Comerica Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MINN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SMU 73–70 · win probability SMU 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SMU has more of the edges
SMU 3, MINN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: SMU plays 71.1 a game (68th fastest), MINN 63.6 (362nd). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: SMU 30.4, MINN 35.8. Allowed: SMU 32.1, MINN 26.9
Three-pointers
SMU hits 37.1% and allows 34.1%; MINN hits 34.1% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 35.9% and 47.1% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SMU 20%, MINN 66%. Transfers in: SMU 7, MINN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SMU 35.4%, MINN 26.8%. Defensive: SMU 68.4%, MINN 70.5%
MINN offense vs SMU defense
Offense 120th of 366 against a defense 69th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SMU 55.6 and allows 51.6; MINN 53.9 and allows 51.9
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SMU 15.8%, MINN 16.6%. Forced: SMU 16.8%, MINN 16.8%
Even
SMU offense vs MINN defense
Offense 45th of 366 against a defense 22nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Schedule so far
SMU has played the 70th-hardest schedule, MINN the 71st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SMU -3.0 | — |
| Total | — | 143.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | SMU 73.3 · MINN 70.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SMU -1.9 | — |
| 1H total | 67.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | SMU 34.5 · MINN 32.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SMU
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-14
59% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-76 | -21.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 69-58 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 102-91 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 106-60 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 100-69 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-72 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 87-81 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-88 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-80 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 77-89 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 99-82 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 110-63 | -21.5 | W +25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-83 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 70-74 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 77-76 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 91-79 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-80 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-88 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 83-84 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-67 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 89-81 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 95-85 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-70 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 69-73 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 75-95 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 86-69 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 58-62 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 79-89 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
−1.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−12.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+0.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
−5.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
+10.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
+16.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−6.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+7.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+14.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
−10.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
−7.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+25.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+12.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−0.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+8.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−7.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−1.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+13.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−8.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−4.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+0.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+14.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
−2.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−2.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+14.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+8.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−8.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
−21.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−9.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
−11.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+13.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
+3.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
−16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
+27.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−33.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+28.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
+8.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
−2.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
−3.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−4.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+5.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+8.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
+7.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
+24.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+2.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+24.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−5.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+1.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−2.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−13.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+12.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−0.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−1.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+7.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+5.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
+15.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−0.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+11.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+13.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−21.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
+14.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−10.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
+10.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+0.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
−44.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
+5.5
over 20under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Minnesota
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
13-20
39% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-21
36% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
