Alex G. Spanos Center · at Pacific
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PAC 75–71 · win probability PAC 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PAC has more of the edges
BRAD 2, PAC 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BRAD 13.9%, PAC 20.1%. Forced: BRAD 18.9%, PAC 15.1%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BRAD 27.4%, PAC 35.3%. Defensive: BRAD 72.2%, PAC 75.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: BRAD 51.1 and allows 52.8; PAC 52.2 and allows 50.0
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BRAD plays 69.9 a game (125th fastest), PAC 66.1 (312th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
PAC at home. This season: PAC 0-0 at home, BRAD 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: BRAD 35.9, PAC 30.5. Allowed: BRAD 38.2, PAC 36.3
Three-pointers
BRAD hits 36.1% and allows 36.6%; PAC hits 35.8% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 40.5% and 35.4% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
BRAD has played the 155th-hardest schedule, PAC the 122nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
BRAD offense vs PAC defense
Offense 175th of 366 against a defense 147th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BRAD 16%, PAC 8%. Transfers in: BRAD 3, PAC 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
PAC offense vs BRAD defense
Offense 195th of 366 against a defense 185th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PAC -3.8 | — |
| Total | — | 145.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | BRAD 71.1 · PAC 74.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PAC -2.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | BRAD 33.1 · PAC 35.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bradley
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +5.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 85-54 | -9.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 67-78 | -15.5 | L −26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-75 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 87-77 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 88-64 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-87 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 64-60 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 84-55 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 108-99 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 207 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 73-69 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 76-68 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-86 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 93-66 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 94-90 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-88 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 75-68 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 70-85 | -7.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-73 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 49-61 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 95-84 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 70-60 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 72-79 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-60 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 87-78 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 90-84 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 69-73 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 66-80 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−4.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
+21.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
−26.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−1.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
−11.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+14.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
−11.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
+14.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−1.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
+10.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+3.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−2.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−3.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
−6.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−14.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+20.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+1.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
−3.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
−20.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−1.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
−22.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+11.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−0.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−8.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+12.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
+12.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
−9.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
+10.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
−5.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+5.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+0.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+0.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SBU
L 63-69
−7.5
8
vs
CMU
W 85-54
−8.5
12
vs
UTM
L 67-78
+0.5
15
@
SF
L 64-75
−7.5
19
vs
UML
W 87-77
+14.5
24
vs
PRIN
W 88-64
+10.5
25
vs
UCSD
L 77-87
+18.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-64
−6.5
2
vs
WSU
W 64-60
−24.5
6
vs
NIU
W 84-55
−7.5
18
@
INST
W 108-99
+56.5
21
vs
SIU
W 73-69
−10.5
29
vs
EVAN
W 76-68
−0.5
1
@
BEL
L 78-88
+12.5
4
@
MUR
L 66-86
−10.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 93-66
+14.5
10
vs
UNI
W 75-69
+12.5
13
@
EVAN
W 94-90
+41.5
17
@
ILST
L 62-88
+2.5
21
vs
INST
W 75-68
−12.5
24
vs
UIC
L 70-85
+10.5
31
@
DRKE
W 87-73
+9.5
3
vs
VAL
W 72-65
−7.5
6
@
UNI
L 49-61
−24.5
9
vs
BEL
W 95-84
+26.5
15
@
SIU
W 70-60
−16.5
18
@
VAL
L 72-79
+8.5
21
vs
ILST
W 74-60
−11.5
24
@
UIC
L 86-93
+37.5
1
vs
MUR
W 87-78
+7.5
6
vs
VAL
W 90-84
+34.5
7
vs
UNI
L 69-73
+14.5
18
vs
DAY
L 66-80
+4.5
over 19under 14avg +5.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pacific
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-20
