M&T Bank Center at Gampel Pavilion · at UConn
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CONN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CONN 98–44 · win probability CONN 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CONN has more of the edges
MVSU 0, CONN 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MVSU offense vs CONN defense
Offense 366th of 366 against a defense 2nd, on the model’s ratings
CONN offense vs MVSU defense
Offense 25th of 366 against a defense 366th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MVSU has played the 327th-hardest schedule, CONN the 4th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: MVSU 45.2 and allows 55.5; CONN 54.3 and allows 45.7
Three-pointers
MVSU hits 29.5% and allows 37.2%; CONN hits 34.4% and allows 30.1%. Threes are 30.2% and 40.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MVSU 26.4%, CONN 35.7%. Defensive: MVSU 64.5%, CONN 71.2%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MVSU 21.9%, CONN 16.4%. Forced: MVSU 17.1%, CONN 17.8%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MVSU plays 70.2 a game (111th fastest), CONN 66.1 (307th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MVSU 0%, CONN 51%. Transfers in: MVSU 2, CONN 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
CONN at home. This season: CONN 0-0 at home, MVSU 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MVSU 33.9, CONN 29.9. Allowed: MVSU 50.8, CONN 40.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CONN -54.1 | — |
| Total | — | 141.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | MVSU 43.5 · CONN 97.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CONN -32.1 | — |
| 1H total | 66.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | MVSU 17 · CONN 49.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MVSU 0–1 CONNCONN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MVSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | MVSU 53 @ CONN 87 | CONN -44.5 | MVSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Miss Valley St
32 games played
Straight up
2-30
6% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-106 | +34.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-108 | +38.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 56-88 | +41.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 75-81 | +26.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-80 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 84-120 | +42.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 52-66 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 49-108 | +38.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-88 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 49-96 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-86 | +42.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 69-93 | +44.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-89 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 51-71 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-84 | +12.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-79 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-62 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-80 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-78 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 81-97 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 66-74 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-72 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 55-92 | +16.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 72-71 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 23 | @ | L 62-83 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 70-69 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 64-67 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 77-85 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 52-77 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
−16.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
−9.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
+9.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+20.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
+13.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+5.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+6.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−4.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−20.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
−6.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−6.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
+7.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+20.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
−6.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−9.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
+17.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−20.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
