Legacy Arena at BJCC · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ALA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SJU 85–82 · win probability SJU 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 166.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SJU has more of the edges
SJU 4, ALA 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SJU 14.4%, ALA 13.1%. Forced: SJU 19.1%, ALA 12.8%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SJU 35.2%, ALA 32.4%. Defensive: SJU 70.1%, ALA 67.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SJU 51.0 and allows 47.5; ALA 55.2 and allows 49.2
Free throws
Free throw rate: SJU 40.2, ALA 36.0. Allowed: SJU 31.8, ALA 32.0
SJU offense vs ALA defense
Offense 8th of 366 against a defense 54th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SJU 22%, ALA 46%. Transfers in: SJU 6, ALA 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: SJU plays 70.8 a game (82nd fastest), ALA 74.7 (7th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
SJU has played the 15th-hardest schedule, ALA the 1st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
ALA offense vs SJU defense
Offense 2nd of 366 against a defense 11th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Three-pointers
SJU hits 33.5% and allows 31.3%; ALA hits 35.8% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 35.2% and 54.3% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SJU -2.3 | — |
| Total | — | 166.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | SJU 84.6 · ALA 82.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SJU -1.5 | — |
| 1H total | 77.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | SJU 39.7 · ALA 38.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SJU 0–1 ALAALA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SJU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2025-26 | ALA 103 @ SJU 96 | SJU -4.5 | ALA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
St John's
37 games played
Straight up
30-7
81% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-23
38% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 108-74 | -26.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 96-103 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-60 | -28.5 | W +4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 97-49 | -28.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 82-83 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 96-81 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-85 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 63-58 | -13.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 91-64 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 79-66 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-59 | -26.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-77 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 84-70 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-73 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 92-68 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 86-79 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 65-60 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-83 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 92-70 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 68-56 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-72 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 87-82 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-69 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-70 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 81-52 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 40-72 | +5.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-57 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-69 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 72-65 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-72 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-68 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-52 | +2.5 | W +22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 67-65 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 75-80 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+7.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
−11.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
+19.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+1.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+9.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−15.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−8.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−1.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−6.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−0.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+3.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−20.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
+9.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+14.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+8.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+4.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−6.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
−3.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+9.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
+2.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+10.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
−11.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
+3.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−2.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
+16.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−26.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
+24.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−12.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
+1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
+1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+1.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
+22.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
+15.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−1.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+1.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
QUIN
W 108-74
+25.5
8
vs
ALA
L 96-103
+26.5
15
vs
W&M
W 93-60
−26.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 97-49
−12.5
24
vs
ISU
L 82-83
+6.5
25
vs
BAY
W 96-81
+17.5
26
vs
AUB
L 74-85
−7.5
6
vs
MISS
W 63-58
−30.5
13
vs
IONA
W 91-64
−4.5
16
vs
DEP
W 79-66
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 66-78
−10.5
23
vs
HARV
W 85-59
−1.5
31
@
GTWN
W 95-83
+25.5
3
vs
PROV
L 71-77
−18.5
6
@
BTLR
W 84-70
−8.5
10
@
CREI
W 90-73
+10.5
13
vs
MARQ
W 92-68
+4.5
17
@
VILL
W 86-79
+17.5
20
vs
HALL
W 65-60
−20.5
24
@
XAV
W 88-83
+11.5
28
vs
BTLR
W 92-70
+3.5
3
@
DEP
W 68-56
−21.5
6
vs
CONN
W 81-72
+9.5
9
vs
XAV
W 87-82
+9.5
14
@
PROV
W 79-69
−19.5
18
@
MARQ
W 76-70
−11.5
21
vs
CREI
W 81-52
−23.5
25
@
CONN
L 40-72
−33.5
28
vs
VILL
W 89-57
−1.5
3
vs
GTWN
W 72-69
−7.5
6
@
HALL
W 72-65
−1.5
12
vs
PROV
W 85-72
−1.5
13
vs
HALL
W 78-68
+10.5
14
vs
CONN
W 72-52
−15.5
20
vs
UNI
W 79-53
−1.5
22
vs
KU
W 67-65
−12.5
27
vs
DUKE
L 75-80
+14.5
over 14under 23avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Alabama
35 games played
Straight up
25-10
71% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-16
