Abessinio Court at Eleanor R. Baldwin Arena · at FAU
Closing line
FAU -1.5✓ FAU covered by 3.5
Closing total148.5Over by 12.5
| This season | FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: BC 76–76 FAU · ✗ FAU (50%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | OT | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 31 | 35 | 12 | 78 |
| FAU | 35 | 31 | 17 | 83 |
1st half: BC 31, FAU 35 (FAU by 4). The model had BC by 0.2 and a total of 70.7 (actual 66).
Team stats
| BC | FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-67 42% | Field goals | 29-67 43% |
| 10-28 36% | 3-pointers | 12-23 52% |
| 12-24 50% | Free throws | 13-25 52% |
| 52 14 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 12 | Assists | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 9 |
| 5 | Blocks | 10 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 12 |
| 19 | Fouls | 17 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 20 |
Players
| BC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred Payne G | 40 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 2-11 | 2-7 |
| Donald Hand Jr. G | 36 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 6-18 | 2-7 |
| Chase Forte G | 34 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-3 |
| Aidan Shaw F | 32 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Jayden Hastings F | 15 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Boden Kapke F | 30 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-4 |
| Marko Radunovic F | 17 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-3 |
| Jason Asemota F | 11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Caleb Steger G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Kany Musungay F | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Will Eggemeier, Nick Petronio, Akbar Waheed III, Jack DiDonna, Luka Toews, Jack Bailey
| FAU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Vanterpool G | 37 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 4-10 | 1-2 |
| Xander Pintelon F | 36 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 4-10 | 3-7 |
| Kanaan Carlyle G | 30 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-7 |
| Devin Williams F | 30 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-2 |
| Isaiah Elohim G | 22 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Yohann Sissoko G | 24 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 4-6 | 3-3 |
| Niccolo Moretti G | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Vincent Neugebauer C | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Max Langenfeld G | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Josiah Parker F | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| Maxim Logue F | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Amar Amkou G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Liam Dayco-Green, Zion Sampaio, Lachlan Smith
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketFAU -1.5
ModelBC -0.1
Model edgeBC +1.6
L FAU covered
Total
Market148.5
Model151.1
Model edgeOver 2.6
W Over
Projected score
BC 75.6 · FAU 75.5
BC 78 · FAU 83
Win probability
FAU 50%
1st half
Spread
BC -0.2
FAU -4.0
Total
70.7
66 points
Projected score
BC 35.5 · FAU 35.3
BC 31 · FAU 35
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenBC -1.5
3 → FAU
CloseFAU -1.5
3 pts toward FAU
Total
Open149.5
▼ 1
Close148.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
BC +110 · FAU -130
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened BC -1.5 · closed FAU -1.5 · moved 3 toward FAUmodel BC -0
model BC -0
Opened 149.5 · closed 148.5 · moved 1 downmodel 151
model 151
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Boston College
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 69-60 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 55-80 | +10.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 72-69 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 82-61 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 82-52 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-74 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-61 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 83-88 | -16.5 | L −21.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 51-73 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 66-72 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 73-69 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 77-103 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 78-70 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 78-68 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 64-85 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 71-79 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 60-78 | +11.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 63-88 | +23.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 124.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 96-102 | +19.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 198 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 77-76 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 58-84 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 86-95 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 94-97 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-70 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 54-36 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 90 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 69-54 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 60-78 | +11.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 71-82 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 69-78 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 67-93 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