13-2039%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-60 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-50 | -31.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 60-83 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 72-65 | -25.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 66-54 | -27.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 65-77 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 75-86 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 73-64 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 57-85 | +19.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-53 | -21.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 78-50 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 60-43 | -25.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | U 103 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 84-78 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 70-67 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 69-70 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 75-78 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-77 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 74-82 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 75-77 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 62-67 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 57-69 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 61-44 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 136.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 80-61 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 67-77 | +22.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 47-77 | +7.5 | L −22.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 67-72 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 48-67 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
+13.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−18.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−15.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
−13.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−1.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
−5.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
+16.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−8.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
+14.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
+14.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−8.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+10.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+7.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−4.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
−1.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+5.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
−0.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−14.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
+5.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
−4.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+11.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−15.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−5.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
+20.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+10.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
+12.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+6.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−22.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−3.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
−11.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−15.5
covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GWEB
W 87-60
−1.5
8
vs
ALCN
W 95-50
−7.5
12
@
MIZ
L 60-83
−15.5
15
vs
GB
W 72-65
−9.5
18
vs
CHST
W 66-54
−24.5
22
vs
SF
L 65-77
+1.5
27
vs
STAN
L 68-72
−2.5
28
vs
SCU
L 75-86
+22.5
3
vs
IU
W 73-64
−7.5
10
@
PUR
L 57-85
−1.5
14
vs
TXSO
W 89-53
−2.5
21
vs
CAM
W 78-50
−17.5
29
vs
FDU
W 60-43
−36.5
3
@
NU
W 84-78
+23.5
6
vs
IOWA
W 70-67
+6.5
9
vs
USC
L 69-70
−8.5
13
vs
WIS
L 75-78
+6.5
17
@
ILL
L 67-77
+1.5
20
@
OSU
L 74-82
+12.5
24
vs
NEB
L 57-76
−7.5
28
@
WIS
L 63-67
−16.5
1
@
PSU
L 75-77
+9.5
4
vs
MSU
W 76-73
+12.5
8
vs
MD
L 62-67
−9.5
14
@
WASH
L 57-69
−12.5
17
@
ORE
W 61-44
−31.5
21
vs
RUTG
W 80-61
+4.5
24
@
MICH
L 67-77
−1.5
28
vs
UCLA
W 78-73
+14.5
4
@
IU
L 47-77
−14.5
7
vs
NU
W 67-66
−0.5
11
vs
RUTG
L 67-72
+3.5
1
vs
BAY
L 48-67
−31.5
over 12under 21avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SMU has the better starters
Position by position: SMU 2, Minnesota 1, even 2
SMUBetterMinnesota
G R. Brumbaugh TR19.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 95
←SMUSmall
G I. Asuma10.9 pts · 4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 64
G D. Terrell TR13.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 89
←SMUBig
G M. Palmer TR4.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 43
G O. Sellers TR10.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 78
=Even
F B. Durkin10.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 65
G J. Patrick TR7.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 59
→MINNSmall
F J. Crocker-Johnson13.4 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 81
F J. Munch TR7.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 69
=Even
F G. Grove4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
SMUBetterMinnesota
SMU offense45th of 366 · +4.2
=Even
MINN defense22nd of 366 · +5.2
SMU defense69th of 366 · +0.8
=Even
MINN offense120th of 366 · -2.8
Backcourt+8.2 · 4 players
←SMUBig
Backcourt-0.5 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.7 · 1 player
→MINNSmall
Frontcourt+2.9 · 3 players
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
←SMUSmall
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSMU betterMINN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Brumbaugh36 min · TRD. Terrell33 min · TRO. Sellers29 min · TRJ. Patrick20 min · TRN. Kalischer-Stork1 minG. NormandNew
Forwards
J. Munch21 min · TRJ. Toombs20 minJ. Stewart16 min · TRN. Codie16 min · TRJ. O'Neal15 minN. Walls3 min
Guards
I. Asuma34 minM. Palmer18 min · TRK. Evans18 min · TRK. Shinholster13 minN. Groves6 min · TRW. Grady6 min · TR
Forwards
B. Durkin33 minJ. Crocker-Johnson32 minG. Grove21 minN. AndersonNew
Centers
M. Kordel4 min · TRC. MpoyiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 84.1 #19 | Points per game | 69.4 #294 |
| 1.19 #26 | Points per possession | 1.10 #147 |
| 71.1 #68 | Pace (possessions) | 63.6 #362 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.6 #27 | Effective FG% | 53.9 #69 |
| 37.1 #27 | 3-point % | 34.1 #164 |
| 35.9 #252 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.1 #31 |
| 30.4 #301 | Free throw rate | 35.8 #159 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #119 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #170 |
| 35.4 #37 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #304 |
| 16.9 #27 | Assists per game | 17.0 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.9 #265 | Points allowed | 68.5 #38 |
| 1.09 #199 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #139 |
| 51.6 #189 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.9 #207 |
| 34.1 #188 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #229 |
| 16.8 #171 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #168 |
| 68.4 #237 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #137 |
| 7.0 #129 | Steals per game | 6.3 #197 |
| 3.6 #132 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #284 |
SMU
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Miami OH79–89
- Lvs Louisville58–62
- Wvs Syracuse86–69
- L@ Florida St78–91
- Lvs Miami69–77
A week or more of rest.
Minnesota
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Baylor48–67
- Lvs Rutgers67–72
- Wvs Northwestern67–66
- L@ Indiana47–77
- Wvs UCLA78–73
A week or more of rest.