Madison Square Garden · at St John's
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SJU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARIZ 78–77 · win probability ARIZ 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARIZ has more of the edges
ARIZ 4, SJU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ARIZ 15.1%, SJU 14.4%. Forced: ARIZ 16.2%, SJU 19.1%
Shooting
Effective FG%: ARIZ 54.7 and allows 45.3; SJU 51.0 and allows 47.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ARIZ 38.4%, SJU 35.2%. Defensive: ARIZ 73.1%, SJU 70.1%
Three-pointers
ARIZ hits 36.6% and allows 31.4%; SJU hits 33.5% and allows 31.3%. Threes are 26.4% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: ARIZ 43.9, SJU 40.2. Allowed: ARIZ 27.1, SJU 31.8
Home court
SJU at home. This season: SJU 0-0 at home, ARIZ 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: ARIZ plays 71.6 a game (49th fastest), SJU 70.8 (82nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ARIZ 29%, SJU 22%. Transfers in: ARIZ 5, SJU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
ARIZ offense vs SJU defense
Offense 4th of 366 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
ARIZ has played the 11th-hardest schedule, SJU the 15th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SJU offense vs ARIZ defense
Offense 8th of 366 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARIZ -0.9 | — |
| Total | — | 155.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ARIZ 78 · SJU 77.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARIZ -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | ARIZ 36.6 · SJU 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Arizona
39 games played
Straight up
36-3
92% wins
Against the spread
23-16
59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-19
51% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-87 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 93-67 | -33.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-49 | -35.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 71-67 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 103-73 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 98-61 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 97-68 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 96-75 | -2.5 | W +18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 96-62 | -34.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 68-45 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 107-71 | -39.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 99-71 | -31.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 97-78 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-76 | -17.5 | W +7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 86-73 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-82 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-77 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-51 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-53 | -17.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-74 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-47 | -20.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 78-82 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 75-78 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-68 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-66 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 73-57 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 89-79 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-59 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-74 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 92-58 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 78-66 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 109-88 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
| Mar 28 | vs | W 79-64 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 73-91 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+9.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−7.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−0.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
+2.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
+8.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
−2.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+1.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+17.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
+18.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
−0.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
+9.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
−3.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
−3.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+1.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+7.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+5.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
−14.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−2.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
+12.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
+17.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+1.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−1.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
+16.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
−9.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−11.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−4.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
+13.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
−0.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
+13.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
+8.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
−3.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
+6.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
−1.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+3.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+3.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
+0.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+12.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
+9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
−19.5
covered 23didn’t cover 16avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+15.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−2.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−30.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
−19.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
−18.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
+21.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+12.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+2.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
−7.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
+12.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
−40.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
+23.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
+10.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+12.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+5.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+1.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
+3.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−4.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
−24.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
−2.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+2.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−2.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
−37.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
+7.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−3.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−22.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
−3.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
+11.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
−6.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
−19.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
+11.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
−19.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
+17.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+14.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+2.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
−9.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+30.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
−9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
+6.5
over 20under 19avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
St John's
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-23
38% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 108-74 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 96-103 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-60 | -28.5 | W +4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 97-49 | -28.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 82-83 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-81 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-85 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 63-58 | -13.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 91-64 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 79-66 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-59 | -26.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-77 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 84-70 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-73 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 92-68 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 86-79 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 65-60 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-83 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 92-70 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 68-56 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-72 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 87-82 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-69 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-70 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 81-52 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 40-72 | +5.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-57 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-69 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 72-65 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-72 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-68 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-52 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 75-80 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+7.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
−11.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
+19.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+1.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+9.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−15.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−8.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−1.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−6.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−0.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+3.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−20.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
+9.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+14.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+8.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+4.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−6.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
−3.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+9.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
+2.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+10.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
−11.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
+3.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−2.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
+16.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−26.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
+24.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−12.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
+1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
+1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+1.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
+22.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
+15.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−1.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+1.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+25.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
+26.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
−26.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
−12.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+6.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+17.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−7.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−30.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−4.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−1.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+25.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−18.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
−8.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+10.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+4.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+17.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−20.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
+11.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+3.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
−21.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+9.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
+9.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
−19.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−11.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
−23.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−33.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
−1.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−7.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
−1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
−1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+10.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
−15.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
−1.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−12.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+14.5
over 14under 23avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St John's has the better starters
Position by position: Arizona 0, St John's 3, even 2
ArizonaBetterSt John's
G D. Dixon TR6.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 55
→SJUBig
G T. Yessoufou TR17.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
G J. Mandaquit TR5.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 62
→SJUSmall
G I. Jackson9.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 93
F I. Kharchenkov10.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
→SJUSmall
F K. Hall TR19.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 98
F R. Godfrey TR12 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 96
=Even
F D. Freeman TR16.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 92
C M. Krivas10.4 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
=Even
F R. Bailey TR8.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
ArizonaBetterSt John's
ARIZ offense4th of 366 · +11.0
=Even
SJU defense11th of 366 · +7.0
ARIZ defense7th of 366 · +8.8
=Even
SJU offense8th of 366 · +10.5
Backcourt-0.3 · 2 players
→SJUBig
Backcourt+6.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+10.8 · 3 players
→SJUSmall
Frontcourt+12.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.1 · 4 players
←ARIZSmall
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestARIZ betterSJU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Mandaquit20 min · TRA. Arnold2 minJ. Cook1 minB. JamesNewC. HolmesNew
Forwards
I. Kharchenkov28 minR. Godfrey25 min · TRE. Otten15 min · TRU. Jarusevicius11 min · TRM. MawutNewE. AiyamenkhueNew
Centers
M. Krivas25 min
Guards
T. Yessoufou33 min · TRI. Jackson18 minK. Cuffe16 min · TRA. Brown15 min · TRL. Liotopoulos8 minC. Pohto5 min
Forwards
K. Hall34 min · TRD. Freeman31 min · TRR. Bailey19 min · TRR. Prey11 minZ. MaronkaNewB. SaneNew
Centers
T. EdemaNewL. StojkovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.2 #11 | Points per game | 80.9 #45 |
| 1.21 #11 | Points per possession | 1.14 #68 |
| 71.6 #49 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #82 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.7 #45 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #192 |
| 36.6 #37 | 3-point % | 33.5 #197 |
| 26.4 #363 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #272 |
| 43.9 #11 | Free throw rate | 40.2 #57 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.1 #76 | Turnover rate | 14.4 #38 |
| 38.4 #5 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.2 #43 |
| 16.4 #38 | Assists per game | 16.1 #44 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.4 #53 | Points allowed | 69.7 #59 |
| 0.97 #6 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #15 |
| 45.3 #4 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #32 |
| 31.4 #42 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.3 #39 |
| 16.2 #209 | Turnovers forced | 19.1 #46 |
| 73.1 #34 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #154 |
| 7.4 #95 | Steals per game | 7.7 #58 |
| 4.2 #55 | Blocks per game | 4.8 #22 |
Arizona
36-3 in 2025-26 overall · 19-2 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan73–91
- Wvs Purdue79–64
- Wvs Arkansas109–88
- Wvs Utah State78–66
- Wvs Long Island92–58
A week or more of rest.
St John's
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke75–80
- Wvs Kansas67–65
- Wvs Northern Iowa79–53
- Wvs UConn72–52
- Wvs Seton Hall78–68
A week or more of rest.