+0.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−2.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+9.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+2.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
−7.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−2.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
+8.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
−20.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−1.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
+12.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
−4.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
+15.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
+6.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UAB
L 55-106
+15.5
7
@
MUR
L 60-108
+8.5
12
@
HAW
L 56-88
−7.5
14
vs
UTU
L 75-81
+10.5
15
vs
MAN
L 73-80
−1.5
22
@
CSUB
L 70-86
+17.5
25
@
TA&M
L 84-120
+49.5
3
@
ULM
L 52-66
−31.5
8
@
KSU
L 49-108
−3.5
16
vs
TAR
L 64-88
+9.5
19
@
FSU
L 49-96
−19.5
22
@
WVU
L 51-86
−0.5
29
@
OU
L 69-93
+8.5
3
vs
ALST
L 69-89
+13.5
5
vs
AAMU
L 51-71
−13.5
10
@
PV
L 69-70
−13.5
12
@
TXSO
L 51-84
−7.5
17
vs
BCU
L 63-79
−2.5
19
vs
FAMU
L 48-62
−29.5
28
@
SOU
L 69-80
+7.5
31
vs
UAPB
L 70-78
+4.5
7
vs
JKST
L 81-97
+34.5
9
vs
ALCN
L 66-74
−0.5
14
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
16
@
ALST
L 55-92
+4.5
19
vs
PV
L 62-72
−19.5
21
vs
TXSO
W 72-71
−0.5
23
@
GRAM
L 62-83
+8.5
28
@
UAPB
W 70-69
−8.5
3
@
ALCN
L 64-67
−8.5
5
@
JKST
L 77-85
+17.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 52-77
−6.5
over 14under 18avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
UConn
40 games played
Straight up
34-6
85% wins
Against the spread
17-23
43% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-21
48% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total
Against the spread
17-2343%
5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 79-55 | -42.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 110-47 | -36.5 | W +26.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 89-62 | -32.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-84 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 67-71 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 72-49 | -36.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-61 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 61-56 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-59 | -36.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 71-63 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 79-60 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-54 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 90-67 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-57 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 103-98 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-60 | -19.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 64-62 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 75-67 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 87-81 | -15.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 85-58 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 92-60 | -16.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 72-81 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 80-70 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-75 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 84-91 | -15.5 | L −22.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-63 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 72-40 | -5.5 | W +26.5 | 145.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-67 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 62-68 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 93-68 | -17.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 67-51 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 14 | @ | L 52-72 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 82-71 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 73-57 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 67-63 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 29 | vs | W 73-72 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | O 145 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 71-62 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Apr 6 | vs | L 63-69 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NHVN
W 79-55
−18.5
7
vs
UML
W 110-47
+26.5
10
vs
COLU
W 89-62
−5.5
15
vs
BYU
W 86-84
−4.5
19
vs
ARIZ
L 67-71
−8.5
23
vs
BRY
W 72-49
−13.5
28
vs
ILL
W 74-61
+8.5
2
@
KU
W 61-56
+1.5
5
vs
ETAM
W 83-59
−12.5
9
vs
FLA
W 77-73
−0.5
12
vs
TEX
W 71-63
−3.5
16
vs
BTLR
W 79-60
+3.5
21
@
DEP
W 72-54
+5.5
31
@
XAV
W 90-67
+11.5
4
vs
MARQ
W 73-57
−1.5
7
@
PROV
W 103-98
−4.5
10
vs
DEP
W 72-60
−7.5
13
@
HALL
W 69-64
−1.5
17
@
GTWN
W 64-62
−9.5
24
vs
VILL
W 75-67
−3.5
27
vs
PROV
W 87-81
−9.5
31
@
CREI
W 85-58
+20.5