35% overs · avg −2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 77-78 | +13.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 69-66 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 85-73 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 86-58 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 68-53 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 68-54 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 80-65 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 61-67 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 57-93 | +23.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 95-82 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-66 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 71-80 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 84-53 | -4.5 | W +26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-69 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 89-90 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 69-85 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 56-54 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-51 | -8.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-87 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 56-71 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 92-59 | -7.5 | W +25.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 65-59 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 70-87 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-71 | +22.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-72 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 61-58 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 129.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 68-76 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+12.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−9.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
+5.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−15.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
+23.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
+12.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
+3.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+9.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
+1.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
−12.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+4.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−14.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
−5.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
+26.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
−6.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
−4.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−1.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−3.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+18.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
+0.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
+14.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
−0.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−8.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+25.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
+0.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−3.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
−14.5
21
@
GONZ
L 62-71
+13.5
28
vs
SF
L 61-72
−14.5
7
vs
SEA
W 61-58
+1.5
8
vs
SCU
L 68-76
+1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NEV
L 77-78
+15.5
12
vs
LBSU
W 69-66
−6.5
15
@
CSUF
W 85-73
−1.5
20
@
FAU
L 59-82
−13.5
24
vs
STBK
W 86-58
−1.5
25
vs
JAX
W 68-53
−14.5
29
vs
SAC
W 68-54
−24.5
3
@
AF
W 80-65
+10.5
6
@
CAL
L 61-67
−16.5
16
@
BYU
L 57-93
+0.5
21
vs
NICH
W 95-82
+37.5
28
@
USD
L 54-66
−30.5
30
@
LMU
L 71-80
+11.5
2
vs
ORST
W 84-53
−0.5
4
vs
PEPP
W 74-69
+4.5
8
@
PORT
L 89-90
+34.5
10
vs
USD
W 77-70
−0.5
14
@
SCU
L 69-85
−0.5
17
@
ORST
W 81-64
+5.5
24
vs
SEA
W 56-54
−27.5
28
vs
PORT
W 74-51
−17.5
31
@
SF
L 82-87
+30.5
4
vs
SCU
L 56-71
−24.5
7
@
PEPP
W 92-59
+8.5
11
vs
LMU
W 65-59
−17.5
14
vs
SMC
L 61-72
−2.5
18
@
WSU
L 70-87
+12.5
21
@
GONZ
L 62-71
−11.5
28
vs
SF
L 61-72
−9.5
7
vs
SEA
W 61-58
−10.5
8
vs
SCU
L 68-76
−4.5
over 11under 20avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Bradley 1, Pacific 1, even 3
BradleyBetterPacific
G T. Payton TR9.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 15
→PACBig
G J. Winston TR15.5 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 74
G T. van der Knaap6.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 30
=Even
G C. Amundsen TR9.4 pts · 2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 34
G D. Richardson2.2 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Jones TR3.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 17
F X. Alarie TR10.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 50
←BRADBig
F G. Ripp TR3.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 10
F J. Ibukunoluwa TR2.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Pitt4.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 57
BradleyBetterPacific
BRAD offense175th of 366 · -5.4
=Even
PAC defense147th of 366 · -3.2
BRAD defense185th of 366 · -4.3
=Even
PAC offense195th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt-5.9 · 3 players
→PACBig
Backcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
←BRADSmall
Frontcourt-1.7 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
←BRADSmall
Bench-1.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBRAD betterPAC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Payton34 min · TRT. van der Knaap23 minD. Richardson7 minG. Rugaard1 minK. GrillNewG. GerganovNew
Forwards
X. Alarie28 min · TRJ. Ibukunoluwa6 min · TRB. ThornbrueNew
Centers
G. GuimaresNew
Guards
J. Winston36 min · TRC. Amundsen30 min · TRC. Jones17 min · TRA. Nyorha10 min · TRD. Harris6 min · TRN. BuduNew
Forwards
G. Ripp17 min · TRJ. Pitt17 minJ. Thompson11 min · TRV. OsazeeNewJ. CarotNew
Centers
J. McFarland3 min · TRI. Matlekovic2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.0 #117 | Points per game | 71.3 #262 |
| 1.10 #129 | Points per possession | 1.08 #176 |
| 69.9 #125 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #312 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.1 #189 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #140 |
| 36.1 #53 | 3-point % | 35.8 #65 |
| 40.5 #161 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.4 #266 |
| 35.9 #156 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #297 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.9 #19 | Turnover rate | 20.1 #350 |
| 27.4 #285 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #42 |
| 13.3 #191 | Assists per game | 14.9 #93 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #162 | Points allowed | 69.8 #60 |
| 1.06 #109 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #93 |
| 52.8 #259 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #101 |
| 36.6 #334 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #233 |
| 18.9 #53 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #281 |
| 72.2 #62 | Defensive rebound rate | 75.0 #8 |
| 7.5 #86 | Steals per game | 5.4 #309 |
| 3.2 #192 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #332 |
Bradley
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton66–80
- Lvs Northern Iowa69–73
- Wvs Valparaiso90–84
- Wvs Murray St87–78
- L@ UIC86–93
A week or more of rest.
Pacific
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Santa Clara68–76
- Wvs Seattle U61–58
- Lvs San Francisco61–72
- L@ Gonzaga62–71
- L@ Washington St70–87
A week or more of rest.