The Barn by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota · at Minnesota · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MINN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ILL 80–63 · win probability ILL 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ILL has more of the edges
ILL 4, MINN 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ILL 39.2%, MINN 26.8%. Defensive: ILL 73.3%, MINN 70.5%
MINN offense vs ILL defense
Offense 120th of 366 against a defense 8th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
ILL hits 34.5% and allows 31.3%; MINN hits 34.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 49.7% and 47.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: ILL 54.7 and allows 47.3; MINN 53.9 and allows 51.9
Context
Schedule so far
ILL has played the 18th-hardest schedule, MINN the 71st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MINN at home. This season: MINN 0-0 at home, ILL 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: ILL plays 66.5 a game (292nd fastest), MINN 63.6 (362nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ILL 33.2, MINN 35.8. Allowed: ILL 19.7, MINN 26.9
Even
ILL offense vs MINN defense
Offense 3rd of 366 against a defense 22nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ILL 13.1%, MINN 16.6%. Forced: ILL 11.6%, MINN 16.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ILL 63%, MINN 66%. Transfers in: ILL 1, MINN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ILL -16.3 | — |
| Total | — | 143.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | ILL 79.7 · MINN 63.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ILL -9.8 | — |
| 1H total | 67.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ILL 38.4 · MINN 28.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
ILL 6–0 MINNILL leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · ILL has won the last 6 meetings · ILL 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | MINN 67 @ ILL 77 | ILL -15.5 | MINN W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | ILL 95 @ MINN 74 | MINN +7.5 | ILL W |
| Feb 28, 2023-24 | MINN 97 @ ILL 105 | ILL -12.5 | MINN W |
| Feb 20, 2022-23 | MINN 69 @ ILL 78 | ILL -13.5 | MINN W |
| Jan 16, 2022-23 | ILL 78 @ MINN 60 | MINN +8.5 | ILL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Illinois
37 games played
Straight up
28-9
76% wins
Against the spread
22-15
59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-22
41% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 113-55 | -28.5 | W +29.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 113-70 | -29.5 | W +13.5 | 160.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 81-77 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-65 | -30.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 86-90 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 180.5 | U 176 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 98-58 | -34.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 87-73 | -33.5 | L −19.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 88-80 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 80-83 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 91-48 | -8.5 | W +34.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-55 | -33.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-65 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-55 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 75-69 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 79-68 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 77-67 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 89-70 | -18.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 75-66 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 84-44 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-85 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 90-92 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 71-51 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 101-65 | -8.5 | W +27.5 | 151.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 94-95 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 189 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 70-84 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 80-54 | -17.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 78-72 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 88-91 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 105-70 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 76-55 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 65-55 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 28 | vs | W 71-59 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 62-71 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JKST
W 113-55
+29.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 113-70
+13.5
11
vs
TTU
W 81-77
+0.5
14
vs
COLG
W 84-65
−11.5
19
vs
ALA
L 86-90
−6.5
22
vs
LIU
W 98-58
+5.5
24
vs
RGV
W 87-73
−19.5
28
vs
CONN
L 61-74
−8.5
6
vs
TENN
W 75-62
+14.5
9
@
OSU
W 88-80
+4.5
13
vs
NEB
L 80-83
−12.5
22
vs
MIZ
W 91-48
+34.5
29
vs
SOU
W 90-55
+1.5
3
@
PSU
W 73-65
−6.5
8
vs
RUTG
W 81-55
+3.5
11
@
IOWA
W 75-69
+4.5
14
@
NU
W 79-68
+1.5
17
vs
MINN
W 77-67
−5.5
21
vs
MD
W 89-70
+0.5
24
@
PUR
W 88-82
+11.5
29
vs
WASH
W 75-66
−3.5
1
@
NEB
W 78-69
+10.5
4
vs
NU
W 84-44
+23.5
7
@
MSU
L 82-85
−1.5
10
vs
WIS
L 90-92
−11.5
15
vs
IU
W 71-51
+11.5
18
@
USC
W 101-65
+27.5
21
@
UCLA
L 94-95
−7.5
27
vs
MICH
L 70-84
−12.5
3
vs
ORE
W 80-54
+8.5
8
@
MD
W 78-72
−8.5
13
vs
WIS
L 88-91
−11.5
19
vs
PENN
W 105-70
+9.5
21
vs
VCU
W 76-55
+8.5
26
vs
HOU
W 65-55
+12.5
28
vs
IOWA
W 71-59
+5.5
4
vs
CONN
L 62-71
−10.5
covered 22didn’t cover 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JKST
W 113-55
+10.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 113-70
+22.5
11
vs
TTU
W 81-77
−10.5
14
vs
COLG
W 84-65
−15.5
19
vs
ALA
L 86-90
−4.5
22
vs
LIU
W 98-58
−4.5
24
vs
RGV
W 87-73
−4.5
28
vs
CONN
L 61-74
−15.5
6
vs
TENN
W 75-62
−12.5
9
@
OSU
W 88-80
+5.5
13
vs
NEB
L 80-83
+6.5
22
vs
MIZ
W 91-48
−14.5
29
vs
SOU
W 90-55
−18.5
3
@
PSU
W 73-65
−18.5
8
vs
RUTG
W 81-55
−13.5
11
@
IOWA
W 75-69
+1.5
14
@
NU
W 79-68
−4.5
17
vs
MINN
W 77-67
+1.5
21
vs
MD
W 89-70
+6.5
24
@
PUR
W 88-82
+17.5
29
vs
WASH
W 75-66
−12.5
1
@
NEB
W 78-69
−7.5
4
vs
NU
W 84-44
−21.5
7
@
MSU
L 82-85
+24.5
10
vs
WIS
L 90-92
+28.5
15
vs
IU
W 71-51
−31.5
18
@
USC
W 101-65
+14.5
21
@
UCLA
L 94-95
+42.5
27
vs
MICH
L 70-84
−5.5
3
vs
ORE
W 80-54
−13.5
8
@
MD
W 78-72
+4.5
13
vs
WIS
L 88-91
+20.5
19
vs
PENN
W 105-70
+24.5
21
vs
VCU
W 76-55
−20.5
26
vs
HOU
W 65-55
−21.5
28
vs
IOWA
W 71-59
−8.5
4
vs
CONN
L 62-71
−6.5
over 15under 22avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Minnesota
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
13-20
39% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-21
36% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
13-2039%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-60 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-50 | -31.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 72-65 | -25.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 66-54 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 65-77 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 75-86 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 73-64 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 57-85 | +19.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-53 | -21.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 78-50 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 60-43 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-78 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 70-67 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 69-70 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 75-78 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-77 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 74-82 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 62-67 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-69 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 61-44 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 136.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-61 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 67-77 | +22.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 47-77 | +7.5 | L −22.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-72 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 48-67 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