3
vs
XAV
W 92-60
+15.5
6
@
SJU
L 72-81
−10.5
11
@
BTLR
W 80-70
−1.5
14
vs
GTWN
W 79-75
−12.5
18
vs
CREI
L 84-91
−22.5
21
@
VILL
W 73-63
+6.5
25
vs
SJU
W 72-40
+26.5
28
vs
HALL
W 71-67
−8.5
7
@
MARQ
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
XAV
W 93-68
+7.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 67-51
+1.5
14
@
SJU
L 52-72
−22.5
20
vs
FUR
W 82-71
−9.5
22
vs
UCLA
W 73-57
+10.5
27
vs
MSU
W 67-63
+1.5
29
vs
DUKE
W 73-72
+5.5
4
vs
ILL
W 71-62
+10.5
6
vs
MICH
L 63-69
+0.5
covered 17didn’t cover 23avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NHVN
W 79-55
−11.5
7
vs
UML
W 110-47
+5.5
10
vs
COLU
W 89-62
−4.5
15
vs
BYU
W 86-84
+13.5
19
vs
ARIZ
L 67-71
−18.5
23
vs
BRY
W 72-49
−26.5
28
vs
ILL
W 74-61
−15.5
2
@
KU
W 61-56
−24.5
5
vs
ETAM
W 83-59
+0.5
9
vs
FLA
W 77-73
+4.5
12
vs
TEX
W 71-63
−11.5
16
vs
BTLR
W 79-60
−5.5
21
@
DEP
W 72-54
−7.5
31
@
XAV
W 90-67
+12.5
4
vs
MARQ
W 73-57
−14.5
7
@
PROV
W 103-98
+48.5
10
vs
DEP
W 72-60
−5.5
13
@
HALL
W 69-64
+0.5
17
@
GTWN
W 64-62
−15.5
24
vs
VILL
W 75-67
+4.5
27
vs
PROV
W 87-81
+15.5
31
@
CREI
W 85-58
+0.5
3
vs
XAV
W 92-60
+4.5
6
@
SJU
L 72-81
+9.5
11
@
BTLR
W 80-70
+6.5
14
vs
GTWN
W 79-75
+15.5
18
vs
CREI
L 84-91
+31.5
21
@
VILL
W 73-63
−5.5
25
vs
SJU
W 72-40
−33.5
28
vs
HALL
W 71-67
+7.5
7
@
MARQ
L 62-68
−13.5
12
vs
XAV
W 93-68
+10.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 67-51
−20.5
14
@
SJU
L 52-72
−15.5
20
vs
FUR
W 82-71
+19.5
22
vs
UCLA
W 73-57
−5.5
27
vs
MSU
W 67-63
−6.5
29
vs
DUKE
W 73-72
+9.5
4
vs
ILL
W 71-62
−6.5
6
vs
MICH
L 63-69
−14.5
over 19under 21avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UConn has the better starters
Position by position: Miss Valley St 0, UConn 1, even 4
Miss Valley StBetterUConn
G T. Foster TR5.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
→CONNBig
G N. Machowski TR17.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 80
G T. James TR0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G S. Demary10.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 5.9 ast
Score 98
G E. Pippins NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G S. Ball12.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 87
G A. Abrams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Mullins12 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 88
F T. Williams NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Nash TR5.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 26
Miss Valley StBetterUConn
MVSU offense366th of 366 · -17.5
→CONNBig
CONN defense2nd of 366 · +11.5
MVSU defense366th of 366 · -14.3
→CONNBig
CONN offense25th of 366 · +7.1
Backcourt-2.1 · 4 players
→CONNBig
Backcourt+8.5 · 5 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+3.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMVSU betterCONN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Foster20 min · TRT. James3 min · TRE. PippinsNewA. AbramsNewM. AngloNewC. CameronNew
Forwards
T. WilliamsNewQ. PangNewG. MartinezNewH. WilsonNewM. McCoyNew
Centers
T. WuNew
Guards
N. Machowski35 min · TRS. Demary28 minS. Ball28 minB. Mullins28 minJ. Nash26 min · TRJ. CountyNew
Forwards
N. Khamenia20 min · TRI. Shaw18 min · TRJ. Ross18 minJ. RossNewC. LandrewNewE. AmosovNew
Centers
N. Hines18 min · TRO. Giltay15 min · TRE. Dzafic2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.2 #356 | Points per game | 76.6 #129 |
| 0.90 #364 | Points per possession | 1.16 #52 |
| 70.2 #111 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #307 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.2 #359 | Effective FG% | 54.3 #59 |
| 29.5 #346 | 3-point % | 34.4 #150 |
| 30.2 #351 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #149 |
| 33.9 #215 | Free throw rate | 29.9 #313 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.9 #361 | Turnover rate | 16.4 #163 |
| 26.4 #313 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.7 #30 |
| 11.9 #296 | Assists per game | 18.1 #9 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.7 #353 | Points allowed | 65.2 #6 |
| 1.20 #355 | Points allowed per possession | 0.99 #17 |
| 55.5 #341 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.7 #7 |
| 37.2 #346 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.1 #8 |
| 17.1 #142 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #107 |
| 64.5 #346 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #99 |
| 7.1 #119 | Steals per game | 6.8 #143 |
| 2.6 #300 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #15 |
Miss Valley St
2-30 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Grambling52–77
- L@ Jackson St77–85
- L@ Alcorn St64–67
- W@ AR-Pine Bluff70–69
- L@ Grambling62–83
A week or more of rest.
UConn
34-6 in 2025-26 overall · 19-4 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan63–69
- Wvs Illinois71–62
- Wvs Duke73–72
- Wvs Michigan St67–63
- Wvs UCLA73–57
A week or more of rest.