Skip Chappelle Court in Memorial Gymnasium · at Maine
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ME | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DREX 67–64 · win probability DREX 62%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 131.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
DREX 4, ME 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ME offense vs DREX defense
Offense 357th of 366 against a defense 175th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DREX 31.2%, ME 19.7%. Defensive: DREX 69.0%, ME 65.7%
DREX offense vs ME defense
Offense 323rd of 366 against a defense 191st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DREX has played the 199th-hardest schedule, ME the 319th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: DREX 31.6, ME 38.4. Allowed: DREX 35.4, ME 33.9
Three-pointers
DREX hits 35.5% and allows 30.3%; ME hits 31.2% and allows 29.4%. Threes are 40.0% and 37.0% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: DREX 50.6 and allows 47.1; ME 49.6 and allows 50.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DREX 19.1%, ME 19.2%. Forced: DREX 16.4%, ME 19.3%
Home court
ME at home. This season: ME 0-0 at home, DREX 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DREX 24%, ME 31%. Transfers in: DREX 2, ME 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: DREX plays 65.2 a game (341st fastest), ME 64.9 (348th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DREX -3.4 | — |
| Total | — | 131.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | DREX 67.3 · ME 63.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DREX -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 61.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | DREX 31.8 · ME 29.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DREX 1–0 MEDREX leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · DREX 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2025-26 | ME 56 @ DREX 74 | DREX -10.5 | DREX W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Drexel
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 65-76 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-90 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 75-43 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 71-66 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-75 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-69 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 66-74 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 53-65 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 56-37 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 64-58 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-51 | +5.5 | W +27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 58-59 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-51 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 61-60 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 60-81 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-77 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 73-93 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 69-72 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 70-61 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 65-60 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 51-62 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-65 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
−1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
−3.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−18.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
+18.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−20.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+0.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−0.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+2.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
−6.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
−14.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+3.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+7.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
+0.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
+0.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+1.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
+13.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
+9.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
+27.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
+6.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
+4.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−6.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−16.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+9.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
−21.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
−0.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
+10.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
+8.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
+3.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+2.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
+1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
+29.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−13.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
−20.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−0.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+3.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−6.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+10.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
+3.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
+1.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+4.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+0.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
−7.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
−19.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+5.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
−39.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
−28.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
−3.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
−7.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+21.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
−18.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−17.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−0.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+22.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
+32.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
+5.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
−12.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
−0.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
