Qubein Center · at High Point
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HPU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 1-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-1 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HPU 77–73 · win probability HPU 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
GMU 2, HPU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GMU 15.8%, HPU 12.8%. Forced: GMU 15.5%, HPU 21.3%
Context
Schedule so far
GMU has played the 118th-hardest schedule, HPU the 288th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: GMU plays 64.7 a game (351st fastest), HPU 71.7 (47th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: GMU 41.1, HPU 40.8. Allowed: GMU 28.9, HPU 35.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GMU 31.3%, HPU 31.8%. Defensive: GMU 71.7%, HPU 68.9%
Home court
HPU at home. This season: HPU 0-0 at home, GMU 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
GMU hits 33.3% and allows 32.6%; HPU hits 34.2% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 35.2% and 43.6% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GMU 24%, HPU 36%. Transfers in: GMU 8, HPU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
GMU offense vs HPU defense
Offense 106th of 366 against a defense 127th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: GMU 52.7 and allows 49.5; HPU 54.5 and allows 50.5
Even
HPU offense vs GMU defense
Offense 64th of 366 against a defense 64th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HPU -4.5 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | GMU 72.7 · HPU 77.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HPU -2.5 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | GMU 33.8 · HPU 36.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 9-1 90% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
George Mason
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-46 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 61-44 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-57 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-65 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-66 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 99-81 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 62-73 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 73-61 | -16.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 86-79 | -23.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 80-75 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 61-50 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 67-58 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-80 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 69-64 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 65-74 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 65-71 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-82 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-72 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 67-82 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-81 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-58 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-57 | +7.5 | W +36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 57-63 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 71-77 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
+9.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
−3.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−7.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
+5.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+15.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
+4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+3.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+7.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−6.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−4.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
−16.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
−12.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
−3.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
+4.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
+3.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+7.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
−3.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
+3.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
−10.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
+1.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+2.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−14.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
+1.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
−15.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−15.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
−17.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
−19.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
+9.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
+4.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
+36.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−8.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
−24.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
+39.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−39.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
−0.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+18.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
−4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+6.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+24.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−9.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−10.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
+18.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
+15.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
+20.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
−28.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
−9.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+21.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
+15.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
−20.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
+3.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
−22.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+7.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−7.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
−27.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
+12.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−24.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
+11.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
+7.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
−17.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
−12.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
−3.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−23.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
+6.5
over 15under 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
High Point
33 games played
Straight up
28-5
85% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-11
67% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 97-71 | -3.5 | W +22.5 | 153.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-64 | -17.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 74-91 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 168.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 93-50 | -23.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 90-80 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 91-80 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 93-73 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 84-86 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 89-72 | -28.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 78-86 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 84-72 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 93-47 | -19.5 | W +26.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 87-69 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 80-67 | -16.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 104-49 | -26.5 | W +28.5 | 162.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-82 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-92 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 162.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-69 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 93-83 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 84-81 | -14.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 71-59 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 80-55 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 86-77 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 95-70 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 112-87 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 74-48 | -14.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-87 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 166.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 79-73 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 81-59 | -27.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 75-71 | -14.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 91-76 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 83-82 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 88-94 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 171.5 | O 182 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FUR
W 97-71
+22.5
11
vs
JAX
W 85-64
+3.5
14
@
UAB
L 74-91
−18.5
17
vs
CAN
W 93-50
+19.5
20
vs
UIC
W 90-80
−0.5
22
vs
UIW
W 91-80
−1.5
29
vs
WCU
W 93-73
+3.5
3
vs
SIU
L 84-86
−11.5
5
vs
NJIT
W 89-72
−11.5
14
vs
APP
L 78-86
−20.5
19
vs
LAS
W 84-72
−1.5
22
vs
BRY
W 93-47
+26.5
31
@
UNCA
W 87-69
+7.5
3
vs
LONG
W 80-67
−3.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 104-49
+28.5
10
@
CHSO
W 84-82
−6.5
14
@
WIN
L 75-92
−19.5
17
vs
UPST
W 89-69
+3.5
23
@
RAD
W 93-83
+2.5
29
vs
PRES
W 84-81
−11.5
31
@
LONG
W 71-59
+2.5
4
vs
CHSO
W 80-55
+10.5
7
vs
RAD
W 86-77
−5.5
12
@
UPST
W 95-70
+10.5
14
@
GWEB
W 112-87
−0.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 74-48
+11.5
21
vs
WIN
W 89-87
−7.5
26
@
PRES
W 79-73
−6.5
6
vs
GWEB
W 81-59
−5.5
7
vs
UNCA
W 75-71
−10.5
8
vs
WIN
W 91-76
+8.5
19
vs
WIS
W 83-82
+11.5
21
vs
ARK
L 88-94
+6.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FUR
W 97-71
+14.5
11
vs
JAX
W 85-64
−7.5
14
@
UAB
L 74-91
−3.5
17
vs
CAN
W 93-50
−9.5
20
vs
UIC
W 90-80
+11.5
22
vs
UIW
W 91-80
+10.5
29
vs
WCU
W 93-73
+6.5
3
vs
SIU
L 84-86
+7.5
5
vs
NJIT
W 89-72
+5.5
14
vs
APP
L 78-86
+19.5
19
vs
LAS
W 84-72
+6.5
22
vs
BRY
W 93-47
−13.5
31
@
UNCA
W 87-69
+4.5
3
vs
LONG
W 80-67
−13.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 104-49
−9.5
10
@
CHSO
W 84-82
+2.5
14
@
WIN
L 75-92
+4.5
17
vs
UPST
W 89-69
+5.5
23
@
RAD
W 93-83
+10.5
29
vs
PRES
W 84-81
+15.5
31
@
LONG
W 71-59
−26.5
4
vs
CHSO
W 80-55
−27.5
7
vs
RAD
W 86-77
+0.5
12
@
UPST
W 95-70
+10.5
14
@
GWEB
W 112-87
+37.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 74-48
−30.5
21
vs
WIN
W 89-87
+9.5
26
@
PRES
W 79-73
+0.5
6
vs
GWEB
W 81-59
−15.5
7
vs
UNCA
W 75-71
−1.5
8
vs
WIN
W 91-76
+9.5
19
vs
WIS
W 83-82
+3.5
21
vs
ARK
L 88-94
+10.5
over 22under 11avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
High Point has the better starters
Position by position: George Mason 0, High Point 1, even 4
George MasonBetterHigh Point
G B. Okojie TR20.1 pts · 3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 91
=Even
G J. Rivera-Torres TR15.9 pts · 8.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 91
G M. Valentine TR13.1 pts · 5.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
=Even
G C. Williams TR12.4 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 60
G L. Marville TR9.5 pts · 2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 39
→HPUSmall
G C. Brown TR10.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 64
F E. Jones TR12.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
=Even
F I. Garrett TR13.8 pts · 7.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 79
F E. Adair TR14.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 74
=Even
F F. Sherman TR10.8 pts · 8.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 85
George MasonBetterHigh Point
GMU offense106th of 366 · -1.5
=Even
HPU defense127th of 366 · -2.3
GMU defense64th of 366 · +1.1
=Even
HPU offense64th of 366 · +2.2
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt+3.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
→HPUSmall
Frontcourt+3.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
→HPUBig
Bench+4.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestGMU betterHPU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Okojie35 min · TRM. Valentine32 min · TRL. Marville26 min · TRE. Oliogu-Elabor16 min · TRM. Presley16 minB. O'Connor15 min
Forwards
E. Jones29 min · TRE. Adair26 min · TRM. Marcus24 min · TRE. Kanga13 minR. MendyNewS. PendergrassNew
Centers
J. Nnaji8 min · TR
Guards
J. Rivera-Torres36 min · TRC. Williams32 min · TRC. Brown27 min · TRC. Martinez22 minL. Campbell15 min · TRS. McDermott2 min · TR
Forwards
I. Garrett29 min · TRF. Sherman26 min · TRF. Brankovic24 min · TRC. Fletcher22 minB. Hausen21 minC. Miller7 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.9 #227 | Points per game | 86.4 #9 |
| 1.13 #93 | Points per possession | 1.20 #12 |
| 64.7 #351 | Pace (possessions) | 71.7 #47 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.7 #113 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #51 |
| 33.3 #214 | 3-point % | 34.2 #161 |
| 35.2 #270 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.6 #98 |
| 41.1 #44 | Free throw rate | 40.8 #50 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #121 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #5 |
| 31.3 #149 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.8 #131 |
| 12.6 #243 | Assists per game | 15.4 #74 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.0 #31 | Points allowed | 72.8 #128 |
| 1.05 #89 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #38 |
| 49.5 #83 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #126 |
| 32.6 #91 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #97 |
| 15.5 #254 | Turnovers forced | 21.3 #8 |
| 71.7 #79 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #207 |
| 5.0 #334 | Steals per game | 10.1 #2 |
| 3.0 #228 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #119 |
George Mason
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Liberty71–77
- Lvs St Bonaventure57–63
- Wvs Saint Louis86–57
- L@ VCU65–70
- Wvs St Bonaventure71–58
A week or more of rest.
High Point
28-5 in 2025-26 overall · 18-1 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arkansas88–94
- Wvs Wisconsin83–82
- Wvs Winthrop91–76
- Wvs UNC Asheville75–71
- Wvs Gardner-Webb81–59
A week or more of rest.