Michelob ULTRA Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SJU 82–69 · win probability SJU 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SJU has more of the edges
SJU 6, ORE 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SJU 14.4%, ORE 17.6%. Forced: SJU 19.1%, ORE 15.8%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SJU plays 70.8 a game (82nd fastest), ORE 66.8 (287th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: SJU 51.0 and allows 47.5; ORE 49.5 and allows 50.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SJU 35.2%, ORE 32.3%. Defensive: SJU 70.1%, ORE 67.7%
Three-pointers
SJU hits 33.5% and allows 31.3%; ORE hits 32.0% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 35.2% and 42.8% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: SJU 40.2, ORE 35.0. Allowed: SJU 31.8, ORE 32.0
ORE offense vs SJU defense
Offense 66th of 366 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Even
SJU offense vs ORE defense
Offense 8th of 366 against a defense 39th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SJU has played the 15th-hardest schedule, ORE the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SJU 22%, ORE 23%. Transfers in: SJU 6, ORE 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SJU -12.5 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | SJU 81.9 · ORE 69.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SJU -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 70.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SJU 39.2 · ORE 31.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
St John's
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-23
38% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 108-74 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 96-103 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-60 | -28.5 | W +4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 97-49 | -28.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 82-83 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-81 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-85 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 63-58 | -13.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 91-64 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 79-66 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-59 | -26.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-77 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 84-70 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-73 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 92-68 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 86-79 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 65-60 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-83 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 92-70 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 68-56 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-72 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 87-82 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-69 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-70 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 81-52 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 40-72 | +5.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-57 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-69 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 72-65 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-72 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-68 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-52 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 75-80 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+7.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
−11.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
+19.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+1.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+9.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−15.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−8.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−1.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−6.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−0.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+3.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−20.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
+9.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+14.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+8.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+4.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−6.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
−3.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+9.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
+2.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+10.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
−11.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
+3.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−2.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
+16.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−26.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
+24.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−12.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
+1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
+1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+1.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
+22.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
+15.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−1.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+1.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+25.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
+26.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
−26.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
−12.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+6.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+17.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−7.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−30.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−4.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−1.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+25.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−18.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
−8.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+10.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+4.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+17.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−20.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
+11.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+3.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
−21.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+9.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
+9.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
−19.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−11.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
−23.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−33.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
−1.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−7.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
−1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
−1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+10.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