−18.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−20.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+22.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−14.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Maine
31 games played
Straight up
7-24
23% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-67 | +20.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-71 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 64-70 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 53-58 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 61-74 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-65 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-64 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 57-79 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 61-93 | +17.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 69-59 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 43-70 | -6.5 | L −33.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 51-56 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 62-69 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 62-67 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-65 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 52-49 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 79-63 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 77-91 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-70 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-73 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 62-78 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 58-67 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 61-58 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 70-59 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-74 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 56-67 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 58-60 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GW
L 47-67
+0.5
8
@
STBK
L 60-71
−7.5
10
@
RUTG
L 60-72
+6.5
16
vs
QUIN
L 64-70
−2.5
19
@
MRMK
L 65-72
−0.5
23
vs
BRWN
L 53-58
−3.5
28
@
AMER
L 61-74
−5.5
29
vs
LONG
L 61-65
+1.5
30
vs
SIE
L 60-64
+5.5
3
@
OHIO
L 57-79
−9.5
6
@
M-OH
L 61-93
−14.5
10
@
BU
W 69-59
+18.5
13
vs
CAN
L 43-70
−33.5
21
@
DREX
L 56-74
−7.5
3
vs
BRY
L 51-56
−3.5
8
@
UMBC
L 62-69
+0.5
10
@
NJIT
W 74-70
+5.5
15
@
UVM
L 62-67
+9.5
19
vs
UNH
L 48-65
−18.5
22
vs
UALB
W 52-49
+5.5
24
vs
BING
W 79-63
+10.5
31
@
UML
L 77-91
−9.5
5
vs
UVM
W 76-70
+14.5
7
@
BRY
L 67-73
−3.5
12
vs
UMBC
L 62-78
−12.5
14
vs
NJIT
L 58-67
−7.5
21
@
UNH
W 61-58
+6.5
26
@
UALB
W 70-59
+15.5
28
@
BING
L 67-74
−8.5
3
vs
UML
L 56-67
−9.5
7
@
NJIT
L 58-60
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GW
L 47-67
−29.5
8
@
STBK
L 60-71
−0.5
10
@
RUTG
L 60-72
+1.5
16
vs
QUIN
L 64-70
−3.5
19
@
MRMK
L 65-72
+6.5
23
vs
BRWN
L 53-58
−16.5
28
@
AMER
L 61-74
+1.5
29
vs
LONG
L 61-65
−12.5
30
vs
SIE
L 60-64
−3.5
3
@
OHIO
L 57-79
−2.5
6
@
M-OH
L 61-93
+14.5
10
@
BU
W 69-59
−0.5
13
vs
CAN
L 43-70
−14.5
21
@
DREX
L 56-74
+0.5
3
vs
BRY
L 51-56
−18.5
8
@
UMBC
L 62-69
−2.5
10
@
NJIT
W 74-70
+13.5
15
@
UVM
L 62-67
−1.5
19
vs
UNH
L 48-65
−16.5
22
vs
UALB
W 52-49
−30.5
24
vs
BING
W 79-63
+17.5
31
@
UML
L 77-91
+31.5
5
vs
UVM
W 76-70
+15.5
7
@
BRY
L 67-73
+11.5
12
vs
UMBC
L 62-78
+4.5
14
vs
NJIT
L 58-67
−12.5
21
@
UNH
W 61-58
−16.5
26
@
UALB
W 70-59
−1.5
28
@
BING
L 67-74
+7.5
3
vs
UML
L 56-67
−16.5
7
@
NJIT
L 58-60
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Drexel has the better starters
Position by position: Drexel 3, Maine 1, even 1
DrexelBetterMaine
G J. Reed7.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 44
←DREXSmall
G D. Williams TR8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 23
G A. Abram TR3.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 80
←DREXBig
G C. Crawford4.2 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 14
G D. Tingler3.4 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 59
←DREXBig
G V. Garcia Adsten TR3.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 11
F P. Pagonis TR4.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 6
→MESmall
F A. Flagg6.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 33
F M. de LaPorterie2.9 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 12
=Even
F Y. Bamba2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 11
DrexelBetterMaine
DREX offense323rd of 366 · -10.5
→MEBig
ME defense191st of 366 · -4.5
DREX defense175th of 366 · -3.9
←DREXBig
ME offense357th of 366 · -13.7
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
←DREXBig
Backcourt-6.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 2 players
→MESmall
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestDREX betterME betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Reed19 minA. Abram11 min · TRD. Tingler10 minM. Davis2 minL. PittmanNewM. HippsNew
Forwards
P. Pagonis18 min · TRM. de LaPorterie13 minR. Akuta5 minC. EdomwonyinNewD. SimonovicNew
Guards
D. Williams25 min · TRC. Crawford20 minV. Garcia Adsten18 min · TRD. LopesNewK. BedardNewH. FranzNew
Forwards
A. Flagg25 minY. Bamba12 minA. Evans8 min · TRK. Gribben3 minE. Byther2 minO. Faubert2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.3 #328 | Points per game | 61.2 #364 |
| 1.03 #282 | Points per possession | 0.95 #356 |
| 65.2 #341 | Pace (possessions) | 64.9 #348 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #204 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #263 |
| 35.5 #90 | 3-point % | 31.2 #314 |
| 40.0 #171 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.0 #231 |
| 31.6 #265 | Free throw rate | 38.4 #93 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.1 #322 | Turnover rate | 19.2 #328 |
| 31.2 #156 | Offensive rebound rate | 19.7 #364 |
| 12.8 #226 | Assists per game | 11.8 #300 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.6 #26 | Points allowed | 68.5 #39 |
| 1.04 #64 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #90 |
| 47.1 #22 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #136 |
| 30.3 #15 | Opponent 3-point % | 29.4 #4 |
| 16.4 #195 | Turnovers forced | 19.3 #38 |
| 69.0 #202 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.7 #322 |
| 5.8 #254 | Steals per game | 7.7 #57 |
| 3.5 #144 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #194 |
Drexel
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth57–65
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
- L@ Hofstra51–62
- Wvs Campbell65–60
- Wvs Towson68–62
A week or more of rest.
Maine
7-24 in 2025-26 overall · 6-11 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ NJIT58–60
- Lvs UMass Lowell56–67
- L@ Binghamton67–74
- W@ UAlbany70–59
- W@ New Hampshire61–58
A week or more of rest.