The Sandy and John Black Pavilion at Ole Miss · at Ole Miss
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MISS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MISS 85–64 · win probability MISS 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
CARK 3, MISS 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
CARK has played the 241st-hardest schedule, MISS the 20th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CARK offense vs MISS defense
Offense 231st of 366 against a defense 37th, on the model’s ratings
MISS offense vs CARK defense
Offense 50th of 366 against a defense 241st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CARK 28.8%, MISS 28.3%. Defensive: CARK 72.6%, MISS 67.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CARK 31.2, MISS 33.0. Allowed: CARK 30.1, MISS 41.2
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CARK 62%, MISS 32%. Transfers in: CARK 2, MISS 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
MISS at home. This season: MISS 0-0 at home, CARK 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CARK 15.4%, MISS 14.0%. Forced: CARK 19.1%, MISS 16.5%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CARK 54.0 and allows 54.9; MISS 50.5 and allows 50.5
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: CARK plays 70.2 a game (105th fastest), MISS 69.5 (145th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
CARK hits 35.5% and allows 35.2%; MISS hits 33.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 48.7% and 35.5% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MISS -20.4 | — |
| Total | — | 149.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | CARK 64.4 · MISS 84.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MISS -12.0 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | CARK 28.9 · MISS 40.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
C Arkansas
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg +5.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 54-94 | +31.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 56-93 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 77-84 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 56-74 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 92-65 | +4.5 | W +31.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -3.5 | W +34.5 | 138.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 72-83 | +36.5 | W +25.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-99 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 85-83 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 93-73 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 78-84 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-79 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 62-60 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 98-69 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 86-65 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 100-90 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-81 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-60 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-78 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-76 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 88-76 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-75 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 93-88 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-79 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-73 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 93-98 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 191 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−8.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−1.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
−0.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−1.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+31.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+15.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−10.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
+34.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−4.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
+25.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+7.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+4.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+8.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
−8.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−5.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−5.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+16.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
+17.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+15.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+4.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
+10.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+11.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
+0.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
−0.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
+6.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+2.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−5.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+9.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
+2.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+6.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
+5.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
−6.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg +5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UNC
L 54-94
−9.5
11
@
ARK
L 56-93
−9.5
16
vs
SAM
L 77-84
+9.5
20
@
UNT
L 56-74
−4.5
23
vs
EWU
W 92-65
+2.5
25
vs
EIU
W 81-60
+1.5
29
@
ETSU
L 57-80
−7.5
3
vs
LR
W 85-47
−6.5
7
@
ETAM
L 68-75
−2.5
13
@
VAN
L 72-83
−3.5
21
@
SMU
L 82-99
+24.5
1
vs
FGCU
W 85-83
+11.5
3
vs
STET
W 93-73
+18.5
8
@
BELL
L 78-84
+7.5
10
@
EKU
L 75-79
−2.5
15
vs
JAX
W 62-60
−14.5
17
vs
UNF
W 98-69
+2.5
22
@
WGA
W 86-65
−3.5
28
@
QUC
W 100-90
+31.5
31
vs
EKU
W 90-81
+19.5
4
vs
UNA
W 81-60
−6.5
7
@
LIP
W 86-78
+8.5
9
@
UNA
W 72-65
−8.5
11
vs
BELL
W 84-76
+9.5
14
vs
WGA
W 79-62
−9.5
19
@
STET
W 88-76
+14.5
21
@
FGCU
L 71-75
−6.5
25
@
APSU
W 93-88
+28.5
28
vs
QUC
W 84-79
−0.5
6
vs
BELL
W 86-73
+4.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 73-63
−8.5
8
vs
QUC
L 93-98
+33.5
over 16under 16avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ole Miss
35 games played
Straight up
15-20
43% wins
Against the spread
15-20
43% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-15
57% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-58 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 86-65 | -37.5 | L −16.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-77 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 82-60 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 72-65 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 69-74 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-75 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 66-75 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-63 | +13.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 71-67 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-66 | -20.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 62-76 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 79-43 | -28.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 70-86 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 87-94 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-69 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 97-95 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 66-78 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 63-72 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 66-84 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 74-93 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-90 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 77-80 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-94 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 99-106 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | O 205 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-79 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 86-89 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 76-66 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 76-72 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 80-79 | +12.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 90-93 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+8.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
−16.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
−3.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
−1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−13.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
−0.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
−11.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−10.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
+8.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−8.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
−6.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−6.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
+7.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
−9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
−3.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+5.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+12.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
+4.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−8.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
+2.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
+7.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
−5.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
−1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
−12.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
−15.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
+6.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
−5.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
−9.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+16.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+4.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−10.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
+15.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
+9.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
+13.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+5.5
covered 15didn’t cover 20avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SELA
W 88-58
+2.5
7
vs
ULM
W 86-65
+1.5
11
vs
MEM
W 83-77
+7.5
14
vs
CSUB
W 82-60
+1.5
18
vs
APSU
W 72-65
−8.5
25
vs
IOWA
L 69-74
+2.5
26
vs
UTAH
L 74-75
+4.5
2
vs
MIA
L 66-75
−4.5
6
@
SJU
L 58-63
−30.5
13
vs
USM
W 71-67
−0.5
17
vs
AAMU
W 80-66
+10.5
21
vs
NCSU
L 62-76
−10.5
29
vs
ALCN
W 79-43
−26.5
3
@
OU
L 70-86
+9.5
7
vs
ARK
L 87-94
+27.5
10
vs
MIZ
W 76-69
+1.5
14
@
UGA
W 97-95
+33.5
17
@
MSST
W 68-67
−12.5
20
vs
AUB
L 66-78
−7.5
24
@
UK
L 63-72
−10.5
31
@
VAN
L 68-71
−10.5
3
@
TENN
L 66-84
+10.5
7
@
TEX
L 68-79
+1.5
11
vs
ALA
L 74-93
+2.5
14
vs
MSST
L 78-90
+21.5
18
@
TA&M
L 77-80
−0.5
21
vs
FLA
L 75-94
+16.5
25
vs
LSU
L 99-106
+57.5
28
@
AUB
W 85-79
+10.5
3
vs
VAN
L 86-89
+19.5
7
vs
SC
L 61-64
−22.5
11
vs
TEX
W 76-66
−5.5
12
vs
UGA
W 76-72
−8.5
13
vs
ALA
W 80-79
−7.5
14
vs
ARK
L 90-93
+23.5
over 20under 15avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ole Miss has the better starters
Position by position: C Arkansas 0, Ole Miss 4, even 1
C ArkansasBetterOle Miss
G L. Moore9.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 28
→MISSBig
G C. Stephenson TR18.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
G T. Robinson14.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 89
=Even
G I. Kamardine11.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 78
G C. McCormick9.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 44
→MISSBig
G A. Clark TR12.7 pts · 3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 88
G H. Beauchamp4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 8
→MISSBig
F D. Haskins TR11.1 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 76
F M. Marable3.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 3
→MISSBig
F R. Siulepa TR10 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
C ArkansasBetterOle Miss
CARK offense231st of 366 · -7.1
→MISSBig
MISS defense37th of 366 · +3.0
CARK defense241st of 366 · -6.4
→MISSBig
MISS offense50th of 366 · +3.6
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
→MISSBig
Backcourt+6.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.0 · 1 player
→MISSBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.8 · 4 players
→MISSBig
Bench+2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCARK betterMISS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Moore30 minT. Robinson28 minC. McCormick23 minH. Beauchamp15 minO. Dehrmann3 minJ. Shulman3 min
Forwards
M. Marable21 minT. Anderson12 min · TRS. Saadi9 min · TRA. HoernerNew
Guards
C. Stephenson33 min · TRI. Kamardine31 minA. Clark31 min · TRP. Pinkins25 minZ. Day8 minB. HenshallNew
Forwards
D. Haskins28 min · TRR. Siulepa27 min · TRS. Trouet26 min · TRC. Brown13 min · TRD. PattonNew
Centers
M. Handlogten15 min · TRS. Cicic13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.3 #77 | Points per game | 75.9 #145 |
| 1.13 #90 | Points per possession | 1.09 #157 |
| 70.2 #105 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #145 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.0 #68 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #217 |
| 35.5 #89 | 3-point % | 33.2 #221 |
| 48.7 #21 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.5 #258 |
| 31.2 #278 | Free throw rate | 33.0 #238 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #92 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #23 |
| 28.8 #240 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #253 |
| 16.0 #46 | Assists per game | 13.5 #178 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.0 #216 | Points allowed | 76.1 #219 |
| 1.08 #180 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #215 |
| 54.9 #328 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #127 |
| 35.2 #262 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #151 |
| 19.1 #45 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #190 |
| 72.6 #48 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.4 #285 |
| 8.5 #18 | Steals per game | 7.1 #118 |
| 1.9 #351 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #48 |
C Arkansas
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals93–98
- Wvs FGCU73–63
- Wvs Bellarmine86–73
- Wvs Queens University Royals84–79
- W@ Austin Peay93–88
A week or more of rest.
Ole Miss
15-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arkansas90–93
- Wvs Alabama80–79
- Wvs Georgia76–72
- Wvs Texas76–66
- Lvs South Carolina61–64
A week or more of rest.