−15.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
−1.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−12.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+14.5
over 14under 23avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oregon
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 60-59 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 67-63 | -15.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-69 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-75 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 73-84 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 80-97 | -2.5 | L −19.5 | 141.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-76 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 77-82 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-74 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 104-62 | -13.5 | W +28.5 | 146.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 94-69 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 82-91 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 80-57 | -21.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 64-54 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 85-88 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 62-72 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 55-90 | +10.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 71-81 | +18.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 52-68 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 57-72 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 57-73 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 66-84 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 64-68 | +19.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 74-92 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 44-61 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 136.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-70 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 85-71 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-63 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 54-80 | +17.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 85-79 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
HAW
W 60-59
−10.5
7
vs
RICE
W 67-63
−11.5
12
vs
SDST
W 83-69
−2.5
17
vs
ORST
W 87-75
−1.5
24
vs
AUB
L 73-84
−6.5
25
vs
SDSU
L 80-97
−19.5
27
vs
CREI
L 66-76
−7.5
2
vs
USC
L 77-82
−2.5
6
@
UCLA
L 63-74
−2.5
13
vs
UCD
W 104-62
+28.5
17
vs
PORT
W 94-69
+5.5
21
vs
GONZ
L 82-91
+3.5
28
vs
OMA
W 80-57
+1.5
2
@
MD
W 64-54
+8.5
5
@
RUTG
L 85-88
−7.5
8
vs
OSU
L 62-72
−11.5
13
@
NEB
L 55-90
−24.5
17
vs
MICH
L 71-81
+8.5
20
vs
MSU
L 52-68
−5.5
25
@
WASH
L 57-72
−7.5
28
vs
UCLA
L 57-73
−11.5
1
vs
IOWA
L 66-84
−8.5
7
@
PUR
L 64-68
+15.5
9
@
IU
L 74-92
−7.5
14
vs
PSU
W 83-72
+4.5
17
vs
MINN
L 44-61
−20.5
21
@
USC
W 71-70
+6.5
25
vs
WIS
W 85-71
+19.5
28
@
NU
L 62-63
+2.5
3
@
ILL
L 54-80
−8.5
7
vs
WASH
W 85-79
+7.5
10
vs
MD
L 60-70
−14.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
HAW
W 60-59
−25.5
7
vs
RICE
W 67-63
−15.5
12
vs
SDST
W 83-69
+6.5
17
vs
ORST
W 87-75
+20.5
24
vs
AUB
L 73-84
+1.5
25
vs
SDSU
L 80-97
+35.5
27
vs
CREI
L 66-76
−8.5
2
vs
USC
L 77-82
+4.5
6
@
UCLA
L 63-74
−9.5
13
vs
UCD
W 104-62
+19.5
17
vs
PORT
W 94-69
+8.5
21
vs
GONZ
L 82-91
+17.5
28
vs
OMA
W 80-57
−14.5
2
@
MD
W 64-54
−28.5
5
@
RUTG
L 85-88
+33.5
8
vs
OSU
L 62-72
−18.5
13
@
NEB
L 55-90
−1.5
17
vs
MICH
L 71-81
−5.5
20
vs
MSU
L 52-68
−19.5
25
@
WASH
L 57-72
−14.5
28
vs
UCLA
L 57-73
−6.5
1
vs
IOWA
L 66-84
+16.5
7
@
PUR
L 64-68
−12.5
9
@
IU
L 74-92
+22.5
14
vs
PSU
W 83-72
+9.5
17
vs
MINN
L 44-61
−31.5
21
@
USC
W 71-70
−8.5
25
vs
WIS
W 85-71
+3.5
28
@
NU
L 62-63
−16.5
3
@
ILL
L 54-80
−13.5
7
vs
WASH
W 85-79
+18.5
10
vs
MD
L 60-70
−9.5
over 14under 18avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St John's has the better starters
Position by position: St John's 4, Oregon 0, even 1
St John'sBetterOregon
G T. Yessoufou TR17.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
=Even
G F. Payne TR15.8 pts · 4.2 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 88
G I. Jackson9.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 93
←SJUSmall
G T. Riley TR12.3 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 78
F K. Hall TR19.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 98
←SJUSmall
F A. Meadow TR12 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 77
F D. Freeman TR16.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 92
←SJUSmall
F S. Stewart6.5 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 64
F R. Bailey TR8.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
←SJUSmall
F T. Bol Bowen TR6.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 67
St John'sBetterOregon
SJU offense8th of 366 · +10.5
=Even
ORE defense39th of 366 · +3.0
SJU defense11th of 366 · +7.0
←SJUSmall
ORE offense66th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+6.5 · 2 players
←SJUSmall
Backcourt+4.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+12.5 · 3 players
←SJUBig
Frontcourt+2.6 · 3 players
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
→OREBig
Bench+1.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSJU betterORE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Yessoufou33 min · TRI. Jackson18 minK. Cuffe16 min · TRA. Brown15 min · TRL. Liotopoulos8 minC. Pohto5 min
Forwards
K. Hall34 min · TRD. Freeman31 min · TRR. Bailey19 min · TRR. Prey11 minZ. MaronkaNewB. SaneNew
Centers
T. EdemaNewL. StojkovicNew
Guards
F. Payne35 min · TRT. Riley32 min · TRJ. Easter18 min · TRW. Lin18 minJ. Johnson12 min · TRR. GonzalesNew
Forwards
A. Meadow30 min · TRS. Stewart23 minT. Bol Bowen19 min · TRP. Compton14 min · TRD. Aristode13 min · TRL. Johnson6 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.9 #45 | Points per game | 70.8 #267 |
| 1.14 #68 | Points per possession | 1.06 #235 |
| 70.8 #82 | Pace (possessions) | 66.8 #287 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #192 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #271 |
| 33.5 #197 | 3-point % | 32.0 #277 |
| 35.2 #272 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #121 |
| 40.2 #57 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #181 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.4 #38 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #244 |
| 35.2 #43 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.3 #114 |
| 16.1 #44 | Assists per game | 14.3 #126 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.7 #59 | Points allowed | 73.9 #155 |
| 0.98 #15 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #249 |
| 47.5 #32 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #148 |
| 31.3 #39 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #144 |
| 19.1 #46 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #231 |
| 70.1 #154 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.7 #271 |
| 7.7 #58 | Steals per game | 6.1 #231 |
| 4.8 #22 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #79 |
St John's
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke75–80
- Wvs Kansas67–65
- Wvs Northern Iowa79–53
- Wvs UConn72–52
- Wvs Seton Hall78–68
A week or more of rest.
Oregon
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 5-16 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Maryland60–70
- Wvs Washington85–79
- L@ Illinois54–80
- L@ Northwestern62–63
- Wvs Wisconsin85–71
A week or more of rest.