CIT
W 69-60
−7.5
8
vs
VCU
L 55-80
−14.5
15
vs
TEM
W 72-69
+4.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 82-61
+8.5
24
vs
ODU
W 82-52
+18.5
25
vs
MOST
W 76-74
−0.5
26
vs
BOIS
W 63-61
+11.5
29
vs
DART
L 83-88
−21.5
3
vs
SC
L 51-73
−17.5
7
@
WAKE
L 66-72
+4.5
15
vs
STO
W 73-69
−9.5
21
vs
SMU
L 77-103
−17.5
28
vs
FDU
W 78-70
−6.5
1
vs
MIA
W 78-68
+11.5
4
@
GT
L 64-85
−13.5
11
vs
SYR
L 71-79
−9.5
13
@
ND
L 60-78
−6.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 63-88
−1.5
21
@
UVA
L 56-74
−9.5
25
@
UNC
L 96-102
+13.5
1
vs
FSU
W 77-76
+6.5
5
vs
LOU
L 58-84
−12.5
8
@
SYR
L 86-95
−1.5
12
vs
ND
L 94-97
+0.5
15
@
NCSU
L 62-70
+0.5
18
vs
VT
W 54-36
+19.5
22
vs
GT
W 69-54
+16.5
26
@
STAN
L 60-78
−6.5
1
@
CAL
L 71-82
−2.5
5
vs
CLEM
L 69-78
+6.5
8
@
PITT
L 67-93
−12.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
CIT
W 69-60
−6.5
8
vs
VCU
L 55-80
−5.5
15
vs
TEM
W 72-69
−3.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 82-61
+7.5
24
vs
ODU
W 82-52
−9.5
25
vs
MOST
W 76-74
+16.5
26
vs
BOIS
W 63-61
−20.5
29
vs
DART
L 83-88
+31.5
3
vs
SC
L 51-73
−12.5
7
@
WAKE
L 66-72
+3.5
15
vs
STO
W 73-69
+6.5
21
vs
SMU
L 77-103
+34.5
28
vs
FDU
W 78-70
−0.5
1
vs
MIA
W 78-68
+3.5
4
@
GT
L 64-85
+2.5
11
vs
SYR
L 71-79
+4.5
13
@
ND
L 60-78
−2.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 63-88
+12.5
21
@
UVA
L 56-74
+5.5
25
@
UNC
L 96-102
+48.5
1
vs
FSU
W 77-76
+7.5
5
vs
LOU
L 58-84
−6.5
8
@
SYR
L 86-95
+35.5
12
vs
ND
L 94-97
+52.5
15
@
NCSU
L 62-70
−8.5
18
vs
VT
W 54-36
−52.5
22
vs
GT
W 69-54
−18.5
26
@
STAN
L 60-78
−4.5
1
@
CAL
L 71-82
+8.5
5
vs
CLEM
L 69-78
+9.5
8
@
PITT
L 67-93
+19.5
over 18under 13avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
FAU
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
11-22
33% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
11-2233%
3 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 97-64 | -6.5 | W +26.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 94-100 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 116-119 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | O 235 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 77-74 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 86-78 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 63-75 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-63 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 78-80 | -14.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 88-77 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-63 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-80 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 69-86 | +13.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 62-90 | +3.5 | L −24.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 75-64 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 76-81 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 65-80 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 75-73 | -10.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 64-77 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-74 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 2 | vs | W 94-72 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 79-55 | -6.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 87-75 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 68-75 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 65-84 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 61-71 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 2 | @ | W 69-63 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 80-89 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 81-53 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 64-59 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-83 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-86 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
INST
W 97-64
+26.5
12
@
UCF
L 94-100
−1.5
15
@
COFC
L 116-119
−1.5
16
vs
LIB
W 77-74
+5.5
21
vs
OKST
W 86-78
+5.5
22
vs
DRKE
L 63-75
−16.5
24
vs
HALL
L 61-63
−4.5
30
vs
FGCU
L 78-80
−16.5
4
@
FIU
W 88-77
+1.5
10
vs
JAX
W 85-63
+9.5
14
vs
TXST
W 89-80
−0.5
21
@
MSU
L 69-86
−3.5
2
vs
MEM
L 62-90
−24.5
5
@
ECU
W 78-76
−0.5
8
@
CLT
W 75-64
+5.5
12
vs
UAB
L 76-81
−7.5
15
@
TULN
L 65-80
−17.5
19
vs
RICE
W 75-73
−8.5
26
@
UNT
L 64-77
−5.5
29
vs
UTSA
W 94-74
+11.5
2
vs
USF
W 94-72
+13.5
8
@
TLSA
W 79-55
+17.5
10
vs
CLT
W 87-75
−1.5
16
@
TEM
W 83-81
−2.5
20
vs
WICH
L 68-75
−13.5
23
@
MEM
L 65-84
−10.5
27
vs
UNT
L 61-71
−11.5
2
@
USF
W 69-63
+3.5
6
@
UAB
L 80-89
−2.5
9
vs
ECU
W 81-53
+23.5
13
vs
CLT
W 64-59
−5.5
14
vs
TULN
L 76-83
−10.5
19
vs
DAY
L 79-86
−5.5
covered 11didn’t cover 22avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
INST
W 97-64
+9.5
12
@
UCF
L 94-100
+39.5
15
@
COFC
L 116-119
+71.5
16
vs
LIB
W 77-74
+3.5
21
vs
OKST
W 86-78
+1.5
22
vs
DRKE
L 63-75
−4.5
24
vs
HALL
L 61-63
−13.5
30
vs
FGCU
L 78-80
+13.5
4
@
FIU
W 88-77
+6.5
10
vs
JAX
W 85-63
−6.5
14
vs
TXST
W 89-80
+19.5
21
@
MSU
L 69-86
−2.5
2
vs
MEM
L 62-90
−12.5
5
@
ECU
W 78-76
+3.5
8
@
CLT
W 75-64
−13.5
12
vs
UAB
L 76-81
−6.5
15
@
TULN
L 65-80
−8.5
19
vs
RICE
W 75-73
−1.5
26
@
UNT
L 64-77
+4.5
29
vs
UTSA
W 94-74
+8.5
2
vs
USF
W 94-72
+14.5
8
@
TLSA
W 79-55
−17.5
10
vs
CLT
W 87-75
+13.5
16
@
TEM
W 83-81
+1.5
20
vs
WICH
L 68-75
−13.5
23
@
MEM
L 65-84
−12.5
27
vs
UNT
L 61-71
−2.5
2
@
USF
W 69-63
−22.5
6
@
UAB
L 80-89
+8.5
9
vs
ECU
W 81-53
−16.5
13
vs
CLT
W 64-59
−21.5
14
vs
TULN
L 76-83
+12.5
19
vs
DAY
L 79-86
+14.5
over 17under 16avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Boston College
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
FAU
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.