and allows 36.6%; GMU hits 33.3% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 40.5% and 35.2% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
BRAD has played the 155th-hardest schedule, GMU the 118th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRAD 16%, GMU 24%. Transfers in: BRAD 3, GMU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GMU -8.3 | — |
| Total | — | 146.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRAD 68.9 · GMU 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GMU -4.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRAD 31.8 · GMU 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BRAD 1–0 GMUBRAD leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · BRAD 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2024-25 | BRAD 75 @ GMU 67 | GMU -5.5 | BRAD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bradley
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +5.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-54 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 67-78 | -15.5 | L −26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-75 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-77 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 88-64 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 64-60 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-55 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 108-99 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 73-69 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 76-68 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-86 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 93-66 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-88 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 75-68 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 70-85 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-73 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 49-61 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 95-84 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 70-60 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-79 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-60 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 87-78 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 90-84 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 69-73 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 66-80 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−4.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
+21.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
−26.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−1.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
−11.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+14.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
−11.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
+14.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
+10.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+3.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−2.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−3.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
−6.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−14.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+20.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+1.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
−3.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
−20.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−1.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
−22.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+11.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−0.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−8.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+12.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
+12.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
−9.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
+10.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
−5.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+5.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+0.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+0.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−7.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
−8.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
+0.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−7.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
+14.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+10.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
+18.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
−6.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−24.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
−7.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+56.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−10.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−0.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
+12.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−10.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+14.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+12.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
+41.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
+2.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−12.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
+10.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+9.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−7.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−24.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+26.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
−16.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
+8.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
−11.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
+37.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+7.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+34.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+14.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
+4.5
over 19under 14avg +5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
George Mason
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-46 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 61-44 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-57 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-65 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-66 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 99-81 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 62-73 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 73-61 | -16.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 86-79 | -23.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 80-75 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 61-50 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 67-58 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-80 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 69-64 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 65-74 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 65-71 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-82 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-72 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 67-82 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-81 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-58 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-57 | +7.5 | W +36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 57-63 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 71-77 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
+9.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
−3.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−7.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
+5.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+15.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
+4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+3.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+7.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−6.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−4.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
−16.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
−12.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
−3.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
+4.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
+3.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+7.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
−3.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
+3.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
−10.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
+1.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+2.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−14.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
+1.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
−15.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−15.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
−17.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
−19.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
+9.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
+4.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
+36.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−8.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
−24.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
+39.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−39.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
−0.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+18.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
−4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+6.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+24.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−9.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−10.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
+18.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
+15.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
+20.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
−28.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
−9.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+21.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
+15.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
−20.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
+3.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
−22.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+7.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−7.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
−27.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
+12.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−24.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
+11.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
+7.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
−17.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
−12.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
−3.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−23.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
+6.5
over 15under 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
George Mason has the better starters
Position by position: Bradley 0, George Mason 3, even 2
BradleyBetterGeorge Mason
G T. Payton TR9.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 15
→GMUBig
G B. Okojie TR20.1 pts · 3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 91
G T. van der Knaap6.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 30
→GMUBig
G M. Valentine TR13.1 pts · 5.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
G D. Richardson2.2 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Marville TR9.5 pts · 2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 39
F X. Alarie TR10.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 50
→GMUSmall
F E. Jones TR12.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
F J. Ibukunoluwa TR2.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F E. Adair TR14.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 74
BradleyBetterGeorge Mason
BRAD offense175th of 366 · -5.4
→GMUSmall
GMU defense64th of 366 · +1.1
BRAD defense185th of 366 · -4.3
→GMUSmall
GMU offense106th of 366 · -1.5
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→GMUBig
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
→GMUBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
←BRADSmall
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBRAD betterGMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Payton34 min · TRT. van der Knaap23 minD. Richardson7 minG. Rugaard1 minK. GrillNewG. GerganovNew
Forwards
X. Alarie28 min · TRJ. Ibukunoluwa6 min · TRB. ThornbrueNew
Centers
G. GuimaresNew
Guards
B. Okojie35 min · TRM. Valentine32 min · TRL. Marville26 min · TRE. Oliogu-Elabor16 min · TRM. Presley16 minB. O'Connor15 min
Forwards
E. Jones29 min · TRE. Adair26 min · TRM. Marcus24 min · TRE. Kanga13 minR. MendyNewS. PendergrassNew
Centers
J. Nnaji8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.0 #117 | Points per game | 72.9 #227 |
| 1.10 #129 | Points per possession | 1.13 #93 |
| 69.9 #125 | Pace (possessions) | 64.7 #351 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #189 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #113 |
| 36.1 #53 | 3-point % | 33.3 #214 |
| 40.5 #161 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #270 |
| 35.9 #156 | Free throw rate | 41.1 #44 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #121 |
| 27.4 #285 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.3 #149 |
| 13.3 #191 | Assists per game | 12.6 #243 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #162 | Points allowed | 68.0 #31 |
| 1.06 #109 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #89 |
| 52.8 #259 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #83 |
| 36.6 #334 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #91 |
| 18.9 #53 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #254 |
| 72.2 #62 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #79 |
| 7.5 #86 | Steals per game | 5.0 #334 |
| 3.2 #192 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #228 |
Bradley
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton66–80
- Lvs Northern Iowa69–73
- Wvs Valparaiso90–84
- Wvs Murray St87–78
- L@ UIC86–93
A week or more of rest.
George Mason
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Liberty71–77
- Lvs St Bonaventure57–63
- Wvs Saint Louis86–57
- L@ VCU65–70
- Wvs St Bonaventure71–58
A week or more of rest.