EagleBank Arena · at George Mason
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GMU 82–66 · win probability GMU 91%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GMU has more of the edges
LONG 1, GMU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LONG has played the 330th-hardest schedule, GMU the 118th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: LONG 49.7 and allows 53.8; GMU 52.7 and allows 49.5
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: LONG plays 71.5 a game (54th fastest), GMU 64.7 (351st). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: LONG 41.4, GMU 41.1. Allowed: LONG 42.1, GMU 28.9
GMU offense vs LONG defense
Offense 106th of 366 against a defense 242nd, on the model’s ratings
LONG offense vs GMU defense
Offense 182nd of 366 against a defense 64th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
LONG hits 31.4% and allows 33.8%; GMU hits 33.3% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 34.8% and 35.2% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LONG 34.6%, GMU 31.3%. Defensive: LONG 72.3%, GMU 71.7%
Home court
GMU at home. This season: GMU 0-0 at home, LONG 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LONG 19.2%, GMU 15.8%. Forced: LONG 19.7%, GMU 15.5%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LONG 28%, GMU 24%. Transfers in: LONG 6, GMU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GMU -15.2 | — |
| Total | — | 148.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | LONG 66.4 · GMU 81.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GMU -8.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | LONG 30.1 · GMU 39.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LONG 0–1 GMUGMU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · LONG 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2022-23 | LONG 69 @ GMU 83 | GMU -6.5 | GMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Longwood
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-78 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-82 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 82-83 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-95 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-70 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 66-92 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-80 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-81 | -13.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-71 | +24.5 | W +21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-70 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-80 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-85 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-56 | -16.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 81-79 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-71 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-79 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 107-96 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 203 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 82-85 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−3.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
−7.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
−18.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
−21.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−1.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−1.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
−20.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
−1.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
−18.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
+21.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−1.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
+19.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
+3.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−8.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+3.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+2.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
+18.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+0.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−6.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−2.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+7.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
+5.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
−7.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+0.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−4.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+13.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+14.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−7.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+4.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
+24.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
+26.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
+11.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−12.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−12.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
+9.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
+9.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
+17.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
−24.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−0.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
−9.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
−13.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−15.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+7.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+10.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
−8.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+3.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−22.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−26.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+4.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
−0.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
+11.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+9.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−2.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+48.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+9.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
+26.5
over 16under 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
George Mason
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-46 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 61-44 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-57 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-65 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-66 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 99-81 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 62-73 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 73-61 | -16.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 86-79 | -23.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 80-75 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 61-50 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 67-58 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-80 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 69-64 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 65-74 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 65-71 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-82 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-72 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 67-82 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-81 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-58 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-57 | +7.5 | W +36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 57-63 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 71-77 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
+9.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
−3.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−7.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
+5.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+15.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
+4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+3.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+7.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−6.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−4.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
−16.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
−12.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
−3.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
+4.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
+3.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+7.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
−3.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
+3.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
−10.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
+1.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+2.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−14.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
+1.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
−15.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−15.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
−17.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
−19.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
+9.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
+4.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
+36.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−8.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
−24.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
+39.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−39.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
−0.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+18.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
−4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+6.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+24.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−9.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−10.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
+18.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
+15.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
+20.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
−28.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
−9.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+21.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
+15.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
−20.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
+3.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
−22.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+7.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−7.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
−27.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
+12.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−24.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
+11.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
+7.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
−17.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
−12.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
−3.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−23.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
+6.5
over 15under 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
George Mason has the better starters
Position by position: Longwood 0, George Mason 3, even 2
LongwoodBetterGeorge Mason
G M. Williams TR9.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 65
→GMUSmall
G B. Okojie TR20.1 pts · 3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 91
G A. Billups7.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 47
→GMUSmall
G M. Valentine TR13.1 pts · 5.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
G J. Benard7.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 44
=Even
G L. Marville TR9.5 pts · 2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 39
G T. Robinson TR9.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 64
=Even
F E. Jones TR12.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
G E. Kelly2.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
→GMUBig
F E. Adair TR14.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 74
LongwoodBetterGeorge Mason
LONG offense182nd of 366 · -5.7
→GMUSmall
GMU defense64th of 366 · +1.1
LONG defense242nd of 366 · -6.4
→GMUBig
GMU offense106th of 366 · -1.5
Backcourt-1.7 · 5 players
→GMUBig
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLONG betterGMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Williams24 min · TRA. Billups23 minJ. Benard20 minT. Robinson19 min · TRE. Kelly11 minB. Wesson2 min · TR
Forwards
D. Kauzonas10 min · TRL. Milosevic8 min · TRK. Musungay4 min · TRI. Kalala3 min
Guards
B. Okojie35 min · TRM. Valentine32 min · TRL. Marville26 min · TRE. Oliogu-Elabor16 min · TRM. Presley16 minB. O'Connor15 min
Forwards
E. Jones29 min · TRE. Adair26 min · TRM. Marcus24 min · TRE. Kanga13 minR. MendyNewS. PendergrassNew
Centers
J. Nnaji8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.9 #143 | Points per game | 72.9 #227 |
| 1.07 #215 | Points per possession | 1.13 #93 |
| 71.5 #54 | Pace (possessions) | 64.7 #351 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.7 #254 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #113 |
| 31.4 #309 | 3-point % | 33.3 #214 |
| 34.8 #279 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #270 |
| 41.4 #40 | Free throw rate | 41.1 #44 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.2 #327 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #121 |
| 34.6 #57 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.3 #149 |
| 12.2 #270 | Assists per game | 12.6 #243 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.2 #223 | Points allowed | 68.0 #31 |
| 1.06 #113 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #89 |
| 53.8 #293 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #83 |
| 33.8 #171 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #91 |
| 19.7 #31 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #254 |
| 72.3 #58 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #79 |
| 8.3 #28 | Steals per game | 5.0 #334 |
| 2.0 #347 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #228 |
Longwood
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Asheville82–85
- Wvs Radford90–74
- W@ Charleston So107–96
- L@ Presbyterian65–72
- Wvs SC Upstate82–75
A week or more of rest.
George Mason
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Liberty71–77
- Lvs St Bonaventure57–63
- Wvs Saint Louis86–57
- L@ VCU65–70
- Wvs St Bonaventure71–58
A week or more of rest.