+13.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−18.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−15.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
−13.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−1.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
−5.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
+16.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−8.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
+14.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
+14.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−8.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+10.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+7.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−4.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
−1.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+5.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
−0.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−14.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
+5.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
−4.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+11.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−15.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−5.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
+20.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+10.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
+12.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+6.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−22.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−3.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
−11.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−15.5
covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
−7.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−9.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−24.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
+1.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−2.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
+22.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
−7.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−1.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
−2.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
−17.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−36.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+23.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+6.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−8.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
+6.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+1.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
+12.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−7.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
−16.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
+9.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+12.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−9.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−12.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
−31.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+4.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
−1.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+14.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−14.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−0.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
+3.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−31.5
over 12under 21avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Illinois has the better starters
Position by position: Illinois 4, Minnesota 1, even 0
IllinoisBetterMinnesota
G S. Vaaks TR15.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 86
←ILLSmall
G I. Asuma10.9 pts · 4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 64
G A. Stojakovic13.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 95
←ILLBig
G M. Palmer TR4.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
F D. Mirkovic13.3 pts · 8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 94
←ILLSmall
F B. Durkin10.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
F J. Davis5.4 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 58
→MINNSmall
F J. Crocker-Johnson13.4 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 81
C T. Ivisic10.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 79
←ILLSmall
F G. Grove4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
IllinoisBetterMinnesota
ILL offense3rd of 366 · +11.7
=Even
MINN defense22nd of 366 · +5.2
ILL defense8th of 366 · +8.4
←ILLSmall
MINN offense120th of 366 · -2.8
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
←ILLBig
Backcourt-0.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+6.7 · 3 players
←ILLBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 3 players
Bench+2.9 · 3 players
←ILLBig
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestILL betterMINN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Vaaks32 min · TRA. Stojakovic26 minB. Fagbemi4 minQ. McCoyNewQ. ColemanNewL. WilliamsNew
Forwards
D. Mirkovic30 minJ. Davis20 minZ. Ivisic17 minL. DavisNewZ. ZensNew
Centers
T. Ivisic25 minJ. Jakstys5 min
Guards
I. Asuma34 minM. Palmer18 min · TRK. Evans18 min · TRK. Shinholster13 minN. Groves6 min · TRW. Grady6 min · TR
Forwards
B. Durkin33 minJ. Crocker-Johnson32 minG. Grove21 minN. AndersonNew
Centers
M. Kordel4 min · TRC. MpoyiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.2 #24 | Points per game | 69.4 #294 |
| 1.25 #1 | Points per possession | 1.10 #147 |
| 66.5 #292 | Pace (possessions) | 63.6 #362 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.7 #46 | Effective FG% | 53.9 #69 |
| 34.5 #142 | 3-point % | 34.1 #164 |
| 49.7 #15 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.1 #31 |
| 33.2 #232 | Free throw rate | 35.8 #159 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.1 #9 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #170 |
| 39.2 #3 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #304 |
| 14.2 #133 | Assists per game | 17.0 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.8 #45 | Points allowed | 68.5 #38 |
| 1.03 #61 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #139 |
| 47.3 #26 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.9 #207 |
| 31.3 #38 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #229 |
| 11.6 #365 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #168 |
| 73.3 #28 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #137 |
| 3.7 #365 | Steals per game | 6.3 #197 |
| 4.6 #28 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #284 |
Illinois
28-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn62–71
- Wvs Iowa71–59
- Wvs Houston65–55
- Wvs VCU76–55
- Wvs Penn105–70
A week or more of rest.
Minnesota
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Baylor48–67
- Lvs Rutgers67–72
- Wvs Northwestern67–66
- L@ Indiana47–77
- Wvs UCLA78–73
A week or more of rest.