54% overs · avg +0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-62 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 103-96 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 172.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 13 | vs | L 80-87 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 90-86 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 180.5 | U 176 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 85-95 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 178.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 115-76 | -13.5 | W +25.5 | 181.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 105-72 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-84 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 97-55 | -33.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 75-96 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 104-93 | -14.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 92-81 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 102-78 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-74 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 173.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 90-96 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 176.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 88-92 | -11.5 | L −15.5 | 177.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 97-82 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 171.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-81 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 177.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-79 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 90-64 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 77-100 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 176.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 100-97 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 180.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 96-92 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 93-74 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 89-75 | -17.5 | L −3.5 | 170.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 117-115 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 181.5 | O 232 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 90-83 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 172.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 100-75 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 176.5 | U 175 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 88-98 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-84 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 175.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 79-80 | -12.5 | L −13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 90-70 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 90-65 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 27 | vs | L 77-90 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 172.5 | U 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−7.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+11.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−10.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
+6.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
−5.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+25.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+18.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
−2.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
+8.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−18.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
−3.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
+9.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
−2.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
−15.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+10.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−3.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−10.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
+15.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
−13.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
−5.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+6.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+12.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−3.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
−1.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
−0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
+12.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
+7.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
−11.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+6.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−13.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+8.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
+23.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UND
W 91-62
−17.5
8
@
SJU
W 103-96
+26.5
13
vs
PUR
L 80-87
−5.5
19
vs
ILL
W 90-86
−4.5
24
vs
GONZ
L 85-95
+1.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 115-76
+9.5
26
vs
MD
W 105-72
+10.5
3
vs
CLEM
W 90-84
+8.5
7
vs
UTSA
W 97-55
−19.5
13
vs
ARIZ
L 75-96
−7.5
17
vs
USF
W 104-93
+18.5
21
vs
KENN
W 92-81
−9.5
29
vs
YALE
W 102-78
+8.5
3
vs
UK
W 89-74
−10.5
7
@
VAN
L 90-96
+9.5
10
vs
TEX
L 88-92
+2.5
13
@
MSST
W 97-82
+7.5
17
@
OU
W 83-81
−13.5
24
vs
TENN
L 73-79
−15.5
27
vs
MIZ
W 90-64
−13.5
1
@
FLA
L 77-100
+0.5
4
vs
TA&M
W 100-97
+16.5
7
@
AUB
W 96-92
+12.5
11
@
MISS
W 93-74
+2.5
14
vs
SC
W 89-75
−6.5
18
vs
ARK
W 117-115
+50.5
21
@
LSU
W 90-83
+0.5
25
vs
MSST
W 100-75
−1.5
28
@
TENN
W 71-69
−22.5
3
@
UGA
L 88-98
+6.5
7
vs
AUB
W 96-84
+4.5
13
vs
MISS
L 79-80
−7.5
20
vs
HOF
W 90-70
+1.5
22
vs
TTU
W 90-65
−9.5
27
vs
MICH
L 77-90
−5.5
over 19under 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St John's has the better starters
Position by position: St John's 2, Alabama 0, even 3
St John'sBetterAlabama
G T. Yessoufou TR17.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
=Even
G A. Holloway16.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 99
G I. Jackson9.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 93
=Even
G A. Allen11.4 pts · 6.9 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 94
F K. Hall TR19.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 98
=Even
F D. Fielder TR14.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 98
F D. Freeman TR16.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 92
←SJUSmall
F J. Davis-Fleming TR3.7 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
F R. Bailey TR8.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
←SJUSmall
F B. Garrison TR4.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
St John'sBetterAlabama
SJU offense8th of 366 · +10.5
=Even
ALA defense54th of 366 · +1.5
SJU defense11th of 366 · +7.0
=Even
ALA offense2nd of 366 · +13.7
Backcourt+6.5 · 2 players
→ALASmall
Backcourt+8.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt+12.5 · 3 players
←SJUBig
Frontcourt+5.2 · 3 players
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
→ALASmall
Bench+0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSJU betterALA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Yessoufou33 min · TRI. Jackson18 minK. Cuffe16 min · TRA. Brown15 min · TRL. Liotopoulos8 minC. Pohto5 min
Forwards
K. Hall34 min · TRD. Freeman31 min · TRR. Bailey19 min · TRR. Prey11 minZ. MaronkaNewB. SaneNew
Centers
T. EdemaNewL. StojkovicNew
Guards
A. Holloway28 minA. Allen28 minP. Murphy3 minC. CloerNewQ. SamuelsNewA. DiazNew
Forwards
D. Fielder24 min · TRJ. Davis-Fleming20 min · TRB. Garrison16 min · TRL. Jemison16 minK. Bristow13 minJ. RichardsonNew
Centers
C. Onyejiaka6 minT. St. LouisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.9 #45 | Points per game | 91.2 #1 |
| 1.14 #68 | Points per possession | 1.22 #5 |
| 70.8 #82 | Pace (possessions) | 74.7 #7 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #192 | Effective FG% | 55.2 #34 |
| 33.5 #197 | 3-point % | 35.8 #66 |
| 35.2 #272 | 3-point attempt rate | 54.3 #1 |
| 40.2 #57 | Free throw rate | 36.0 #150 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.4 #38 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #10 |
| 35.2 #43 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.4 #111 |
| 16.1 #44 | Assists per game | 16.3 #39 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.7 #59 | Points allowed | 82.7 #343 |
| 0.98 #15 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #232 |
| 47.5 #32 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.2 #73 |
| 31.3 #39 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #170 |
| 19.1 #46 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #361 |
| 70.1 #154 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #295 |
| 7.7 #58 | Steals per game | 6.4 #186 |
| 4.8 #22 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #17 |
St John's
30-7 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke75–80
- Wvs Kansas67–65
- Wvs Northern Iowa79–53
- Wvs UConn72–52
- Wvs Seton Hall78–68
A week or more of rest.
Alabama
25-10 in 2025-26 overall · 13-6 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan77–90
- Wvs Texas Tech90–65
- Wvs Hofstra90–70
- Lvs Ole Miss79–80
- Wvs Auburn96–84
A week or more of rest.